How I use Synology and Google Photos to build the perfect photo backup system
Google Photos is the go-to photo backup app for quite literally everyone. It's fast, reliable, and everyone has a Gmail account, so it's the most accessible app out there for backing up your family memories. It's got tons of smart features and uses AI like no other photos app, from its almost magical AI editing to something as simple as natural language searches. It just works.
However, a lot of things have weakened the case for Google Photos. For instance, I have to deal with media compression to save space — otherwise, I'd be hitting storage caps if I were to upload everything in full quality. Or worse, I'd have to keep upgrading my subscription and pay Google more every few months just to preserve my media in original quality. My current plan wouldn't even last a couple of months, and 2TB isn't worth the fee for me, despite the perks.
I'd rather get my own storage for the same price — and I don't mean an external hard drive that awkwardly dangles from my computer.
Would you consider moving away from Google Photos?
0 votes
Nope, never ditching Google Photos
NaN %
Maybe, if I find a nice alternative
NaN %
I already use a hybrid setup like Synology + Google Photos
NaN %
I invested in a Synology NAS a few years ago. While it has streamlined my digital life but my most prized setup remains Synology Photos. It has changed how my family and I back up our media and turned it into a unique system. I'll tell you how I pieced it together and why it's perhaps the go-to strategy for a lot of home users who own a NAS.
For once, I don't mind a clone
Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority
We all know how good Google Photos is. It's the benchmark in smart media management that all other apps should look up to. Besides its AI perks, it's also the easiest tool to create cross-platform shared albums. I have numerous of them with my family and friends, all of which I treasure. So, it was out of the question that I'd ditch the app entirely, no matter the platform I'm on. I want all the convenience, but I wanted something that didn't cap me in any way.
When I first got my trusty Synology DS920+, I played around with a lot of its built-in features. What stood out were Synology Drive and Photos — almost exact replicas of Google's apps, as if Synology was trying to make things familiar for people switching over — if their names weren't already a dead giveaway.
Synology Photos has quite a lot of similarities with Google Photos, from the general layout to facial tagging for easy searches. You can create albums, share media with your family, cast them to your TV, add widgets that auto-rotate your photos, and whatnot. And the best part — you're not limited by cloud storage capping. Sky's the limit (or the remaining hard drive space).
I'll admit Synology Photos isn't the most intuitive app by far, so it's not something I'd want to use every day. It feels more like a 'tool' you pull out when needed — which is why I needed a middle ground.
Why pick one when you can go hybrid?
Rita El Khoury / Android Authority
I didn't want to give up Google Photos and was tempted by the freedom Synology offered. So, I did what any sane person would do — I included both in my setup. And they now work beautifully together.
Google Photos remains my primary app to access media on my phone. It's fast, easy, and always accessible. Most importantly, I'm not missing out on the thousand AI features Google keeps adding. Whenever I need to look up an old photo, I fire up Google Photos like it's muscle memory — even on iPhone. It's my default for quick photo editing and album sharing too.
Synology Photos is my bottomless pit where I dump all my high-res photos in bloated formats while all my 4K videos stay crisp.
Meanwhile, Synology Photos also gets the same copies of my media — but in full quality. It's my bottomless pit where I dump all my high-res photos in bloated formats while all my 4K videos stay crisp. All our phones and devices back up to the NAS with zero worries about running out of space, poor internet, or compressing files.
My NAS is my safe space for all our family media. Things happen to our devices and the cloud all the time. Even if I hit the limit with Google Photos, lose my phone, or accidentally delete something from Google, I know a full-res copy still exists on local storage. They live on a server I control, and won't be subjected to random cloud policy changes I must reluctantly agree to.
My only hiccup
Rita El Khoury / Android Authority
But there is one downside to this otherwise flawless system. Indian summers don't let me run the NAS all day — it'd fry the drives if I did. In the little window that it works every day, there are times when Synology Photos misses backing up some media. And if it goes on for a few days, I end up with a backlog of unsaved photos.
It's made worse by the fact that I don't open the Synology Photos app on my phone that often, putting it in deep sleep, I have to wake it from every few days — or weeks — depending on my memory. That's the only hiccup in this otherwise fully automated setup.
How the twins play together nicely
Dhruv Bhutani / Android Authority
This setup is the reason I can get by with the basic Google One plan with 100GB shared across my family. Since our photos go up only in storage saver mode, we're all well below that limit. And the full-res versions? They're safe on the NAS. It actually aligns with the expert-recommended strategy of keeping an off-site backup for extra safety.
And this dual strategy works really well for anyone tired of ballooning Google One bills, but who can't stop taking a zillion photos and videos on vacations. And honestly, you shouldn't either — capturing memories over everything else, always!
This dual strategy actually aligns with the expert-recommended strategy of keeping an off-site backup for extra safety.
If you're a first-time NAS user or on a tight budget, any brand would work in case you want something to just set and forget, though Synology Photos remains more intuitive among NAS offerings (not a high bar). Even 8TB is more than enough for regular home use and storing 'unlimited' photos, while Google handles all the smarts in a low-storage version of your library.
That double backup is far more trustworthy and gives extra peace of mind. And given how moth-eaten and torn my old, physical photo albums are, I wouldn't take any chances with my memories.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Fast Company
15 minutes ago
- Fast Company
How AI is impacting trust among college students and teachers
The advent of generative AI has elicited waves of frustration and worry across academia for all the reasons one might expect: Early studies are showing that artificial intelligence tools can dilute critical thinking and undermine problem-solving skills. And there are many reports that students are using chatbots to cheat on assignments. But how do students feel about AI? And how is it affecting their relationships with peers, instructors and their coursework? I am part of a group of University of Pittsburgh researchers with a shared interest in AI and undergraduate education. While there is a growing body of research exploring how generative AI is affecting higher education, there is one group that we worry is underrepresented in this literature, yet perhaps uniquely qualified to talk about the issue: our students. Our team ran a series of focus groups with 95 students across our campuses in the spring of 2025 and found that whether students and faculty are actively using AI or not, it is having significant interpersonal, emotional effects on learning and trust in the classroom. While AI products such as ChatGPT, Gemini or Claude are, of course, affecting how students learn, their emergence is also changing their relationships with their professors and with one another. 'It's not going to judge you' Most of our focus group participants had used AI in the academic setting—when faced with a time crunch, when they perceive something to be 'busy work,' or when they are 'stuck' and worry that they can't complete a task on their own. We found that most students don't start a project using AI, but many are willing to turn to it at some point. Many students described positive experiences using AI to help them study or answer questions, or give them feedback on papers. Some even described using AI instead of a professor, tutor or teaching assistant. Others found a chatbot less intimidating than attending office hours where professors might be 'demeaning.' In the words of one interviewee: 'With ChatGPT you can ask as many questions as you want and it's not going to judge you.' But by using it, you may be judged. While some were excited about using AI, many students voiced mild feelings of guilt or shame about their AI use due to environmental or ethical concerns, or just coming across as lazy. Some even expressed a feeling of helplessness, or a sense of inevitability regarding AI in their futures. Anxiety, distrust and avoidance While many students expressed a sense that faculty members are, as one participant put it, 'very anti-ChatGPT,' they also lamented the fact that the rules around acceptable AI use were not sufficiently clear. As one urban planning major put it: 'I feel uncertain of what the expectations are,' with her peer chiming in, 'We're not on the same page with students and teachers or even individually. No one really is.' Students also described feelings of distrust and frustration toward peers they saw as overly reliant on AI. Some talked about asking classmates for help, only to find that they 'just used ChatGPT' and hadn't learned the material. Others pointed to group projects, where AI use was described as 'a giant red flag' that made them 'think less' of their peers. These experiences feel unfair and uncomfortable for students. They can report their classmates for academic integrity violations—and enter yet another zone in which distrust mounts—or they can try to work with them, sometimes with resentment. 'It ends up being more work for me,' a political science major said, 'because it's not only me doing my work by myself, it's me double checking yours.' Distrust was a marker that we observed of both student-to-teacher relationships and student-to-student relationships. Learners shared fears of being left behind if other students in their classes used chatbots to get better grades. This resulted in emotional distance and wariness among students. Indeed, our findings reflect other reports that indicate the mere possibility that a student might have used a generative AI tool is now undercutting trust across the classroom. Students are as anxious about baseless accusations of AI use as they are about being caught using it. Students described feeling anxious, confused and distrustful, and sometimes even avoiding peers or learning interactions. As educators, this worries us. We know that academic engagement—a key marker of student success—comes not only from studying the course material, but also from positive engagement with classmates and instructors alike. AI is affecting relationships Indeed, research has shown that faculty-student relationships are an important indicator of student success. Peer-to-peer relationships are essential too. If students are sidestepping important mentoring relationships with professors or meaningful learning experiences with peers due to discomfort over ambiguous or shifting norms around the use of AI technology, institutions of higher education could imagine alternative pathways for connection. Residential campuses could double down on in-person courses and connections; faculty could be incentivized to encourage students to visit during office hours. Faculty-led research, mentoring and campus events where faculty and students mix in an informal fashion could also make a difference. We hope our research can also flip the script and disrupt tropes about students who use AI as 'cheaters.' Instead, it tells a more complex story of students being thrust into a reality they didn't ask for, with few clear guidelines and little control. As generative AI continues to pervade everyday life, and institutions of higher education continue to search for solutions, our focus groups reflect the importance of listening to students and considering novel ways to help students feel more comfortable connecting with peers and faculty. Understanding these evolving interpersonal dynamics matters because how we relate to technology is increasingly affecting how we relate to one another. Given our experiences in dialogue with them, it is clear that students are more than ready to talk about this issue and its impact on their futures. Acknowledgment: Thank you to the full team from the University of Pittsburgh Oakland, Greensburg, Bradford and Johnstown campuses, including Annette Vee, Patrick Manning, Jessica FitzPatrick, Jessica Ghilani, Catherine Kula, Patty Wharton-Michael, Jialei Jiang, Sean DiLeonardi, Birney Young, Mark DiMauro, Jeff Aziz, and Gayle Rogers.
CNN
16 minutes ago
- CNN
Microsoft alerts businesses and governments to attacks on SharePoint servers
Microsoft has issued an alert about 'active attacks' on server software used by government agencies and businesses to share documents within organizations and recommended security updates that customers should apply immediately. The Federal Bureau of Investigation said Sunday it is aware of the attacks and is working closely with its federal and private sector partners, but offered no other details. In an alert issued Saturday, Microsoft (MSFT) said the vulnerabilities apply only to SharePoint servers used within organizations. It said SharePoint Online in Microsoft 365, which is in the cloud, was not hit by the attacks. 'We've been coordinating closely with CISA, DOD Cyber Defense Command and key cybersecurity partners globally throughout our response,' a Microsoft spokesperson said, adding that the company had issued security updates and urged customers to install them immediately. The Washington Post, which first reported the hacks, said unidentified actors in the past few days had exploited a flaw to launch an attack that targeted US and international agencies and businesses. The hack is known as a 'zero day' attack because it targeted a previously unknown vulnerability, the newspaper said, quoting experts. Tens of thousands of servers were at risk. In the alert, Microsoft said that a vulnerability 'allows an authorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.' It issued recommendations to stop the attackers from exploiting it. In a spoofing attack, an actor can manipulate financial markets or agencies by hiding the actor's identity and appearing to be a trusted person, organization or website. Earlier, Microsoft said it is working on updates to 2016 and 2019 versions of SharePoint. If customers cannot enable recommended malware protection, they should disconnect their servers from the internet until a security update is available, it added.
Forbes
16 minutes ago
- Forbes
Material Needs of Artificial Intelligence Eclipsed by Energy Debates
Artificial Intelligence technologies will require a range of neglected materials President Trump attended an important summit on Artificial Intelligence (AI) and concomitant energy infrastructure at Carnegie Mellon University in Pittsburgh on July 15th, 2025. Major investments were announced by Google and Blackstone investment to build data centers and hydroelectric dams in Pennsylvania to power the AI economy for the region. Missing from the conversations was the material needs for AI technologies that could be just as serious resource constraint to upscaling the use of these technologies. While there is much talk of critical minerals for defense and for clean energy infrastructure, the material needs of AI are not as prominently discussed. Concerns about energy intensity dominate debates about AI. Carbon emissions estimates have also been researched by Google researchers using Life Cycle Analysis techniques, but the materiality of AI infrastructure has not been well-researched. In her prominent book Atlas of AI, renowned Microsoft researcher and academic Kate Crawford documents the vast extractive needs of AI but notes that detailed analysis of materials that will be needed has been sparse. Part of the challenge is the secrecy around AI hardware material needs. At a recent colloquium on critical materials for AI hosted by Professor Alondra Nelson at the Institute for Advanced Study in Princeton New Jersey, researchers lamented that confidentiality concerns often prevented forensic accounting of material needs for AI. Where estimates are available, they are often focused on the material needs for the electricity infrastructure needed for data centers. For example, the Wall Street Journal did a story earlier this year on the copper metal needs for AI but focused on the energy infrastructure needs. The article cited JP Morgan forecasts which suggested that the copper needed for AI energy supply would require another 2.6 million tons of copper adding to the projected 4-million-ton projected metal deficit by 2030. There was a reference to a Bank of America study in the article which differentiated the material needs of the data centers themselves at around 200,000 metric tons a year compared with 500,000 tons annually for energy infrastructure. Yet these are only estimates for one metal. Gallium has gained some interest in recent years because of its high-performance potential in AI chips but systematic estimates of upscaling supply are limited. Journalists and academics alike also conflate material needs due to a lack of understanding of the chemistry of these technologies. For example, lithium is largely needed for batteries that are not necessarily an AI infrastructure issue but can get conflated in discussions on any novel technological entity. Indium and arsenic will also be needed for refined chip technologies but there are no clear estimates of projected demand. Similarly, germanium demand is expected to increase with AI infrastructure but only rough estimates of 60% growth by 2034 are available via consulting firms with no peer-reviewed research on demand growth linked to particular targets for AI penetration in various technologies. High purity alumina is another key material for AI technologies which also presents important opportunities for innovation in deriving the material from a range of existing material stocks. Australia is going to be a key provider of this material and has recently started construction of the world's largest factory for its production in Gladstone, Queensland. Quantum computing may also take on many roles of conventional AI processors in coming years. While many of the metals needed for this infrastructure may be similar, there are some notable additions of materials such as boron and ytterbium which are also specifically more well-suited for quantum computing technologies. Superconductors with a range of exotic material needs are essential for quantum computing. These materials also operate only at lower temperature ranges and hence additional infrastructure for cooling would be needed above and beyond what is already needed for data centers. As momentum builds towards international governance of AI and the findings of the U.N. Secretary General's High Level Advisory Board on Artificial Intelligence get implemented, a sharp focus on material forecasts is needed. Scenarios for mineral demand which are linked to specific upscaling targets of countries for AI infrastructure should be developed. Based on those scenarios, a prioritization of those tasks for which AI has most societal benefit should be developed. In some cases, AI could itself assist with material efficiency. In coming years research have a highly consequential area for inquiry set before them on figuring out optimal material usage profile for AI technologies and how they might transform both our physical and social reality.
