
US tariffs push Andhra shrimp farmers to the brink, MP seeks urgent relief
Dr Gurumoorthy told the Lok Sabha that Andhra Pradesh, which accounts for the lion's share of India's shrimp exports, has been hit hardest. Nearly 70 percent of the state's produce is shipped to the United States, but with Washington imposing an effective tariff of nearly 60 percent, consignments have slowed to a trickle. Tirupati district alone cultivates shrimp in over 28,000 acres, yielding about 1.25 lakh tonnes annually.
The MP explained that the trouble began after the US slapped an additional 25 percent import duty – on top of the existing 25 percent coupled with 3.96 percent anti-dumping and 5.76 percent countervailing duties. 'Within two days of the announcement, prices crashed by 10–15 percent,' he said, noting that the 30-count variety has slid from Rs 450 to Rs 400 per kg, while the 50-count variety dropped from Rs 330 to Rs 300.
According to industry estimates, Andhra Pradesh has about 6.5 lakh aquafarmers, with another 30–40 lakh people dependent on allied activities such as hatcheries, feed supply, processing, and logistics. Losses are running between Rs 50,000 and Rs 80,000 per tonne, leaving farmers unable to recover even their input costs.
Adding to the woes is the absence of adequate cold storage facilities. Farmers are often forced to offload their harvest immediately at distress prices, as holding stock is not feasible. Efforts to divert exports to China or cater to local processors have met with only limited success.
Dr Gurumoorthy urged the Centre to intervene with a relief package, price stabilisation measures, and investments in storage infrastructure. He also pressed for a push to open alternative export markets so that the livelihoods of lakhs of coastal families do not sink further.

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
Split with US: Fallout worries top officials
The Centre is increasingly concerned about the potential impact of worsening relations with the US on the large Indian diaspora, particularly in the tech sector, people aware of the discussions said. Senior officials told a parliamentary panel that they were concerned about the fallout on Indian professionals and students in the US including job losses and tighter immigration policies. This comes at a time when India and the US have differed over market access for various American goods, and the US has objected to India's purchase of Russian oil. The concerns were flagged by the government, represented by senior officials such as foreign secretary Vikram Misri, commerce secretary Sunil Barthwal, and India's chief negotiator for the Bilateral Trade Agreement (BTA) with the US Rajesh Agarwal, during a recent meeting of the Parliamentary Standing Committee on External Affairs. The officials told the committee, chaired by Congress MP Shashi Tharoor, that the trade logjam may impact Indian professionals working in the US, said one of the three people cited above. The Indian diaspora contributes significantly through remittances, which extending India's soft power and acting as a crucial buffer against global economic uncertainties. While the absolute number of Indian students and workers in the US is not available, it is estimated to be in the hundreds of thousands. Queries emailed to the ministries of external affairs, commerce, and Tharoor remained unanswered. The officials' alert comes as new data highlights a cooling job market for foreign workers in the US. Registrations for Indian H-1B visas for 2026 dropped by 27% to 358,000, and were more than 54% lower than the prior year. Only 120,141 of these registrations were selected to move forward, well above the annual 85,000 visa cap. The H-1B programme is a critical pathway for Indian tech workers seeking jobs in the US. "Strained trade ties could bring tighter visa rules, higher compliance demands, and caution in hiring, especially in tech and professional services," said Sonal Arora, country manager, GI Group Holding, a global staffing solutions provider. 'But with their adaptability, strong professional networks, and proven expertise, Indian professionals are likely to adjust quickly, find new opportunities, and continue playing a key role in strengthening economic and cultural connections," said Arora. The US has recently ramped up pressure on India in trade talks, imposing a 25% tariff on certain Indian goods in late July and a second 25% tariff on August 6 as a penalty for India's continued purchase of Russian oil. The second tariff is set to take effect just as a US negotiating team arrives in New Delhi for another round of talks on 25 August. India's remittances have more than doubled from $55.6 billion in 2010–11 to $118.7 billion in 2023–24. According to the Reserve Bank of India's Sixth Round of Remittances Survey, these inflows have financed around half of India's merchandise trade deficit and have generally remained higher than gross FDI, making them a stable source of external financing. After a pandemic-induced dip of 3.6% in 2020–21, remittances rebounded strongly between 2021–22 and 2023–24, growing at an average annual rate of 14.3%. Also, the remittances sent back home by Indians working abroad registered a 14% rise in FY25 to a record $135.46 billion. Indians working abroad sent home a record $129.4 billion in 2024. The RBI said the inflows, classified under 'private transfers," accounted for more than 10% of total inflows. The government also informed the Parliamentary Standing Committee on External Affairs that the US has negotiated tough terms with all countries with which it has finalized bilateral trade deals. Citing agreements with Japan, Indonesia, Vietnam, and the EU, officials noted that while the additional tariffs on these countries have been adjusted or reduced, they have not been fully removed despite the substantial concessions obtained from them. As India remains firm on its stance of not bringing non-negotiable issues to the negotiating table, the US imposed a 25% duty on 30 July, effective from 7 August, and announced an additional 25% duty as a penalty for buying oil from Russia on 6 August. The new 25% duty is set to come into force from 27 August, just a few days after a US team of negotiators is scheduled to begin the sixth round of negotiations from 25 August in New Delhi.


Economic Times
28 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Wipro and Warburg amplify talks for Harman India arm
Mumbai: Global private equity firm Warburg Pincus and Wipro Technologies are in advanced negotiations to acquire the digital transformation solutions (DTS) business of US-headquartered audio and connected technologies firm Harman in India, said people privy to the discussions. The deal is expected to value the business at about $500 million (Rs 4,375 crore), they told ET on condition of anonymity. Deutsche Bank is advising Harman, a wholly owned subsidiary of South Korean conglomerate Samsung Electronics, on the proposed transaction. A Warburg Pincus spokesperson declined to comment, while queries emailed to Harman and Wipro Technologies did not elicit a response till press time. Harman—known for audio brands JBL, Harman Kardon and Infinity—designs and engineers connected products and solutions for automakers and consumers worldwide. Offerings include connected car systems, audio-visual products and enterprise automation solutions. The company began operations in India in 2008 and currently employs more than 9,000 people across eight cities. It has been working with Bengaluru-based Wipro Technologies through a strategic engineering collaboration since the year it entered the country, including the Harman India Development Centre at Wipro's facilities in Bengaluru and Chennai. Samsung Electronics acquired Harman International Industries in 2017 for about $8 billion. While the automotive segment remains Harman's primary revenue driver, the company's DTS unit in India has a strong presence across healthcare, communications and industrial applications. It supports life sciences and medtech companies in accelerating clinical trials, modernising platforms and ensuring regulatory compliance, and helps industrial and consumer businesses with real-time factory insights, connected ecosystems and enterprise systems. Wipro Technologies has been on an acquisition spree over the past few years. In 2024, it took over Aggne Global, a US-based insurance tech firm, to strengthen its presence in the insurance sector. It also bought out US-based IT consulting firm Applied Value Technologies to enhance its enterprise application development and support services. Besides, it purchased a 27% stake in SDVerse, an automotive software marketplace, last year. In 2022, Wipro Technologies acquired Rizing Intermediate Holdings, Inc. for $540 million to bolster its SAP consulting capabilities. Its largest acquisition was Capco, a global management and technology consultancy, for $1.45 billion in 2021. Warburg Pincus has been an active investor in digital solutions and outsourcing. It previously owned Encora, a digital engineering services provider for outsourced software product development, which it sold to Advent International in 2021. In India, the New York-headquartered private equity firm backs Perfios, a business-to-business software-as-a-service provider for the banking, financial services and insurance sector, operating in 18 countries.

Mint
28 minutes ago
- Mint
IBC amendments seek to boost assets available for distressed company revival
Creditors to bankrupt firms could get their hands on a wider pool of valuable assets and claw back money from more shady promoter transactions, once latest changes to India's insolvency rules take effect. While the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (IBC) remains the primary mode for bankruptcy resolution, lenders often seize assets of defaulting companies under various other laws; however, such assets stay with the individual banks themselves. The amended law will aid in bringing such assets—also seized from the defaulter's personal or corporate guarantors, essentially, its promoters, corporate parent, or an associate company—within the pool of assets for resolution. Experts said this increases flexibility in rescuing businesses and fetches better value for the business, rather than selling assets by individual lenders in a fragmented way. However, the process is not automatic, and must be blessed by the committee of creditors supervising the resolution. On Tuesday, the Lok Sabha referred the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code (Amendment) Bill 2025 to a select committee of the Parliament. Before the debut of IBC in 2016, lenders used the Securitization and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act (Sarfaesi Act) of 2002 to seize assets from defaulters. In some cases, lenders still resort to Sarfaesi Act that allows secured creditors to seize assets of borrowers who fail to repay dues within 60 days of demanding repayment. Separately, the new bill extends the timeline to tag dubious pre-bankruptcy transactions of sick companies as avoidance transactions that can be reversed by tribunals. While the stipulated time for admitting a case to bankruptcy court is 14 days, the average time is 434 days. The lengthy window enables unethical promoters to siphon off money via wrongful transactions once the bankruptcy petition is filed. Avoidance transactions may be undervalued, preferential, fraudulent or extortionate. Currently, transactions done up to two years prior to admission can be cancelled in the case of related party transactions, and up to one year in the case of other transactions. The bill seeks to expand this 'look back' period to two-year preceding initiation of bankruptcy proceedings all the way up to the date of its admission in NCLT in the cases of related party transactions. In the case of an unrelated parties, this period starts from one year prior to bankruptcy petition filing to its admission date. 'We have seen in many insolvency cases that considerable time—on an average one to two years—is taken in admission of the insolvency after the initiation of the insolvency process by the creditors and most of the defaulting entities would have engaged in avoidance transactions either during this period or even much earlier than this," said Surendra Raj, partner, Grant Thornton Bharat. 'Amending the look-back period for reporting such transactions undertaken during the two years (for related parties) and one year (for unrelated parties) from the initiation date (that is, the date when first application is filed for initiation of insolvency) would bring in many more such avoidance transactions in the purview of being classified as avoidance transaction. While this is certainly a welcome step to bring back public money to victims, one needs to be very careful that genuine business transactions don't get reported in this category resulting in over work for already burdened NCLTs," said Raj. 'Hence, very careful analysis would be required to be done by the resolution professional or the liquidator and professional advisors before reporting these transactions," said Raj. Soumitra Majumdar, partner, JSA Advocates & Solicitors said the proposed amendments provide the much-needed clarity on treatment of avoidance transactions and the resultant assets. 'The statutory aim appears to be to build in certainty of recovery, and flexibility in disposal methods of assets—both at the corporate debtor level and at those of the guarantors, subject to certain conditions. Ability to efficiently monetise assets will enhance creditor and stakeholder recoveries," said Majumdar. 'On the demand side, buyers will naturally be encouraged to offer price commensurate with the economic value of assets, without having to account for legal and regulatory risks associated with such acquisitions," said Majumdar. The government should also introduce dedicated NCLT benches to adjudicate on these transactions because many applications to annul these transactions, having approximately exposure of ₹3.89 trillion already in the last eight years are pending for adjudication at different stages, said Raj of Grant Thornton Bharat. The bill also clarifies that recovery proceedings from avoidance transactions or fraudulent trading will not affect the debt resolution process and these will continue independently even after completion of debt resolution or even liquidation of the company.