Air India venture sacks four seniors for office party soon after plane crash
The clip, which featured AISATS Chief Operating Officer Abraham Zachariah and other staff members dancing to loud music, was widely circulated on social media. The timing of the celebration—held shortly after one of India's deadliest aviation disasters—was widely condemned as tone-deaf and deeply insensitive.
Flight AI171, a Boeing 787-8 Dreamliner en route to London, crashed into a hostel for medical students at Ahmedabad's BJ Medical College shortly after takeoff. Of the 260 people on board, only one survived.
by Taboola
by Taboola
Sponsored Links
Sponsored Links
Promoted Links
Promoted Links
You May Like
'Swing is King': Mr. Hemant's Strategy Finally Explained in Free Session
TradeWise
Learn More
Undo
— TheSquind (@TheSquind)
As grieving families awaited the repatriation of victims' remains, the video drew sharp criticism for its perceived lack of empathy. Many users on social media slammed the company for insensitivity and poor judgment.
Live Events
In response, AISATS issued a statement saying, 'At AISATS, we stand in solidarity with the families affected by the tragic loss of AI171 and deeply regret the lapse in judgment reflected in a recent internal video. The behaviour does not align with our values, and firm disciplinary action has been taken against those responsible as we reaffirm our commitment to empathy, professionalism, and accountability.'
While AISATS did not specify when the party occurred, sources confirmed that four senior staff members were terminated for their direct involvement in organizing the event.
AISATS is a joint venture between Air India, now owned by the Tata Group, and Singapore-based SATS Ltd., a global leader in airport services.
The company emphasized that disciplinary action had been taken to uphold its ethical standards, but the damage to its public image amid a national tragedy has already drawn significant backlash.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Economic Times
2 minutes ago
- Economic Times
Lawyer argues Meta can't be held liable for gunmaker's Instagram posts in Uvalde families' lawsuit
Reuters A lawsuit filed by families of the Uvalde school shooting victims alleging Instagram allowed gun manufacturers to promote firearms to minors should be thrown out, lawyers for Meta, Instagram's parent company, argued children and two teachers were killed in the May 2022 shooting at Robb Elementary School in Uvalde, families sued Meta in Los Angeles in May 2024, saying the social media platform failed to enforce its own rules forbidding firearms advertisements aimed at minors. The families, who were present at last month's hearing, did not appear in court, with a lawyer citing the back-to-school season. Many plaintiffs attended the hearing virtually, he one ad posted on Instagram, the Georgia-based gunmaker Daniel Defense shows Santa Claus holding an assault rifle. In another post by the same company, a rifle leans against a refrigerator, with the caption: 'Let's normalize kitchen Daniels. What Daniels do you use to protect your kitchen and home?'The lawsuit alleges those posts are marketed toward minors. The Uvalde gunman opened an online account with Daniel Defense before his 18th birthday and purchased the rifle as soon as he could, according to the lawsuit. He also owned various Instagram accounts and had an 'obsessive relationship' with the platform, at times opening the app more than 100 times a day, plaintiffs' lawyers found in an analysis of the shooter's say minors can access gun content on InstagramMeta attorney Kristin Linsley argued that the families provided no proof that minors, including the Uvalde gunman, even read the Daniel Defense posts on Instagram. She also said the posts didn't violate Meta's policies because they weren't direct advertisements and did not include links to purchase any Mesner-Hage, representing the victims' families, said the defense's claim is 'fundamentally unfair,' as the plaintiffs don't have access to Meta data that would indicate whether the shooter encountered those posts. She added that if the content had landed on the shooter's feed, as the plaintiffs allege, then Meta 'not only knew about it, they designed the system so it would be delivered to him.''They knew more about him than anyone else on the planet,' she said content advertising firearms for sale on Instagram is allowed if posted by 'brick-and-motor and online retailers,' but visibility of those posts was restricted for minors under Meta's advertising policies from the end of 2021 to October 2022.'This is not a playbook for how to violate the rules. This is actually what the rules are,' Linsley plaintiff's team, however, showed a fake profile they created for a 17-year-old boy earlier this month, through which they were able to search Daniel Defense's Instagram account and see a post that included a picture of a gun, as well as a link to the gun manufacturer's the link was clicked, the gun-maker's website opened, and the team was able to select a firearm and add it to their cart, all within Instagram's app — an experiment that refutes Meta's assertion that posts relating to firearms aren't visible to users under 21, Mesner-Hage said in her rebuttal that the experiment was done this year and not in 2021 to 2022, which is when the policy she described was in families have also sued Daniel Defense and video game company Activision, which produces 'Call of Duty.'Case hinges on social media's responsibility for content creation Linsley said the Communications Decency Act allows social media platforms to moderate content without being treated as publishers of that content. "The only response a company can have is to not have these kinds of rules at all," Linsley said. 'It just gets you down a rabbit hole very quickly.'Mesner-Hage argued Meta is not protected by the act because social media platforms don't just host speech, but help curate it through its algorithms. Daniel Defense, she said, didn't have to pay for ads to get free access to Meta's analytical data through its business account on Instagram. That data shows the company which age bracket and gender engaged most with a specific post.'Daniel Defense is not on Instagram to make friends. ... They're on there to promote their product,' Mesner-Hage said. 'It's not a paid advertisement, but I would struggle to describe this as anything other than an advertisement.'The lawsuit alleges that firearm companies tweaked their online marketing to comply with Meta's policies, including by avoiding the words 'buy' or 'sell' and not providing links to purchase, and that the social media company did not protect users against such month, lawyers for Activision also argued that legal proceedings against them should be thrown out, saying the families allegations are barred by the First Amendment. The families alleged that the war-themed video game Call of Duty trained and conditioned the Uvalde gunman to orchestrate his for the plaintiffs asked the judge to allow them to amend their lawsuit with the new information they presented Tuesday before ruling on the defense's motion. The defense claimed that was unnecessary, as the case would not have merit even with the judge has yet to rule on Activision's motion and did not immediately rule on the Meta case. Elevate your knowledge and leadership skills at a cost cheaper than your daily tea. Swiggy, Tencent backer Prosus adds Rajnikanth fan to script India AI-commerce play India's F&O boom puts spotlight on retail protection through education Can new shipping laws bury the ghost of British legacy? As big fat Indian wedding slims to budget, Manyavar loses lustre Stock Radar: Bajaj Auto showing signs of reversal after falling over 30% from highs; medium term should 'buy the dip' F&O Radar | Deploy Bull Call Ladder in JSW Steel stock to benefit from bullish outlook Time for risk-takers to come out of hibernation? 5 mid-cap stocks from different sectors with an upside potential of up to 27% Buy, Sell or Hold: Motilal Oswal initiates coverage on JSW Cement; Emkay Global sees over 30% upside in Gravita India
Time of India
13 minutes ago
- Time of India
GST, tariff hopes lift rupee; up 40 paise versus dollar
AI-generated image MUMBAI: The rupee recorded its biggest daily gain in a month, regaining the 86 level, with the domestic unit firming up 40 paise to close at 86.95 on Tuesday, up from 87.35 on Monday. The rally came on optimism that the U.S. may ease its stance on additional 25% tariffs after talks between Donald Trump, Vladimir Putin and Volodymyr Zelenskiy, raising hopes of a peace deal that could also reduce the likelihood of fresh sanctions on India's Russian oil imports. Optimistic rise Domestic drivers also supported the currency, including stronger consumption trends and the government's plan to cut goods and services tax (GST) rates - the biggest such reform in eight years. Economists said the move could lift near-term growth momentum, improve sentiment and help revive foreign portfolio flows that had recently turned negative. The rupee further drew strength from a recent credit rating outlook upgrade for India, which has bolstered confidence in the economy. According to Jateen Trivedi of LKP Securities, the upgrade, along with reduced selling pressure from foreign investors and positive signals from India-Japan ties ahead of the Prime Minister's visit to Tokyo later this month, has helped improve sentiment, with the rupee expected to trade in a range of 86.60-87.25. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like TV providers are furious: this gadget gives you access to all channels Techno Mag Learn More Undo Dilip Parmar of HDFC Securities noted that the Indian rupee outperformed Asian currencies due to risk-on sentiment, supported by growth-focused policies, renewed foreign fund inflows and a technical pullback. He added that the spot USD/INR rate is likely to find support at 86.80 and face resistance near 87.20 in the near term. Stay informed with the latest business news, updates on bank holidays , public holidays , current gold rate and silver price .
News18
27 minutes ago
- News18
Sebi Mulls Intraday Trading Cap On Weekly Options Expiry
The Mint report stated that a committee has been set up to discuss this limit, saying surveillance measures like imposing a penalty on clients who routinely exceed the intraday limits were discussed. The development comes after the regulator cracked down on US-based high-trading firm Jane Street Group for alleged manipulation of Bank Nifty and Nifty. As of now there is no intraday limit, though clients should not cross a Rs 1500 crore end of the day on a net basis and Rs 10,000 crore on a gross level. A broker familiar with the committee's deliberations told Mint that while most clients follow end-of-day limits on non-expiry days, they tend to exceed these caps on expiry days, as contracts lapse by market close and the restriction becomes irrelevant. 'The proposal may have been discussed to curb the frenzy typically seen on expiry days," he noted. In another news, Sebi on Monday proposed a phased approach to restructuring existing equity indices that are linked to derivatives contracts to prevent market manipulation. According to Reuters report, the proposal seeks to restructure three indices of banking stocks – NSE's Nifty Bank, BSE's Bankex, and Nifty Financial Services.
