Tejashwi seeks to puncture ECI's claims on progress in Bihar SIR
Addressing a press conference, the Leader of the Opposition in the State Assembly also took strong exception to the EC's "silence" on the Supreme Court's suggestion that Aadhar card and ration card be included in the list of acceptable documents, to be submitted by voters whose names did not figure in the electoral rolls of 2003 when SIR was last conducted.
"In its press note issued on Saturday, the EC claimed that more than 80% of the State's 7.90 crore voters have already been covered under SIR. This is a bewildering claim considering the fact that an estimated four crore people from Bihar live in other states."
"We would like to know from the EC how many such migrants have been covered under the exercise. It is well known that during the elections, a large number of people return to their home state to cast their votes. During the COVID-19 pandemic, several special trains had to be run for an estimated 40 lakh returnees. The EC should disclose what arrangements were made this time," the former Deputy Chief Minister said.
The EC seems to be playing with figures to give a false impression that it has been undertaking this exercise competently, he alleged.
"We have received complaints that booth-level officers (BLOs) are under pressure to achieve targets and they are ending up collecting enumerating forms without getting those duly signed and filled up by the voters concerned," he added.
Mr. Yadav also had a few video clips played, in which enumeration forms were shown strewn on the streets, to underscore that the SIR was marred by many irregularities.
However, the X handle of the chief electoral officer has been running "fact checks" debunking these videos.
Mr. Yadav alleged, "The EC is never coming up with a proper statement or press conference explaining what it intends to do about the SC order earlier this week when it was told to consider including Aadhar card and ration card." There is no clarity on the role that booth-level agents nominated by political parties are supposed to play in the exercise, he said.
"In its tearing hurry to meet the July 25 deadline, the EC came up with an advertisement proclaiming that those unable to submit their documents may just deposit their forms, leaving the remaining things for the claims/objections stage. But there was no official notification to this effect and the BLOs are confused," claimed the chairman of the INDIA bloc's coordination committee for the state assembly polls due later this year.
Mr. Yadav, who spoke in the presence of a number of alliance partners, also said, "We still hold the view that SIR is an exercise aimed at depriving, wrongfully, many existing voters of their right to franchise in order to benefit the ruling NDA. Leaders like Prime Minister Narendra Modi, Union Minister Amit Shah and Chief Minister Nitish Kumar should be squarely blamed for this undemocratic move."
In the 2020 Assembly polls, there were several seats in which candidates of Mahagathbandhan (INDIA bloc's Bihar prototype) lost by margins of 3,000 votes or less. A little manipulation in the voters' list can easily tilt the scales. If indeed the EC believes that the voters' list had been suspect so far, it should declare last year's Lok Sabha elections as null and void, Yadav said.
He scoffed at the claim of the BJP that the exercise was essential to weed out "illegal Bangladeshi immigrants and Rohingyas" from the voters' list.
"In the 2014 and 2019 Lok Sabha polls, the BJP-led coalition did exceedingly well. Even last year, the NDA bagged 30 out of the state's 40 seats. So the BJP should tell us whether it thinks the alleged infiltrators were voting for Narendra Modi," he added.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
20 minutes ago
- Time of India
'Log kisi ko bhi, kuch bhi keh dete hain': Supreme Court on PM's objectionable cartoons
The Supreme Court on Tuesday granted protection from coercive action to a cartoonist accused of sharing alleged objectionable cartoons of Prime Minister Narendra Modi and RSS workers on social media . A bench of Justices Sudhanshu Dhulia and Aravind Kumar, however, cautioned if he continued to share offensive posts on social media, the state was free to take action against him under law. "We will have to do something about it," the bench said as it mulled passing orders on abusive social media posts. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like This Is How Much New Windows Should Cost In Round Rock westshorehomeremodel Learn More Undo Miffed over the alleged abusive online posts, it added, "Log kisi ko bhi, kuch bhi keh dete hain (People say anything to anyone)'." Cartoonist Hemant Malviya challenged in the apex court a Madhya Pradesh High Court order passed on July 3 refusing to grant him anticipatory bail. Live Events He was booked by Lasudiya police station in Indore in May on a complaint filed by lawyer and RSS worker Vinay Joshi. Malviya hurt religious sentiments of Hindus and disturbed communal harmony by uploading objectionable material on social media, Joshi alleged. Advocate Vrinda Grover, representing Malviya, on July 14 argued the issue related a cartoon made in 2021 during the Covid-19 pandemic. "It may be unpalatable. Let me say it is in poor taste. Let me go to that extent. But is it an offence? My lords have said, it can be offensive but it is not an offence. I am simply on law. I am not trying to justify anything," she said. Grover agreed to delete the alleged offensive post. "Whatever we may do with this case, but this is definitely the case that the freedom of speech and expression is being abused," Justice Dhulia then observed. Additional Solicitor General K M Nataraj, appearing for Madhya Pradesh, said such "things" were repeatedly done. When Grover said there should be some maturity, Nataraj said, "It is not the question of maturity alone. It is something more." The FIR mentioned various "objectionable" posts, including allegedly inappropriate comments on Lord Shiva as well as cartoons, videos, photographs and comments regarding Modi, RSS workers and others. Malviya's lawyer in the high court contended that he only posted a cartoon, but he could not be held responsible for the comments posted on it by other Facebook users. The FIR accused him of posting indecent and objectionable material with the intention of hurting religious sentiments of Hindus and tarnishing the RSS's image. The police invoked Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita Sections 196 (acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony between different communities), 299 (deliberate and malicious acts intended to outrage religious feelings) and 352 (intentional insult with intent to provoke breach of the peace) as well as section 67-A (publishing or transmitting in electronic form any sexually explicit material) of the Information Technology Act against the accused.
NDTV
26 minutes ago
- NDTV
Supreme Court Flags "Grey Area" In Law Over Seeking Votes On Religion, Caste
New Delhi: The Supreme Court, while rejecting a petition seeking de-registration and de-recognition of Asaduddin Owaisi's party AIMIM, today orally remarked that there exists a "grey area" when it comes to political parties using religious and caste sentiments to get votes, which is "dangerous". A bench of Justice Surya Kant and Justice Joymala Bagchi today refused to entertain the plea against AIMIM but allowed the petitioner to file a writ petition raising the larger issue without naming any particular party. The top court was hearing plea against the Delhi High Court's dismissal of Tirupati Narashima Murari's petition seeking quashing of the registration granted by the Election Commission to All India Majlis-e-Ittehadul Musalimeen (AIMIM) as a political party. Bench of Justices Surya Kant and Joymalya Bagchi, however, held that under the Abhiram Singh verdict, an election petition can be filed against an individual candidate who seeks votes in name of religion and not a political party. Advocate Vishnu Shankar Jain for petitioners today argued that Mr Owaisi's party is in teeth of Constitution, especially the principle of Secularism. Advocate Jain cited a landmark ruling by Supreme Court in Abhiram Singh case where it was held that no-one can ask for votes in the name of religion. However, the bench said that under the Abhiram Singh verdict an election petition can be filed against individual candidate who seek votes in name of religion and not a political party. Justice Surya Kant remarked that the AIMIM's constitution is not against the Indian Constitution. "There are certain rights guaranteed to minorities in Constitution... party manifesto says it will work towards protection of those rights," Justice Kant remarked. Advocate Jain however further pressed that AIMIM's constitution also says it will promote Islamic education amongst Muslims. Advocate Jain said that this is discriminatory as if he goes before the Election Commission and sought registration of a political party with a Hindu name, saying he will promote teaching of Vedas, Upanishads etc, he won't be allowed. At this point Justice Kant said that there is nothing wrong in promoting education. "If ECI raises objection against teaching of Vedas or anything, please go to the apt forum. Law will take care of that. Nothing wrong in reading old treatise, books or literature. Absolutely no prohibition under law," Justice Kant said. Advocate Jain however argued that under Constitution only education institution can do so. But Justice Kant said that it will be great if political parties engage in promoting education. The advocate again pressed his arguments that "AIMIM promotes unity only in Muslims, why not all Indians?" The top court was not convinced with his arguments and suggested that he raise the larger issue without naming any party or person in a fresh plea. Justice Kant partially agreed with advocate Jain's argument and said, "You may be right, there is some grey area... File a petition which does not name any particular person... or accuses everyone." Justice Kant said that there are some parties which rely on caste sentiments, that's equally dangerous. The bench said that the larger perspective is reforms and granted liberty to petitioner to come to court with larger issue of parties seeking vote in names of caste and religion.
Indian Express
an hour ago
- Indian Express
From the Urdu Press: ‘EC must see writing on wall, do course correction', ‘Nitish govt must curb Bihar killings'
Amid the controversy over the Election Commission (EC)'s Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in poll-bound Bihar — which has sparked confusion and fear among a large section of people, especially the poor, marginalised and minorities — the EC has written to Chief Electoral Officers (CEOs) of all states, directing them to begin preparations for a similar exercise. The matter is also being heard in the Supreme Court. Urdu dailies continued to spotlight these developments, calling the EC's move a 'veiled exercise to determine citizenship' or an 'NRC through the backdoor' despite not having this remit. Commenting on the Supreme Court's move to allow the EC to carry on with the SIR in Bihar while giving it some crucial suggestions, the Hyderabad-based Siasat, in its July 11 leader, points out that the apex court has raised questions about the timing of the exercise, barely a few months before the Bihar Assembly polls. So, in case of disenfranchisement, an elector would not even have time to seek redressal to be able to vote in the polls, the editorial says. The court has also questioned the procedure to be followed by the EC before deleting names from voter lists. Saying that the SIR, in the process of checking voters' eligibility, is ascertaining citizenship, the daily notes that the top court also said that it is the jurisdiction of the Union Home Ministry and not the EC to determine whether an individual is a citizen or not. 'The Opposition parties have raised similar concerns while questioning the SIR, which they fear would deprive many voters of exercising their franchise. Besides seeking documents that effectively determine citizenship of a voter (if not registered in the 2003 rolls), the poll body has even sought similar documents of the parents of such a voter (if born after July 1, 1987),' it states. 'In a poor and backward state like Bihar, conducting the SIR in this manner has led to the EC being accused of shifting its goalpost — from updating and revising voter lists to establishing their citizenship, which in turn has triggered accusation that it is actually a bid to push the National Register of Citizens (NRC) through the backdoor.' The EC's bid not to include the Aadhaar card in the list of 11 documents it asked for the SIR also made its intent 'suspect', given that for every official transaction Aadhaar has been virtually made mandatory, the editorial says. The apex court's suggestion to the EC to consider Aadhaar, voter card and ration card in the SIR — and explain the reasons if they could not be accepted for the process — is the major takeaway of the first hearing in the matter. 'The writing on the wall for the EC is clear. Despite being an independent, constitutional body, its image has taken a beating in recent years. Besides levelling allegations of electoral irregularities, the Opposition has also accused it of working at the behest of the Central government,' the edit says. 'The EC must operate under the constitutional and legal framework. It is accountable to the people of the country as elections are the lifeblood of a democracy, which could not be allowed to be undermined. The EC must review its decisions and take people, the key stakeholder of democracy, into confidence. The SIR must be conducted well before an election so that it could fulfil the imperatives of due process.' Referring to an anecdote recounted by RSS chief Mohan Bhagwat, of a Sangh leader who joked about stepping aside at 75 years of age and making way for others, the New Delhi edition of Rashtriya Roznama Sahara, in its July 14 editorial, says the statement has stirred a debate in political circles. Speaking at a function in Nagpur to release a biography of late RSS ideologue Moropant Pingle, Bhagwat noted that Pingle said: 'When someone is felicitated at 75, it means your time is up, now step aside and let others do the work'. Several Opposition leaders sought to link Bhagwat's statement to the fact that both he and Prime Minister Narendra Modi are turning 75 soon (Bhagwat on September 11 and Modi on September 17). The daily also notes that 75 has become somewhat of an age milestone for retirement in the BJP, with the examples of leaders like L K Advani and Murli Manohar Joshi in the recent past. However, the edit says, this benchmark will not be applicable to Modi, pointing to a statement by Union Home Minister Amit Shah that Modi will continue as PM even after 75 and asserting that there was no upper age limit in the BJP's constitution. 'The RSS chief's signal is not personal but ideological,' it notes. 'However, both the RSS and the BJP have refrained from discussing in public the implications of Bhagwat's statement, although it has prompted talks and speculations in various quarters, including the Opposition and the media.' Flagging a spate of killings reported from Patna and other parts of Bihar in recent days, Siasat, in its July 15 editorial, says that during the regime of Lalu Prasad-led RJD, the then Opposition parties BJP and JD(U), now NDA allies, used to accuse it of 'jungle raj'. 'Nitish Kumar has been the Bihar Chief Minister for 20 years now. The BJP has also been with Nitish for a long period. But, lawlessness still prevails in the state. And, strangely, even now the BJP and the JD(U) point an accusing finger at the Lalu Prasad government for the state of affairs in Bihar,' it says. The daily writes that the law and order situation in the state has sharply declined, with several people murdered in Patna alone over the last few days. 'In the latest incident, a lawyer was shot dead in the state capital. Earlier, a BJP leader and a businessman were gunned down in the city. In Purnea district, five members of a family were burnt alive. Despite the failures of police and administration over these chilling incidents, Nitish Kumar and the BJP have maintained silence,' it says. 'The string of killings has deepened a sense of insecurity among people while raising the morale of criminals.' The editorial states that the Nitish government needs to take responsibility for the law and order situation and take action to improve it. 'Instead, the NDA is still indulging in blaming the Lalu regime in a bid to cover up its failings, which is unfortunate. The Nitish government needs to give an account of its two-decade-long reign amid accusations that it has not taken any concrete measures to change the condition of the state.' The edit points out that the NDA partner and LJP(RV) chief, Chirag Paswan, has expressed concerns over the rising number of murder cases in Bihar. 'If such incidents occur in the Opposition-rules states, such as West Bengal, the BJP goes hammer and tongs in attacking them. But in the case of Bihar, the party has shied away from its accountability. It should nudge Nitish to stir into action and focus on upholding law and order.'
