Musk says he plans to sue Apple for not featuring X or Grok among its top apps
Musk posted the comments on X late Monday, saying, 'Hey @Apple App Store, why do you refuse to put either X or Grok in your 'Must Have' section when X is the #1 news app in the world and Grok is #5 among all apps? Are you playing politics? What gives? Inquiring minds want to know.'
Grok is owned by Musk's artificial intelligence startup xAI.
Musk went on to say that 'Apple is behaving in a manner that makes it impossible for any AI company besides OpenAI to reach #1 in the App Store, which is an unequivocal antitrust violation. xAI will take immediate legal action.'
He gave no further details.
In an emailed statement, Apple defended the fairness of its App Store.
'The App Store is designed to be fair and free of bias,' it said. 'We feature thousands of apps through charts, algorithmic recommendations, and curated lists selected by experts using objective criteria. Our goal is to offer safe discovery for users and valuable opportunities for developers, collaborating with many to increase app visibility in rapidly evolving categories.'
The company has faced various allegations of antitrust violations in recent years.
A federal judge recently found that Apple violated a court injunction in an antitrust case filed by Fortnite maker Epic Games.
Regulators of the 27-nation European Union fined Apple 500 million euros in April for breaking competition rules by preventing app makers from pointing users to cheaper options outside its App Store.
Last year, the EU fined the U.S. tech giant nearly $2 billion for unfairly favoring its own music streaming service by forbidding rivals like Spotify from telling users how they could pay for cheaper subscriptions outside of iPhone apps.
As of early Tuesday, the top app in Apple's App Store was TikTok, followed by Tinder, Duolingo, YouTube and Bumble. Open AI's ChatGPT was ranked 7th.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Bloomberg
2 minutes ago
- Bloomberg
Stocks Hit Record High; Bessent: Rates Should Be 1.5-1.75% Lower
Scott Bessent feeds the rally, as Treasuries gain and US stocks close at another record high. The Treasury Secretary tells Bloomberg interest rates should be up to 175 basis points lower. Donald Trump warns of "very severe consequences" if Russia's Vladimir Putin doesn't agree to a ceasefire at tomorrow's summit. And Bloomberg learns Apple is planning to introduce an ambitious slate of new AI devices... including robots, a lifelike Siri and home-security cameras. (Source: Bloomberg)
Tom's Guide
32 minutes ago
- Tom's Guide
iOS 26 Image Playground vs Android 16 Pixel Studio: I found the best AI image generator, and it's not even close
Late last fall, I put Apple's just released Image Playground with iOS 18.2 to the test against Pixel Studio to see which AI image generator was better. Let's just say that it was a one-sided win for Google that proved its AI-assisted image generator on its Pixel 9 phones is way better, both in how they look and their accuracy. With the iOS 26 beta, I've been testing out the updated version of Image Playground to see all the new changes — but more importantly — if the upgrades are enough to make it better than Pixel Studio. Using an iPhone 16 Pro Max and Pixel 9 Pro XL for this test, running iOS 26 and Android 16 respectively, I provided both image generators with the same prompts as before to see what they produce this time around. In this iOS 26 Image Playground vs. Android 16 Pixel Studio face-off, I'll be grading them in each of the categories below to make it clear which one is better. Here are the results. For this first test, I gave both image generators the following prompt: a cat wearing a crown, sitting on a throne made of yarn. In iOS 26, there are a total of four style options to choose from when — so I ended up choosing Sketch because it's also one of the options available with Pixel Studio. I have to say, Apple definitely delivers a much better result this time because there's more detail and realism to the image it generated. Everything I gave in the prompt is generated accurately, including the throne made out of yarn, which it didn't do at all with my previous testing. I'm also drawn to the cat's face, which has way more detail as well. Meanwhile, Pixel Studio continues to accurately produce my descriptions. I would even argue that there's a smidge more detail with the cat overall and how it really makes it so that the throne is completely made up out of yarn. The only thing missing here is just some color, but the sketch option in Pixel Studio doesn't apply any unless I explicitly say it. I'm really torn about this one, so I'm calling it a tie. Get instant access to breaking news, the hottest reviews, great deals and helpful tips. Winner: tie Next up, I asked Image Playground and Pixel Studio to generate 'a majestic lion with a flowing mane, perched atop a towering rock overlooking a vast savanna.' Compared to what it did previously under iOS 18.2, this updated version of Image Playground adds more realism to the shot — and I really like it. I opted to go with the animation style, which makes it way more convincing. But despite the improvement, the models that Google is using with Pixel Studio are still better. I chose the freestyle option again because the depiction is more realistic. I really love the glow produced by the setting sub behind the lion, as well as how it generates the better landscape. Winner: Pixel Studio Image Playground had trouble with this prompt the last time, but it's no problem with this upgraded iOS 26 version. I gave them the prompt for 'a city floating in the clouds, connected by bridges made of rainbows.' Apple gets it right with a city floating in the clouds, but I don't see the bridges made of rainbows. There's a rainbow for sure, but it's not exactly what I requested with the prompt. Pixel Studio again produces a very realistic shot of the cloud city, including what appears to be bridges made up of rainbows. The only thing it doesn't represent well is an actual city floating in the clouds. It looks more like it's surrounded by clouds. Still, I'm giving this one to Pixel Studio. Winner: Pixel Studio For my next test I tried the following prompt: "a robot made of flowers, watering other flowers in a garden." With iOS 26, Apple adds new style options with Image Playground that generate images with ChatGPT instead of Apple Intelligence. However, I notice that it takes much longer for it to produce images. I'm talking about over 30 seconds, whereas it would take about 5 seconds with Apple Intelligence. I chose the anime style option and for the most part it accurately generates my prompt. Although, the robot doesn't look as convincing. With the Pixel Studio's generation, I also chose the anime style — and it looks way more authentic in my opinion, down to how it actually looks more like a robot. I also like the small details all around the shot, like the differently colored flowers covering the bot. Winner: Pixel Studio Going with something more familiar with my next prompt, I do recall how Image Playground had trouble with this one: teenage mutant ninja turtle fighting a one eyed giant rat. I will mention that this time I didn't have to modify the prompt at all one bit. Whether it's because Apple doesn't want to infringe on copyrights for teenage mutant ninja turtles, it generates a really weird looking turtle. True, it's supposed to be a mutant, but it's terrifying. Plus, it looks more like it's buddying up with the rat rather than fighting it — and the rat has a normal pair of eyes. So yeah, it's not accurate at all. What's interesting about them is that I stuck with the sketch style option with both image generators. Pixel Studio is simply amazing and accurate with its photo. Not only does it get the teenage mutant ninja turtle correctly, but there's a ton of detail. While the rat technically has three eyes instead of one, at least it looks like they're about to brawl. Winner: Pixel Studio For my last prompt, I asked them to generate a 'sporty red car at the beach with a volleyball net in the background.' I went with the sketch style again because it's one of the few identical options available with Pixel Studio and Image Playground. Apple got this prompt right the last time and it does it again here. While the car itself could be a bit more sporty, it is in red and there's a volleyball net in the background. I don't know why the pole on the left doubles as a palm tree, but it might be added to enhance the look of the scene being on a beach. I still prefer Pixel Studio's image because of the realism of the shots. The car in question looks awfully like a Porsche, complete with the red paint job I requested — while the volleyball net in the background completes the scene at the beach. Winner: Pixel Studio Even though it's not technically a unanimous win, Pixel Studio still proves Google is still ahead when it comes to generating images from scratch. Not only does it produce them with accuracy, but the level of detail is remarkable. Plus, it helps that there's a variety of styles to choose from and how quickly it takes to produce them. Apple's moving in the right direction, by ditching the cartoony generations I saw Image Playground produced when it launched last fall with iOS 18.2. I will say that the level of detail has improved dramatically with this iOS 26 iteration, but there's still room for improvement. Perhaps Apple might reveal yet another boost for Image Playground with its rumored iPhone 17 event next month? Follow Tom's Guide on Google News to get our up-to-date news, how-tos, and reviews in your feeds. Make sure to click the Follow button.
Business Insider
33 minutes ago
- Business Insider
Meet your new office bestie: ChatGPT
Deborah has fast become one of Nicole Ramirez's favorite colleagues. She's quick to deliver compliments, sharp-witted, and hyper-efficient. Perhaps best of all, there's no internal competition with Deborah at the health marketing agency they work for, because she isn't on the payroll. She isn't even human. Ramirez, a 34-year-old who lives in the Pittsburgh area, says she randomly chose the name Deborah as a way to refer to the generative AI app ChatGPT, which she began using about a year ago to help her with basic tasks like drafting emails. As time went on, she asked Deborah to do more complex work, such as market research and analysis, and found herself typing "thank you" after the results came back. Eventually the relationship got to the point where the app became akin to a coworker who's always willing to give feedback — or listen to her gripes about real-life clients and colleagues. And so the bot became a bud. "Those are things that you would usually turn to your work bestie over lunch about when you can go to ChatGPT — or Deborah, in my case," says Ramirez. People are treating AI chatbots as more than just 24/7 therapists and loyal companions. With the tools becoming ubiquitous in the workplace, some are regarding them as model colleagues, too. Unlike teammates with a pulse, chatbots are never snotty, grumpy, or off the clock. They don't eat leftover salmon at their desks or give you the stink eye. They don't go on a tangent about their kids or talk politics when you ask to schedule a meeting. And they won't be insulted if you reject their suggestions. For many, tapping AI chatbots in lieu of their human colleagues has deep appeal. Consider that nearly one-third of US workers would rather clean a toilet than ask a colleague for help, according to a recent survey from the Center for Generational Kinetics, a thought-leadership firm, and commissioned by workplace-leadership strategist Henna Pryor. Experts warn, though, that too much bot bonding could dull social and critical-thinking skills, hurting careers and company performance. In the past two years, the portion of US employees who say they have used Gen AI in their role a few times a year or more nearly doubled to 40% from 21%, according to a Gallup report released in June. Part of what accounts for that rapid ascendance is how much Gen AI reflects our humanity, as Stanford University lecturer Martin Gonzalez concluded in a 2024 research paper. "Instead of a science-fiction-like ball of pulsing light, we encounter human quirks: poems recited in a pirate's voice, the cringeworthy humor of dad jokes," wrote Gonzalez, who's now an executive at Google's AI research lab DeepMind. One sign that people see AI agents as lifelike is in how they politely communicate with the tools by using phrases like "please" or "thank you," says Connie Noonan Hadley, an organizational psychologist and professor at Boston University's Questrom School of Business. "So far, people are keeping up with basic social niceties," she says. "AI tends to give you compliments, too, so there are some social skills still being maintained." Human colleagues, on the other hand, aren't always as well-mannered. Monica Park, a graphic designer for a jeweler in New York, used to dread showing early mock-ups of her work to colleagues. She recalls the heartache she felt after a coworker at a previous employer angrily responded to a draft of a design she'd drawn with an F-bomb. "You never know if it's a good time to ask for feedback," Park, 32, tells me. "So much of it has to do with the mood of the person looking at it." Last year she became a regular ChatGPT user and says that while the app will also dish out criticism, it's only the constructive kind. "It's not saying it in a malicious or judgmental way," Park says. "ChatGPT doesn't have any skin in the game." Aaron Ansari, an information-security consultant, counts Anthropic's AI chatbot Claude among his top peers. The 46-year-old Orlando-area resident likes that he can ask it to revise a document as many times as he wants without being expected to give anything in return. By contrast, a colleague at a previous job would pressure him to buy Girl Scout cookies from her kids whenever he stopped by her desk. "It became her reputation," Ansari says. "You can't go to 'Susie' without money." Now a managing partner at a different consulting firm, he finds himself opening Claude before pinging colleagues for support. This way, he can avoid ruffling any feathers, like when he once attempted to reach a colleague in a different time zone at what turned out to be an inconvenient hour. "You call and catch them in the kitchen," says Ansari. "I have interrupted their lunch unintentionally, but they certainly let me know." AI's appeal can be so strong that workers are at risk of developing unhealthy attachments to chatbots, research shows. " Your Brain on ChatGPT," a study published in June from researchers at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology, found that the convenience that AI agents provide can weaken people's critical-thinking skills and foster procrastination and laziness. "Like junk food, it's efficient when you need it, but too much over time can give you relational diabetes," says Laura Greve, a clinical health psychologist in Boston. "You're starved of the nutrients you need, the real human connection." And if workers at large overindulge in AI, we could all end up becoming "emotionally unintelligent oafs," she warns. "We're accidentally training an entire generation to be workplace hermits." In turn, Hadley adds, businesses that rely on collaboration could suffer. "The more workers turn to AI instead of other people, the greater the chance the social fabric that weaves us together will weaken," she says. Karen Loftis, a senior product manager in a Milwaukee suburb, recently left a job at a large tech company that's gone all-in on AI. She said before ChatGPT showed up, sales reps would call her daily for guidance on how to plug the company's latest products. That's when they'd learn about her passion for seeing musicians like Peter Frampton in concert. But when she saw the singer-songwriter perform earlier this year, it was "like a non-event," she said, because those calls almost entirely stopped coming in. "With AI, it's all work and no relationships," she said. Workers who lean heavily on AI may also be judged differently by their peers than their bosses. Colleagues are more inclined to see them as dependent on the technology, less creative, and lacking growth potential, says David De Cremer, a behavioral scientist and Dunton Family Dean of Northeastern University's D'Amore-McKim School of Business. "It's objectification by association," he says. Company leaders, however, are more likely to view workers who demonstrate AI chops as assets. Big-company CEOs such as Amazon's Andy Jassy and Shopify's Tobi Lütke have credited the technology for boosting productivity and cost savings. Workers who spoke with BI about using chatbots — including those who work remotely — say they still interact with their human peers, but less often as they did before AI agents came along. Lucas Figueiredo, who lives near Atlanta and works at a revenue management specialist for an airline, says he previously struggled to tell whether the AirPods a former colleague constantly wore were playing music whenever he wanted to ask this person a coding question. "You don't want to spook someone or disrupt their workflow," the 27-year-old tells me, though he admits he has done just that. These days, if Figueiredo gets stuck, he will first go to Microsoft's Copilot before approaching a colleague for an assist. The new strategy has been paying off.
