FAA, NTSB investigate after two Washington flights abort landings due to nearby army helicopter
A mid-air collision of an American Airlines regional jet and an Army helicopter killed 67 people in January 2025. PHOTO: REUTERS
- US federal investigators have launched a probe after two flights aborted landings at Reagan Washington National Airport, or DCA, on May 1 because a US Army Black Hawk helicopter was too close.
The Federal Aviation Administration (FAA) said on May 2 that air traffic control told Delta Air Lines Flight 1671, an Airbus A319 that had originated in Orlando, and Republic Airways Flight 5825, an Embraer 170 that had departed from Boston, to perform go-arounds at around 2.30pm due to a priority military air transport helicopter in the vicinity.
The National Transportation Safety Board (NTSB) and the US Army are also investigating.
'While conducting flight operations into the Pentagon in accordance with published FAA flight routes and DCA Air Traffic Control, a UH-60 Black Hawk was directed by Pentagon Air Traffic Control to conduct a 'go-around', overflying the Pentagon helipad in accordance with approved flight procedures,' the US Army said in a statement.
'As a result, DCA Air Traffic Control issued a 'go-around' to two civil fixed wing aircraft to ensure the appropriate de-confliction of airspace.'
Following a Jan 29 mid-air collision of an American Airlines regional jet and an Army Black Hawk that killed 67 people, the FAA imposed permanent restrictions on non-essential helicopter operations around Reagan National Airport.
The FAA told Congress it was reviewing the army helicopter's route in the two 'loss of separation' incidents on May 1 and whether the route violates an agreement with the Army.
'It appears the Black Hawk operation did not proceed directly to the Pentagon Heliport. Instead it took a scenic route around the Pentagon versus proceeding directly from the west to the heliport,' the FAA memo seen by Reuters said.
Senate Commerce Committee chair Ted Cruz said 'the army is once again putting the travelling public at risk… It's time for the FAA to act swiftly and assert control over the national airspace, so the army stops running air taxis for military officials near Ronald Reagan Washington National Airport'.
Transportation Secretary Sean Duffy said the army had disregarded helicopter safety rules.
'No more helicopter rides for VIPs or unnecessary training in a congested DCA airspace full of civilians. Take a taxi or Uber – besides, most VIPs have black car service,' Mr Duffy said.
Delta said there were five crew and 97 passengers on the flight.
'Nothing is more important at Delta than the safety of our customers and people. We'll cooperate with the FAA as they investigate,' the airline said on May 2.
The Pentagon did not immediately comment.
A person involved said investigators are reviewing the helicopter's route and interactions with air traffic control.
A US official, speaking on the condition of anonymity, said that according to initial information, the military helicopter was doing an emergency evacuation rehearsal.
'It is outrageous that only three months after an army Black Hawk helicopter tragically collided with a passenger jet, the same army brigade again flew a helicopter too close to passenger jets on final approach at (Reagan Washington),' Senator Maria Cantwell, the top Democrat on the Commerce Committee, said.
'This comes less than a week after this brigade resumed flights in the National Capital Region. It is far past time for Secretary Hegseth and the FAA to give our airspace the security and safety attention it deserves.'
Republic Airways did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
The airport is located in northern Virginia, just outside Washington and about 6.4km from Capitol Hill, making it popular with lawmakers, tourists and local residents.
The FAA in March permanently closed one key route and prohibited the use of two smaller runways at the airport when helicopters conducting urgent missions are operating near the airport.
Since 2021, there have been 85 recorded events involving a potentially dangerous near-miss between a helicopter and a plane – defined as a lateral separation of less than 460m and a vertical separation of less than 60m, the National Transportation Safety Board said in March.
A number of recent safety incidents at the airport have raised alarm, including a March 28 incident involving a Delta flight and a group of Air Force jets.
Airlines for America, a group representing American Airlines and other US carriers, in March urged the FAA to permanently reduce helicopter traffic around the airport.
The group called on the FAA to suspend some nearby helicopter routes, with limited exceptions for essential military or medical emergencies.
The army has also come under fire for routinely turning off a key safety system known as ADS-B during training missions in the Washington area.
The FAA is investigating helicopter traffic near other major airports and last week announced changes to address safety concerns in Las Vegas. REUTERS
Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Straits Times
14 hours ago
- Straits Times
Trump signs orders to bolster US drone defences, boost supersonic flight
Mr Trump sought to enable routine use of drones beyond the visual sight of operators and reduce US reliance on Chinese drone companies. PHOTO: BLOOMBERG WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump on June 6 signed executive orders to bolster US defences against threatening drones and to boost electric air taxis and supersonic commercial aircraft, the White House said. In the three executive orders, Mr Trump sought to enable routine use of drones beyond the visual sight of operators - a key step to enabling commercial drone deliveries - and reduce US reliance on Chinese drone companies as well as advance testing electric vertical takeoff and landing aircraft. The order should boost eVTOL firms including Joby Aviation and Archer Aviation. Mr Trump is establishing a federal task force to ensure US control over American skies, expand restrictions over sensitive sites, expand federal use of technology to detect drones in real time and provide assistance to state and local law enforcement. Mr Trump also aims to address the 'growing threat of criminal terrorists and foreign misuse of drones in US airspace,' said Mr Michael Kratsios, director of the White House Office of Science and Technology Policy. 'We are securing our borders from national security threats, including in the air, with large-scale public events such as the Olympics and the World Cup on the horizon.' The National Football League praised the executive order, saying it was critical to protecting fans. 'Over the past several years, an increasing number of drones have flown into restricted airspace during our games. This executive order is the most significant step taken to address the issue,' the NFL said, adding Congress should also take action. Mr Sebastian Gorka, senior director of counterterrorism at the National Security Council, cited the use of drones in Russia's war in Ukraine and threats to major US sporting events. 'We will be increasing counter-drone capabilities and capacities,' Mr Gorka said. 'We will increase the enforcement of current laws to deter two types of individuals: evildoers and idiots.' The issue of suspicious drones also gained significant attention in 2024 after a flurry of drone sightings in New Jersey. The Federal Aviation Administration receives more than 100 drone-sighting reports near airports each month. Drone sightings have at times disrupted flights and sporting events. Mr Trump also directed the FAA to lift a ban imposed in 1973 on supersonic air transport over land. Supersonic aircraft have been criticised by environmentalists for burning more fuel per passenger than comparable subsonic planes. 'The reality is that Americans should be able to fly from New York to LA in under four hours,' Mr Kratsios said. 'Advances in aerospace engineering, material science and noise reduction now make overland supersonic flight not just possible, but safe, sustainable and commercially viable.' The order directs FAA to repeal the supersonic speed limit as long as aircraft do not produce an audible sonic boom on the ground. Airplane manufacturer Boom Supersonic welcomed the move. Its CEO, Mr Blake Scholl, said: 'The supersonic race is on and a new era of commercial flight can begin.' The era of regular commercial supersonic flights ended in 2003 when Concorde, flown by Air France and British Airways, was retired after 27 years of service. The Trump orders do not ban any Chinese drone company, officials said. In 2024, former President Joe Biden signed legislation that could ban China-based DJI and Autel Robotics from selling new drone models in the US. DJI, the world's largest drone manufacturer, sells more than half of all US commercial drones. REUTERS Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
Straits Times
28-05-2025
- Straits Times
Trump is getting the military parade he wanted in his first term
US President Donald Trump will be getting a military parade on his birthday, which is also the Army's birthday parade. PHOTO: AFP Trump is getting the military parade he wanted in his first term WASHINGTON – In President Donald Trump's first term, the Pentagon opposed his desire for a military parade in Washington, wanting to keep the armed forces out of politics. But in Mr Trump's second term, that guardrail has vanished. There will be a parade this year, and on the president's 79th birthday, no less. The current plan involves a tremendous scene in the centre of Washington: 28 M1A1 Abrams tanks; 28 Stryker armored personnel carriers; more than 100 other vehicles; a World War II-era B-25 bomber; 6,700 soldiers; 50 helicopters; 34 horses; two mules; and a dog. But critics say it is another example of how Mr Trump has politicised the military. The Army estimates the cost at US$25 million (S$32.2 million) to US$45 million. But it could be higher because the Army has promised to fix any city streets that the parade damages, plus the cost of cleanup and police are not yet part of the estimate. While US$45 million is a tiny fraction of Mr Trump's proposed Pentagon budget of US$1.01 trillion for fiscal year 2026, it comes as the administration seeks to slash funding for education, health and public assistance. 'It's a lot of money,' the Army spokesperson Steve Warren acknowledged. 'But I think that amount of money is dwarfed by 250 years of service and sacrifice by America's Army.' The Army is not calling the event a birthday parade for Mr Trump. It is the Army's birthday parade. The Continental Army was officially formed on June 14, 1775, so June 14 will mark 250 years. That also happens to be Mr Trump's birthday. There was no big parade in Washington back when the Army turned 200 in 1975, when Vietnam War scars were still raw. While smaller commemorations were held at Army bases around the country, complete with dinner dances, barbershop quartets and cake cutting, few people were looking to glorify the military so soon after the Kent State shootings. Besides, the country was gearing up for big bicentennial celebrations in 2026 . If things were going to be similarly low-key this time around, Fort Myer, across the Potomac in Arlington, Virginia, might be an ideal location, 'where the Old Guard could march with some veterans,' said Senator Jack Reed of Rhode Island, the leading Democrat on the Armed Services Committee, in a reference to the 3rd Infantry Regiment, the Army's oldest active duty infantry unit. 'But this is Trump,' Mr Reed added, speaking to reporters last week at the Defence Writers Group. 'It's consistent with so much of what he's doing.' Army officials say the parade will cross in front of Mr Trump's viewing stand on Constitution Avenue, near the White House, on the evening of Saturday, June 14, part of a big bash on the National Mall. There will be marching troops who will be housed in two government buildings, officials say. They will sleep on military cots and bring their own sleeping bags, a topic of much merriment on late-night television. There will be Paladins, the huge self-propelled howitzers, and nods to vintage style. Army officials want to outfit some troops in uniforms from the wars of long ago, like the one in 1812 or the Spanish-American War. For more than two years, the Army has been planning national, global and even interstellar aspects of the celebration – an Army astronaut on the International Space Station will be phoning in, Mr Warren said. But those planned celebrations focused on festivals, a postal stamp, various fun runs, military bands and the like. At some point this year, Army officials said, a military parade in Washington appeared in the plans. Still, officials say there are no plans at the moment to sing 'Happy Birthday' to Mr Trump, or to the Army, during the parade. One plan does, however, call for paratroopers from the Golden Knights, the Army parachute team, to land amid the festivities and hand Mr Trump a flag. In 2017 during his first term, Mr Trump watched the Bastille Day parade in Paris with President Emmanuel Macron of France and returned home wanting his own. But the Trump 1.0 Pentagon shut him down. Mr Jim Mattis, the defence secretary at the time, said he would 'rather swallow acid', according to 'Holding the Line', a book by Guy Snodgrass, Mr Mattis' former speechwriter. 'We're all aware in this country of the president's affection and respect for the military,' Mr Mattis said tersely when reporters asked about Mr Trump's wishes. 'We have been putting together some options. We will send them up to the White House for decision.' General Paul J. Selva, then the vice-chair of the Joint Chiefs of Staff, told Mr Trump during a meeting at the Pentagon that military parades were 'what dictators do', according to 'The Divider', by Peter Baker, a New York Times reporter, and Ms Susan Glasser. When Mr Mattis was gone, Mr Trump brought up the idea again. Mr Mattis' successor, Mr Mark T. Esper, responded with an 'air parade' as part of July 4 celebrations in 2020, Pentagon officials said. An array of fighter jets and other warplanes flew down the East Coast over cities that played roles in the American Revolution, including Boston, New York and Philadelphia. Officials in Mr Trump's first Defence Department resisted his parade suggestion – it was never a direct order – because they viewed it as putting the military in the middle of politics, something the Pentagon historically has been loath to do. But now Mr Trump has Defence Secretary Pete Hegseth and military leaders who have been more willing to put his musings into action. This 'raises the question, 'Is the US military celebrating Trump?'' said Dr Risa Brooks , an associate professor of political science at Marquette University. 'Having tanks rolling down streets of the capital doesn't look like something consistent with the tradition of a professional, highly capable military,' Prof Brooks said in an interview. 'It looks instead like a military that is politicised and turning inwardly, focusing on domestic oriented adversaries instead of external ones.' There have been big American military parades in the past, but the last one was almost 35 years ago, to commemorate the end of the first Gulf War. Military parades in the United States have traditionally followed the end of major conflicts, such as the Civil War and the two World Wars. There were also military parades during three presidential inaugurations during the Cold War. And small-town festivities also sometimes commemorate the military with a few armored vehicles and troops. 'I don't actually see the problem with a military parade,' said Dr Kori Schake , a former defence official in the George W. Bush administration who directs foreign and defense policy studies at the American Enterprise Institute. Dr Schake said more Americans need to see the troops who serve the country. 'If seeing our fellow Americans in uniform encourages public knowledge and connection, or inspires volunteering, it would be beneficial,' she said. At the end of the day, 'the military won't die on this hill even if they do not like it,' said Dr Peter Feaver , a political-science professor at Duke University who has studied the military for decades. 'Trump's 2.0 team is better at giving the president what he wants whether or not it is best in the long run.' NYTIMES Join ST's Telegram channel and get the latest breaking news delivered to you.
CNA
27-05-2025
- CNA
SpaceX hoping for clean Starship test flight after two explosive failures
STARBASE, Texas : Starship, the futuristic SpaceX rocket vehicle on which Elon Musk's ambitions for multiplanetary travel are riding, stood poised for a ninth uncrewed test launch on Tuesday, aiming for a clean flight after the last two attempts ended in explosive failure. The two-stage spacecraft, consisting of the Starship cruise vessel mounted atop a towering SpaceX Super Heavy rocket booster, was due to blast off as early as 7:30 p.m. EDT (2330 GMT) from the company's Starbase launch site on the Gulf Coast of Texas near Brownsville. Federal regulators granted SpaceX a license for Starship's latest flight attempt just four days ago, capping a mishap investigation that had grounded Starship for nearly two months. Its last two test flights - in January and March - were cut short moments after liftoff as the vehicle blew to pieces before reaching space, raining debris over parts of the Caribbean and disrupting scores of commercial airline flights in the region. The Federal Aviation Administration expanded debris hazard zones around the ascent path for Tuesday's launch, to mark the ninth full test flight of the Starship campaign. The previous back-to-back failures occurred in early test-flight phases that SpaceX had easily achieved before, dealing a striking setback to a program that Musk, the billionaire entrepreneur who founded the rocket company in 2002, had sought to accelerate this year. Musk, the world's wealthiest individual and a key supporter of U.S. President Donald Trump, was especially eager for a success after vowing in recent days to refocus his attention on his various business ventures, including SpaceX, following a tumultuous foray into national politics and his attempts at cutting government bureaucracy. Musk is counting on Starship to fulfill his goal of producing a large, multipurpose next-generation spacecraft capable of sending people and cargo to the moon later this decade and ultimately flying to Mars. Closer to home, Musk also sees Starship as eventually replacing the SpaceX Falcon 9 rocket as the workhorse in the company's commercial launch business, which already lofts most of the world's satellites and other payloads to low-Earth orbit. Musk was scheduled to deliver an update on his space exploration ambitions in a speech from Starbase following the test flight, to be livestreamed under the banner slogan "The Road to Making Life Multiplanetary." He was expected to offer new timelines and development plans for sending astronauts aboard Starship on voyages to Mars, a tantalizing but still-distant future destination for human spaceflight that poses major technical hurdles for SpaceX and NASA. The speech could also offer clues about the trajectory of NASA's human spaceflight strategy. While Musk has been known to make overly ambitious projections about SpaceX's development timelines, he has since amassed significantly more sway over the Trump administration's space agenda. The 400-foot-tall (122 m) Starship rocket system is the centerpiece of Musk's vision to ferry humans to Mars and expand SpaceX's global dominance in the satellite launch market, a foothold the company gained with its reusable Falcon 9. Picked by NASA in 2021 as the vehicle to return humans to the moon's surface this decade for the first time in more than 50 years, Starship is expected to play an even bigger role in the U.S. space program. Trump attended a Starship test launch in November and has publicly promoted Musk's Mars vision. Musk and SpaceX remain influential over U.S. space policy despite his recent shift away from government and signals to cut political spending. Trump's choice to lead NASA, Jared Isaacman, a billionaire private astronaut and SpaceX customer for whom Musk advocated, testified before a U.S. Senate committee in April but has not advanced through the full confirmation process, while significant changes loom at the U.S. space agency. A White House budget blueprint released earlier this month proposed $6 billion in cuts at NASA, bolstering the agency's Mars focus and threatening programs that Musk and Isaacman have criticized. During a tense May 22 White House event with Trump and South African President Cyril Ramaphosa, South African-born Musk stood among Trump's cabinet officials in the room and was pointed out by the U.S. president.
