&w=3840&q=100)
Elon Musk must face lawsuit over power as Trump's aide, says judge
Elon Musk will have to face a lawsuit that claims the billionaire wielded illegal power by orchestrating President Donald Trump's dramatic cuts in federal government jobs and spending, a judge ruled.
US District Judge Tanya Chutkan on Tuesday denied a request by the Justice Department to toss the case filed by Democratic state attorneys general against Musk and the Department of Government Efficiency. But she dismissed a claim against Trump, saying courts can't limit the actions of a president performing his official duties.
Chutkan ruled the states presented specific enough allegations and preliminary evidence to proceed with claims that Musk was granted the same authority as Trump's Senate-confirmed cabinet. While Musk has been the public face of DOGE, he's denied he holds a formal position or has any authority to direct agencies to carry out the president's cost-cutting agenda. Musk said last month he'll significantly scale back his DOGE work to be 'super focused' on his businesses, including Tesla Inc. and SpaceX.
The judge found that the Trump administration had adopted a 'perverse reading' of the US Constitution's system of checks and balances and appeared 'to sanction unlimited executive power.'
'Under this reasoning, the President could authorize an individual to act as a Prime Minister who vetoes, amends, or adopts legislation enacted by Congress, as an Ultimate Justice who unilaterally overrules any decision by the Supreme Court, as a King who exercises preeminent authority over the entire nation, or allow a foreign leader to direct American armed forces,' Chutkan wrote.
A White House spokesperson and representative of the New Mexico attorney general's office, which is leading the 14-state coalition that sued, did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
Musk and his US DOGE Service have faced a slew of legal challenges since Trump took office in January. In addition to questioning the role of Musk and his DOGE-affiliated staff, some suits are seeking to block their access to agency systems and records that contain vast troves of Americans' financial and personal information.
While rulings to deny motions to dismiss normally can't be appealed, the Justice Department could argue for an exception because the case presents significant questions about presidential power and interpreting the US Constitution.
The lawsuit accuses Musk of violating the Constitution's Appointments Clause, which limits high-level decisions about US agency operations and personnel to officials who are nominated by the president and confirmed by the Senate. The states argued Trump 'bypassed' Congress and 'unilaterally granted massive, unchecked executive authority to Elon Musk and DOGE to destabilise the government.'
In court papers, the Democratic officials highlighted public statements Trump made about putting Musk in charge and Musk's comments appearing to take ownership of moves to shutter USAID and carry out a barrage of federal funding cuts, among other things. They argued that he wasn't simply making recommendations to Senate-confirmed agency heads, but rather was 'compelling' and 'directing' them to act or 'overruling' decisions they'd made.
No 'Formal Power'
In urging Chutkan to dismiss the case, Justice Department lawyers argued that even if they conceded Musk had 'massive' or even 'decisive' influence over US domestic policy, he didn't have the 'formal power to act.' As long as a Senate-confirmed official 'takes formal responsibility' for decisions that Musk recommended, there couldn't be a constitutional violation, the government said.
Chutkan wrote that Musk's title of 'special government employee' might be his 'formal classification' but 'not necessarily the position he holds.' She said the government had unsuccessfully tried to 'minimize' Musk's role and that the states put forward enough evidence at this stage that he was directing the actions of DOGE-affiliated staff at 17 federal agencies.
The government argued the states lacked standing to file the suit because they couldn't prove they faced imminent and concrete injuries from Musk and DOGE's efforts to carry out Trump's directive to identify waste, fraud and abuse at federal agencies.
But Chutkan again concluded that the states put forward enough evidence for now that their government offices and public institutions were affected by cuts to federal funding and programs that they allege Musk spearheaded. The attorneys general also argued that DOGE staff 'created a substantial risk of cybersecurity breaches' by improperly getting access to 'sensitive' state data.
Chutkan's decision comes after the US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit in March paused her earlier ruling allowing the state attorneys general to demand records and information from Musk and the US DOGE Service. The appeals court had delayed that fight until Chutkan ruled on whether to let the case go forward.
The case is New Mexico v. Musk, 25-cv-429, US District Court, District of Columbia (Washington).
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hindustan Times
24 minutes ago
- Hindustan Times
‘Tharoor, Owaisi, Sule defended India abroad, Rahul Gandhi betrayed': Himanta
In a rare show of appreciation for their political opponents, Assam chief minister Himanta Biswa Sarma on Monday praised Congress leader Shashi Tharoor, AIMIM supremo Asaduddin Owaisi and NCP(SCP) leader Supriya Sule for defending India with dignity abroad. The BJP leader also launched a sharp attack on Congress MP Rahul Gandhi for "tarnishing India's image on international platforms, while contrasting him with these other opposition leaders. Also Read | 'World now knows the truth': Shashi Tharoor-led delegation on Operation Sindoor wraps up US visit "I am thankful to Congress and other opposition leaders, especially Shashi Tharoor, who have strongly defended India's position on foreign soil. Not only him, but leaders like Asaduddin Owaisi and Supriya Sule also represented India on foreign soil and defended the nation," Himanta was quoted as saying by PTI. "They all stood for India. But the Leader of the Opposition in the Lok Sabha, Rahul Gandhi, did not. He has betrayed the nation. He has betrayed the armed forces," Sarma further alleged. Also Read | 19 Brahmos, Crystal Maze missiles: How India brought Pakistan to its knees during Op Sindoor Himanta Biswa Sarma was referring to the all-party delegations that recently toured several countries, carrying out an anti-terror drive on behalf of the central government. Sarma further accused Rahul Gandhi of repeatedly raising doubts about India's military strength and questioning the government's response to Pakistan. During a discussion on a resolution in the state assembly over the success of 'Operation Sindoor', Sarma said Gandhi has been constantly asking about India's losses, but never wanted to know the damage incurred by Pakistan in the military conflict. Also Read | Gen Ghai, face of army during Op Sindoor, promoted as dy chief of army staff "Asking about the losses after the military conflict is a different thing, but he asked about India's losses when it was ongoing. However, he never asked about Pakistan's losses," Sarma claimed. Rahul Gandhi often stirred controversies with his remarks abroad, the most recent being his speech at the University of Texas in the United States last year. Addressing the gathering there, Gandhi said, "The West has an employment problem. India has an employment problem... But many countries in the world don't have an employment problem. China certainly doesn't have an employment problem. Vietnam doesn't have an employment problem." Also Read | Did Pakistan hit Adampur, Bhuj air bases during Operation Sindoor? Satellite images show otherwise Recently, Gandhi called out External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar for his "damning silence" on the number of aircraft India lost under Operation Sindoor. The Congress MP also accused the EAM of informing Pakistan of the start of India's response in Operation Sindoor.
The Hindu
29 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Krishnappa, founder of DSS, remembered in Shivamogga
B. Krishnappa, founder of Dalit Sangharsha Samithi (DSS), was remembered on his 87th birth anniversary in Shivamogga on Monday. The elected representatives and leaders of the DSS recalled his struggles for the rights of the Dalits in the State. Speaking on the occasion, Balkhees Banu, Congress MLC, said Prof. Krishnappa founded the DSS following the principles of educate, organise, and agitate preached by Dr. B.R. Ambedkar. Through the organisation, he fought for equality in society, she said. 'The DSS grew bigger over the years and helped thousands of families in their struggles for their rights. I wish the lamp that he lit remains strong and bright,' Ms. Banu said. M. Gurumurthy, the State convener of DSS, said that Prof. Krishnappa led many struggles, fighting for land and houses for the deprived section, and opposed the atrocities committed against them. He inspired many people to join the organisation across the State and fight for their equality.' B.L. Raju, president of Dalit Noukarara Okkuta, said Dalits continue to fight for land rights, and the struggle was led by Prof. Krishnappa. C.S. Shadakshari, State president of the State Government Employees' Association, Sannarama, and office-bearers of the DSS were present.
Time of India
29 minutes ago
- Time of India
If It Happened There: Donald Trump sends central troops to quell protests in opposition-ruled California
Protesters confront police on the 101 Freeway near the Metropolitan Detention Center of downtown Los Angeles, Sunday, June 8, 2025, following last night's immigration raid protest. (AP Photo/Jae C. Hong) Note: The following piece is inspired by Joshua Keating's If It Happened There which uses tropes and tones normally used by American media to describe events in other countries. The facts presented deal with as much exactitude and accuracy as an American media outlets' reporting about a foreign country. Los Angeles, Mexican for the city of angels, is home to Hollywood – America's answer to Bollywood – and a city where starstruck aspirants come with the dream of being immortalised on the silver screen. Yet, the city, which falls under America-administered California, an opposition state which overwhelmingly voted for Mr Donald Trump 's rival from the Democratic Party, Ms Kamala Harris, soon came to resemble a warzone. Mr Trump – known for strongman-like tendencies like Mr Putin and Mr Jinping – sent in over 2,000 National Guard troops, dressed like Stormtroopers, to quell a popular uprising sparked by workplace raids on labourers who Mr Trump's officials claim are 'illegals' working in America without papers. It was, as one expert put it, a prime example of authoritarian overreach that has become a feature of American autocracy since Mr Trump's white nationalist Republican Party came to power in the last election. The flashpoint began in LA's Fashion District, where federal immigration agents—known locally as ICE—raided a garment factory, with similar operations in numerous surrounding areas. The raid at a Home Depot – a retail franchise with numerous outlets across the country – saw violent clashes between protesters, including unionists and local residents. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like 5 Books Warren Buffett Wants You to Read In 2025 Blinkist: Warren Buffett's Reading List Undo Among the arrested was Mr David Huerta, a unionist, who eyewitnesses say was zip-tied and dragged away near the Metropolitan Detention Centre – which has overnight come to resemble a heavily guarded fortress. The situation grew increasingly volatile, coming to resemble a modern-day version of A Song of Ice and Fire – a popular series of books – which inspired the incest-drama Game of Thrones. Driverless Waymo cars – a company owned by Google, often accused of monopolising the internet to further America's imperial power – were set ablaze in a powerful demonstration of the working-class revolution against Silicon Valley's technocratic regime. While California's duly elected leaders – progressive Democrat Governor Mr Gavin Newsom and Los Angeles Mayor Ms Karen Bass – objected, 2,000 National Guard troops hit hotspots near downtown Los Angeles. Local protest organisers – many embedded with immigrant rights groups – were illegally dragged away. Teenagers and older women with placards were violently attacked as federal officials justified the harsh measures, claiming they were 'suspected participants.' A Distraction? Some commentators even wondered if Mr Trump's heavy-handed action might be a ruse to distract from his recent feud with Mr Elon Musk, a technocrat and the world's richest man who funded Mr Trump's return to the White House with both his personal wealth and by buying the social media platform named X – formerly known as Twitter – to help spread canards that could return Mr Trump to the White House. Mr Trump, also a former avid user of Twitter who was banned from the platform earlier and opened his own rival Truth Social, had a spat with Mr Musk over a finance bill that the American President likes to call the 'Big Beautiful Bill,' and which Mr Musk called fiscal suicide. The fallout included a physical altercation with Mr Trump's tariff honcho, Mr Scott Bessent, whose attempt at a parliamentary rebuttal ostensibly left Mr Musk with a black eye. Mr Musk – known for using powerful drugs like ketamine – retaliated by calling Mr Trump some unprintable names and even claiming that the American President's name was present in the Epstein Files. The Epstein Files, incidentally, refer to a litany of famous celebrities – from both sides of the political aisle, including Republicans and Democrats – who visited Mr Epstein's island where they allegedly participated in peccadilloes involving underage individuals without their consent. Protesters take cover behind chairs near the Metropolitan Detention Center in downtown Los Angeles, Sunday, June 8, 2025, following last night's immigration raid protest. (AP Photo/Eric Thayer) Mr Musk – who until recently ran a government department that looked at cutting fiscal waste – is the first member of Mr Trump's new team to have a public falling out. Unlike the last administration, where many members including the then Vice President Mr Mike Pence stood up to Mr Trump, the new cabinet is full of individuals whose first claim to fame is complete fealty to Mr Trump. This includes Ms Kristi Noem, the head of Homeland Security, Ms Linda McMahon, the Secretary of Education, former Fox News host Mr Pete Hegseth who is now the Secretary of Defence, and the current Vice President, Mr JD Vance, who once called Mr Trump 'cultural heroin' and compared him to Adolf Hitler. In his second term, Mr Trump has eschewed any pretence of adhering to the US Constitution, whether its quelling dissent in institutes of higher education, illegally deporting American citizens, or accepting expensive gifts from foreign nations. Mr Trump's actions might not just affect residents of America-administered California or even just Americans, given the country's overstated power over the rest of the world. The new regime under Mr Trump has taken sweeping decisions to target its own population, deport legal citizens, silence dissent, and punish anyone perceived to be disloyal, while the courts – once heralded as the guardians of the Constitution – mutely watch on. Questions must be raised as to whether a country like the United States of America is a fit choice for global events, like the next football World Cup – set to be held in 2026 – when it can't even adhere to the basic norms that citizens of democracies take for granted.
