
Bail plea of actors Srikanth, Krishna in drug case: Madras High Court to pass orders on July 8
Justice M. Nirmal Kumar heard the arguments advanced by senior counsel R. John Sathyan and advocate L. Infant Dinesh on behalf of the two actors and decided to pronounce orders on Tuesday (July 8). The counsel contended their clients were innocent and had nothing to do with the narcotics case.
According to the prosecution, Sub Inspector Arulmani attached to the Anti Narcotics Intelligence Unit (AINU) under the Triplicane Assistant Commissioner of Police, had received a source information on June 17 regarding a person in possession of cocaine near the Regional Meteorological Centre bus stop at Nungambakkam in Chennai.
Since the location fell within the Nungambakkam police station limits, the Sub Inspector shared the information with the jurisdictional Inspector (Law and Order) and obtained permission to conduct a raid by the AINU team at the bus stop where they caught hold of the first suspect Prado alias G. Pradeep Kumar.
The AINU team reportedly informed the suspect of his right to be searched either before a judicial magistrate or top government officials. However, on his insistence that he could be searched by the Sub Inspector himself, the team attempted to persuade a few passers by to be a witness to the search but in vain.
Hence, the Sub Inspector conducted the search with two of the constables in his team as the witnesses and reportedly recovered one gram of cocaine. Immediately, the suspect was arrested. He also reportedly confessed to be have obtained the contraband from Nigeria through a Ghana national named M. John.
On June 18, the AINU team arrested John at Hosur (Krishnagiri district) bus stand and reportedly recovered 10 grams of cocaine from him. Thereafter, the Sub Inspector lodged a complaint with the Nungambakkam police leading to the registration of a First Information Report (FIR) against both of them.
Further investigation in the case led to the arrest of the two actors before the court on charges of allegedly procuring the contraband for personal consumption. The prosecution claimed a urine test conducted with respect to Mr. Srikanth on June 23 had shown traces of the contraband.
However, the actor in his bail petition, said, the urine test was conducted four hours after his arrest and in the meantime, the police had given him food, water, coffee and snacks. After consuming them, the actor said he started vomiting non-stop and fainted leading to his treatment at a government hospital.
Actors' contention
'The police took the petitioner to the Rajiv Gandhi Government General Hospital in Chennai and treated him briefly by administering some medicines. Hence, there is a real apprehension that any substance could have been administered to him to falsely implicate him in the case,' his petition read.
He also alleged the police had roped him in the case only to sensationalise the entire issue though no contraband was seized from him. On his part, actor Krishna too contended no contraband was seized from him and he had been implicated in the case only on the basis of the alleged confession by the two suspects arrested initially.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


India Today
6 hours ago
- India Today
Caught on CCTV: Class 10 student falls to death from hostel balcony in Odisha
A Class 10 student of a private English medium school in Odisha's Keonjhar district lost his life after falling from the terrace of his school hostel on Saturday evening. The victim, identified as Krishna Pradhan, was a boarder at Kairala English Medium School in the incident was caught on a CCTV camera which showed a few students walking in the corridor. Later, Krishna is seen climbing the railing and then jumping off the According to initial reports, Krishna was staying in the school's four-storey hostel building. The exact circumstances surrounding his fall remain unclear, and the incident has raised serious questions about hostel safety and student mental police have launched an investigation and are collecting both forensic and circumstantial evidence from the scene. While the possibility of suicide is being examined, officials have not ruled out foul play. As of now, no official statement has been issued by the school authorities or the police regarding the cause of the tragedy has brought renewed attention to the lack of mental health support systems in educational institutions across Odisha. Despite the University Grants Commission (UGC) issuing guidelines in 2023 for setting up counselling units, helpline services, and student support centres, implementation has been sparse, especially in schools and colleges outside urban said further updates will be provided once the investigation concludes.- EndsMust Watch


Time of India
7 hours ago
- Time of India
Police add 6 kg ganja to seized 230-kg bags; court acquits suspects
Chennai: While acquittals in ganja peddling cases due to lack of evidence are not uncommon, a Chennai narcotics court recently acquitted four individuals accused of smuggling 230 kg of ganja because the police submitted six kg more of the drug in court than what was originally seized. The quantity variation found is very high, creating a reasonable suspicion about the seized property itself. The actual quantity is 230 kg, but it was 236.58 kg during the proceedings under Section 52A (during the destruction of the seized drug in the presence of a magistrate) of the NDPS Act, special judge for NDPS cases M Rajalakshmi said. In addition to that, according to the case of the prosecution, two samples were taken from all five bags, each containing 50 grams. Out of the two samples taken from five bags, one sample from each pair was sent for analysis to the forensic science laboratory, the court said. You Can Also Check: Chennai AQI | Weather in Chennai | Bank Holidays in Chennai | Public Holidays in Chennai According to the evidence given by the deputy director of the laboratory, the contraband is dry ganja, and hence there is no possibility of an increase in weight, she added. The court further pointed out that there was a delay of six days in sending the contraband recovered from the accused to the court, and meanwhile, the properties were kept in the police station. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Use an AI Writing Tool That Actually Understands Your Voice Grammarly Install Now Undo "Even though the delay of six days is not so enormous, coupled with the evidence given by PW6 (DSP) that the seized contraband was kept in the police station without a seal and the huge variation in the quantity of samples and the bulk quantity recovered from the accused create a serious doubt whether the property produced before this court was actually recovered from the accused," the court wondered. Since the prosecution did not succeed in proving the possession of contraband by all accused, nothing can be presumed by the court under the NDPS Act, the court said and acquitted all four accused.

The Hindu
10 hours ago
- The Hindu
Sivaganga custodial death: CBI registers FIR against police
The Central Bureau of Investigation (CBI) on Saturday (July 12, 2025) registered a First Information Report (FIR) against the police personnel responsible for the custodial death of B. Ajith Kumar, a 29-year-old temple security guard, in Tamil Nadu's Sivaganga district last month. Following the government's order for transferring the probe to CBI within a day of transferring it to the CB-CID, the CBI registered a case under Section 103 (punishment for murder) of Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita (BNS) based on the FIR filed at Thirupuvanam police station in Sivaganga district. Also, the Madurai Bench of the Madras High Court while hearing a batch of petitions regarding the custodial death, ordered the CBI to appoint an investigating officer within a week to take over the probe and submit a final report by August 20. The FIR added: 'On the basis of the notification issued by the Government of Tamil Nadu, notification u/s 5 of Delhi Police Special Establishment (DSPE) Act has been issued by DoPT, Ministry of Personnel, Public Grievances and Pensions, Government of India.' The FIR said Deputy Superintendent of Police Mohit Kumar has been appointed as the Investigating Officer (IO) for the case. The CBI's FIR includes an English translation of the initial FIR, which was based on a complaint by Head Constable Kannan of the Manamadurai subdivision crime team. The youth, who worked as a security guard at the Badrakali Amman Temple in Madapuram village near Thirupuvanam, following a gold theft complaint by a woman from Madurai named J.P. Nikitha, was picked up for interrogation by a special team on June 27. As the interrogation at various places outside the Thirupuvanam police station continued into the second day (June 28), he was taken to a secluded location near the temple where he was allegedly thrashed by the police team for several hours. The victim was taken by the police to a nearby private hospital. As they refused admission, he was taken to Sivaganga government hospital and later to Government Rajaji Hospital in Madurai, but was declared dead. Six police personnel of the special team were suspended and five among them were subsequently arrested. Hearing a batch of public interest litigation (PIL) petitions regarding the custodial death, Justices S.M. Subramaniam and A.D. Maria Clete of the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court ordered for a judicial inquiry. Subsequent to this, Fourth Additional District Judge of Madurai, S. John Sundarlal Suresh, conducted an investigation and submitted a report to the High Court on July 8.