More migrant workers claim UK farm exploitation
Nearly 700 foreign seasonal agricultural labourers complained to the Worker Support Centre (WSC) national charity in 2024 they were being treated unfairly by farmers who had brought them over to work, compared to just over 400 in 2023.
One former fruit picker told the BBC more must be done to protect migrants from being treated like slaves.
The UK government said it always took "decisive action" if abusive practices were found on farms.
Bolivian Julia Quecano Casimiro came to the UK on a seasonal worker visa to pick cherries for Haygrove, a Herefordshire-based farm business.
Ms Casimiro is currently taking the company to an employment tribunal over claims of unfair dismissal, discrimination and underpayment of wages, and now campaigns for better protection for seasonal farm workers.
In an initial ruling, the Home Office found there were reasonable grounds to believe that Ms Casimiro could have been a victim of modern slavery.
She told the BBC she feared the true scale of exploitation of workers was a "hidden problem", adding: "Many seasonal workers continue to have their rights violated at this very moment.
"What is happening is very serious because we don't have access to any assistance or support.
"If the UK government does not take action to stop what is happening there will continue to be more victims of modern slavery."
A spokeswoman for Haygrove said Ms Casimiro's discontent was prompted by a discrepancy in the face value of flight tickets and the amount loaned to workers for the tickets, and lower than typical hours of work available in the month of July, as a result of extraordinary weather conditions.
The company added that her allegations are "materially incorrect and misleading" and that it has "never had accusations of this nature before in the history of our business".
It told the BBC that its practices "are routinely audited by a range of third-party bodies, including by the Gangmasters and Labour Abuse Authority (GLAA), the Home Office, the British Retail Consortium, Red Tractor/Assured Produce, LEAF, Soil Association and SEDEX".
The company said Ms Casimiro worked at Hayford for 11 days before leaving with a free air ticket home, and her claims were based on a "short-lived, snapshot, atypical experience".
"We take great care in ensuring fairness and equality in our recruitment and working processes," the spokeswoman added.
The company said it is also co-operating with a nationwide GLAA investigation into how companies recruited 20 Indonesian workers.
Last summer, those workers claimed they were charged illegal fees to come to the UK by recruitment agencies abroad.
The Haygrove spokeswoman said: "We are deeply concerned by claims that Indonesian workers were charged illegal fees by recruitment agents, which is strictly against our policy and principles."
She added that the company took any allegations of misconduct "very seriously" and had "co-operated fully with investigations by the GLAA".
Haygrove is "committed to fair employment practices and the wellbeing of all our workers", she said.
The government's seasonal agricultural worker scheme will see 43,000 visas made available for the horticulture industry and 2,000 for poultry farms this year.
A survey carried out early last year by the Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (Defra) found 91% of respondents reported a positive experience working on UK farms.
However, the WSC, which works to prevent abuses of marginalised workers, said it dealt with a rise in complaints about the scheme during 2024.
One man, from Kyrgyzstan, who worked on different farms in England and Scotland on and off over three years, told the WSC he had been expected to live in poor conditions, been discriminated against and been unfairly dismissed.
The worker, who wanted to remain anonymous to protect future job opportunities, told the BBC through a translator that he felt standards had got worse over that time and farm employers did not care about workers' wellbeing, or level of pay.
The WSC said its caseworkers dealt with 158 farm labourers in one month last summer and referred 19 cases involving 101 individuals to enforcement agencies. The workers were mainly Kazakh, Kyrgyz, Tajik and Uzbek.
The charity wants a review of the seasonal agricultural worker scheme and of any risks of exploitation it presents.
A Home Office spokeswoman said its staff had visited 318 farms and carried out more than 2,100 worker interviews, with improvements made every year to stop exploitation and poor working conditions.
"We will always take decisive action where we believe abusive practices are taking place or the conditions of the route are not met," she added.
The National Farmers' Union said overseas workers were "invaluable" to British farmers, who "take employee welfare extremely seriously and are continually adapting the way they operate to provide the best experience for workers".
A spokeswoman added that the vast majority of workers have "a good experience in the UK which results in many returning to the same farms season after season".
UK fruit picking like prison, says migrant worker
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


USA Today
31 minutes ago
- USA Today
Nation's largest landlord, Greystar, settles price-fixing suit with feds
Federal attorneys did not estimate the impact on renters, but noted one apartment complex boasted of raising rents 25% in a single year. Apartment-dwellers may get some rental relief after federal officials reached a price-fixing settlement with the nation's largest private landlord: Greystar. The agreement between the government and South Carolina-based Greystar, which manages about 950,000 units nationally, blocks the company from using computer software blamed for ratcheting up rents. Greystar on Aug. 8 said it had also reached a similar settlement in a class-action lawsuit brought by renters. Federal attorneys had accused Greystar of using computer algorithms to bump up rents by illegally colluding with other landlords via software known as "RealPage." The software system allowed landlords to privately share their proprietary pricing data with each other so they could raise prices collectively. Federal attorneys said the collusion maximized profits for landlords while stifling competition. The lawsuit said RealPage users were also collectively encouraged never to lower rents, even if the market had softened. "American greatness has always depended on free-market competition, and nowhere is competition more important than in making housing affordable again," Attorney General Pam Bondi said in a statement. In the settlement with Greystar, which still needs approval from a federal judge, Justice Department attorneys said the use of RealPage by Greystar was modern-day price fixing. They did not estimate the impact on renters, but in one legal filing noted an apartment complex boasted of using RealPage systems to raise rents 25% in a single year, while also getting their competitors to raise theirs. "Whether in a smoke-filled room or through an algorithm, competitors cannot share competitively sensitive information or align prices to the detriment of American consumers," Assistant Attorney General Abigail Slater said in a statement. Greystar admitted no wrongdoing in settling the case, but agreed to help federal prosecutors in their separate ongoing investigation into RealPage. Greystar also agreed to external monitoring. "We entered into these settlements to make clear the government's interpretation of the law and to ensure we continue to do things the right way," Greystar officials said in a statement. In a separate lawsuit that remains pending, the FTC and the state of Colorado have accused Greystar of tricking customers into signing misleading leases with higher rents than advertised, stacking in undisclosed fees, or charging people a nonrefundable application fee before revealing the true monthly rental price. Federal officials have hinted they may soon settle that case, and Greystar has already rolled out a new website and rent-pricing calculator for prospective tenants.


UPI
3 hours ago
- UPI
IDF says slain reporter was Hamas; journalist groups condemn killing
The Israel Defense Forces said Sunday that it killed an Al Jazeera reporter it accused of being a Hamas militant. File Photo by Jim Hollander/UPI | License Photo Aug. 11 (UPI) -- The Israeli military said it struck and killed Al Jazeera reporter Anas al-Sharif, accusing him of being a Hamas militant, which attracted condemnation from journalist organizations. The Israel Defense Forces made the announcement Sunday on X, saying al-Sharif "was the head of a Hamas terrorist cell and advanced rocket attacks on Israeli civilians and IDF troops." "A press badge isn't a shield for terrorism," the IDF said on X. Al Jazeera reported that al-Sharif was one of four colleagues killed in a targeted Israeli attack on a tent housing journalists in Gaza City, one of the few areas in the Palestinian enclave not under Israeli military control. Seven people were killed in the strike, the Qatar-based news organization said. In a statement, Al Jazeera Media Network condemned what it called the "targeted assassination" of its correspondent, along with photographers Ibrahim Al Thaher and Mohamed Nofal. "As Al Jazeera Media Network bids farewell to yet another group of its finest journalists, who boldly and courageously documented the plight of Gaza and its people since the onset of the war, it holds the Israeli occupation forces and government responsible for deliberately targeting and assassinating its journalists," Al Jazeera Media Network said, adding that al-Sharif's death follows calls from Israeli officials to target him and his colleagues. The IDF has repeatedly criticized Al Jazeera and has accused several of its reporters in Gaza of being Hamas or Islamic Jihad militants. Late last month, IDF spokesman Avichay Adraee accused al-Sharif in a video posted to Facebook of being a member of Hamas' military wing since 2013. Following al-Sharif's death, Adraee continued to post videos and photos to his Facebook account repeating his claims that the journalist was a militant. In its statement Sunday, the IDF cited Israeli intelligence and Gaza documents as proof that al-Sharif "was a Hamas operative integrated into Al Jazeera." Israel has killed at least 178 Palestinian journalists during its nearly two-year-old war in Gaza, according to the Committee to Protect Journalists, which said Israel has "a longstanding, documented pattern of accusing journalists of being terrorists without providing any credible proof." "Israel's pattern of labeling journalists as militants without providing credible evidence raises serious questions about its intent and respect of press freedom," CPJ Regional Director Sara Qudah said in a statement in response to al-Shari's death. "Journalists are civilians and must never be targeted. Those responsible for these killings must be held accountable."

Epoch Times
3 hours ago
- Epoch Times
Advocacy Group Urges China to Lift Exit Bans on 7-Year-Old and His Mother
A Chinese mother and her U.S.-born young child are being barred from leaving China after a family trip there last year, marking another case where Beijing has stopped foreigners and Chinese nationals from departing the country. On Aug. 7, the Dui Hua Foundation, a San Francisco-based advocacy group for at-risk detainees in China, raised the plight of the Gao family—permanent U.S. residents Gao Zhen and his wife Zhao Yaliang, and their seven-year-old son, Gao Jia, a U.S. citizen from New York. The senior Gao and his younger brother, Gao Qiang, are well-known as the 'Gao Brothers' for their artworks critical of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). One particularly well-known art piece is a bronze statue of former CCP leader Mao Zedong kneeling, his right hand on his chest with a sorrowful expression. In August last year, Gao Zhen was detained on the charge of 'slandering China's heroes and martyrs' during a family trip. The foundation pointed out that the charge was based on the Heroes and Martyrs Protection Law, which went into effect in 2018, even though his artworks mocking the Chinese regime's leadership were created before 2009. Zhao and her son have been barred from leaving China since the senior Gao's arrest. The foundation questioned why Beijing chose to impose the exit ban on them, noting that neither has been accused of a crime nor is required for any criminal investigation by the Chinese authorities. Unable to return to the United States, the seven-year-old Gao 'has been unable to attend school for a full year,' the foundation added. 'It's one thing to slap exit bans on adult Americans like bankers or government employees, it's an entirely different matter to impose an exit ban on a young child,' John Kamm, executive director of the Dui Hua Foundation, said in a statement. Last month, the Chinese regime announced that it had imposed an exit ban on Mao Chenyue, an Atlanta-based managing director at Wells Fargo, accusing the banker of being 'involved in a criminal case.' Also in July, the U.S. State Department confirmed that a U.S. Patent and Trademark Office employee was being prevented from leaving China after traveling there in a personal capacity. In September last year, the foundation estimated that there were 'more than 300 Americans under coercive measures in China,' and 'more than 30 are under exit bans.' The foundation stated that China's treatment of the younger Gao violates the U.N. Convention on the Rights of the Child, which China signed in 1990 and ratified two years later. As for the senior Gao, the foundation stated that he is scheduled to be tried and sentenced 'in the coming weeks,' and warned that he could receive a long sentence, despite his not guilty plea. 'Charging someone with a crime that was not a crime at the time the alleged offense took place,' Kamm said, 'is a violation of a fundamental principle of justice, the principle of non-retroactive application of the law.' 'The Chinese government must stop persecuting the Gao family. It must free Gao Zhen and lift the exit bans on Gao Jia and his mother and allow them to return to the United States.' New York-based nonprofit, the Human Rights Foundation (HRF), sent a letter dated Oct. 31 last year to the consulate general of China in New York, demanding the senior Gao's immediate and unconditional release. The letter, written by HRF Chief Advocacy Officer Roberto González, argued that his artworks 'are incredibly necessary to educating the world on the truth of Mao's dictatorial legacy.' Mao instigated the Red Guards, who were Chinese high school and university students, to persecute those identified as 'class enemies' of the communist regime, amid the Cultural Revolution that lasted 10 years until Mao's death in 1976. González also argued that Beijing should repeal the Heroes and Martyrs Protection Law to 'safeguard artistic freedom in China.' 'His detention is not just a violation of his rights but a blatant abuse of power and an attack on the fundamental human freedoms of all Chinese people who have the right to learn the truth about dictator Mao Zedong,' the letter reads.