
These are America's 10 weakest state economies most at risk in a recession
An analysis of all 50 states' economic development marketing efforts — part of CNBC's annual America's Top States for Business study — finds that a strong economy is the most frequently mentioned selling point to attract corporate site selectors these days. That includes factors like job growth, fiscal stability, and a wealth of other corporate headquarters. State web sites mentioned economic factors 222 times in our analysis, well ahead of the next most cited factor, infrastructure, at 203.
Site selection consultant Tom Stringer, a principal and leader of the site selection and incentives practice at Grassi Advisors in New York, said that emphasis on economic strength and stability stands to reason.
"You want to look for an environment where there is consistency," he said. "That is very important to businesses, because the stability allows you to operate with a degree of certainty, a degree of cost control, and it also talks to the health of the economy."
Because the Top States overall methodology prioritizes the factors that states are talking about most, the Economy category carries the most weight in this year's competitiveness study.
To score each state's economy, we considered traditional measures such as state gross domestic product growth, job growth, state fiscal health, the number of major corporations headquartered in each state, and the strength of the local housing market. But with the Trump administration seeking to slash federal spending and raise tariffs, we also considered how dependent each state is on the federal government. And we considered each state's exposure to a trade war, using data compiled for us by Trade Partnership Worldwide, a Washington, D.C.-based research firm.
Some states enter these uncertain times in a position of strength. But by the numbers, these ten states are the most vulnerable in a downturn.
The Beaver State's economy relies heavily on international trade. It makes up nearly one-quarter of the state's GDP. And nearly 14 percent of that international goods trade is with China, leaving Oregon seriously exposed in a trade war.
"Exports and manufacturing play outsized roles in the state, so trade tensions will be borne disproportionately," said the state's most recent official revenue forecast, released in May.
That forecast stops short of calling for a recession, but it predicts "near stagnation" of the state's economy, which was already not going great guns heading into the turmoil. Economic growth last year was among the slowest in the nation.
2025 Economy Score: 198 out of 445 Points (Top States Grade: D+)
GDP (2024): $265.1 billion (+1.2%)
Job Growth (2024): 0.6%
Debt Rating and Outlook (Moody's): AA1 Stable
Share of state spending from federal funds: 32%
International goods trade (2024): $61.4 billion (23.2% of GDP)
Major Corporate Headquarters: Nike
The Mountain State's economy did show some healthy growth last year, but that may be coming to an end for now, according to Sean O'Leary, senior policy analyst at the West Virginia Center on Budget and Policy. In a blog post in May, O'Leary wrote that federal job cuts are starting to show up in the economy of a state with more than 17,000 federal jobs — about 2.5% of the state's workforce. Unemployment has fallen in West Virginia, but that has more to do with people leaving the workforce than workers finding jobs. Employment barely grew last year, and jobs have begun to decline in 2025. Meanwhile, deep tax cuts enacted in 2023 with subsequent cuts each year have had a limited impact on growth, O'Leary said, while reducing state revenue.
"As we continue on into the year, the flat job growth, weakening labor force, and proposed federal program changes like cuts to Medicaid should raise concern for policymakers," O'Leary said.
2025 Economy Score: 195 out of 445 Points (Top States Grade: D+)
GDP (2024): $83.7 billion (+3.5%)
Job Growth (2024): 0.2%
Debt Rating and Outlook (Moody's): AA2 Stable
Share of state spending from federal funds: 28%
International goods trade (2024): $9.6 billion (11.6% of GDP)
Major Corporate Headquarters: None
The Peace Garden State has one of the strongest balance sheets of any state — it could operate for more than 235 days on its fund balances alone, according to the Pew Charitable Trusts. That's longer than any other state except Wyoming. Those reserves might come in handy based on the rest of North Dakota's economic picture, which is not pretty. North Dakota's economy contracted last year, while the national economy grew by 2.8%. It doesn't help — indeed it hurts — that the price of North Dakota crude oil has been down around than 15% from its high, falling dangerously close to the breakeven price of around $65 per barrel. The state energy regulator said in May that oil producers are likely to take more rigs out of production as the year goes on.
2025 Economy Score: 194 out of 445 Points (Top States Grade: D+)
GDP (2024): $59.9 billion (–0.7%)
Job Growth (2024): 1.5%
Debt Rating and Outlook (Moody's): AA1 Stable
Share of state spending from federal funds: 31%
International goods trade (2024): $12.4 billion (20.7% of GDP)
Major Corporate Headquarters: None
Honestly, The Land of Lincoln's has a lot going for it, economically. It is home to more S&P 500 companies than all but three states (California, New York and Texas). It is a magnet for foreign direct investment. Gov. JB Pritzker just signed the state's seventh consecutive balanced budget, which will bring the state's rainy day fund to nearly $2.5 billion by the end of this fiscal year. Perhaps best of all, the state is among the least dependent on Washington — federal funds comprise just 19% of state spending, less than any other state.
The trouble is that Illinois dug itself into such a deep fiscal hole over the years that it can't just dig itself out overnight. Pritzker touts Illinois' nine consecutive credit rating upgrades on his watch, but Illinois still has the worst credit rating of any state, according to Moody's. Despite progress in recent years, Illinois still faces more than $140 billion in unfunded pension liabilities. Add the fact that the state faces serious exposure in a trade war, and you get an economy that remains deeply troubled even if it is moving in the right direction.
2025 Economy Score: 188 out of 445 Points (Top States Grade: D–)
GDP (2024): $895.3 billion (+1.1%)
Job Growth (2024): 0.7%
Debt Rating and Outlook (Moody's): A3 Positive
Share of state spending from federal funds: 19%
International goods trade (2024): $282.5 billion (31.6% of GDP)
Major Corporate Headquarters: Abbott Laboratories, Deere, McDonald's
The Ocean State's economy grew solidly in 2024, but it still not inspiring a ton of confidence among investors and entrepreneurs. Rhode Island ranks 35th in foreign direct investment as a percentage of its GDP, based on data from the U.S. Commerce Department. And it ranks 47th for new business formations, according to U.S. Census Bureau data. Only a small percentage of the state's international trade is with China, which could help blunt the impact of a trade war. But the state is heavily dependent on Washington, leaving it vulnerable to federal budget cuts.
2025 Economy Score: 180 out of 445 Points (Top States Grade: D–)
GDP (2024): $65.3 billion (+3.2%)
Job Growth (2024): 1.1%
Debt Rating and Outlook (Moody's): AA2 Stable
Share of state spending from federal funds: 40%
International goods trade (2024): $14.3 billion (21.9% of GDP)
Major Corporate Headquarters: CVS Health, Hasbro
The Land of Enchantment's economy stands to lose big as the Trump administration slashes the size of the federal government. Federal funds account for a whopping 43% of state spending. And, heading into the DOGE era, New Mexico was home to more than 22,000 federal employees in a workforce of less than 900,000. New Mexico is a popular place for new business formations — in the top five, according to the Census Bureau. But they don't seem to last long. An analysis of Bureau of Labor Statistics data by Simply Business, a national insurance marketplace, found that new businesses in New Mexico had the second lowest survival rate — after Minnesota — when considering the fate of businesses one, two and three years after startup.
2025 Economy Score: 177 out of 445 Points (Top States Grade: D–)
GDP (2024): $112.8 billion (+2.2%)
Job Growth (2024): 1.1%
Debt Rating and Outlook (Moody's): AA2 Positive
Share of state spending from federal funds: 43%
International goods trade (2024): $19.3 billion (17.1% of GDP)
Major Corporate Headquarters: None
While The Pelican State does not have a large federal workforce, fully half of state spending is funded by the federal government — more than any other state. That puts Louisiana in a bad spot when it comes to the potential effect of federal budget cuts. More than a third of Louisiana residents rely on Medicaid for health coverage, and the majority of that is paid for by Washington. Even before the size of the federal cuts began to take shape, state lawmakers began bracing for impact. State Senate President Cameron Henry said last month that lawmakers postponed consideration of tax cuts until the scope of the federal cuts becomes clear. Louisiana derives a large portion of its economy from international trade, though only a small portion of that economic activity comes from China.
2025 Economy Score: 173 out of 445 Points (Top States Grade: F)
GDP (2024): $256.4 billion (+3.1%)
Job Growth (2024): 1%
Debt Rating and Outlook (Moody's): AA2 Stable
Share of state spending from federal funds: 50%
International goods trade (2024): $100 billion (39% of GDP)
Major Corporate Headquarters: Entergy
These are uncertain times in the heartland, as any farmer in The Sunflower State will tell you. Tight credit, declining land values and crop prices, and the prospect of higher tariffs all have the rural economy under stress. The Kansas City Federal Reserve Bank, which covers Kansas along with Nebraska, Wyoming, Colorado, and parts of New Mexico and Missouri, said in May that a one percent drop in farmland prices in Kansas in the first quarter of this year contributed to what it called a "subdued" farm economy. That filters through to the rest of the state, and it is a continuation from last year, when growth in Kansas was sluggish.
2025 Economy Score: 142 out of 445 Points (Top States Grade: F)
GDP (2024): $185.7 billion (+1%)
Job Growth (2024): 0.7%
Debt Rating and Outlook (Moody's): AA2 Stable
Share of state spending from federal funds: 31%
International goods trade (2024): $30.6 billion (16.5% of GDP)
Major Corporate Headquarters: None
The Magnolia State depends heavily on the federal government, with nearly half of its state budget coming from Washington and a large number of federal jobs relative to its overall workforce. Plus the state derives nearly one third of its GDP from international trade, making it vulnerable to higher tariffs. Nonetheless, Republican Gov. Tate Reeves is pushing forward with a plan to phase out the state income tax over time, though the same bill he signed in March raises gasoline taxes. Mississippi saw solid job growth and respectable economic growth last year. But the headwinds it faces now are formidable.
2025 Economy Score: 130 out of 445 Points (Top States Grade: F)
GDP (2024): $122.4 billion (+2.4%)
Job Growth (2024): 1.3%
Debt Rating and Outlook (Moody's): AA2 Stable
Share of state spending from federal funds: 46%
International goods trade (2024): $35.5 billion (29% of GDP)
Major Corporate Headquarters: None
The Last Frontier's last place economy is a major reason it also finishes at the bottom overall in CNBC's annual competitiveness ranking. Alaska's fortunes are inexorably linked to the price of oil, and Alaska North Slope crude is down significantly in the past year.
Alaska's fortunes are also closely tied to the federal government, with one of the largest federal workforces of any state relative to its overall workforce. Efforts to diversify Alaska's economy go back decades, and they have never had much success. Republican Gov. Mike Dunleavy has been pushing the idea of leasing the state's vast public lands for underground carbon storage, but it has been slow to get off the ground. Another idea is less about diversification than it is about getting more out of the state's petroleum resources. The Trump administration is backing a long sought after natural gas pipeline alongside the Trans Alaska oil pipeline to monetize a natural byproduct of crude production. But the economics of the project are tricky, again because oil prices are so low.
2025 Economy Score: 110 out of 445 Points (Top States Grade: F)
GDP (2024): $54.9 billion (+1.5%)
Job Growth (2024): 2.7%
Debt Rating and Outlook (Moody's): AA3 Positive
Share of state spending from federal funds: 40%
International goods trade (2024): $9.6 billion (17.5% of GDP)
Major Corporate Headquarters: None
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Atlantic
5 minutes ago
- Atlantic
The Making of a Trump-Putin Summit
Vladimir Putin is coming to America. Despite the international warrant for the Russian president's arrest, despite his years of hostile threats against NATO, and despite him showing no remorse for his invasion of a sovereign nation. None of that matters to President Donald Trump, who announced Friday night that he would meet the globally shunned leader this Friday in Alaska. What does matter to Trump is that he may be able to stop the bloodshed in Ukraine, the worst European conflict since World War II, fulfilling one of his biggest campaign promises. Many of Washington's European allies, Ukraine included, now worry that the Art of the Deal president could propose a solution to this conflict that makes concessions to the aggressor, including and especially a redrawing of Ukraine's borders, when he sits with Putin. Putin has made no commitments to cede territory or scale back Russia's aggressive military campaign, and he has long claimed that Ukraine does not exist. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky, in a video message yesterday, angrily condemned the notion that Trump and Putin alone could decide Ukraine's future. 'Any decisions made against us, any decisions made without Ukraine, are at the same time decisions against peace,' he said. Trump, who has grown frustrated in recent weeks with Putin's lack of enthusiasm for compromise, had set a deadline for Russia to come to the negotiating table or risk increased tariffs and other punitive measures. He even threatened to move nuclear-armed submarines closer to Russia, and vowed to punish India—one of the largest buyers of Russian oil—for helping bankroll Moscow's energy sector. Trump had promised to end the conflict before even stepping foot inside the White House. As months passed with no deal, Trump finally came to believe that Putin was to blame. But signs that an end to hostilities between Ukraine and Russia was remotely plausible came the day after Trump's envoy to the Middle East (and beyond), Steve Witkoff, returned early this month from Israel. Through back-channel discussions with a close Putin ally, Witkoff—the real-estate executive who, like Trump, is more dealmaker than diplomat—received word of the Russian leader's new willingness to discuss ways to end the fighting. Witkoff had reason to believe that talks were in the making, but he did not want to discuss the details over the phone, according to two people who spoke on the condition of anonymity because the discussions weren't public. After giving his pilot a night off in Miami, Witkoff shuttled back to Washington to brief Trump, Vice President J. D. Vance, Secretary of State Marco Rubio, and White House Chief of Staff Susie Wiles on what he learned, before heading to Moscow last week to get a face-to-face guarantee from Putin that he would attend an in-person meeting in good faith. 'We are not going to send Donald Trump there if it's not perfect,' a top Trump adviser told us. By Wednesday, Trump and Witkoff looped in European allies, including Zelensky, on Witkoff's meeting and their plans to get Trump and Putin in a room together. Trump is open to including Zelensky in the Alaska talks this week, a White House official told us. But for now, at Putin's request, the Ukrainian leader has not received an invite. 'The President hopes to meet with Putin and Zelensky in the future to finally bring this conflict to an end,' White House deputy press secretary Anna Kelly told us in a statement. Zelensky's resistance risks provoking the ire of Trump, who often hails himself as a peacemaker in a world that, in his telling, had plunged into warfare and chaos during Joe Biden's presidency. There is real worry in Kyiv and Europe about the deal Trump may strike, especially as public opinion about U.S. assistance to Ukraine continues to sour, particularly among Republicans. At most, European and U.S. officials believe that Trump may walk away with some flimsy guarantees to freeze the conflict—meaning that Ukrainian territory captured by Russia since February 2022 will stay in Russian hands. That, according to Zelensky, is a nonstarter. Trump has disliked Zelensky dating back to their 'perfect call' in 2019 that ultimately led to his first impeachment, and he views Ukraine as undeserving of U.S. support. Trump also remains skeptical of the traditional transatlantic alliances prized by his predecessors, and he routinely calls out Europe for failing to share more of the burden regarding NATO's collective-defense agreement. Trump's skepticism of Ukraine was shaped even before he became president, when, in the thick of the 2016 election, the country's anti-corruption agency released information alleging payments to his campaign manager at the time, Paul Manafort. In White House meetings and talks with foreign leaders during his first term, Trump repeatedly described Ukraine as 'totally corrupt' and full of 'terrible people.' Trump has even repeated Kremlin talking points that Ukraine is to blame for the war. Trump has long believed that he and Putin share a special rapport. Allies say he felt that the two survived the 'Russia, Russia, Russia hoax ' together, and that Putin would respect his historic political comeback. Trump has been deferential to his Russian counterpart, fueling speculation about the true nature of their relationship in global capitals since his first term in office. At their introductory meeting in Germany, in 2017, Putin urged Trump to recognize Russia's claim of sovereignty over part of Ukraine, citing links dating to an 11th-century political federation located in modern-day Ukraine, Belarus, and part of Russia. Former officials with direct knowledge of the meeting said Trump listened intently to Putin's soft-spoken argument against Ukrainian sovereignty. But Putin, a shrewd former Russian-intelligence officer, has never quite returned the affection. He openly admitted, when asked during the leaders' 2018 Helsinki summit, that he had hoped Trump would win the election two years prior, although he never owned up to interfering in the contest on the Republican candidate's behalf. He has been at times cool to Trump in recent months, including being slow to congratulate him on his election. Administration officials like to note the state of play when Trump took office the second time, emphasizing how much the U.S.-Russia relationship has deteriorated since February 2022, with Putin isolated from much of the Western world, particularly after the International Criminal Court issued a warrant for his arrest in connection with the war in Ukraine (the U.S. is not a party to the Rome Statute of the ICC). Witkoff, officials say, has largely been responsible for restoring those direct lines—something you want intact when dealing with two of the world's biggest nuclear powers. Witkoff 'speaks directly for the president,' one person said. 'Trump is a chameleon, but when it comes to Witkoff, the two are in lockstep.' Trump has many people he calls friends, but few like Witkoff; the men have the same background in New York real estate and made a point of not abandoning the president during his months of political exile after he left office, in 2021. A person familiar with the White House discussions said the members of the small senior national-security team supporting Trump all bring different perspectives to the peace talks. Vance has long been a skeptic of U.S. involvement in Ukraine. Rubio has taken a more hawkish approach to Russia. Witkoff and Trump consider themselves dealmakers, often speaking with each other in front of the others in a language the others don't speak, the person said. Still, Trump came into office believing that he could quickly deliver a cease-fire. For months, he generally sided with Moscow in its war against Ukraine, absolving Russia for having started the conflict and threatening to abandon Kyiv as it mounted a desperate defense. He upbraided Zelensky in the Oval Office, in February, and briefly stopped sharing intelligence with Ukraine. He believed that he could, in addition to working with his Russian counterpart to end the war, reset relations and forge new economic ties between the two countries. He even envisioned a grand summit to announce a peace deal. But Putin rejected repeated American calls to stop his attacks. And Trump, in recent months, began to take that personally, complaining privately to advisers—and then eventually in public—that Putin would tell him one thing in their phone calls (that he was committed to peace) and then act entirely differently afterward (by bombing Ukraine). Putin only ratcheted up his attacks as the weather warmed and Russia began a renewed summer offensive. Some aides close to Trump came to believe that Putin would signal a willingness to negotiate—including agreeing to some low-level meetings with the Ukrainians in Turkey this spring—in order to buy time to continue his offensive. Trump's recent sanctions threat played a role in pushing Putin back toward negotiations, aides believe. The president imposed some steep secondary sanctions on India but held off on punishing other nations that do business with Moscow—namely, China—and he did not sanction Russia directly by Friday's deadline, giving Putin more time to negotiate. Still, the president had remained intrigued by the thought of a summit's made-for-TV spectacle. When the idea resurfaced last week, Trump first said that he wanted an initial meeting with Putin, followed by a second one that included Zelensky. But the Kremlin balked at the subsequent summit, not wanting to legitimize Zelensky by putting him opposite Putin (Trump later said that Zelenky's eventual inclusion would not be a dealbreaker). White House aides are leery of dispatching Trump to meet with Putin without any guarantee of a deliverable goal—namely, a cease-fire or, at minimum, a real step toward the cessation of hostilities. U.S. and European officials were still gauging whether Russia was serious about curtailing the fighting or simply buying time for more attacks to strengthen its position for future negotiations. And though Trump believes his own personal negotiating skills could sway Putin, it is not clear that Russia would offer an agreement acceptable to Zelensky. Trump has long argued that it is always better to talk, regardless of who it is with, and he has especially emphasized that dialogue between nuclear-armed states, such as the U.S. and Russia, is imperative. He's been known to walk away from splashy summits when talks go awry, as he did in 2019, when he abruptly ended his Vietnam meeting with North Korean Chairman Kim Jong Un. He canceled a highly controversial Camp David meeting with the Taliban before it ever took place. But five days is also a long time in Trump's America, and these fragile efforts to get Trump and Putin in the same Alaskan meeting room could easily hit barriers before the delegations board their flights.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
NEWS OF THE WEEK: Donald Trump blasts Gayle King: 'No talent'
Responding to a New York Post article claiming Gayle King's CBS Mornings faces an uncertain future, the President announced, "Gayle King's career is over.". In a post to Truth Social, he continued, "She should have stayed with her belief in Trump. She never had the courage to do so. No talent, no ratings, no strength!". The tirade comes weeks after CBS announced the cancellation of The Late Show With Stephen Colbert. King has been with CBS for more than a decade, after leaving longtime friend Oprah's OWN network.
Yahoo
33 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Good Times Restaurants Third Quarter 2025 Earnings: EPS: US$0.14 (vs US$0.12 in 3Q 2024)
Good Times Restaurants (NASDAQ:GTIM) Third Quarter 2025 Results Key Financial Results Revenue: US$37.0m (down 2.4% from 3Q 2024). Net income: US$1.49m (up 13% from 3Q 2024). Profit margin: 4.0% (up from 3.5% in 3Q 2024). EPS: US$0.14 (up from US$0.12 in 3Q 2024). Trump has pledged to "unleash" American oil and gas and these 15 US stocks have developments that are poised to benefit. All figures shown in the chart above are for the trailing 12 month (TTM) period Good Times Restaurants shares are up 23% from a week ago. Risk Analysis You should learn about the 2 warning signs we've spotted with Good Times Restaurants. Have feedback on this article? Concerned about the content? Get in touch with us directly. Alternatively, email editorial-team (at) article by Simply Wall St is general in nature. We provide commentary based on historical data and analyst forecasts only using an unbiased methodology and our articles are not intended to be financial advice. It does not constitute a recommendation to buy or sell any stock, and does not take account of your objectives, or your financial situation. We aim to bring you long-term focused analysis driven by fundamental data. Note that our analysis may not factor in the latest price-sensitive company announcements or qualitative material. Simply Wall St has no position in any stocks mentioned.