
Fighters vs wimps: Swing-state Democrat Rep. Chris Deluzio sees a new divide in the party
At one time not so long ago, Sen. Bernie Sanders, I-Vt., was maybe seen as too progressive for most swing-district Democrats to appear with.
Not anymore.
When Sanders went through Pennsylvania over the weekend, one such Democrat, Rep. Chris Deluzio, was by his side on his ' Fight Oligarchy ' tour.
In an interview Monday with NBC News, Deluzio argued that the old intraparty divide of moderate vs. progressive is over. Deluzio has himself straddled that split at times. But he's also sought to grab the left's mantle of economic populism as he's won two terms in a district just outside of Pittsburgh.
Now, amid President Donald Trump's second term, he sees the real battle not between the center and left but between fighters and wimps.
Deluzio argued that more populist positioning, citing his own push for an anti-corruption, anti-corporate and anti-monopoly platform, 'is uniting more Democrats across the old ideological labels who understand that one, now is not the time to be a wimp, and that two, we've got to put the economic fight front and center.'
That Deluzio, who represents a D+3 district, according to the Cook Political Report, would appear with Sanders would've raised eyebrows in past cycles. The congressman said that, while he's not sure how many Democratic officials feel differently about appearing on the trail with Sanders now, he doesn't see much difference between his messaging and the Vermont senator's.
Appearing with him in Harrisburg and Bethlehem over the weekend — on the other side of the state from his congressional district — Deluzio railed against 'bootlicker politicians,' 'the oligarchs in the White House and the boardroom' and 'these phony patriots' he sees 'waging a war on the American Dream.' And he called on Democrats to rally around a congressional stock trading ban as part of an anti-corruption push.
'Donald Trump understood that anger,' Deluzio said in Bethlehem of working-class disenchantment with the status quo. 'He saw that wound in the American psyche. What does he offer? Snake oil of hate, division and autocracy. That's not the way forward. We're here to call out that bulls---.'
In the early days of Trump's administration, Democrats were divided over how strongly to combat Trump, with some feeling the anti-Trump 'resistance' of his first term contributed to his comeback the second time around. Yet as the president has moved to quickly enact his agenda of deconstructing the civil service, slashing federal funding to an array of programs and enacting sweeping global tariffs, many in the party have shifted.
'It's not so much ideological, right?' Deluzio said in the interview. 'It's about style, and, of course, it is about substance too. Across the ideological spectrum from Sen. Sanders to Sen. [Elissa] Slotkin and anybody else who's weighed in here, I think you're seeing a pretty clear consensus among Democrats who get this, that you've got to be tough … You've got to be clear about who you're fighting against.'
Slotkin, D-Mich., had pushed back recently on using the 'oligarchy' framing to argue against Trump and his agenda, saying that many Americans don't understand what an oligarchy — a form of government where power is held by a small group of people — is. Sanders hit back, telling NBC News' ' Meet the Press ' that Americans 'are not quite as dumb as Ms. Slotkin thinks they are.'
But Deluzio doesn't think there is much of a divide there.
'Sen. Slotkin is someone who gets and has talked aggressively about Democrats needing this alpha energy, as she says, as Democrats should be fighting,' he said. 'So I actually think it's less of a division than some have reported it. … Whether you're using 'oligarch,' 'robber baron' or 'corporate jagoff,' we know who we're talking about. The American people know who we're talking about here.'
Deluzio came under fire from some party activists and allies last month when House Democrats promoted a video of him on X describing how tariffs can be part of a plan to boost American manufacturing just two days after Trump announced his sweeping global tariffs that sparked a market selloff.
'I don't think there's much of a divide about Trump's tariffs being really dangerous and hurtful,' he said in the interview. 'We have to be able to say that, and actually I think it's pretty powerful, coming from the Rust Belt, coming from Western Pennsylvania, that I can say that clearly. And then, I think we have to articulate, 'well, what do we want to do differently?' And for me, yes, targeted enforcement against countries like China and sectors like steel and ship-building, that's part of it.'
'You also need the industrial policy at home,' he continued. 'You need the incentives for American companies to invest here, and foreign companies to invest, and that is completely lacking in Trump's trade approach. So I think Democrats have to articulate what we would do differently, too.'
Deluzio is seen as someone who could be a future statewide candidate in Pennsylvania. He spoke with NBC News days after New York Magazine offered an in-depth story on Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pa., where staffers alleged that his recovery from a stroke and subsequent mental health episodes has taken a step backward, causing internal tension with his team and even his wife, Gisele.
Asked if he believed Fetterman can continue serving the state in the Senate, Deluzio said he would wait to render judgment until Fetterman addressed the story.
'Number one, I want him to be healthy, and he's been pretty honest so far about his struggles and treatment,' Deluzio said. 'I want to give him a chance to respond, and I haven't seen him say anything yet, so I want to give him a chance to do that.'
After the interview, Fetterman told NBC News on Tuesday morning that the story was built on 'one source' with 'a couple anonymous sources,' describing it as a 'hit piece from a very left publication.'
'There's really nothing more to say about it,' he added.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Evening Standard
an hour ago
- Evening Standard
Los Angeles curfew comes into force as Trump says he'll 'liberate LA' amid anti-immigration protests and looting
Democratic leaders have raised concerns over a national crisis in what has become the most intense flashpoint yet in the Trump administration's efforts to deport migrants living in the country illegally, and then crack down on opponents who take to the streets in protest.


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
Trump, Newsom each find support and face risks in immigration debate
"In a way, it benefits both Trump and Newsom. Trump's core supporters love dramatic displays of force, and they hate California," John Pitney Jr., a politics professor at Claremont McKenna College, told USA TODAY. "Progressive Democrats hate Trump. They've been leery of Newsom's outreach to conservatives, and his recent statements shore up support on his left." But there are also political threats to both men if the protests drag on, which could make each look ineffective. The additional risk to Newsom's presidential aspirations in 2028 is that other Democrats could come away looking more powerful, such as Michigan Gov. Gretchen Whitmer or Maryland Gov. Wes Moore. "Politically, at least, Newson is in the trickier spot here," William Howell, a political scientist at the University of Chicago, told USA TODAY. Trump campaign on immigration enforcement and has long criticized California Trump and the GOP have long portrayed California as the epitome of bad governance. They've recently poured the blame on Newsom, who was first elected as governor to the nation's most populous state in 2019 and now is in his second term. California's high taxes, homeless problem and other issues have provided the GOP with political fodder for years. "Donald Trump wants to portray California as the epitome of an America gone wrong," said Sonoma State University political science professor David McCuan. The clash between protesters who burned cars, threw rocks and shot fireworks at authorities plays into the GOP's portrayal of California as chaotic. The situation revolves around an issue - undocumented immigration - where Trump believes he has a mandate from voters for mass deportations and strong border security. "Illegal immigration was on top of voters' minds across the country in 2024," said Mark Bednar, a former senior House GOP leadership aide. "And it should shock no one that President Trump is working around the clock to address it." Newsome accuses Trump of political overreach Newsom has condemned the violence, but the pressure from the GOP shows the difficult situation he's in trying to criticize Trump's actions as overreach while also maintaining order in his state. "Newsom, meanwhile, has clear incentives to stand up to Trump and decry his autocratic excesses, which explains his vocal opposition," said Howell from the University of Chicago. "But if he harbors national political ambitions, which he plainly does, then Newsom needs to avoid aligning himself with the most extreme members of the Democratic Party." Matt Lesenyie, a political science professor at California State University Long Beach political, said Newsom is at a "huge disadvantage" against Trump on this issue. "A lot of people, not just Newsom, get hurt with Trump because they let him pick the fight," Lesenyie said. "I think it's too late for Newsom or (Los Angeles Mayor) Karen Bass... this is going to turn into a war of images." Surrogates fuel the political fires The California confrontation has spread far beyond the state's boundaries. House Speaker Mike Johnson, R-Louisiana, told reporters June 10 that Newsom "ought to be tarred and feathered" for "standing in the way of the administration carrying out federal law." In the Oval Office with Trump, Homeland Security Secretary Kristi Noem said Californians "should never elect him into a leadership position ever again." Trump added: "The governor's a nice guy but he's grossly incompetent." Trump told reporters later in the day he's "always had a good relationship" with Newsom and had a 16-minute phone conversation with him, but that "he just doesn't do a very good job." "We have an Olympics coming up," Trump said of the 2028 games. "We have a lot of people all over the world watching Los Angeles. We've got the Olympics, so we have this guy allowing this to happen." Sen. John Fetterman, D-Pennsylvania, said in a social media post June 9 he stands for "free speech, peaceful demonstrations and immigration - but this is not that." "This is anarchy and true chaos," he said. "My party loses the moral high ground when we refuse to condemn setting cars on fire, destroying buildings, and assaulting law enforcement." But other fellow Democrats have rallied to Newsom's defense. Sen. Chris Coons of Delaware, the top Democrat on the Senate subcommittee responsible for the Pentagon's budget, said "warfighters are not political tools meant to patrol the streets of our own cities or to suppress the political views of their fellow Americans." "I trust local law enforcement, Mayor Bass, and Governor Newsom when they say that violence won't be tolerated and that they are able to handle these protests without the military," Coons said. "What President Trump is doing is not only unneeded. It has made the situation much worse." Those competing visions on how to handle the protests were on full display during a June 10 House hearing featuring Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth, who faced a question from Rep. Pete Aguilar, D-California, seeking justification for using the military for civilian law enforcement. "Why are you sending warfighters to cities to interact with civilians?" Aguilar asked. Hegseth replied that Trump "believes in law and order.'


The Herald Scotland
an hour ago
- The Herald Scotland
How Trump's $45 million DC parade will lower food prices
President Trump promised to get those grocery prices down. He's a master dealmaker, so he said prices would drop on Day 1. I've noticed that didn't happen, since I'm still paying $10 for a box of Patriot-O's cereal ("It's like an insurrection in your tummy!") and alternating which kid gets to eat dinner each night. Trump spending millions sending troops to LA will lower food prices But that's all part of Trump's genius. He SAID grocery prices would fall immediately, then they didn't, and now he's spending millions on things that appear to have nothing to do with lowering grocery prices or inflation. CHECKMATE, DEMOCRATS! Opinion: After LA, Trump hard launches new First Amendment: Only MAGA can protest I'm confident that once MY president uses loads of taxpayer money squashing the LA protests he smartly provoked and celebrating his birthday by destroying the streets of DC with a tank parade, grocery stores and food suppliers will have no choice but to drop their prices. Because who knows what this guy might do next? It's the art of the deal, baby! Trump's business savvy means we all benefit from his birthday parade Say you're a grocery store owner and you're about to slap a price tag on a box of cereal. Those cereal producers might be charging the store more because of Trump's incredibly smart tariffs, or because of supply chain issues, or because of the inflation Trump promised would disappear, that hasn't disappeared yet. (That's also part of his master plan - he's trying to confuse inflation so it won't know what to expect out of him. Classic dealmaker maneuver.) Opinion: Trump lied about LA protests to deploy the National Guard. He wants violence. If you're a Marxist, radical, socialist Democrat, you probably think: The grocery store owner is going to put a higher price on the cereal because it costs them more, and they need to make a profit. WRONG! 'I'm going to patriotically lower the cost of this cereal' That grocery store owner is going to think: "Since President Trump was willing to spend millions in taxpayer money to send the Marines into Los Angeles to fight people I don't like, and because he loves America so much he made America pay for his birthday parade, I'm going to patriotically lower the cost of this cereal to make my president look good, even if it means I'll go out of business in three months." Duh. That's a little thing called good ol' American capitalism, you lefty doorknobs. Look it up!! Enjoy the military parade and the US invasion of LA, MAGA! So yes, as an American who loves America and has invested my life savings in President Trump's cryptocurrency, I feel 1,000% confident that dropping nearly $200 million on invading Los Angeles and rolling tanks through our nation's capital will lower grocery prices and probably also reduce inflation. The rest of you just don't understand how America can get great again. Maybe if you watch the big June 14 military parade that we're paying for, you'll understand. Follow USA TODAY columnist Rex Huppke on Bluesky at @ and on Facebook at