Sheinbaum's expulsion of criminals is more about placating Trump than keeping Mexico safe
This week's expulsion marked the second time Mexico had sent top criminals to the US this year: in February, Mexican authorities handed over 29 cartel members, including druglord Rafael Caro Quintero, who was responsible for the murder of a DEA agent in 1985. The latest transfers took place after US authorities vowed that prosecutors would not seek the death penalty in any of the cases.
But despite the claims from Sheinbaum and others in her government, analysts say these transfers are less about Mexico's national security and more about appeasing Donald Trump, who has made going after drug cartels a hallmark policy of his administration – even going so far as to designate several Mexican criminal groups as foreign terrorist organizations.
'I think [Sheinbaum] believes she can depressurize by sending a bunch of narcs that are already in custody … as an offering to placate Washington's thirst for Mexican criminals,' said Tony Payan, a Mexico expert at Rice University's Baker Institute for Public Policy. 'They're simply being put on a plane and offered on a silver platter.'
Sheinbaum said that the expulsion of 26 criminals from organized crime groups including the Jalisco New Generation and Sinaloa cartels was unrelated to efforts to reach a new security agreement with the United States.
Among those handed over to US authorities were Abigael González Valencia, a leader of 'Los Cuinis', a criminal group closely allied with the Jalisco cartel, as well as Roberto Salazar, wanted in connection with the slaying of a Los Angeles county sheriff's deputy in 2008.
'In all of these cases, the extradition or the transfer of these members of organized crime, the decision is for the safety of our country,' she said during a news conference on Wednesday. 'Nor do they have anything to do with the security agreement; they are sovereign decisions taken for the security of our country.'
Security minister Omar García Harfuch echoed her comments, saying the move had been taken to stop convicted criminals from continuing to run their organizations from behind bars.
'This action was taken to prevent the continued ordering of kidnappings, extortion, homicides, and other crimes from prison,' he said.
Sheinbaum has taken numerous other actions to crack down on drug trafficking in an effort to appease the Trump administration, including deploying thousands of troops to the state of Sinaloa, a cartel stronghold, arresting dozens of top-level narcos and seizing large quantities of fentanyl.
But, Sheinbaum still faces increasing pressure from the Trump administration in terms of economic tariffs which would hobble the Mexican economy. Perhaps not coincidentally, the timing of tariff discussions have been closely followed by the transfer of wanted criminals from Mexico to the US.
The transfers in February came as officials in Mexico were attempting to put off the Trump administration's imposition of tariffs on Mexican imports. This latest round of 26 criminal transfers comes just a few weeks after Trump spoke with Sheinbaum and agreed to delay the threatened 30% tariffs for another 90 days.
'At the end of the day Mexico hasn't faced the levels of tariffs that were supposed to take effect because of fentanyl trafficking on February 1st,' said Cecilia Farfán-Méndez, a security analyst at the Global Initiative Against Transnational Organized Crime. 'These types of transfers which for the Mexican government are not necessarily costly are a way of making progress in DC.'
Sheinbaum 'is trying to show Washington that she's pliable, she's cooperative, she is responsive, and she's willing to talk and she's willing to concede', Payan added.
Still, according to Ilan Katz, head of the criminal law commission at the Mexican Bar Association, the claim by security minister Harfuch that these criminals continue to present a threat in Mexico even behind bars is not without merit.
'Narcos in Mexico have had a lot of operational capacity even while in confinement,' he said. 'One of the solutions is to effectively remove any drug trafficker from the country who might have communication with their criminal groups from prison.'
The two mass transfers are also significant in that they are not technically extraditions, but rather the Mexican government simply acting unilaterally without the due process normally required by the justice system to complete an extradition.
'Drug traffickers in Mexico have been able to evade extraditions to the United States through a series of injunctions and suspensions,' said Katz. 'It's the lesser of two evils to send this guy right now and comply with the extradition order rather than to continue keeping him here because of those suspensions.'
But this too is problematic, says Farfán-Méndez, if Mexico is simply exporting its criminals without due process to be dealt with elsewhere.
'It creates questions about whether this represents justice in Mexico,' she said. 'What does it say about our criminal justice system?'
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Daily Mail
9 minutes ago
- Daily Mail
Ex-MSNBC star warns Dems have fallen into Trump's DC crime 'trap'
Longtime MSNBC star Chris Matthews has warned Donald Trump is goading Democrats into 'a trap' with his takeover of the Washington, DC, police force. The retired 'Hardball' host explained how he believes the president is effectively daring members of the party to defend an unacceptable status quo of crime in the municipality. The government in January said violent crime in DC was at a '30-year-low' in 2024, and early statistics from the Metropolitan Police Department suggest similar results can be expected for 2025. Matthews - after leaving MSNBC in 2020 - told Brzezinski: 'I think that the Democrats need to go beyond saying, "No, look at the data, crime is going down,"' 'I feel that is exactly the wrong response politically,' he continued. 'Even if it's true.' With the 2026 midterm elections just over a year away, Matthews, 79, went on to explain more in-depth why he believes progressive relying on statistics showing that crime is decreasing are playing into the president's hands. 'The Democrats are, I agree with you, Mika, they're falling into the trap of defending what's indefensible,' he said, predicting the strategy could soon blow up in Dems' faces, especially when Midterms roll around next year 'I love DC I think it's a beautiful city,' he added separately. '[But you see] signs of homelessness, which is not being treated... You see graffiti, which drives me crazy, because it's right on the most beautiful places, the bridges and all covered in graffiti, and they have to paint it over to cover it up,' 'They don't really get rid of it, it's still there.' He said he believes the issue stems from a divide seen between those who live in 'the suburbs and the rural areas' of big cities like DC still struggling from a pandemic-related spike in crime. 'I think Trump knows that people are afraid to go into big cities, to go to a Phillies game,' Matthews said. 'They talk about it. They don't want to go downtown.' Brzezinski's cohost husband, Joe Scarborough, would have agreed if he were present. He read a text from a 'very liberal' friend who lives in DC on-air Tuesday, to illustrate a similar point. 'He says, "This may sound controversial, but I'm not totally opposed to Trump's National Guard move in D.C. I know he's doing it for politics, but crime remains rampant,"' Scarborough read. '"I've had too many friends carjacked, shot at. None of us will walk more than three blocks after 8 p.m. 13 year-olds are committing many of these crimes. Quite a change from a decade ago, when things were much calmer."' Cooper, on Tuesday, told New York Times correspondent Maggie Haberman that Dems' decision was set to backfire because so many locals of all political persuasions have personally experienced DC's lawlessness. 'It's so interesting,' Cooper he said on the set of Anderson Cooper 360. 'The conflict, you know, Democrats face when talking about the policing in the District of Columbia.' 'Do you point out statistics of out of a 30-year low as they as the statistics show, and thereby sound like you're saying, oh, there's not a crime problem in Washington, DC? Where there's crime problem everywhere.' Haberman, in turn, conceded: 'There is a crime problem everywhere.' The president justified the order by insisting the state of DC constituted a 'crime emergency'. Troops arrived there on Tuesday. The situation remains ongoing. Total violent crime in the District of Columbia decreased 35 percent from 2023 last year, the DOJ said in January. But it continues to be plagued by shocking incidents. Brzezinski, in turn, told Matthews: 'Yes, it's a trap. If it's not a winner politically to say, "Oh, you're wrong, look at the data," because you know if one violent crime happens in a very heavily populated part of the city, people hear about it and it's visceral. 'They don't want it,' she added. 'And they'll gravitate to the person who appears to be doing something about it.' Brzezinski and Scarborough have lived in DC for the past three decades. retired from MSNBC after more than 30 years with the network in March 2020. He lives in a Maryland suburb with his family.
The Guardian
37 minutes ago
- The Guardian
Texas Democrats say they are prepared to return to state after two-week absence
Texas Democrats said on Thursday they are prepared to return to the state under certain conditions, ending a nearly two-week-long effort to block Republicans from passing a new congressional map that would add five GOP seats. The lawmakers said they would return as long as the legislature ends its first special session on Friday, which Republicans have said they plan to do. Texas's governor, Greg Abbott, has said he will immediately call another special session. The Democrats also said they would return once California introduces a new congressional map that would add five Democratic seats, offsetting the gains in Texas. California's governor, Gavin Newsom, is expected to announce what he has teased as a 'major' redistricting announcement on Thursday. Gene Wu, chair of the Texas house Democratic caucus, said in a statement that he and his colleagues 'successfully mobilized the nation against Trump's assault on minority voting rights'. 'Facing threats of arrest, lawfare, financial penalties, harassment and bomb threats, we have stood firm in our fight against a proposed Jim Crow congressional district map,' he said. 'Now, as Democrats across the nation join our fight to cause these maps to fail their political purpose, we're prepared to bring this battle back to Texas under the right conditions and to take this fight to the courts.' Sign up to This Week in Trumpland A deep dive into the policies, controversies and oddities surrounding the Trump administration after newsletter promotion The lawmakers said in a statement that returning to Texas would allow them to build a strong public and legislative record that could be used in legal challenges against the map.
The Independent
38 minutes ago
- The Independent
Social Security has existed for 90 years. Why it may be more threatened than ever
When President Franklin D. Roosevelt signed the Social Security Act into law 90 years ago this week, he said it would provide economic stability to older people while giving the U.S. "an economic structure of vastly greater soundness.' Today, the program provides benefits to almost 69 million Americans each month. It's a major source of income for people older than 65 and is popular across the country and political lines. It also looks more threatened than ever. Just as it has for decades, Social Security faces a looming shortfall in money to pay full benefits. Since President Donald Trump took office in January, the program has faced more tumult. Agency staffing has been slashed. Unions and advocacy groups concerned about sharing sensitive information have sued. Administration officials, including the president, have falsely claimed that millions of dead people were receiving Social Security benefits. Former top adviser Elon Musk said the program was a potential ' Ponzi scheme." At an Oval Office event Thursday commemorating the program's anniversary, Trump said 'Social Security will be great again' under his watch and that 'you have my commitment.' But the president and Republicans who control Congress have not proposed a long-term solution to shore up the program. Social Security remains far from the sound economic system that Roosevelt envisioned, due to changes made — and not made — under both Democratic and Republican presidents. Here's a look at past and current challenges to Social Security, the proposed solutions and what it could take to shore up the program. The go-broke date has been moved up The so-called go-broke date — or the date at which Social Security will no longer have enough funds to pay full benefits — has been moved up to 2034, instead of last year's estimate of 2035. After that point, Social Security would only be able to pay 81% of benefits, according to an annual report released in June. The earlier date came as new legislation affecting Social Security benefits have contributed to earlier projected depletion dates, the report concluded. The Social Security Fairness Act, signed into law by Democratic President Joe Biden and enacted in January, had an impact. It repealed the Windfall Elimination and Government Pension Offset provisions, increasing Social Security benefit levels for former public workers. The new tax law signed by Trump in July will accelerate the insolvency of Social Security, said Brendan Duke at the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. 'They haven't laid out an idea to fix it yet," he said. Trump said Thursday, repeating the claim that his new tax and spending law will eliminate taxes on federal Social Security benefits. That law has a temporary tax deduction for people 65 and over that applies to all income, not just Social Security. But not all Social Security beneficiaries can claim it; among those who cannot are low-income older adults who do not pay taxes on Social Security. AARP CEO Myechia Minter-Jordan said the number of beneficiaries is set to increase to 82 million people by the time Social Security turns 100. 'As we look ahead to the next 90 years of Social Security, it's critical that it remains strong for generations to come,' she said in a statement. The privatization conversation has been revived The notion of privatizing Social Security surfaced most recently when Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent this month said new tax-deferred investment accounts dubbed ' Trump accounts ' may serve as a ' backdoor to privatization," though Treasury has walked back those comments. The public has been widely against the idea of privatizing Social Security since Republican President George W. Bush embarked on a campaign to pitch privatization of the program in 2005, through voluntary personal retirement accounts. The plan was not well-received by the public. Glenn Hubbard, a Columbia University professor and top economist in Bush's White House, told The Associated Press that Social Security needs to be reduced in size in order to maintain benefits for generations to come. He supports limiting benefits for wealthy retirees. 'We will have to make a choice," Hubbard said. 'If you want Social Security benefits to look like they are today, we're going to have to raise everyone's taxes a lot. And if that's what people want, that's a menu, and you pay the high price and you move on." Another option would be to increase minimum benefits and slow down benefit growth for everyone else, which Hubbard said would right the ship without requiring big tax increases, if it's done over time. 'It's really a political choice,' he said, adding 'Neither one of those is pain free." Nancy Altman, president of Social Security Works, an advocacy group for the preservation of Social Security benefits, is more worried that the administration of benefits could be privatized under Trump, rather than a move toward privatized accounts. The agency cut more than 7,000 from its workforce this year as part of the Department of Government Efficiency's effort to reduce the size of the government. A Social Security Administration representative didn't respond to a request for comment. Concerns persist An Associated Press-NORC Center for Public Affairs Research poll conducted in April found that an increasing share of older Americans — particularly Democrats — support the program but aren't confident the benefit will be available to them when they retire. 'So much of what we hear is that its running out of money,' said Becky Boober, 70, from Rockport, Maine, who recently retired after decades in public service. She relies on Social Security to keep her finances afloat, is grateful for the program and thinks it should be expanded. 'In my mind there are several easy fixes that are not a political stretch,' she said. They include raising the income tax cap on high-income earners and possibly raising the retirement age, which is currently 67 for people born after 1960, though she is less inclined to support that change. Some call for shrinking the program Rachel Greszler is a senior research fellow at the Heritage Foundation, the group behind the Project 2025 blueprint for Trump's second term. It called for an increase in the retirement age. Greszler says Social Security no longer serves its intended purpose of being a social safety net for low-income older adults and is far too large. She supports pursuing privatization, which includes allowing retirees to put their Social Security taxes into a personal investment account. She also argues for shrinking the program to a point where every retiree would receive the same Social Security benefit so long as they worked the same number of years, which she argues would increase benefits for the bottom one-third of earners. How this would impact middle-class earners is unclear.
