logo
What Leaders Need To Know About Open-Source Vs Proprietary Models

What Leaders Need To Know About Open-Source Vs Proprietary Models

Forbes07-07-2025
HONG KONG, CHINA - JANUARY 28: In this photo illustration, the DeepSeek logo is seen next to the ... More Chat GPT logo on a phone on January 28, 2025 in Hong Kong, China. (Photo illustration by)
As business leaders adopt generative artificial intelligence they must decide whether to build their AI capabilities using open-source models or rely on proprietary, closed-source alternatives. Understanding the implications of this choice can be the difference between a sustainable competitive advantage and a strategic misstep.
But what exactly is 'open source?'
According to the Open-Source Initiative (OSI), for software to be considered open, it must offer users the freedom to use the software for any purpose, to study how it works, to modify it, and to share both the original and modified versions. When applied to AI, true open-source AI include model architecture (the blueprint for how the AI processes data); training data recipes (documenting how data was selected and used to train the model); and weights (the numerical values representing the AI's learned knowledge).
But very few AI models are truly open according to the OSI definition.
The Gradient of Openness
While fully open-source models provide complete transparency, few model developers want to publish their full source code, and even fewer are transparent about the data their models were trained on. Many so-called foundation models – the largest generative AI models – were trained on data whose copyrights may be fuzzy at best and blatantly infringed at worst.
More common are open-weight systems that offer public access to model weights without disclosing the full training data or architecture. This allows faster deployment and experimentation with fewer resources, though it limits the ability to diagnose biases or improve accuracy without full transparency.
Some companies adopt a staggered openness model. They may release previous versions of proprietary models once a successor is launched, providing limited insight into the architecture while restricting access to the most current innovations. Even here, training data is rarely disclosed.
Navigating the Gradient
Deciding whether an enterprise wants to leverage a proprietary model like GPT-4o, or some level of openness, such as LlaMA 3.3, depends, of course on the use case. Many organizations end up using a mix of open and closed models.
The main decision is where the model will reside. For regulated industries like banking, where data can't leave the premises due to regulatory constraints, open-source models are the only viable option. Because proprietary model owners need to protect their intellectual property, those models can only be accessed remotely via an application programming interface (API).
Open-source models can be deployed on a company's premises or in the cloud.
Both open and closed models can be fine-tuned to specific use cases, but open-source models offer more flexibility and allow deeper customization. Again, the data used in that fine tuning need not leave the company's hardware. Fine-tuning proprietary models requires less expertise but must be done in the cloud.
Still, cost and latency can tip the scales in favor of proprietary AI. Proprietary providers often operate large-scale infrastructure designed to ensure fast response times and predictable performance, especially in consumer applications like chatbots or virtual assistants handling millions of queries per day.
Open-source AI, although cheaper to operate in the long run, requires significant investment in infrastructure and expertise to achieve similar latency and uptime.
Navigating the regulatory landscape is another concern for companies deploying AI. The European Union's Artificial Intelligence Act sets stricter transparency and accountability standards for proprietary AI models. Yet proprietary providers often assume greater compliance responsibility, reducing the regulatory burden on businesses. In the U.S., the National Telecommunications and Information Administration (NTIA) is considering guidelines that assess AI openness through a risk-based lens.
Of course, a major consideration is security. By using a proprietary model, companies place their trust in the provider that the model is secure. But that opacity can hide vulnerabilities, leaving companies reliant on vendors to disclose and address threats.
Open-source models, on the other hand, benefit from global security research communities that rapidly detect and patch vulnerabilities.
Still, businesses often prefer the convenience of API access to proprietary models for rapid prototyping. And for consumer facing applications, proprietary models are fast and easy to integrate into products.
Will Open-Source Overtake Proprietary Models?
But an even larger issue looms over the future of closed and open source. As open models increase in performance, closing the gap with or even exceeding the performance of the best proprietary models, the financial viability of closed models and the companies that provide them remains uncertain.
China is pursuing an aggressive open-source strategy, cutting the cost of its models to steal market share of companies like OpenAI. By openly releasing their research, code, and models, China hopes to make advanced AI accessible at a fraction of the cost of Western proprietary solutions.
Key Takeaways for Business Leaders
Remember Betamax, the proprietary video cassette recording format developed and tightly controlled by Japan's Sony in the 1970s. It lost to the more open VHS format for the same reason many people think closed AI models will eventually be eclipsed by open-source AI,
Leaders must define what they want to achieve with AI, whether it be efficiency, innovation, risk reduction, or compliance, and let these goals guide their model selection and deployment strategy. For example, they can leverage open-source communities for innovation and rapid prototyping, while relying on proprietary solutions for mission-critical, high-security applications.
Collaborating with external partners and leveraging both open-source and proprietary models as appropriate will position organizations to innovate responsibly and remain competitive.
The key is for leaders to understand their unique operational needs, data sensitivities, and technical capabilities—then choose accordingly. But choosing between open-source and proprietary AI models is less a binary decision than it is finding the optimal model on a continuum from closed to fully open.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Musk says he plans to sue Apple for not featuring X or Grok among its top apps
Musk says he plans to sue Apple for not featuring X or Grok among its top apps

Chicago Tribune

time14 minutes ago

  • Chicago Tribune

Musk says he plans to sue Apple for not featuring X or Grok among its top apps

Billionaire SpaceX, Tesla and X owner Elon Musk says he plans to sue Apple for not featuring X and its Grok artificial intelligence chatbot app in its top recommended apps in its App Store. Musk posted the comments on X late Monday, saying, 'Hey @Apple App Store, why do you refuse to put either X or Grok in your 'Must Have' section when X is the #1 news app in the world and Grok is #5 among all apps? Are you playing politics? What gives? Inquiring minds want to know.' Grok is owned by Musk's artificial intelligence startup xAI. Musk went on to say that 'Apple is behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store, which is an unequivocal antitrust violation. xAI will take immediate legal action.' He gave no further details. In an emailed statement, Apple defended the fairness of its App Store. 'The App Store is designed to be fair and free of bias,' it said. 'We feature thousands of apps through charts, algorithmic recommendations, and curated lists selected by experts using objective criteria. Our goal is to offer safe discovery for users and valuable opportunities for developers, collaborating with many to increase app visibility in rapidly evolving categories.' The company has faced various allegations of antitrust violations in recent years. A federal judge recently found that Apple violated a court injunction in an antitrust case filed by Fortnite maker Epic Games. Regulators of the 27-nation European Union fined Apple 500 million euros in April for breaking competition rules by preventing app makers from pointing users to cheaper options outside its App Store. Last year, the EU fined the U.S. tech giant nearly $2 billion for unfairly favoring its own music streaming service by forbidding rivals like Spotify from telling users how they could pay for cheaper subscriptions outside of iPhone apps. As of early Tuesday, the top app in Apple's App Store was TikTok, followed by Tinder, Duolingo, YouTube and Bumble. Open AI's ChatGPT was ranked 7th.

AI PCs: Why Adoption Is Still a Challenge In India
AI PCs: Why Adoption Is Still a Challenge In India

Entrepreneur

time14 minutes ago

  • Entrepreneur

AI PCs: Why Adoption Is Still a Challenge In India

Opinions expressed by Entrepreneur contributors are their own. You're reading Entrepreneur India, an international franchise of Entrepreneur Media. The advent of AI PCs has marked a significant milestone in the evolution of personal computing, promising to reshape how we work, create, and connect. While AI PCs are beginning to make their mark in India, particularly within the enterprise and premium consumer sectors, we're still in the early innings of widespread adoption. What was initially seen as a futuristic concept has now started resonating with users, for features such as AI-assisted writing, image generation, performance tuning, and intelligent battery optimization. Counterpoint estimates that by the end of 2025, one-third of new PCs sold in India will have on device AI capabilities such as Generative AI or Agentic AI. However, this still remains a premium and high tier focus and yet to trickle down to the mass market. Currently, AI PCs are positioned in the premium category owing to the advanced chipsets, built-in Neural Processing Units (NPUs), and software innovations, particularly considering it as a new category. Over time, as volumes scale and the ecosystem matures, price points will gradually decrease, much like previous transitions in technology leading to better adoption. The Growth So Far Dell Technologies have been working on AI integration in PCs for over two decades, with purpose-built accelerators that enhance performance, productivity, and user experience. In April 2025, Dell Technologies launched its latest business AI PC lineup featuring the Dell Pro and Dell Pro Max series. "Today, in India, we believe AI will be a cornerstone in defining the next generation of computing. As users demand more intelligent, adaptive, and efficient solutions, AI PCs are becoming central to meeting these needs. Features such as real-time personalization, contextual responsiveness, and predictive performance are no longer optional; they are becoming the norm. And with the upcoming Windows 10 end of cycle in October, we anticipate a major refresh cycle across the market. This presents a pivotal opportunity for users to transition to AI-powered PCs, unlocking new levels of productivity and user-centric computing," said Indrajit Belgundi, senior director and general manager, client solutions group, Dell Technologies India. As adoption accelerates, Dell foresees AI becoming indispensable in computing, especially in a dynamic and diverse market like India, driving transformation across sectors and empowering users with smarter, more intuitive tools. Acer India expects exponential growth in the next two–three years. The shift from cloud-based AI to on-device AI is accelerating demand for hardware that can support these capabilities natively. Government initiatives, digital learning, remote work, and a rising creator economy are also contributing to this momentum. "At Acer, our AI PC range—led by devices like the Acer Swift 14 AI and Predator Helios AI—has seen strong momentum. This growth is a result of ongoing efforts to demonstrate how on-device AI can make everyday tasks smarter, faster, and more personalized. The market's positive response reinforces our view that AI PCs are not a passing trend, but a transformative evolution in personal computing, and we remain committed to driving awareness and meaningful engagement in this space," said Sudhir Goel, Chief Business Officer, Acer India. Acer is among the early movers in the AI PC space in India, and while the AI PC category is still evolving in terms of formal market share metrics, "We've carved a strong position across both consumer and gaming segments. Our focus so far has been on building awareness, educating customers about the practical benefits of on-device AI, and ensuring availability across key online and offline channels. Our share in AI PC within our portfolio will be in the early double digit," Goel added. Over the last year, specific user groups, especially creators and professionals have been expecting to do more with their devices. "Despite current penetration still being modest, expectations are for AI PC volumes in India to grow 8–10 times from today's levels by the end of this year as replacement cycles kick in and Windows 10 devices reach end-of-support," said Arnold Su, Vice President, Consumer and Gaming PC, System Business Group, ASUS India. ASUS has seen strong growth across the board and believes that it will drive the next product replacement cycle for PCs. In the consumer segment, it has achieved an 18.5 percent market share backed by a 21.9 percent Y-O-Y growth. AI PCs penetration is expected to double by next year, and globally, they are projected to make up nearly 50 percent of the market by 2027. Driving this momentum are hybrid lifestyles, government-led digitization, and India's thriving SMB sector. "Our OMEN range of PCs are also equipped with AI features to enable a better gaming experience. With in-built AI features like HP AI Companion - a chatbot for smarter productivity, and Poly Camera Pro with noise cancellation, auto framing, and clear audio, we're helping users reimagine how they work, create, and collaborate in the new era," said Vineet Gehani – senior director, personal systems, HP India. What To Expect From OEMs To expand its reach further, Acer is intensifying efforts across three pillars—awareness, accessibility, and advocacy. Through targeted digital campaigns, influencer engagement, and strategic pricing, Acer aims to drive broader adoption and make AI PCs a mainstream choice across user categories in the coming quarters. "We plan to scale up retail and experiential campaigns that demystify AI use cases for consumers, particularly in Tier 1 and Tier 2 cities. We are also working closely with platform partners, ecosystem players like Microsoft and Intel, and our own R&D teams to continuously evolve our product offerings with AI-first innovations," Goel explained. ASUS has already started making AI-ready devices available in the affordable category. Its Snapdragon-powered Vivobook 16 is among the AI-capable devices in the segment and was launched at an accessible price. "This is just the beginning, we're committed to expanding this portfolio further and ensuring that meaningful AI adoption is not limited to premium users alone. At ASUS, we've always believed in making next-gen technology more accessible for the wider market. We're not just focusing on premium users; our goal is to expand across price points and usage needs. On the product front, we are actively building richer and more intuitive user experiences with features like adaptive dimming and adaptive lock, which use AI to optimize screen usage and extend battery life by up to 40 percent," Su added. HP, with an AI PC portfolio, designed for enterprises, SMBs, creators, gamers, and everyday consumers, its latest OmniBook and EliteBook AI PCs—powered by high-performance NPUs delivering up to 55 TOPS— claims to bring intelligence and performance together. "We are also making AI PCs accessible across price points, ensuring that every audience—from students and SMBs to professionals and creators—can be ready for the future of work. With prices starting at INR 70,000, we are delivering innovation within reach for all segments of the Indian market," Gehani added. The Near Future According to IDC, by 2028, nearly 98 percent of all PCs are expected to be AI PCs equipped with NPUs that can run AI tasks directly on the device. This shift means faster performance, enhanced security, and improved energy efficiency, transforming productivity and collaboration. This shift will mirror what we saw with transitions to smartphones. Once the utility becomes evident and accessible, adoption accelerates quickly and this is already happening with AI PCs in India. India has seen a strong initial wave of interest translating into real adoption, especially among creators, working professionals, and students who are constantly multitasking or managing high-volume content workflows. However, this won't be without its challenges, "These models commanding a 10-15 percent price premium over traditional models is a significant barrier. Its visibility in offline retail channels—especially outside of major metro areas—is still limited, mostly dominated by older inventory with basic AI capabilities. To truly accelerate this market, we need to see more concerted efforts in trade, consumer education and the development of localized AI applications that clearly demonstrate the value of these devices to give instant ROI for the users purchasing an advanced AI PC," said Anshika Jain, senior research analyst, Counterpoint Research.

Bessent Warns Europe It's ‘Put Up or Shut Up' Time on Russia
Bessent Warns Europe It's ‘Put Up or Shut Up' Time on Russia

Bloomberg

time15 minutes ago

  • Bloomberg

Bessent Warns Europe It's ‘Put Up or Shut Up' Time on Russia

By , Annmarie Hordern, and Jonathan Ferro Save Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent urged European nations to be prepared to get on board with higher tariffs on China and other nations that buy Russian energy, lamenting that he got a cool response when he floated the idea at a Group of Seven meeting earlier this year. Bessent said sanctions on Russia 'can go up' or 'can be loosened' depending on the outcome of a meeting set for Friday between President Donald Trump and President Vladimir Putin. But the Europeans need to back the idea of harsher measures in any case.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store