James Clapper, John Brennan hit back at Trump allegations about Russia probe as 'patently false'
"That is patently false. In making those allegations, they seek to rewrite history. We want to set the record straight and, in doing so, sound a warning," the pair wrote in a guest essay for The New York Times.
Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard has alleged former President Barack Obama and members of his administration, including Clapper and Brennan, promoted a "contrived narrative" that Russia interfered in the 2016 election to benefit Trump, which led to the sprawling collusion investigation that consumed Trump's presidency. Trump has described the alleged actions by Obama, Clapper, Brennan and Comey as "serious treason."
"While some external critiques have noted that parts of the Russia investigation could have been handled better, multiple, thorough, years-long reviews of the assessment have validated its findings and the rigor of its analysis," Brennan and Clapper wrote, arguing the most "noteworthy" example was the bipartisan Senate Intelligence report on the investigation.
"Every serious review has substantiated the intelligence community's fundamental conclusion that the Russians conducted an influence campaign intended to help Mr. Trump win the 2016 election," the pair continued. "Although the misrepresentations and disinformation of the administration are too numerous to address here, let us set the record straight on three. To be clear, we are writing here in our personal capacities, and our views don't imply the endorsement of any federal agency."
Brennan and Clapper argued that the Steele Dossier, which was authored by ex-British intelligence officer Christopher Steele and funded by Hillary Clinton's presidential campaign and the DNC, was not used as a source or taken into account for any of the analysis. However, they added it was included as a "separate annex only to the most highly classified version of the document that contained the assessment," at the direction of the FBI.
The intelligence officials also said that their assessment made "no judgment" about the impact of the Russian operation on the outcome of the 2016 election.
"Russian influence operations might have shaped the views of Americans before they entered the voting booth, but we found no evidence that the Russians changed any actual votes," Clapper and Brennan wrote.
Clapper appeared on CNN to dispute the allegations, telling host Kaitlan Collins that the claims were false. Brennan joined MSNBC earlier this month and said he was "clueless" as to why he would be investigated.
"Finally, and contrary to the Trump administration's wild and baseless claims, there was no mention of 'collusion' between the Trump campaign and the Russians in the assessment, nor any reference to the publicly acknowledged contacts that had taken place," Clapper and Brennan added.
The pair insisted the "real politicization" was coming from members of Trump's administration, specifically Gabbard and CIA Director John Ratcliffe.
"The real politicization is the calculated distortion of intelligence by administration officials, notably Mr. Trump's directors of national intelligence and the C.I.A., positions that should be apolitical. We find it deeply regrettable that the administration continues to perpetuate the fictitious narrative that Russia did not interfere in the 2016 election. It should instead acknowledge that a foreign nation-state — a mortal enemy of the United States — routinely meddles in our national elections and will continue to do so unless we take appropriate bipartisan action to stop it," Clapper and Brennan concluded.
Fox News Digital reached out to the White House for comment but did not immediately receive a response.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
27 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Analysis-Trump's 50% Brazil coffee tariff expected to rejig trade, send more beans to China
By Marcelo Teixeira NEW YORK (Reuters) -The Trump administration's steep import tariff on Brazilian coffee looks set to reshuffle trade routes for beans from the world's top grower and exporter, benefiting China and incentivizing traders to look for indirect routes into the U.S. A 50% tariff on some Brazilian products, including coffee, will begin on August 6, the administration of U.S. President Donald Trump said on Wednesday. The move will challenge commodities traders and Brazilian coffee exporters to find buyers for the roughly 8 million bags sold to U.S. coffee processors every year. At around 25 million bags per year, the U.S. is the world's largest coffee consumer. A third of that comes from Brazil, through bilateral trade that was worth $4.4 billion in the 12 months ended in June. "The global coffee trade flow will be reshuffled. The pain will be felt from Sao Paulo to Seattle - from origin to roaster, to cafe chains, grocers, and morning commuters," said Michael J. Nugent, a senior U.S. coffee broker and owner of MJ Nugent & Co. The possible rerouting of the massive volume Brazil usually sends to the U.S., similar to the entire production of high-quality coffee grower Ethiopia, could benefit a major Trump rival: China. More Brazilian beans may be bound for China because of trade ties between the two nations, both members of the BRICS group, and after the first Trump administration disrupted trade, said Marc Schonland, an independent advisor to the U.S. coffee industry. Coffee consumption is surging in China as young professionals drop tea to seek a higher caffeine boost. Brazil is its main supplier, exporting 538,000 bags to China in the first half of 2025, data from exporters association Cecafe showed. Coffee consumption has grown around 20% per year for the last 10 years in China and per capita coffee consumption doubled in the last 5 years, according to industry data. More Brazilian beans could also head to the European Union, where they face no tariffs, said Logan Allender, head of coffee at U.S. roaster and distributor Atlas Coffee Club. Trade experts see possibilities for exporters to try to dodge the tariffs by exporting Brazilian coffee to other countries, and from there to the U.S. "It will add a bit of logistics costs, but brings down the (tariff) effect to a max 10% to 15%," said Debajyoti Bhattacharyya, commercial vice president at agricultural commodities firm AFEX Ltd., adding that countries such as Mexico or Panama could be used for the stopovers. "Without a strong traceable supply chain, tariffs are meaningless. I mean, we can't stop oil from flowing, why would coffee?" he said. Senior soft commodities analyst and independent consultant Judith Ganes said the fact the U.S. left coffee out of an extensive exemption list of Brazilian products suggests Trump is using the product as a bargaining chip in his political quarrel with Brazil's President Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva. Trump has said Brazil's Supreme Court is treating his ally, former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro, unfairly. The U.S. sanctioned Supreme Court justice Alexandre de Moraes on Wednesday. Traders said coffee that is loaded in Brazil by August 6 can enter the U.S. without paying the tariff up until October 6. William Kapos, CEO at Downeast Coffee Roasters, a large coffee processor in the U.S. East Coast, said he is rushing to ship Brazilian coffee he has already purchased out of South America before that deadline next week. Going forward, Kapos said he will look to buy coffee from Central America and Africa to replace Brazilian beans. "But everybody will do that, so price-wise it is going to be a squeeze on U.S. buyers," he said. Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data
Wall Street Journal
27 minutes ago
- Wall Street Journal
Two Books on the Bomb and the Men Who Built It
After three decades of uneasy slumber since the end of the Cold War, atomic weapons are back in the headlines. There were Vladimir Putin's threats to use them in Ukraine or send them up into space. They appeared suddenly on the 'escalation ladder' when tensions flared up between India and Pakistan. And it was the looming threat of a rogue nuclear-weapons program that forced President Trump to use B-2s in Iran to extinguish that threat, at least for now. The time certainly looks ripe for not one but two books on the dropping of the very first atomic bomb, on Aug. 6, 1945, with Garrett Graff's 'The Devil Reached Toward the Sky' and Iain MacGregor's 'The Hiroshima Men.' Eighty years on, after countless books, documentaries and major motion pictures, is there anything more to be said on the subject? Happily for both authors, the answer is yes. By going deeper into the personal details and reminiscences of a generation that is all but lost to us now, Mr. Graff and Mr. MacGregor have made the story more human, especially when the weapon's essential inhumanity threatens to overshadow everything else. The two books complement each other. The bulk of 'The Devil Reached Toward the Sky' focuses on the physical making of the bomb itself, while 'The Hiroshima Men' gives us the context in which it was used: the 3½-year epic fight to the finish between the U.S. and Japan in the Pacific. Familiar names, including Gen. Leslie Groves, J. Robert Oppenheimer and Paul Tibbets—the pilot of the Enola Gay—appear in both accounts almost stereo-optically, allowing readers to get a deeper understanding of each person.
USA Today
28 minutes ago
- USA Today
'DO YOUR JOB': Trump urges senators to skip summer break
Senate Republicans have a major backlog of nominations as Democrats drag their feet, frustrating the president. WASHINGTON − President Donald Trump again called for senators to stay in town and bypass their usual, month-long summer break to push through a backlog of judicial confirmations. "The Senate must stay in Session, taking no recess, until the entire Executive Calendar is CLEAR!!!" Trump wrote in a Truth Social post July 31. "Republicans, for the health and safety of the USA, DO YOUR JOB, and confirm All Nominees," he added. "They should NOT BE FORCED TO WAIT." As August approached, Republicans had a logjam of at least 130 nominees, according to Politico. Normally, the process of confirming most lower-level judicial nominees would move at a faster pace with some bipartisan agreement moving things along. But this year, Democrats are dragging their feet, frustrated by Republicans advancing Trump's agenda items like a sweeping tax bill and $9 billion in spending cuts. The delays have frustrated Trump, who called earlier in July for Senate Majority Leader John Thune, R-South Dakota, to cancel the chamber's August recess. The president also lashed out on social media against Republican Sen. Chuck Grassley of Iowa, urging the Senate Judiciary Committee chair to ditch a longstanding confirmation practice to expedite the process. "Senator Grassley must step up," Trump wrote in a July 29 post. "He should do this, IMMEDIATELY, and not let the Democrats laugh at him and the Republican Party for being weak and ineffective." Grassley said the next day during a committee hearing he was "offended by what the president said" and "disappointed that it would result in personal insults." To progress through Trump's list of nominees, Thune has left the door open to cutting into senators' break, along with other options such as changing Senate rules. 'I think everything is on the table,' Thune told reporters July 31. Lawmakers often use their beloved summer breaks to return home and reconnect with constituents in person. The prospect of staying extra days or weeks in Washington would likely be met with resistance from members on both sides of the aisle. However, some senators say they would be willing to stick around as needed. 'I'm for staying and doing what we need to do,' Sen. Tommy Tuberville, R-Alabama, told USA TODAY. 'They pay us to work. They don't pay us to go home and sit for a month.'
