logo
Americans are struggling with layoff anxiety: It's causing workers to 'burn out faster,' experts say

Americans are struggling with layoff anxiety: It's causing workers to 'burn out faster,' experts say

CNBC02-07-2025
In the wake of high-profile layoffs, many workers are feeling anxious about job security.
U.S. employers reported nearly 700,000 job cuts in the first five months of 2025, according to outplacement services firm Challenger, Gray and Christmas, an 80% increase compared to job cuts in the first five months of 2024.
It's little wonder, then, that 46% of Americans report feeling "concerned" about layoffs in the next year, according to a recent Indeed survey.
The fear of losing your job can be all-consuming, affecting everything from your productivity to your personal relationships.
According to executive coach and licensed social worker Melody Wilding, layoff anxiety can create a "vicious cycle" of overwork for employees.
Concern for their jobs is "causing people to work much more, maybe in areas that are not productive, and burn out faster," she says.
Below, experts share tips to keep layoff anxiety from affecting your well-being, both at work and at home.
Layoff anxiety can make it difficult to stay focused, even on tasks you usually handle with ease, Wilding says.
"It's always in the back of your head, so you're not really bringing your best to anything you're doing," she says. "There's just a hum of anxiety in the background."
According to career and leadership coach Phoebe Gavin, constantly thinking or talking about your job is another red flag.
"If it's something that is just popping into your mind, even at unrelated times, and you're having a hard time distracting yourself or redirecting yourself from that thought, that is definitely a telltale sign that you should probably do something about that anxiety," she says.
On a larger scale, layoff anxiety can create a negative environment at work. According to Wilding, when people are on edge, they're more likely to be "reactive and maybe even defensive or snippy" with their co-workers, which creates an atmosphere of "tension and fear."
Equally, Gavin says, it can strain your personal relationships: if you're constantly "stress venting" to your loved ones about your job concerns, you run the risk of overexerting your support system.
"Anxiety from any place in your life is going to seep into the rest of your life," she says.
For many of Gavin's clients, the hardest part of layoff anxiety is "feeling like you have absolutely no control over the situation."
While anxiety may feel "paralyzing," coming up with a clear action plan can give you a greater sense of stability, she says.
"When my clients are catastrophizing about this sort of thing, I always ask them, 'what would you do? I know you would bad, but what would you ?'" she says. "Often we're able to come up with a list of actions that we can take."
If you have a good relationship with your supervisor, Gavin recommends having an honest conversation about the prospect of layoffs, as well as doing some industry research on your own time.
Even if you do get laid off, Wilding says, "it usually isn't as catastrophic as we make it" in our minds. You may have to tighten your budget and put more energy into job searching, but being laid off doesn't mean that your career is over.
Wilding suggests sprucing up your resume and reconnecting with your professional network so that you're ready to hit the job market if necessary.
"It can give you a feeling of agency and control that should something bad happen, at least I'm ready to go," she says.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Judge issues injunction preventing FTC from investigating watchdog Media Matters
Judge issues injunction preventing FTC from investigating watchdog Media Matters

Los Angeles Times

time25 minutes ago

  • Los Angeles Times

Judge issues injunction preventing FTC from investigating watchdog Media Matters

A federal judge has issued an injunction preventing the Trump administration's Federal Trade Commission from investigating Media Matters for America, the liberal media watchdog group that had alleged the spread of hate speech on X since Elon Musk acquired the social media platform. U.S. District Court Judge Sparkle L. Sooknanan ruled Friday that the FTC's probe of Media Matters, 'purportedly to investigate an advertiser boycott concerning social media platforms,' represents a clear violation of the group's freedom of speech. 'It should alarm all Americans when the government retaliates against individuals or organizations for engaging in constitutionally protected public debate,' Sooknanan wrote. Even before the FTC got involved, Media Matters has been defending itself against a lawsuit by Musk following the organization's November 2023 story that, following Musk's purchase of the social media site once known as Twitter, antisemitic posts and other offensive content were appearing next to advertisements there. Sooknanan said the injunction halting any FTC probe was merited because Media Matters is likely to succeed on its claim that the FTC is being used to retaliate against it for a critical article on a Trump supporter. 'The court's ruling demonstrates the importance of fighting over folding, which far too many are doing when confronted with intimidation from the Trump administration,' said Angelo Carusone, chairman and president of Media Matters. There was no immediate comment from an FTC spokesman.

Court should reject HPE-Juniper merger: Former DOJ antitrust deputy
Court should reject HPE-Juniper merger: Former DOJ antitrust deputy

Yahoo

timean hour ago

  • Yahoo

Court should reject HPE-Juniper merger: Former DOJ antitrust deputy

A Justice Department shake-up that led last month to the departure of the antitrust division's second in command arose over a DOJ decision to bend to lobbyists in the department's review of Hewlett Packard Enterprise's (HPE) acquisition of rival Juniper Networks ( according to Roger Alford, the fired official. The division's former antitrust deputy, Alford accused DOJ officials Chad Mizelle, chief of staff to Attorney General Pam Bondi, and Stanley Woodward, an associate attorney general nominee, of allowing lobbyists to prevail over the rule of law in the review that green-lighted the deal. Alford's critique came during an address on Monday at the Tech Policy Institute Aspen Forum. "It is my opinion that in the HPE/Juniper merger scandal, Chad Mizelle and Stanley Woodward perverted justice and acted inconsistent with the rule of law," Alford said. "I hope the court blocks the HPE/Juniper merger. If you knew what I knew, you would hope so too." The Justice Department did not immediately respond to a request for comment. Alford, a law professor at the University of Notre Dame, was one of two of the Justice Department's most senior officials shown the door last month. He also served in the antitrust division during President Trump's first term. Before his departure from the second administration, he was principal deputy to President Trump's hand-picked antitrust chief, Gail Slater. The other official, William Rinner, a deputy assistant attorney general, headed up merger enforcement. Rinner also served in Trump's first administration. The Wall Street Journal reported that the two had been working on the department's challenge to the acquisition before a settlement was reached with HPE's politically connected lawyers, who lacked antitrust expertise. Alford said the HPE-Juniper review exemplified a broader, ongoing battle within the Republican Party over the future of the second Trump administration. "I am not talking about the well-known ideological battle between traditional conservatives and Trump supporters. I am talking about the battle between genuine MAGA reformers and MAGA-In-Name-Only lobbyists," Alford said. "It's a fight over whether Americans will have equal justice under law, or whether preferential access to our justice system is for sale to the wealthy and well-connected." The former deputy went on to question whether the US under the balance of President Trump's second term would be governed by the rule of law or the rule of lobbyists. He said the agency could correct course if it takes action to carry out the Trump administration's original mission to enforce the competition rules. "For the words 'equal justice under law' to be more than just a phrase etched in marble, it must be practiced by those privileged to enforce it," he said. "I am speaking out now because it is still early days in this Administration and I think correcting the problems at the DOJ is still possible, either by political will or judicial decree." Alford praised his former boss, Slater, and department colleagues, including Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche, who Alford said he believes remain true to President Trump's core message instructing that antitrust enforcement is not for sale and should deliver tangible "common sense populism"-oriented results for millions of Americans. During a panel discussion at George Washington Law School in May, Alford emphasized that the administration's focus was on mergers expected to drive up prices on goods and services that impact everyday Americans, like housing, education, healthcare, and everyday goods and services. Merger challenges like the one against HPE — filed roughly a week after Trump took office — appeared to signal the administration's plans to vigorously pursue competition concerns. Further underscoring its offensive approach, the administration pushed ahead with antitrust prosecutions targeting the biggest names in tech, including Google (GOOG), Apple (AAPL), Amazon (AMZN), and Meta (META). The Justice Department sued Hewlett-Packard in January, alleging that the $14 billion tie-up to combine the nation's second- and third-largest providers of enterprise wireless networking would substantially lessen market competition. Five months later, in June, the department announced it had settled with HPE and would allow the deal to go forward by requiring HPE to divest its global "Instant On" WLAN business to a DOJ-approved buyer, plus ensure it would license key software assets to rivals. Alford called on California Federal District Judge P. Casey Pitt to closely scrutinize the events that led to the merger settlement between the DOJ and HPE-Juniper court proceedings under the 1974 Tunney Act. The act requires companies seeking approval of merger settlements to disclose their settlement-related communications with the executive branch. Democratic lawmakers also asked Judge Pitt to hold a hearing to review the settlement. Alexis Keenan is a legal reporter for Yahoo Finance. Follow Alexis on X @alexiskweed. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store