
Trump tariffs: Where do we stand after new levies unveiled – DW – 08/01/2025
In his election campaign, Donald Trump once said that "tariff is the most beautiful word in the dictionary." Now, after six months in office, the US president is eager to turn his very specific vision of global trade into reality.
With a move that shocked both politics and business across the world, Trump announced on April 2 that he would impose a "baseline tariff" of 10% on all goods imported to the United States.
In addition, goods from about 60 other trade partners would face so-called reciprocal tariffs that were even higher and meant as payback for the unfair trade policies of what Trump called "the worst offenders."
However, on July 31 Trump signed an executive order again imposing new, and even higher tariffs on scores of countries, citing emergency powers he said he is using to shrink the country's trade deficits with many of its trade partners.
The executive order lays out rates to be applied against nearly 70 countries, ranging from 10% to 41% for goods transshipped through other jurisdictions to avoid US duties.
In a minor reprieve that opens the door to further negotiations, the White House said the measures will take effect next week for most countries.
The order came after a flurry of tariff-related activity in previous weeks that saw some countries strike more favorable terms for trade with the US.On July 27, the US and the European Union agreed that European goods imported to the US would face a 15% baseline tariff. This includes the EU's crucial automobile sector, which had been subject to a 25% levy since Trump took office earlier in January.
By contrast, the EU will charge US firms no duties at all, and has pledged to buy US energy worth $750 billion (€656 billion), as well as make investments in the US of around $600 billion, according to the White House.
The agreement, which still needs to be signed off by all 27 EU members, has already come under strong criticism. French Prime Minister Francois Bayrou said this week the EU had capitulated, describing Sunday as a "dark day."
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
The United Kingdom was the first country to strike a trade deal with Washington in May.
British products will be subject to a 10% base rate, with exceptions for some industries. The UK is still negotiating exemptions for its steel and aluminium products from the 25% rate in force. In return, the UK had to open its market further to US ethanol and beef.
Under a deal struck in July, Japan's exports to the US will be taxed at 15%, including automobiles, an industry accounting for 30% of Japanese exports to the US in 2024.
Tariffs of 50% on Japanese steel and aluminium will continue to apply and the White House said that under the deal, Japan would make an unspecified $550 billion investments in the US.
With regard to South Korea, recent negotiations have resulted in a 15% baseline tariff on all imports from that country — down from a threatened 25% for one of the US's top-10 trading partner and key Asian ally.
Trump said Wednesday that South Korea had also agreed to invest $350 billion in US projects and to purchase $100 billion of liquefied natural gas and other energy products.
Furthermore, South Korea will accept American products, including automobiles and agricultural goods into its markets and impose no import duties on them, he added.
Washington has also concluded trade deals with the Philippines, Vietnam, Indonesia and Pakistan.
Products from the Philippines — a major exporter of high-tech items and apparel — will face a 19% levy. Vietnam was able to lower a threatened reciprocal tariff of 49% under a deal reached in early July. A main exporter of clothing and shoes to the US, Vietnam will see its shipments subject to a 20% tariff.
Indonesian exports to the US will be taxed at 19% and, according to Washington, nearly all US goods will be able to enter Indonesia tariff-free.
Pakistan, which was facing a potential 29% tariff under Trump's April 2 announcement, said Thursday it had struck a deal that would result in lower tariffs, as well as an agreement in which Washington would help develop the country's oil reserves.
To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video
China — the world's second-largest economy — is a special case. Washington and Beijing had raised tariffs on each other's goods to more than 100% before temporarily lowering rates for a 90-day period. That pause is set to end on August 12.
China has taken an aggressive stance in response to Trump's brief threat of imposing a 145% levy on imports, retaliating with tariffs of its own on US goods and blocking the sale of vital rare earth minerals and components used by American defense and high-tech manufacturers.
Countries without bilateral trade agreements will soon face reciprocal tariffs ranging from 25% to 50%, with a baseline of 15% to 20% for any not making a deal.
Among the tariff levels adjusted in Trump's latest order, Switzerland now faces a higher 39% duty. The Swiss government said Friday it would negotiate to avoid the higher levy, which will potentially hammer its key pharmaceutical industry. The new rate is up from the 31% previously threatened.
Brazil is one of the few major economies to run a trade deficit with the United States, meaning Brazil imports more from the US than it exports to the country.
Nevertheless, the US president has threatened to impose a 50% tariff on Brazil's products because of political differences. Trump called a current trial against former Brazilian President Jair Bolsonaro a "witch hunt," and has demanded the release of the ultraconservative politician.
Brazil's current president, Luiz Inacio Lula da Silva, has in turn called Trump an "emperor" and said he didn't fear publicly criticizing Trump.
India, meanwhile, has drawn Trump's ire for its huge trade surplus with the US and its trade ties with Russia.
As a result, Trump announced on Wednesday that he would impose a 25% tariff on Indian goods, plus an additional "penalty" because of India's purchase of Russian oil that helps Moscow finance its war in Ukraine.
On his Truth Social platform, Trump also wrote that India "is our friend," but added its tariffs on US products "are far too high."
Canada and Mexico — two of the US' biggest trading partners — haven't been spared Trump's tariff threats either, even though trade between the three neighbors is governed by the US-Mexico-Canada (USMCA) trade agreement, negotiated during Trump's first term in office.
Earlier this month, Trump threatened to raise current tariffs on Mexico from 25% to 30% starting on Aug. 1, saying President Claudia Sheinbaum's government hadn't done enough to help secure their shared border.
Many goods certified under the USMCA free-trade pact, however, have remained exempt.
On Thursday, the US president extended Mexico's current rates for 90 days to allow more time for trade negotiations.
"The complexities of a Deal with Mexico are somewhat different than other Nations because of both the problems, and assets, of the Border, Trump said in a Truth Social post, following a call with Sheinbaum.
On Thursday, the US president singled out Canada for a separate tariff hike raising levies for goods from the country fom 25% to 35% starting on Aug. 1.
Trump also warned of more trade consequences for Canada after Prime Minister Mark Carney announced plans to recognize a Palestinian state. Trump's order also cited Canada's failure to "cooperate in curbing the ongoing flood of fentanyl and other illicit drugs" as well as its "retaliation" against his measures.
In March, Washington already imposed a 25% tariff on Canadian cars and auto parts, adding a 50% levy on steel and aluminium imports in June.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


DW
2 hours ago
- DW
Ukraine: Kyiv says it hit Russian oil, military facilities – DW – 08/02/2025
Ukraine says it has struck some key oil and military facilities on Russian territory. A blaze that broke out near the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Plant after Ukrainian shelling has been brought under control. DW has the latest. Ukraine's military says it has hit key infrastructure inside Russia, including a significant oil refinery. Kyiv also says it struck a military airfield used for drones and an electronics factory. A fire that broke out near the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant after Ukrainian shelling has been brought under control, according to Russian authorities. Meanwhile, the has reported that Indian government sources have revealed there are no plans to stop buying oil from Russia. This is despite US President Donald Trump's threats to impose penalties on will keep purchasing oil from Russia despite US President Donald Trump's threats of penalties. This is according to two Indian government sources and reported on by the Reuters news agency, via the. "These are long-term oil contracts," Reuters reported one of the sources as saying. "It is not so simple to just stop buying overnight." Trump last month suggested on social media that India would face additional penalties for purchases of Russian arms and oil. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video A fire that broke out near the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant after Ukrainian shelling has subsided after being brought under control, the Moscow-installed administration of the Russian-held plant in Ukraine said on Saturday. Russia seized the Zaporizhzhia plant in the first weeks of its full-scale invasion of Ukraine, which got underway in February 2022. Since Moscow took the plant, both sides have accused each other of firing or taking other measures that could increases the danger of a nuclear accident. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Ukraine said it had struck infrastructure within Russia, including a major oil refinery as well as a military airfield for drones and an electronics factory. Ukraine's Unmanned Systems Forces (USF) said the military had hit the refinery in Ryazan, some 180 kilometers (110 miles) southeast of Moscow. The attack sparked a fire on its premises. The USF said it also hit the Annanefteprodukt oil storage facility in the Voronezh region. Elsewhere, the Ukrainian SBU intelligence agency said its drones had hit Russia's Primorsko-Akhtarsk military airfield. The airbase has been used to launch waves of long-range drones at targets in Ukraine. The SBU said it also struck a plant in Penza. According to the intelligence agency, the factory supplies Moscow's military-industrial complex with electronics. Ukraine's military said Saturday that it had hit key infrastructure inside Russia, including a significant oil refinery, as well as a military airfield used for drones, and an electronics factory. Mwanwhile, a fire broke out near the Zaporizhzhia Nuclear Power Plant after Ukrainian shelling, before being brought under control. According to the , Indian government sources have revealed there are no plans to stop buying oil from Russia. This is despite US President Donald Trump's threats to impose penalties on New Delhi.


DW
3 hours ago
- DW
German government takes tougher tone with Israel – DW – 08/02/2025
Germany's foreign minister visited Jerusalem on Friday and insisted that more aid be let into Gaza. Despite the tough talk, experts say it's unlikely there will be any consequences if Israel doesn't do as Germany asks. After his talks with Israeli President Benjamin Netanyahu and representatives from the United Nations in Jerusalem, German Foreign Minister Johann Wadephul tried to put more pressure on the Israeli government. On Friday he made an urgent appeal to the Israelis: The government should immediately allow the UN to help the hungry people in Gaza. "That is why we call on Israel to allow the UN to transport and distribute the aid safely," Wadephul said, while in Jerusalem. "This was also part of my discussion with the Israeli government yesterday. The humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip must be ended now, with the help of the efficient, established UN system." The day before Wadephul had described the situation in Gaza in dramatic tones. The death and suffering there was "unimaginable," he said. Wadephul also appealed to the militant group Hamas, asking them to stop fighting and to return all the hostages they still held. Hamas is classified as a terrorist organization by Germany, the US, Israel and other countries. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Israel's foreign minister Gideon Saar didn't publicly express an opinion on Germany's suggestions. But Wadephul told reporters he thought Germany's message had been understood. Saar did reject accusations from his colleague in the Israeli government, the far-right extremist Itamar Ben-Gvir, Israel's minister of national security. On social media platform X, Ben-Gvir said that 80 years after the Holocaust, Germany was once again supporting Nazis. Before he left Germany, Wadephul had warned that Israel was becoming increasingly isolated internationally. He also said Berlin would respond to any unilateral actions by Israel and was critical of potential Israeli plans to annex the occupied West Bank. Israel's Saar answered Ben-Gvir on social media too. "I strongly reject Minister Ben-Gvir's statements about Germany. They are unnecessary and harmful. Germany is a friendly country and Foreign Minister Wadephul is a friend of Israel. This does not change, even when there are differences of opinion between us." Germany is still pushing for a two-state solution to the intractable problems in the Middle East. Wadephul confirmed the right of the Palestinians to their own state after he met with Palestinian President Mahmoud Abbas on Friday. However Netanyahu's government has rejected that idea in the recent past. Even as Germany criticizes the expansion of Israeli settlements in the West Bank, Israel's foreign minister sees the settlements as justified. German Chancellor Friedrich Merz had sent Wadephul to Israel after a meeting of the country's so-called security cabinet. This group includes the ministers of foreign affairs, defense, interior and finance, as well as various intelligence services. Wadephul's mission was to make it clear that the humanitarian crisis in Gaza must be resolved and he was also to assess whether and how the Israeli government could be convinced to do this. Over this weekend, he is to report back to the Chancellor and the security cabinet. The results of this are hard to predict. Whether the German government would use sanctions against Israel, stop weapons deliveries or recognize a Palestinian state is unclear. However observers in Berlin says it's unlikely any concrete steps will be taken, because of Germany's special responsibility towards Israel, after committing the Holocaust. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Criticism is likely but sanctions won't happen, says Martin Huber, the secretary general of the conservative, Bavaria-based Christian Social Union, or CSU. Even so, the tone German politicians are using is becoming sharper, as more and more pictures of starving children in Gaza emerge. The leader of the Social Democrats' parliamentary group, Dirk Wiese, told local journalists that the time for talk has passed. "We need political pressure and concrete progress," he said. The Social Democrats are part of Germany's governing coalition together with the CSU and the Christian Democratic Union, or CDU. Up until now the German government has been holding back, Andreas Reinicke, the director of the German Orient-Institute, told public radio Deutschlandfunk. But that's for good reasons, he argued, in reference to the Holocaust. However if the world now really wants a two-state solution, "then we will have to do this not only verbally, but also with an active process," Reinicke said. "I believe Germany's influence [on Israel] is greater than is commonly assumed." Meanwhile the Israeli government disputes that locals in Gaza are going hungry and insists that the siltation is actually better than depicted in the international press. Foreign Minister Saar accused media of showing misleading pictures of hungry children. "This is what a modern blood libel looks like," he wrote on social media platform X, referring to a-now-well-known picture of Osama al-Raqab, an emaciated 5-year-old. Al-Raqab has cystic fibrosis and was evacuated to Italy in June, Saar pointed out. The Israeli government's position on the issue is in opposition to what international aid agencies have observed and eyewitnesses have reported. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Wadephul also said that the thesis often insisted upon by the Israeli government — that Hamas will benefit from any aid shipments they allow in — is no longer justified. It could well be that Hamas previously diverted some of the shipments, he said. "But the humanitarian catastrophe in the Gaza Strip is now so great that it is not justified to put up further hurdles here," Wadephul insisted. Another contentious point: While the German foreign minister and others argue that the UN and the World Food Program should be taking care of supplies into Gaza, Israel and its main ally, the US, insist the newly created and increasingly controversial Gaza Humanitarian Foundation, or GHF should be. On Friday, Steve Witkoff, the US special envoy to the Middle East, demonstratively visited a GHF aid distribution site near Rafah, in Gaza. The US ambassador in Israel, Mike Huckabee, claims the GHF has given out 100 million meals in two months. However the UN and other aid organizations say the GHF is not working properly. During past weeks, there have been reports of hundreds of people killed or wounded while trying to get aid from the GHF. On Friday, the German air force began to help, dropping palettes of aid into the Gaza Strip, flying out of Jordan. However even Germany's foreign minister considers this more a symbolic than anything particularly helpful. The crucial thing now is to send hundreds of trucks carrying food into the Gaza Strip daily, Wadephul said while in view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video


DW
6 hours ago
- DW
Inside the EU's stalled plan to penalize Israel – DW – 08/02/2025
For the first time ever, EU officials have threatened to restrict Israeli access to research funds over its conduct in Gaza. But the move is still under review, and many say it is too little, too late as famine looms. Something changed in Brussels over the last few days: After more than a year and a half of urging Israel to end bombardments and blockades of Gaza, the EU took a step toward backing its words with action. "The mood has hardened significantly," one EU diplomat who asked not to be named told DW. With the United Nations warning of a "grave risk of famine" in Gaza, the EU's executive — for the first time — has proposed penalizing Israel by barring Israeli startups from accessing some EU research funds. "With its intervention in the Gaza Strip and the ensuing humanitarian catastrophe, including thousands of civilian deaths and rapidly rising numbers of spreading extreme malnutrition specifically of children, Israel is violating human rights and humanitarian law and thus is in breach of an essential principle of ... EU-Israel cooperation," the European Commission wrote in its proposal on Monday. But the plan isn't over the line yet. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video The new proposal hit a hurdle immediately after reached the EU's 27 capitals. Some states, including Germany, were asking for more time to asses the plan, EU diplomats told DW. And without Berlin's backing, the plan is unlikely to advance. On Monday, Israel's Foreign Ministry called Brussels' proposal "unjustified" and claimed any such punitive measures would only serve to "strengthen Hamas." Oxfam's Bushra Khalidi told DW there is now "clearly growing pressure within some pockets of the [EU] Commission, backed by some EU countries, to shift course" toward taking action on Israel. "But let's be clear," she added. "The fact that the EU cannot even agree on the smallest step is a disgrace. The bar is on the floor, and yet the EU and some EU countries are still managing to trip over it." Ever since the militant group's attacks on October 7, 2023, the EU has been united in its condemnation of Hamas — classed as a terrorist organization by the bloc — and in its call for the release of Israeli hostages. Beyond that, however, every statement on the EU's ties with Israel has been fiercely debated across a deeply divided bloc. On one end of the spectrum, there are countries like Spain and Ireland. Since February 2024, Madrid and Dublin have been calling for an "urgent review" into Israeli compliance with the agreement that governs its trade and relations with the EU. On the other end, Hungary is seen as Israel's staunchest EU ally, and has been blocking any measures requiring bloc-wide backing. This includes sanctions on a handful of violent Israeli settlers — in contrast to the UK, an ex-EU member, which approved a similar measure months ago. Berlin has also been seen as a strong Israeli ally. Germany views itself as having a historic responsibility toward Israeli security, due to its Nazi past and its systemic murder of six million Jews during the Holocaust. While the EU remains divided on Israel, first signs of a diplomatic shift came in May of this year, when most of the bloc's 27 members backed Spain and Ireland's year-and-a-half old call to review Israel's compliance with the EU association agreement. The Netherlands was among countries which switched camps and prompted the turning point. Germany stuck to its position and warned against the review, urging dialogue instead. However, Berlin was overruled and the investigation went ahead. The review pointed to a series of suspected Israeli breaches, from blocking aid entry to Gaza and attacking hospitals and journalists, to expanding illegal settlements. In a letter seen by DW, Israel blasted the review as a "moral and methodological failure," claiming the UN reports the review was based on were "anything but impartial." But the EU executive stood by its findings and in June, most EU states asked the bloc's officials to draw up a list of possible punitive measures. According to a leaked internal document seen by DW, that list includes halting visa-free travel for Israeli citizens, restricting student exchanges, banning imports from illegal settlements, and sanctioning some Israeli ministers. Some of the measures — such as sanctions — would require unanimous EU support. Others — such as trade restrictions — only require a rubber-stamp from a weighted majority of EU governments. However, even those measures would need to be endorsed from at least a few of the EU's most populous states — Germany, France, Italy, Spain and Poland. Armed with these potential options, the EU's top diplomat Kaja Kallas held talks with her Israeli counterpart — and announced what seemed like a breakthrough just days before EU ministers were due to discuss punitive measures. "Significant steps have been agreed by Israel to improve the humanitarian situation in the Gaza Strip," Kallas said in a statement on July 10. Germany also helped broker the so-called "common understanding." EU officials said Israel's commitments included facilitating a "substantial increase" in trucks entering Gaza and reopening some aid routes. When EU ministers met on July 15, they decided not to advance any steps against Israel, instead asking for regular reports on its compliance with the new deal. Israel's foreign minister called that outcome "an important diplomatic success." "We managed to fend off all types of obsessive attempts by several countries to impose sanctions on Israel in the EU," Gideon Sa'ar wrote on X later that day. But as the month of July went on and warnings of starvation mounted, Brussels' diplomacy option looked less and less effective. "There has been some progress," the EU's humanitarian aid chief Hadja Lahbib said on Friday in a post on X. "But let's be honest: it's still a drop in the ocean. Without access, we cannot properly assess needs or deliver aid." The Israeli government told DW it has "begun implementing significant measures to facilitate humanitarian aid," including "humanitarian pauses," and designating "secure routes" for food delivery. The statement blames the UN and Hamas for the crisis and claims there is "no starvation" in Gaza — despite aid groups' evidence to the contrary. But most European governments say Israeli measures fall far short. Some states including Sweden, the Netherlands and Spain are now openly calling for the EU to go much further and freeze its trade deal with Israel. That would make it more expensive and difficult for Israeli firms to export goods to the EU — Israel's biggest trading partner. "The situation in Gaza is utterly deplorable, and Israel is not fulfilling its most basic obligations and agreed-upon commitments regarding humanitarian aid," Swedish Prime Minister Ulf Kristersson wrote on X on Thursday. "Economic pressure on Israel must increase," he added. To view this video please enable JavaScript, and consider upgrading to a web browser that supports HTML5 video Restricting trade is a power that lies with the EU's executive in Brussels, meaning national governments can't take matters into their own hands. But individual EU states have taken other decisions to pile pressure on Benjamin Netanyahu's government. Several countries including Spain and Belgium have restricted arms exports to Israel. And with EU-level sanctions looking unlikely, Slovenia and the Netherlands have also banned two far-right Israeli ministers from entering their territory earlier this month, accusing them of promoting "ethnic cleansing." In a visit to Israel on Thursday, Germany's foreign minister warned his Israeli counterpart that he risked isolation. Capitals across Europe watched the visit carefully — because any shift in Germany's approach could determine whether planned EU penalties will kick in, or remain an empty threat.