
British Airways slashes ticket prices for America amid decline in travellers over Trump moves
As official US data reveals a 17 per cent year-on-year slump in Europeans visiting the United States in March 2025, airlines are slashing summer prices to fill planes.
British Airways is selling return tickets from Copenhagen via London Heathrow to New York JFK in the peak holiday month of August for just £365 (Dhs1,766) – less than half the cost of a London-New York flight alone.
The latest figures from the US International Trade Administration, which seeks to promote American tourism, show extraordinary declines from key European markets since Donald Trump was elected president.
Immediately upon taking office, Trump ordered much tougher controls on 'all aliens seeking admission to the United States,' demanding they are 'vetted and screened to the maximum degree possible' – raising fears among prospective visitors that they may be deported.
In addition, the president has expressed a wish to acquire both Canada and Greenland for the US.
Although data on Canadian arrivals is not yet published in the official figures, the effect on the Danish market appears clear. Greenland is an autonomous territory within the kingdom of Denmark. Arrivals from Denmark to the US were down around one-third year-on-year.
Some of the slump is attributable to the early Easter in 2024, which boosted numbers last year. The shutdown of Heathrow on 21 March will have had a marginal effect, causing some European travellers to cancel trips altogether after more than 700 outbound flights were axed.
But in a bid to fill its flight in summer, British Airways is selling return trips from many European cities via London Heathrow to New York JFK for less than £500 (Dhs2,400). In all cases research by The Independent – from Copenhagen, Frankfurt, Milan, Rome and Paris – August fares are available for under £500, much less than for the nonstop flights from London to New York.
The Independent has invited British Airways to comment.
Four months ago the research group Tourism Economics, part of Oxford Economics, predicted a 9 per cent increase in visitors to the US in 2025. That is now expected to be a 9 per cent decline. The organisation says: 'Trump's policies and pronouncements have produced a negative sentiment shift toward the US among international travellers.
'The correlating decline in international travel to the US is expected to be strongest in 2025, with persisting degrees of impact throughout the remainder of Trump's second term.'
Tourism Economics identified as key headwinds, 'negative sentiment' and 'border and immigration policies and uncertainty'. It predicts a decline of over 20 per cent in visitor numbers from Canada.
Britain is third only to Canada and Mexico as a source of tourists to the US. Visits from the UK to the US fell by one-seventh (14.3 per cent) in March 2025 compared with a year earlier, according to International Trade Administration figures.
Yet UK travel industry insiders say demand remains strong. Julia Lo Bue-Said, chief executive of the Advantage Travel Partnership said: 'Across our travel agency network we are not seeing any sign of a decline in demand for travel to the USA currently, and bookings continue to be robust, with New York and Orlando performing as strong favourite US destinations.
"Given we have a late Easter this year, this will distort March booking patterns. However, week-on-week bookings to the US are definitely holding strong and as of 31 March sales across our travel agent partners were up 11 per cent compared to the previous week, and up 5 per cent compared to the same week last year.
'Generally the appetite for travel continues unabated, with factors like cost of living pressures and the hunt for value-driven options actually fuelling demand rather than diminishing it.'
The president and CEO of New York City Tourism + Conventions, Julie Coker, predicts a 10 per cent increase in UK visits to the city in 2025.
Paul Charles, chief executive of The PC Agency and former director of communications for Virgin Atlantic, said: 'While there are some early indications of a reduction in demand to the US, experience tells us that airlines, hotels and car hire firms usually tweak their prices and offer enticing offers to build back demand over time.
'Also, consumers still want to go away and that may lead to other destinations benefiting, such as Canada, inbound travel to the UK, wider Europe, and the Middle East as travellers search alternative places for their holidays.
'A silver lining for the industry is that many Easter and Summer holiday bookings to the USA will already have been booked, during the early part of the year, creating less worry about future revenues.'
Delta Air Lines, one of the giant American carriers, has cancelled its expansion plans for the second half of 2025 and warned that it will defer deliveries of new Airbus aircraft while tariffs remain in place.
The chief executive of Delta Air Lines, Ed Bastian, previously said the incoming Trump administration would be a 'breath of fresh air' for airlines after what he called government 'overreach' under President Joe Biden.
His company donated $1 million to Trump's inaugural fund, along with the same amount from United Airlines and Boeing.
Paul English, co-founder of the travel website Kayak told the FT: 'In just two months [Trump] has destroyed the reputation of the US, shown one way by diminished travel from the EU to the US. This is not only one more terrible blow to the US economy, it also represents reputation damage that could take generations to repair.'
The Independent
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


The National
2 hours ago
- The National
Europe must choose: reform and resilience − or drift into irrelevance
Donald Trump has been called many things but his newest label – the great unifier of Europe – might just stick. That provocative notion may raise eyebrows in Brussels, Paris, or Berlin, but Mr Trump's return could be the shock that finally compels Europe to do what it has long known it must: to become more self-reliant. The world has changed. Russia's war in Ukraine shattered the illusion of permanent peace in the region. China 's economic ascendancy is reshaping global competition. And now, with Mr Trump launching a trade offensive against allies and adversaries alike, one truth is impossible to ignore: no one is coming to Europe's rescue. For too long, Europe has assumed that peace, prosperity and US protection were permanent. That illusion is gone. Mr Trump's transactional approach to alliances – where strength is rewarded and weakness punished – has exposed a hard truth: Europe can no longer outsource its defence. His worldview owes more to 19th-century protectionism than 20th-century idealism. But the implications extend beyond defence. Mr Trump's America is not merely retreating from global leadership – it is actively dismantling the postwar order that enabled Europe's rise. Nato, the World Trade Organisation, the International Monetary Fund – these institutions anchored European prosperity and security. That architecture may not include Europe by default next time. Unless Europe steps up, it risks being left behind. Europe faces a choice: reform and lead or stagnate and drift. The first path begins with taking responsibility for its own defence. That demands more than budget increases, with Germany poised to channel as much as €1 trillion ($1.15 trillion) into defence and infrastructure under Chancellor Friedrich Merz. It means aligning strategic priorities, co-ordinating procurement, and deepening military integration – ideally through a 'coalition of the willing', rather than waiting for unanimity. This group could include the UK, Norway, Canada and, potentially, Switzerland. Europe must also fix its chronic economic underperformance. Between 2014 and 2023, nominal US GDP grew 57 per cent; the euro area just 15 per cent. That gap reflects more than demographics – it points to structural inefficiencies. Fragmented capital markets and limited access to risk capital force many European entrepreneurs to look abroad. A genuine capital markets union would change that, unlocking investment in green tech, artificial intelligence, life sciences and more. It's not just about growth. Innovation is the new battleground. Energy is the third pillar. The war in Ukraine didn't cause Europe's energy crisis, but it exposed the risks of dependence. Swapping Russian gas for American liquefied natural gas won't delivery energy security. Resilience will come from accelerating renewables, upgrading grids, building storage and revisiting nuclear energy – not just for climate goals, but for sovereignty. In this optimistic future, Europe is more integrated, more dynamic and more secure. It competes globally and stands on its own terms. The second path is easier – for now. No hard choices. No integration. Just drift. In that future, defence stays fragmented. Capital remains trapped. Europe continues to punch below its weight. And, as the world grows more volatile, Europe becomes less relevant. We've seen this before. In the mid-1980s, Europe was adrift – weak growth, institutional fatigue, geopolitical anxiety. Then-US president Ronald Reagan's arms race unnerved many after a decade of detente. Europe responded with the 1986 Single European Act, which laid the groundwork for the single market. It streamlined decision-making and revived the integration agenda. Europe rose to the moment then – and it must again. This time, the stakes are higher. The next round of reforms must secure not just prosperity, but sovereignty. Business has a role to play too. Just as industrial leaders helped drive integration in the 1990s, today's chief executives must help shape Europe's renewal − not just because it's good policy, but because a fragmented, inward-looking Europe is bad for business and worse for society. Leaders like Henrik Andersen, chief executive of Danish wind turbine maker Vestas, offer a useful example. He has urged Brussels to align energy, trade and industrial policy – not out of idealism, but because Europe's competitiveness in clean tech depends on it. So what must Europe do − urgently and decisively? First, it must provide for its own defence. With US electoral cycles growing ever more unpredictable, European security can no longer hinge on transatlantic assumptions. A credible defence posture is essential − not to replace Nato, but to rebalance it. Second, Europe must unlock capital and innovation. Fragmented financial markets continue to stifle scale and ambition. While North America accounts for 60 per cent of global scale-ups, the EU claims just 8 per cent. A capital markets union is now critical to mobilise European savings, fund its own innovation, and reduce reliance on US capital. Third, the green transition must accelerate − not simply as a climate imperative, but as a strategy for resilience and sovereignty. Renewables, and where appropriate nuclear, should anchor an energy strategy capable of withstanding geopolitical shocks. And finally, Europe must engage globally with coherence and purpose. It has a foreign minister, but still lacks a foreign policy. That must change. Building stable, values-driven partnerships with powers like India, Saudi Arabia and even China will be essential if Europe is to remain an active shaper − rather than a passive observer − of the global order. It's one of history's ironies: Mr Trump may be the catalyst for European renewal. By making US commitments less reliable, he's made European responsibility unavoidable. By rejecting global rules, he's made European leadership indispensable. This is not just another chapter in Europe's integration story. The world has changed − and with it, the stakes. The time for hesitation is over.


The National
3 hours ago
- The National
Club World Cup 2025 stadium guide: Venues, fixtures and travel times
The Club World Cup gets underway in the United States this weekend. For the first time, the tournament will feature 32 teams, which means greater representation of clubs across the football world, and more matches. Not just the format, the venue is significant as well. The United States will be hosting their first major international football tournament this century, which will not only showcase their growing appetite for the most popular sport in the world, but also serve as preparation for the main event next year – the Fifa World Cup, to be held in the US, Canada and Mexico. In all, 12 stadiums across 11 cities in the US will host the Club World Cup, that begins on Saturday (Sunday, 4am UAE). The tournament will also serve as a litmus test for the US as a host. President Donald Trump's travel bans and the wide-ranging restrictions being put on those hoping to come into the country is expected to greatly impact a number of fans who had planned to attend the tournament. As things stand, many fans are unlikely to be in the US as the visa process is unlikely to get expedited. Also, the worsening law and order situation in Los Angeles could upend plans for the tournament in the city. Still, those who get the opportunity to watch will be in for a great ride as a several matches will be held at venues that are more used to the other kind of football – the NFL. Another factor to consider is the sheer scale of the event across the vast expanse of the US. Matches have been scheduled across both the east and west coasts, which would mean some serious air miles for many associated with the tournament. Club World Cup 2025 venues MetLife Stadium (New York) Capacity: 82,500 Fixtures June 15: Palmeiras v Porto June 17: Fluminense v Borussia Dortmund June 19: Palmeiras v Al Ahly June 21: Fluminense v Ulsan June 23: Porto v Al Ahly July 5: Quarter-final July 8: Semi-final July 9: Semi-final July 13: Final Hard Rock Stadium (Miami, Florida) Capacity: 65,000 Fixtures June 14: Al Ahly v Inter Miami June 16: Boca Juniors v Benfica June 18: Real Madrid v Al Hilal June 20: Bayern Munich v Boca Juniors June 23: Inter Miami v Palmeiras June 25: Mamelodi Sundowns v Fluminense June 29: Last 16 (Group D winners v Group C runners-up) July 1: Last 16 (Group H winners v Group G runners-up) Mercedes-Benz Stadium (Atlanta, Georgia) Capacity: 75,000 Fixtures June 16: Chelsea v LA FC June 19: Inter Miami v Porto June 22: Manchester City v Al Ain June 29: Last 16 (Group B winners v Group A runners-up) July 1: Last 16 (Group F winners v Group E runners-up) July 5: Quarter-final Lincoln Financial Field (Philadelphia, Pennsylvania) Capacity: 69,000 Fixtures June 16: Flamengo v Esperance de Tunis June 18: Manchester City v Wydad June 20: Flamengo v Chelsea June 22: Juventus v Wydad June 24: Esperance de Tunis v Chelsea June 26: Salzburg v Real Madrid June 28: Last 16 (Group A winners v Group B runners-up) July 4: Quarter-final Lumen Field (Seattle, Washington) Capacity: 69,000 Fixtures June 15: Botafogo v Seattle Sounders June 17: River Plate v Urawa Red Diamonds June 19: Seattle Sounders v Atletico Madrid June 21: Inter Milan v Urawa Red Diamonds June 23: Seattle Sounders v PSG June 25: Inter Milan v River Plate Rose Bowl Stadium (Los Angeles, California) Capacity: 88,500 Fixtures June 15: PSG v Atletico Madrid June 17: Monterrey v Inter Milan June 19: PSG v Botafogo June 21: River Plate v Monterrey June 23: Atletico Madrid v Botafogo June 25: Urawa Red Diamonds v Monterrey Bank of America Stadium (Charlotte, North Carolina) Capacity: 75,000 Fixtures June 22: Real Madrid v Pachuca June 24: Benfica v Bayern Munich June 28: Last 16 (Group C winners v Group D runners-up) June 30: Last 16 (Group E winners v Group F runners-up) Capacity: 26,000 Fixtures June 15: Bayern Munich v Auckland City June 18: Pachuca v FC Salzburg June 21: Mamelodi Sundowns v Borussia Dortmund June 25: Borussia Dortmund v Ulsan Camping World Stadium (Orlando, Florida) Capacity: 65,000 Fixtures June 24: LA FC v Flamengo June 26: Juventus v Manchester City June 30: Last 16 (Group G winners v Group H runners-up) July 4: Quarter-final Geodis Park (Nashville, Tennessee) Capacity: 30,000 Fixtures June 20: LA FC v Esperance de Tunis June 24: Auckland City v Boca Juniors June 26: Al Hilal v Pachuca Inter & Co Stadium (Orlando, Florida) Capacity: 25,000 Fixtures June 17: Ulsan v Mamelodi Sundowns June 20: Benfica v Auckland City Audi Field (Washington DC) Capacity: 20,000 Fixtures Travel time Having a tournament in a country as big as the US means there will be some long journeys involved. Most of the matches have been bunched together on the east coast of the country, with just two cities on the other side of the map getting to host games. Manchester City's schedule sees them go to Philadelphia for the first game against Wydad on June 18, then to Atlanta to face Al Ain four days later and finally to Orlando to take on Juventus four days after that in Group G. That is a fairly straightforward travel plan for Pep Guardiola's team, with flight times ranging from two to three hours. Atletico Madrid, on the other hand, go from Los Angeles to Seattle and back for their group games against PSG, Seattle Sounders and Botafogo, with each trip upwards of three hours. MLS side Seattle Sounders get to play all their games at home, so don't travel at all. While it might be manageable for teams, fans will have to think twice about the matches they wish to attend. Those hoping to go from Seattle to Miami should be prepared for a six-hour flight. Similarly, LA to New York takes more than five-and-a-half hours by flight. Which means only the most ardent fans will want to travel to west coast, as a majority of the games take place on the eastern side of the country. Prize money The tournament has a staggering prize pool of $1 billion, with the winners standing to earn a cool $125 million. According to Fifa, around $525m has been set aside as guaranteed fees for teams taking part. That includes more than $38m for the top-ranked European teams. Apart from that, $475m has been earmarked for the matches, with $2m for winning group stage games, $7.5m for playing in the last 16 and $40m for the winners of the final.


Al Etihad
9 hours ago
- Al Etihad
Wall Street ends sharply lower as Iran retaliates against Israel attack
14 June 2025 00:41 NEW YORK (REUTERS)Wall Street ended sharply lower on Friday after Iran launched missiles at Israel in response to intensive Israeli strikes on prices surged nearly 7% on fears the conflict could disrupt crude supply from the Middle East. US energy stocks rose in tandem, with Exxon up 2.2% and Diamondback Energy rallying 3.7%.Airline stocks fell on fears that fuel costs could climb. Delta Air Lines lost 3.8%, United Airlines fell 4.4% and American Airlines declined 4.9%.Defense stocks climbed, with Lockheed Martin, RTX Corporation and Northrop Grumman all gaining over 3%.The S&P 500 declined 1.13% to end the session at 5,976.97 Nasdaq declined 1.30% to 19,406.83 points, while the Dow Jones Industrial Average declined 1.79% to 42,197.79 of the 11 S&P 500 sector indexes declined, led lower by financials, down 2.06%, followed by a 1.5% loss in information on U.S. exchanges was 17.9 billion shares traded, compared with an average of 18.2 billion shares over the previous 20 the week, the S&P 500 dipped 0.4%, the Nasdaq lost 0.6% and the Dow fell 1.3%. Photoshop maker Adobe fell 5.3% as concerns that the company's pace of AI adoption was too slow overshadowed an increased annual revenue forecast. Oracle jumped 7.7% to a record high, rallying for a second day after the technology company gave an upbeat forecast driven by demand for its AI dipped 2.1% and Apple lost 1.4%. Visa and Mastercard both fell more than 4% after the Wall Street Journal reported that major retailers are exploring cryptocurrencies that could eliminate the need for payment intermediaries. A tame consumer price report, softer-than-expected producer price data and largely unchanged initial jobless claims earlier this week helped calm investor jitters around tariff-driven price pressures. US Federal Reserve policymakers are widely expected to keep interest rates unchanged at their meeting next week. With investors betting the United States will reach trade agreements that reduce President Donald Trump's steep trade barriers, the S&P 500 is now trading just below its February record highs. The University of Michigan's Surveys of Consumers showed consumer sentiment improved for the first time in six months in June amid trade stocks outnumbered rising ones within the S&P 500 by a 6.1-to-one ratio. The S&P 500 posted 10 new highs and 6 new lows; the Nasdaq recorded 37 new highs and 131 new lows.