
Dog's Day Out: Bengaluru's Midday Meal Scheme
If X is a fire, I'm the soggy towel left in the rain. Some people hailed the decision as a landmark move for animal rights. Others bemoaned the lack of basic human rights before we move on to trickier frontiers like animal rights. Personally, I'm learning NOT to have opinions on every topic. That being said, I admit I have always gotten along fabulously with stray dogs.
It all began when I was in Himachal Pradesh, a state where everything and everybody is beautiful. We were trekking up a hill, and a dog joined us silently. Like the final story in the Mahabharata, as the Pandavas walk up to heaven with a dog in tow, we climbed up the hill, and the dog was content to give us company. We had no snacks or biscuits to offer, only pats and love. That is when I understood that dogs aren't just man's best friend, they're also man's greatest acquaintances.
Since then, I have been friends with the local strays in every city I have lived in or visited. It's the cheapest therapy available. You get to play with the local dogs, your brain releases oxytocin, and you get a friend whose stories you don't have to ignore on Instagram. People often ask me –Why stray dogs? I think it's because they're the last creatures who've stuck with us through our concrete-jungle madness. We cut down forests, drove out wildlife, filled the skies with smog, and these chaps just shrugged and said, 'Alright, we'll sit next to your dosae cart and bark at your SUVs.' You've got to respect that. They're survivors. Crows, too, by the way. They never get the same PR as dogs, but they're just as smart, social, and judgmental. If we ever build a society from scratch after the apocalypse, it'll be led by stray dogs and crows, while humans argue about which filter to use for their disaster selfies.
That said, the stray dog issue in India is undeniably serious. Unchecked populations, poor vaccination, and occasional aggressive behaviour have turned them from companions to controversies. So when the stray dog feeding scheme was announced, I braced myself for chaos. But I must admit – I was impressed by the menu. Chicken and rice. Not biryani, mind you. We are not monsters.
I imagine a group of strays sitting around like old uncles at a canteen, discussing politics over their midday meal. 'The quality of chicken is not so great, da. I told you to move to Indiranagar.'. Of course, critics will argue: Shouldn't we fix potholes, traffic, and garbage before feeding dogs gourmet lunches? To them, I say – have you ever tried fixing traffic in Bengaluru? Feeding dogs is the easier option. And arguably more effective. Every dog has its day. And in Bengaluru, that day now includes a hearty lunch. As for me, I will continue to vibe with the strays while not having an opinion. Unless they ever launch a breakfast scheme for cats. Then, we riot.
(The writer's views are personal)

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)

First Post
7 minutes ago
- First Post
Ukraine's major government shake-up amid stalled talks with Russia. Is Zelenskyy eyeing more control?
Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has announced a major reshuffle in his government. Yulia Svyrydenko is the new prime minister, outgoing PM Denys Shmyhal takes over defence, and he has nominated Olga Stefanishyna as the new US ambassador. Zelenskyy's rivals have accused him of consolidating power, while critical media outlets described it as 'strengthening of the head of the presidential office' read more Ukrainian President Volodymr Zelenskyy seeks to inject fresh political energy more than three years into Russia's invasion. File image/ Reuters Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy has announced a major government reshuffle, replacing his prime minister, defence minister and nominating a new ambassador to the United States, as he seeks to inject fresh political energy more than three years into Russia's invasion. Here are the main points to know about the shake up, which comes as ceasefire talks with Russia stall and with the White House vowing to keep backing Kyiv. Ukraine's new PM with US ties Ukraine's new prime minister is Yulia Svyrydenko, who set her priorities as strengthening the economy, scaling up arms production and expanding support programs. 'It is a great honour for me to lead the Government of Ukraine today,' Svyrydenko said, adding that 'war leaves no room for delay. We must act swiftly and decisively'. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Svyrydenko, who was confirmed by Ukraine's parliament on Thursday, is known for finalising a natural resources deal with the United States that nearly derailed ties between the countries. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy named Yulia Svyrydenko, the First Deputy Prime Minister of Ukraine and the Minister of Economy, as the next Prime Minister of Ukraine on Monday, July 14, 2025. (Photo: Instagram/Yulia Svyrydenko) 'She was the key and the only person leading these negotiations. She managed to prevent them from unravelling,' said Tymofiy Mylovanov, a former economy minister who worked with Svyrydenko. She won the respect of US partners and businesses, analysts have said. 'Trump and his administration are now a priority for Ukraine. Svyrydenko has proven herself there and will continue to do so,' said political analyst Volodymyr Fesenko. A new ambassador to the US Zelenskyy has named outgoing Justice Minister Olga Stefanishyna as his pick for ambassador to the United States – though her candidacy needs to be approved in Washington. Stefanishyna would be taking over from Oksana Markarova, who organised aid and fostered good relations with Joe Biden's administration. But with Trump having railed against his predecessor's multi-billion-dollar support for Kyiv and U-turning multiple times on weapons for Kyiv, Zelenskyy has decided to change his envoy to the White House. Zelenskyy said that Stefanishyna, who also took part in negotiations on the minerals deal, would help 'continue to work with the United States on this basis – adding mutually beneficial economic substance to our political and diplomatic interaction'. Zelenskyy has named outgoing Justice Minister Olga Stefanishyna as his pick for ambassador to the United States, though her candidacy needs to be approved in Washington. File image. AFP Her nomination is a surprise after Zelenskyy had last week strongly indicated that outgoing defence minister Rustem Umerov, who led two recent rounds of negotiations with Russia, would be his pick for US ambassador. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD The president has not said why he opted for Stefanishyna over Umerov, or what role the latter will have, if any, in the new government. Is Zelenskyy seeking more control? Zelenskyy's rivals have long accused him of seeking to consolidate power and some critical media say Svyrydenko's appointment marked the latest step in this trend. Svyrydenko is seen as loyal to Andriy Yermak, the powerful head of the Zelenskyy's office. Ukrainska Pravda, a respected independent media outlet, published a report describing the moves as 'the strengthening of the head of the presidential office – although it's hard to see how that's possible'. Ukraine's President Volodymyr Zelenskyy. File image/ Reuters 'It's obvious that the Presidential office's influence will increase,' opposition lawmaker Mykola Kniazhytskyi told AFP. 'The authorities are pursuing further centralisation and refusing any dialogue,' he added. Other expected changes Outgoing prime minister, an unassuming technocrat, Denys Shmyhal, will take over the defence ministry brief, Zelenskyy has said. Fesenko said Shmyhal's appointment as defence minister would likely see him 'bring some order' to the ministry, which has previously been plagued by corruption scandals. After voting on the prime minister, lawmakers are due to approve her new government, according to political commentators, who suggested changes could be expected at the energy ministry. With input from agencies


Mint
37 minutes ago
- Mint
Will SC's push for online content rules bring clarity or stifle free speech?
The spotlight has returned to the limits of free speech for content creators in India, as the Supreme Court recently asked the government to frame a set of guidelines to curb obscenity and vulgarity in online content without curtailing freedom of expression. Multiple benches of the court, while hearing different cases on 15 July involving comedians and influencers, stressed the need for clear guidelines to curb objectionable content while protecting Constitutional rights. The apex court's directive has left content creators divided. While some welcome the move, hoping it will define clear boundaries for permissible online behaviour and reduce legal uncertainties and arbitrary measures, others fear it could threaten their creative freedom and lead to self-censorship. 'I'm open to guidelines that promote responsible content creation without stifling creative expression. As a roast comedy content creator, I already self-censor to avoid offence, but clarity on what's acceptable would help," said Shivamsingh Rajput, a Surat-based YouTuber who has close to 10.5 million subscribers across his five YouTube channels. 'A content classification system would be great. It would let audiences choose what they watch and take the pressure off creators. Dark humour has its audience worldwide and I believe India could benefit from a more open approach. This would allow our content economy to grow and evolve," Rajput added. Rohan Cariappa, a Bangalore-based creator who creates short comedy skits on Instagram and content about India's growing hip-hop and rap culture on YouTube, expresses skepticism on executing such guidelines. He has close to 500,000 followers across platforms. 'The idea of having a set of guidelines for creators doesn't sound bad to me, but the real problem lies in the execution. With the kind of population and the number of creators we have in this country, it is really difficult to fast-track anything," Cariappa highlighted, adding that as per the latest data, India is home to over 8 million active content creators. 'I also fear that such rules can be misused to arm-twist creators with different ideologies and affinities, be they religious, political, or any other kind. I have personally faced this when a comedy video of mine attracted a legal notice last year after a few complaints and my phone was confiscated only for the case to be quashed by the court later. People have also tended to try to pull down creators who have grown very fast. So, as much as the proposal sounds good, I am unsure whether it is feasible given the size of our community and country," Cariappa further added. The influencer marketing industry in India is expected to grow to ₹3,375 crore in 2026 from ₹2,344 crore last year, as per EY data reported by Mint earlier. The fresh debate on the creation of such guidelines for creators began with India's Got Latent controversy, where Cure SMA India Foundation accused five stand-up comedians, including Samay Raina, of making insensitive remarks about persons with disabilities. While hearing a plea, Justice Surya Kant verbally asked Attorney General R. Venkataramani to draft guidelines in consultation with stakeholders to ensure they align with Constitutional principles. 'What we would like is guidelines in conformity with Constitutional principles, balancing freedom and the limits of that freedom where rights and duties start. We want it to be comprehensive and debated openly," remarked Justice Kant. Justice Kant clarified that Article 21 (right to live with human dignity) of Indian Constitution overrides Article 19 (freedom of speech), especially in cases involving insensitive comments against vulnerable groups. On the same day, another bench of Justices B.V. Nagarathna and K.V. Vishwanathan discussed ways to curb 'divisive tendencies" on social media while hearing West Bengal-based Wazahat Khan's plea to club FIRs against him for posts on Hindu deities. The bench called for detailed deliberations to frame guidelines that balance objectionable content with Constitutional rights. Meanwhile, a third bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Aravind Kumar expressed concern over the tendency of citizens to post 'anything and everything" online while hearing cartoonist Hemant Malviya's plea for protection against a case filed for posting a 'revolting" cartoon on Prime Minister Narendra Modi. 'What is happening today is people say and write all kinds of things without caring about the language they use online and on their shows," Justice Dhulia remarked. Mint spoke to lawyers practising technology law in India's top courts. They noted that the court's discussions and the government's plan to bring new rules align with existing laws like the Information Technology Act, 2000. However, they cautioned that new rules should not create vague or subjective definitions for terms like vulgarity and obscenity, as this could lead to misuse. 'The Intermediary Guidelines to follow already define such content under existing law to allow takedown. New rules shouldn't create separate or vague standards that risk curbing legitimate online expression," said Sidhant Kumar Marwah, Partner at Unum Law. The guidelines mentioned by Marwah refer to The Information Technology (Intermediary Guidelines and Digital Media Ethics Code) Rules, 2021 that are a set of rules that require digital intermediaries such as YouTube, X, Instagram and Facebook to respond to user grievances expeditiously and remove harmful content. Nakul Gandhi, founding partner of NG Law Chambers, said the framework must begin by recognising that freedom of expression is deeply subjective. 'What's vulgar to one may be satire to another. The danger lies in converting personal offence into legal prohibition. Instead of rigid definitions, the law should focus on principled thresholds, such as: Does the content incite violence? Does it exploit or endanger a specific group? These are measurable parameters. But matters of taste, tone, or personal offence should remain outside the scope of legal sanction." Lawyers also stressed the need for safeguards under new rules to prevent arbitrary takedowns by platforms. According to Ankit Sahni, partner at Ajay Sahni & Associates, any government takedown request must have a written order with legal grounds and give creators a chance to respond. 'Transparency reports, time-bound reviews, and oversight by an independent grievance body can build trust." Marwah from Unum Law suggested setting up an independent regulatory body manned by experts, similar to the UK's Online Safety Act, to issue takedown orders based on clear, well-defined standards. However, legal experts warned of what overregulation can do. 'Vague or broad rules may stifle creativity, comedy, and critical commentary. Guidelines must be clear, transparent, and proportionate to protect free expression," noted Anupam Shukla, technology law and privacy practice at Pioneer Legal. Gandhi from NG Law Chambers further cautions that 'the direction seems more cautionary than empowering for creators. Seen in that light, moves towards broad guidelines, without any defined limits, risk becoming tools against creators, especially the independent ones who don't have the backing of big platforms or studios."


Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Partners in crime: How Russia, Ukraine syndicates are running drug trafficking rackets from Bali - with crypto and encrypted chats
Representative image/AI generated Indonesia's National Narcotics Agency (BNN) has identified Bali as a key location for drug trafficking operations, involving Russian and Ukrainian nationals. According to Indonesia's state-run Antara news agency, these syndicates are using advanced technologies like blockchain to avoid detection by law enforcement. BNN chief, police commissioner general Marthinus Hukom, said his agency has found that traffickers are relying on distributed ledger systems to manage their operations discreetly. "This is a very unique phenomenon, where nationals of Russia and Ukraine — two countries currently at war — have become partners in the crime (of) drug trafficking in Bali," Hukom said during a public lecture at Udayana University in Bali, as quoted by Antara. Hukom noted that traffickers are using social media platforms, particularly Instagram, to connect with buyers. Communication is carried out using coded language and encryption to prevent tracing. The syndicates are also conducting transactions through cryptocurrencies rather than traditional payment methods, making enforcement efforts more complex. "It is very difficult to crack down on such practices because the perpetrators do not make transactions in a conventional manner," Hukom was quoted as saying by news agency Ankara. Indonesian authorities are coordinating with Russian officials to address the issue. The United Nations Office on Drugs and Crime has previously said that Indonesia is a major target for international drug syndicates, partly due to its large youth population, even though the country has strict drug laws.