Trump voters in for a shock as $800 billion Medicaid cuts hit home in MAGA stronghold
Teresa and her daughter had to sell lemonade to raise money for his burial and gravestone. One small relief was that Medicaid paid Jackie's hospital bills. Teresa's story shows how important Medicaid is for poor families in rural areas like Knox County. But now that support is under threat due to Trump's plan to cut up to $800 billion from Medicaid, as stated by Telegraph report.
Big Medicaid cuts may hurt Trump's own voters
Trump wants the cuts to help fund $3.7 trillion in tax cuts, and is pushing lawmakers to pass it by July 4. These cuts would make 16 million people lose health insurance by 2034, according to the Congressional Budget Office (CBO). Even though Republicans say the bill will help household income, there's fear it will mostly hurt the poor people who actually voted for Trump.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
15 Most Beautiful Female Athletes in the World
WomenSportOnline.com
Click Here
Out of the 200 countries that depend most on Medicaid, 84% voted for Trump in 2024. Knox County, where 72% voted for Trump, is one of the poorest places in the U.S. and 68% of people use public health insurance. These numbers show how risky this move could be for Trump politically, as mentioned in the report by Telegraph.
Trump's former chief strategist Steve Bannon warned the bill might fail because 'MAGA is on Medicaid.' Pollster Frank Luntz says hardcore Trump fans will still support him even if they lose benefits. But Luntz also said working-class voters may turn against Trump if the cuts hurt them directly. Medicaid started in 1965 to help low-income people with healthcare.
Live Events
Medicare is for people over 65 and fully funded by the federal government. Medicaid is for low-income people and funded by both states and the federal government. Before Obama's Affordable Care Act (ACA) in 2010, adults without kids were mostly not eligible for Medicaid, as per the report by Telegraph.
The ACA let more low-income adults qualify, dropping the number of uninsured Americans from 44 million to 25 million. Trump's bill could undo those gains by cutting $793 billion from Medicaid over 10 years. Kentucky could lose $21 billion in federal funding and 277,000 people may lose coverage, says research group KFF.
ALSO READ:
Musk escalates feud with Trump, throws support behind nemesis Thomas Massie for his re-election
New work rules and paperwork may make people lose coverage
A big change in the bill is a new requirement to work 80 hours a month to keep Medicaid under ACA rules, saving $344 billion. The bill also saves $64 billion by making people re-check their eligibility every 6 months instead of once a year. Darren Bullock, a Trump voter who left the Democrats, might lose his Medicaid because of the new work rules, as mentioned by the report by Telegraph.
Darren says jobs are hard to get in rural areas like Knox County, especially since he has no car, phone, or public transport access. Jennifer Tolbert from KFF warns that people aged 55–64, who often retired early from tough jobs, are most at risk.
She says even people who do work might lose Medicaid just because they can't keep up with the extra paperwork. Teresa McNab, who now works as a full-time cook, says she can meet the work hours but has no time to do the paperwork due to caring for her daughter and elderly mom. Medicaid is also key to drug rehab programs in Kentucky, especially with the region's opioid crisis.
Chris Ross, a former drug addict, says Medicaid paid for his treatment and helped him turn his life around. He now has a job, is married, and got custody of his kids, all thanks to Medicaid support. Daniel Phipps, who runs a rehab group, says most of his patients are on Medicaid, and cuts could harm these services badly, as stated by Telegraph.
While the Republican bill exempts people in rehab from work rules, they might still lose coverage if they can't meet reporting demands. Tolbert adds that local hospitals in poor areas will lose money and may cut back staff or services as more people go uninsured.
Politically, this could hit Trump hard in countries like Knox, where people strongly vote Republican but rely heavily on Medicaid. Chris Ross said people can't just ignore such big threats to their survival — even if they're loyal Trump voters, according to the report by Telegraph.
FAQs
Q1. What is Trump's plan for Medicaid?
Trump wants to cut up to $800 billion from Medicaid to help pay for tax cuts. This may cause millions of people to lose their health insurance.
Q2. Who will be most affected by these Medicaid cuts?
Low-income families, especially in rural places like Knox County, Kentucky, where many people voted for Trump, could lose coverage or face harder rules.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
24 minutes ago
- Time of India
CM: Won't tolerate hooliganism in the name of Marathi
Mumbai: Hooliganism under the guise of Marathi pride will not be tolerated in the state, CM Fadnavis warned on Friday. He said police had registered an FIR and taken action in the Mira Road incident where a businessman was beaten up by MNS workers for not knowing Marathi. Speaking to the media, Fadnavis said beating up someone over language was wrong. "We are Marathi and are proud of the language. Insisting that a person speak in Marathi is not wrong, but beating up a businessman because he does not know it is wrong. Our Marathi-speaking people are doing business in different states, and if they do not know the local language, should they get similar treatment? Such behaviour and hooliganism are not correct. Action will be taken against such violent behaviour," he said. CM Devendra Fadnavis said on Friday, "We are proud of Marathi, but no injustice can be done to any other Indian language. Sometimes I am amazed they embrace English but create disputes over Hindi. What kind of thinking is this, and what kind of action is this?" You Can Also Check: Mumbai AQI | Weather in Mumbai | Bank Holidays in Mumbai | Public Holidays in Mumbai He warned that strict action would be taken against those who take the law into their own hands. "Should businessmen not do business? If a Marathi-speaking businessman goes to Assam and does business there and takes time to learn Assamese, should he be meted out similar treatment? Should the people of Assam beat him up? If you genuinely take pride in Marathi, then serve the language, start classes to teach Marathi, teach your children Marathi. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với mức chênh lệch giá thấp nhất IC Markets Đăng ký Undo Why have you set up schools where it is clearly mentioned that Marathi is the third language?" he asked. On the Thackeray cousins holding a "victory rally" over state govt's withdrawal of two GRs about Hindi being taught as a third language from Class 1, Fadnavis said they (Thackerays) seem to be happy about the decision taken by govt. "Let them hold the victory rally. The committee to make recommendations was set up by them, they put their aide on the committee, the committee recommended that Hindi and English should be made compulsory from Class 1 to 12, the recommendations were accepted by them in the cabinet, the minutes were signed by them. .. the Marathi manoos knows they are double-faced," he said. This was a reiteration of his earlier statement that Uddhav Thackery as CM had accepted the report of the Mashelkar panel recommending that Hindi be the third language from Class 1.
Time of India
43 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Indian diaspora in Africa identifies as African because...': Woman's post supporting Zohran Mamdani goes viral
Woman's post explaining why Mamdani is not wrong to identify himself as an African went viral. Amid the controversy over New York mayoral candidate Zohran Mamdani 's race, a woman supported Mamdani identifying himself as an African though not by blood and said the entire Indian diaspora in Africa identifies as African. "...because we are! From! Africa!" the woman, Sophia Babai, wrote on BlueSky. The woman explained that her parents are from the same diaspora as Zohran's father Mahmood Mamdani and they will always introduce themselves as African, and there is nothing wrong in it. Sophia explained that Americans don't understand the extent to which the Indian diaspora in East Africa is a separate culture in itself. She said that compared to Indians, they eat different food, follow a different branch of Islam and have a culture of their own, which is not Indian. Their language is stuffed with Swahili and they look different from Indians. Woman's post on Gujarati African diaspora in connection with Mamdani went viral Indian diaspora in Africa identify as Africans, the woman said. "It is also just incredibly funny seeing white Americans claim that Zohran can't identify as African because he isn't Black, like sir ma'am where do you think white people came from," the woman said explaining how a group called Lohana who are believed to be from Lahore ended up in Guajarat and Punjab and later converted -- tracing the roots of Mamdani's family. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Giao dịch vàng CFDs với sàn môi giới tin cậy IC Markets Tìm hiểu thêm Undo "Every Gujarati African I have ever met identifies as African first, and probably Indian second but possibly not Indian at all. Indians certainly consider us African, to a point where more traditional Indians will not intermarry with us, even if they are ethnically and religiously identical," the woman explained. The post came in reaction to a major row over Zohran Mamdani claiming himself to be African-American or Black in the application for Columbia University. Though he did not get into Columbia, the revelation that he attempted at a faulty racial identity triggered a political storm, though Mamdani said he was not aiming to gain anything but was trying to capture his diverse background as he was born in Uganda.
India Today
an hour ago
- India Today
Why US U-turn on climate goals could be India's moment for clean-tech leap
India may have just been handed the clearest opening yet to emerge as a global clean-tech giant—not by virtue of a new domestic policy stroke or an international alliance but because of a stunning reversal of climate ambition by the United a stormy session in the US Senate chamber, lawmakers voted to dismantle the very foundation of America's landmark climate law, the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA). Once hailed as the boldest climate legislation in US history, the IRA had unlocked over $370 billion in subsidies, tax credits and incentives to power America's clean energy the new budget bill passed by the Senate—pending only House reconciliation and a presidential sign-off—those gains now stand gutted. On July 1 late evening (Washington D.C. time), the voting saw a tie, the bill passed with US vice-president J.D. Vance casting the tie-breaking will now move to the House of Representatives, which may pass it as is or amend it. If amended, it returns to the Senate for another vote. If approved by the House, it then goes to the US president for signature. Republicans have a slim majority, with 220 representatives in the 435-member house. The global climate economy, into which India has been steadily integrating, is already feeling the tremors. But amidst the churn, India stands out as one of the few nations poised to retreat of the United States from its clean energy commitments has the potential to reshape global supply chains, redirect hundreds of billions of dollars in green capital and shift geopolitical influence over climate action. For India, which has been investing heavily in solar manufacturing, EVs, battery storage and green hydrogen, this unexpected vacuum in American leadership presents a strategic opportunity: to step into the role of a manufacturing base, innovation hub and investment magnet in the emerging green order. But whether India can truly seize the moment will depend on how quickly and decisively its government and industry scale of the rollback in the US is staggering. The Senate bill—officially a sweeping tax and immigration package—includes provisions that render the IRA practically toothless. It ends federal tax credits for clean energy, electric vehicles, rooftop solar, home efficiency and clean manufacturing. It terminates the commercial clean vehicle credit and the consumer EV rebate. It phases out the clean energy manufacturing production credit beginning 2031. Simultaneously, the bill extends permanent credits for coal used in steel production and delays by a decade the implementation of a fee on methane leaks from oil and gas facilities. As a final blow, it rescinds funding for environmental justice, endangered species protection and low-carbon infrastructure in underserved implications are as economic as they are environmental. The Congressional Budget Office estimates the Senate bill would add $3.9 trillion to the US deficit over a decade. According to Energy Innovation, a clean energy support entity, power generation capacity will fall by 300 GW by 2035, the US economy will lose $960 billion in cumulative GDP and more than half a million jobs will warn of graver consequences still. 'If the Senate reconciliation bill passes,' says Advait Arun, senior associate for energy finance at the Center for Public Enterprise, New York, 'the GOP has all but guaranteed that Americans will face blackouts and grid failures in the coming years This bill forcibly deindustrialises the country and severely reduces our shared standard of living.'For India, that collapse of confidence in American clean-tech policy opens three big doors: the redirection of climate capital, relocation of manufacturing capacity and repositioning of leadership in multilateral green platforms. First, the capital. Over $370 billion had been unlocked by the IRA, and vast pools of private equity, pension funds and climate-focused institutional investors had coalesced around the US clean energy tax credits repealed and grid modernisation shelved, much of that capital is now seeking stable, policy-backed alternatives. India, with its green bond framework, sovereign climate finance architecture and expanding production-linked incentive (PLI) schemes, fits the bill provided it can absorb the manufacturing. India's ambitions to build a self-reliant clean-tech manufacturing base—bolstered by the Rs 24,000 crore PLI (Production Linked Incentive) for solar and batteries, the Rs 19,744 crore Green Hydrogen Mission and state-level industrial parks—now appear more globally competitive than dominance of the green manufacturing chain has long been acknowledged, but India has quietly emerged as a fast-follower, especially in areas like electric two-wheelers, distributed solar, and electrolyser manufacturing. With the US effectively sidelining itself, India is in prime position to become the supplier of choice for the Global South—and increasingly for Europe, Japan and Australia, all of whom are seeking diversified, democratic alternatives to Chinese green is here that the comparison with China becomes critical. China today controls over 80 per cent of the world's solar wafer and module production, dominates global battery supply chains and has unmatched scale in electrolyser manufacturing. Its mineral refining ecosystem for lithium, cobalt and rare earths is firms have vertically integrated—from mining to manufacturing to deployment—giving them a cost advantage that few can compete with. However, this dominance has also created geopolitical unease. Western nations worry about overdependence on a single country for critical energy components. Supply chain disruptions during Covid-19 and rising trade frictions have only intensified those by contrast, is late to the scale game but arguably better positioned to serve as a diversified, democratic alternative. It lacks China's vertical integration, but offers political alignment with the West, cost-effective labour and a fast-improving logistics and manufacturing India is not yet seen as a hegemon. It can position itself as a partner, not a replacement. Richard Black, director of policy and strategy at global energy think-tank Ember, captured this realignment well. 'Chinese factories are still going to be producing the clean energy goods in increasing demand around the world, with Indian companies in fast pursuit; and while the US government has just decided that it won't be a customer, it's also decided not to be a competitor,' he third opportunity is diplomatic. India's credibility as a climate voice rose during its G20 presidency. Its leadership of the International Solar Alliance (ISA), the Coalition for Disaster Resilient Infrastructure (CDRI) and the newly-formed Global Biofuels Alliance shows it can knit together broad coalitions around energy and sustainability. With the US retreating, India can step up as the principal advocate for an inclusive, just energy transition—one that prioritises affordability, access and employment, not just net-zero question is whether India is ready. Some parts of the answer are encouraging. The Indian clean-tech ecosystem is no longer in its infancy. Adani Green, ReNew Power and Tata Power Solar are among the world's largest renewable asset owners. Vikram Solar and Waaree Energies have ramped up module exports. Ola Electric, Mahindra and Tata Motors are pushing EV adoption deeper into Tier 2 and Tier 3 New Energy and L&T are investing billions into green hydrogen and battery storage. Infosys, TCS and emerging players like Grid Edge are building AI-based smart grid solutions and energy management systems that can be exported to other developing India is not yet firing on all cylinders. Supply chains for critical minerals remain thin. EV penetration is still uneven. Financing for early-stage clean start-ups is sluggish compared to China or the US. Power evacuation infrastructure lags in key solar-rich states. Besides, the overall scale of capital needed to convert this opportunity is significant: industry estimates suggest India will need to mobilise Rs 2.5 lakh crore to Rs 3 lakh crore (roughly $30-35 billion) over the next five years to scale up manufacturing, build export zones and underwrite risk in frontier clean technologies. Much of that will need to come from global green capital—through sovereign funds, blended finance vehicles, and ESG (environmental, social and governance)-focused infrastructure is here that policy must step in. A new Green Investment Platform, combining the balance sheets of IREDA, NIIF, SBI, and REC, can act as a one-stop shop for investors looking for certainty in Indian climate infrastructure. PLI 2.0 should be rolled out to include energy software, smart grids, carbon tracking systems, and AI-based energy optimisation—areas where India has a comparative SEZs, with fast-track clearances and export corridors, can be established in Gujarat, Tamil Nadu, Odisha and Maharashtra. And perhaps most urgently, a 'Clean Innovation Migration Visa' could invite displaced US clean-tech entrepreneurs, engineers and researchers to set up in India's innovation clusters, including Hyderabad, Pune and is not idle speculation. American stakeholders themselves acknowledge what the bill has unleashed. 'This bill gives up on the present and future of American manufacturing,' said Mike Williams of the Center for American Progress, an independent policy institute. 'It kills investments in clean industries that have been driving domestic manufacturing growth This is a gift to other nations who are furiously working towards beefing up their clean-tech capacities.'Manish Bapna of the Natural Resources Defense Council (NDRC) added: 'This measure props up the dirty and expensive technologies of the past while strangling the clean energy investments creating millions of jobs Republicans are punishing the plentiful wind and solar power that can be quickly added to the grid.'India must remember that this opportunity, while monumental, is also fragile. The same global investors now fleeing US policy volatility are watching India's actions closely. Delay, fragmentation or over-centralisation could spook capital. Likewise, any backsliding on India's own climate targets, or politicisation of the clean energy transition, could blunt its if India can maintain focus, scale up rapidly and speak with one voice on the global stage, it stands to gain not just market share but narrative power. In the 20th century, India missed the hardware revolution and caught up only late to the telecom boom. Clean-tech could be different. It could be the first global industrial transformation that India shapes from the front—technologically, economically and US decision to gut its climate law may have dire consequences for the planet. But it has inadvertently thrown down the gauntlet. India must now decide whether it wants to lead this century's green industrial revolution or watch from the to India Today Magazine- EndsMust Watch
