logo
JACKSON HEWETT: As cash moves toward extinction, it's time to lift the veil on payment costs

JACKSON HEWETT: As cash moves toward extinction, it's time to lift the veil on payment costs

West Australian15-07-2025
As Bitcoin — a completely unnecessary piece of tech — soars to $A180,000 on little more than FOMO, it's worth revisiting what its spruikers once promised.
Remember blockchain? The decentralised online record book that everyone can see, no one can change, and that updates automatically as transactions happen, was billed as the promised land of friction-less payments.
Crypto evangelists told us Bitcoin, and the slew of derivative cryptocurrencies, were vital for the digital age because they were the gateway to a future of real-time, AI-powered transactions and seamless capitalism.
A big claim. Yet here we are on outdated payment platforms, still forking out $60 a year each in sneaky surcharges — or $1.2 billion across the country.
So credit to the Reserve Bank for taking the bit between the teeth and proposing to scrap surcharges altogether.
In an era where the country is crying out for productivity-boosting reforms, here's one that delivers for consumers and may even force some long-overdue innovation in how payments are processed.
'Removing surcharging would make card payments simpler, more transparent and help to increase competition in the card payments system,' the RBA says in its review of merchant card payment costs.
Alongside the surcharge ban, the Bank has proposed capping interchange fees, mandating least-cost routing, and requiring banks and payment providers to clearly disclose the fees they charge merchants. The aim: expose a murky system to sunlight and stop billions in hidden costs being quietly passed onto the public.
Because it's always the least powerful who end up clipped — and nowhere is that clearer than in how card issuers treat small businesses.
The RBA highlights the stark disparity in fees.
Large merchants with scale and savvy payments teams can negotiate all-in processing costs well below 0.5 per cent. Small businesses — your local butcher, café or florist — often pay two or three times that. Total fees of 1.5 to 2 per cent per transaction aren't uncommon.
That's why it's often the corner store that has to slap a handwritten sign next to the EFTPOS machine spelling out the surcharge.
They cop the higher fees — and the customer complaints.
The Council of Small Business Organisations Australia says removing surcharges won't fix the problem, just bury it in the price tag.
'The reality is that these fees will still be paid, just not disclosed. That cost will be baked into the price of coffee, groceries, and services across the country,' said COSBOA chair Matthew Addison.
So how much should the customer be footing, really?
According to the RBA, the average fee for a small business is around 1.6 per cent. That's an extra $1.60 on the $100 flowers you bought mum for Mother's Day.
But the wholesale cost of that transaction — the actual interchange fee — is just 8 cents today, and could fall to 6 cents for debit cards and 0.5 per cent for credit if the RBA gets its way.
Multiply that margin across the 1.3 billion card transactions processed every month in Australia and the scale of extraction becomes clear.
EFTPOS provider Tyro, whose shares briefly fell on the news before rebounding, welcomed the shake-up.
Chief executive John Davey said the changes would force bundled service providers to get real about their pricing.
'Businesses are suddenly going to be invoiced on a monthly basis with a fee. And I would expect that they'll be looking for the best deal they can get, and that will create competition and opportunity,' he said.
But there's a twist in the tale for consumers: those fees help bankroll credit card reward schemes.
'One of the things about interchange that's probably not well understood is that it is funding a lot of the rewards programs that many of us use day to day,' Mr Davey said. 'So yes, maybe I'm being surcharged, but it's also funding a benefit I'm receiving.'
In other words, expect reward points to get stingier if those margins tighten.
Until then — and with changes not likely to come in before 2027 — consumers may be better off using a reward credit card rather than debit, so long as they pay it off in full each month.
According to the RBA's retail payments data, EFTPOS still offers the cheapest route for merchants at 0.42 per cent per transaction, compared with 0.49 per cent for Visa and 0.56 per cent for Mastercard.
AMEX, with its more generous reward structure, averages 1.35 per cent.
But it's not just card costs under pressure.
Cash is quickly vanishing — down to 13 per cent of all transactions and expected to fall to just 4 per cent by the end of the decade. Its infrastructure is in crisis: Armaguard, which moves 90 per cent of Australia's physical money, has had to be bailed out twice in two years by the banks and major retailers just to keep the wheels turning.
Even the RBA and the banks concede the system is unsustainable.
But they also acknowledge that cash still matters — as a backup, a store of value, and a critical tool for vulnerable communities.
Which is why getting the card payment system right is so important. We're building the rails of a near-cashless economy, and too much of the current system is riddled with hidden margins and soft monopolies.
If we want a more productive economy — one that's fairer, more competitive, and more efficient — it's time to bring payment costs down and transparency up.
The blockchain crowd promised that. The Reserve Bank might actually deliver it.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Are banks getting tighter with frequent flyer bonus point offers?
Are banks getting tighter with frequent flyer bonus point offers?

Courier-Mail

timean hour ago

  • Courier-Mail

Are banks getting tighter with frequent flyer bonus point offers?

Don't miss out on the headlines from Lifestyle. Followed categories will be added to My News. I've been looking at getting a new credit card and it seems banks are offering less bonus points. What's the best way to get the most points? This is an interesting observation and my gut instinct tells me you may be correct. Ultimately the best way to check is to look at some historical data of what banks have offered. The team at compares many credit cards on the market and crunched the data on bonus points offers over the past six years. Contrary to my initial thoughts, it wasn't all doom and gloom. Looking at Qantas earning credit cards, the ANZ Frequent Flyer Black, lowest bonus points offered was 90,000. Today, it sits at 130,000 points which is actually its peak offer. For a Velocity card, it's pretty much the same story. The American Express Velocity Platinum Card has fluctuated considerably over the six years however in 2019 it was offering 100,000 bonus points. In January of this year the same offer was available. It has since dropped back to 60,000. Bonus points may have passed their peak, but there are other benefits to being a card holder. Picture: American Express. Taylor Blackburn, personal finance specialist at Finder, explained while it may seem bonus offers have passed their peak, it isn't the case. 'Many of the points offers are cyclical and vary from month to month and year to year, but we are actually on an upswing of sorts. Bonus points are key, but not the only selection criteria.' Blackburn advises to consider the annual fee, earn rate and other features like lounge passes, insurance and purchase protection, not to mention that switching credit cards too often can impact your credit score. Tough times could be ahead The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) has proposed changes that will impact credit cards starting mid-2026. The most relevant change is the RBA wanting to reduce the interchange fee. The interchange fee is what the merchant bank (the bank of the business where you are swiping your card) pays your credit card issuer every time you pay for something. Certain stores slap on a surcharge as a way to recoup some of the money lost when they pay the interchange fee. It may seem like a win, especially if surcharges disappear altogether, but it could become a problem for frequent flyer credit cards. We could see a shake up of frequent flyer programs in 2026. That's because banks typically points in bulk from airlines to then use as sign up bonuses and rewards. These points are partly funded by annual fees, however the real revenue comes from interest charges when you don't pay your statement in full every month and also, interchange fees. Reducing interchange fees could lead to not only a drop in bonus offers and points earned through spending on your credit card. In other news, Westpac is changing the points-earning rates on its range of Platinum and Black credit cards from 1 August. It is introducing a cap on monthly card spend that will earn points at the full rate. After a cardholder spends $5,000 in a statement cycle, the earn rate drops. See also: Why everyone's rushing to use their Qantas Frequent Flyer points by August 5 What's the best way to get the biggest bonus points offer? As Finder research shows, offers are cyclical and change month to month. If you're not in a rush, I would hold out till you see a better offer. One thing is for sure, I would make one last switch before mid-2026 when the landscape could drastically change. Have a question about points? Drop Sabine an email at escape@ Personal replies are unfortunately not possible. Originally published as Are banks getting tighter with frequent flyer bonus point offers?

How Trump's crypto push boosted Bitcoin
How Trump's crypto push boosted Bitcoin

ABC News

time2 hours ago

  • ABC News

How Trump's crypto push boosted Bitcoin

Sam Hawley: Once a sceptic, now a convert. Donald Trump is embracing cryptocurrency and making a tidy profit on the side. The president's newfound love has seen cryptocurrencies like Bitcoin skyrocket in value, and now he's passing bills through Congress to change the sector entirely. Today, Ross Buckley, a Laureate Fellow and Scientia Professor at the University of New South Wales, on whether it's still just a bubble waiting to burst. I'm Sam Hawley on Gadigal land in Sydney. This is ABC News Daily. Ross, this month, the cryptocurrency Bitcoin reached an all time high. Just tell me what is going on. Ross Buckley: Well, we saw a continuation of an incredible increase in Bitcoin's value throughout this year. It's now up 25% on where it started the year. News report: The price of the main cryptocurrency Bitcoin has increased 10% in a week. News report: The price of Bitcoin has reached a new all time high. Bitcoin has passed the symbolic 100,000 US dollar mark. The price of Bitcoin has reached a new all time high this week, surpassing 120,000 US dollars. Ross Buckley: There's a couple of thousand cryptocurrencies, you know, many of them are very minor, but the more significant ones have all been doing very well. Sam Hawley: Yeah. All right. And the overall market capitalisation for crypto has surpassed four trillion dollars, so it's a lot. OK, so let's unpack why, Ross, this is actually happening. And like so much right now, Donald Trump is a part of it. He is a crypto convert, isn't he? He's gone from saying it's a total scam, which he told Fox News in 2021. Donald Trump, US President: Bitcoin just seems like a scam. I don't like it because it's another currency competing against the dollar. I want the dollar to be the currency of the world. Sam Hawley: To really embracing it fully. Ross Buckley: He has indeed. For one thing, he got a lot of votes out of crypto supporters in his run up to his election. And the other thing is he's made an awful lot of money personally out of it. The best estimates, the Financial Times of London estimates he's made between 320 and 350 million already himself. His wife has probably made about half that, about 160 Sam Hawley: million. Yeah, the whole family's in on this, aren't they? Yeah, they are. So Donald Trump is actually making a huge amount of money from it. And of course, there's a whole heap of ethical questions, concerns relating to that. Ross Buckley: Yep, absolutely. Sam Hawley: So just before we go on, you better just explain how crypto actually works. It's not real money. You can't go to a shop and buy something with it, but it is built on hype. So when Donald Trump says he likes it, that gives it a bounce, right? Just explain how it works. Ross Buckley: Well, it's there's a strictly limited amount of it, right? Under the algorithm that creates it, you can never create any more than a certain amount, which means if demand keeps going up and your supply is limited, the price keeps going up. It's not entirely accurate to say you can't buy anything with it. It's just a very inefficient way to buy things. But if you want to buy horrible things on the dark web, for instance, it would be your preferred way of buying them because, you know, it can't be traced. So if you're a money launderer or if you're the sort of person who shops for horrible services on the dark web, your crypto is your preferred way of paying for them. If you're a legitimate person, it is a wildly inefficient way of paying for anything. Sam Hawley: Right. Yeah. So if you're buying things illegally, you can buy drugs, weapons. All that stuff. But if you invest in crypto above board. Ross Buckley: Well, then it's just a speculative asset. So then you're just investing in an asset. History teaches us that when you have booms of this magnitude, they tend to be followed by busts. And when you have a bust, a lot of people lose a lot of money. And that's the purpose of financial regulation, to stop a lot of ordinary people losing a lot of money. I would say it's much more volatile than gold. You know, it's extraordinarily volatile. And, you know, and of course, doesn't have the track record of gold and the physicality of gold, etc. Sam Hawley: OK, so Ross, Donald Trump is now this huge enthusiast for crypto. And by the way, he's also the chief regulator of the industry and he is working to change it. Just tell me about this so-called crypto week in the United States. Ross Buckley: Yes, crypto week comprises three bills that are making their way through the Senate and the House. The first one that has got all the way through and has been signed into law was the so-called Genius Act. Donald Trump, US President: Yeah, we worked hard. It's a very important act, the Genius Act. They named it after me. And I want to thank you. I want to thank you. This is a hell of an act. Ross Buckley: The president might think it's a reference to him. It's actually an acronym. It stands for the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation for US Stablecoins Act. The Genius Act promotes a regime for stable coins and stable coins use similar technology to crypto, but they're different to crypto. They're really profoundly different. So that's the first. There's three bills that were making their way through the legislative process. This one is through. It's signed into law and it promotes a regulatory regime for stable coins. United States Congress: The ayes are 294 and the nays are 134. The bill is passed without objection. A motion to reconsider is laid on the table. Ross Buckley: The second act is the so-called Clarity Act, and that provides a comprehensive regime for the regulation of crypto. And so that is part of what's behind the boom, that a regulatory regime is coming that will make it more legitimate, easier to operate, and most financial services prosper when they're well regulated. And the third part of the crypto week is the Anti-CBDC Act. Now, CBDC is a Central Bank Digital Currencies, and this is an act to make sure that the US will never issue a central bank digital currency, which itself is fascinating because virtually every central bank in every reputable jurisdiction in the world has been working for the last few years on developing central bank digital currencies because everybody else thinks they're a good idea. Sam Hawley: Okay, so one of these bills has already passed the House, the Genius Act, and this goes to the regulation of stable coins. And quite frankly, Ross, I have no idea what they are or what the point of them is. So can you please just unpack that a bit more? What on earth are stable coins? Ross Buckley: Stable coins are digital currencies that are tied to real currency, to government currency. So what the Genius Act says is that banks and other entities can issue their own private digital currency as long as it's fully backed up by US dollars on deposit or by short-term US treasuries or other unimpeachable financial securities. So stable coins, I think, will change the world, and they will be important for Australia in time because if you look at Australia's financial system, our retail payments within the country work extremely well. International payments don't. International payments are slow, they're expensive. If you're engaged in international trade, given the modern world, they use a technology that is centuries and centuries old. Stable coins are perfectly adapted for international trade. So rather than making international payments by the Australian bank contacting the New York bank, which contacts the bank somewhere else, where they all take a little clip out of the ticket, and eventually the transaction happens between Australia and another country, stable coins are digital tokens. They can be sent directly. Payments that today may take two or three days and cost one or two percent will cost one or two hundredths of a percent and happen in a few minutes. Sam Hawley: So if, hang on, so if I went and bought a stable coin, say, worth a dollar, the issuer that gave me that stable coin would have to keep a dollar in reserve. Ross Buckley: You've got it. Sam Hawley: Is that how it works? Ross Buckley: Yep, and it would get, under the Genius Act, it will get audited every month and the regulator will make sure that there is a dollar in a trust account in a bank backing up that stable coin. Sam Hawley: Right, so then if I want to cash in my dollar, I can get paid immediately? Ross Buckley: Yes, you can. And you might say, well, how is that different to digital money now? Is that this is a tokenized form of money. So this token can be sent abroad. This token will work well on blockchains and distributed ledgers and with, in all the sort of plumbing of the system that is being developed. So rather than something happening in the software and then having to step outside the software into the banking system to make the payment, this will run on the same software. So it's very much more efficient. Sam Hawley: But it's still a cryptocurrency, right? But it's just, well, it's less volatile. Ross Buckley: It's rather like a cryptocurrency. It uses all the same technology, but it should not, if it's well done, it shouldn't be volatile at all. It shouldn't be any more volatile than the Australian dollar because it will be a digital expression of the Australian dollar or in this case, the US dollar. Sam Hawley: OK, so how widespread could these stable coins become? Ross Buckley: Well, they're best thought of as just a digital expression of the currency of the country, which is why every other country, including Australia, thinks the best way to create them is as central bank digital currencies, because issuing money is a core sovereign function. You know, paper notes are going out of use. These are just digital versions of paper notes. So logically, you'd think they'd be issued by the entity that issues the paper notes, namely the nation's central bank. But that doesn't fit well with the American ethos. So this trio of acts, the Genius Act promotes stable coins. The Anti-CBDC Act says we will never have the central bank issue this currency, this digital currency. Sam Hawley: And why is that? Ross Buckley: You'd have to ask Americans, wouldn't you? It's a profoundly different culture. They don't trust the government. They're very worried about the privacy imposing potential of a CBDC that government could look into the transactions you're making. But of course, it's easy to develop a CBDC. So the government can't see inside what's happening. That's what the Bank of England is doing with its CBDC. It'll be able to see when you buy them, when you redeem them, but it won't be able to see the transactions you're making at all. And strangely, nobody seems to mind that MasterCard and Visa sees everything we buy on the current system, right? That doesn't seem to bother Americans, but the US government potentially, because the government will promise not to look and it will build in technological solutions to prevent it looking, but Americans don't trust their own government. That's part of it. Sam Hawley: All right, but there are big companies, aren't there, like Amazon and Walmart, that are pretty keen to jump on this? Ross Buckley: Well, if you are an Amazon or a Walmart, at the moment you're looking at those fees, those surcharges, right, which looks like Australia is going to prohibit the separate charging of. The bill for credit card surcharges for Walmart or Amazon, which are much higher than they are in Australia, by the way, in the US, is huge. So if they create their own stable coins, they can create their own payment mechanism and basically sideline Visa and MasterCard altogether. Sam Hawley: Wow, OK. All right, so Ross, Crypto Week was pretty significant in the United States. We're seeing this legislation aiming to integrate cryptocurrencies into financial markets. That's right. But what about here in Australia? Is something similar being considered at all? Ross Buckley: I don't know. I'd be surprised if Australian regulators went in that way because of the potential for a huge bust. And a lot of people losing a lot of money. In some ways, Australia, I think, clearly will respond. The Australian banks will have to respond with their own stable coins to facilitate cheap, efficient international payments by Australian corporations. And if that's done well, that should be absolutely fine. I'd be absolutely gobsmacked if we ever passed a piece of legislation saying we can't issue a central bank digital currency. That would be nutso in my humble view. So I don't think we'll ever have anything quite like the Crypto Week that the Americans have had. But on these issues, we're a profoundly different people. Sam Hawley: Yeah, sure, but could the RBA, for instance, could it be in the future that it is issuing things like stable coins? Ross Buckley: It would issue a central bank digital currency because it's a central bank. And it's been working on this for a few years. It had a very good project two years ago exploring use cases on this. And it's got one going at the moment, Project Acacia, which is looking more broadly to examine how you could use central bank digital currency to pay for tokenised real-world assets. So tokenised money being exchanged for tokenised assets. So the RBA's doing a lot of work on it, some internationally leading work on it, yes. Sam Hawley: OK, all right. Well, of course, Ross, some of us have dabbled in cryptocurrency. A lot of us have not. But does this all mean that perhaps it will become more accessible and more widespread, or do you think, really, it's just the same and it's just too risky? Ross Buckley: The stable coin stuff will change the rails upon which international payments and probably wholesale capital markets payments in Australia in time move. But that won't be something that the average person will really notice. You know, the same way you pay on Osco on your phone, you don't really deal with, you know, just transfer some money to a friend. You don't worry about how all that happens. It just works, right? The stable coin thing will be a revolution of payment rails and will really make a difference. But the cryptocurrency itself, Bitcoin type of stuff, that's every individual's personal choice. The actual cryptocurrency, I think, at these prices is extremely risky. Sam Hawley: Ross Buckley is a Laureate Fellow and Scientia Professor at the University of New South Wales. He's also a member of the Payments System Board at the Reserve Bank. This episode was produced by Sydney Pead. Audio production by Sam Dunn. Our supervising producer is David Coady. I'm Sam Hawley. Thanks for listening.

Opinion: Reduce executive hours and save 30,000 jobs
Opinion: Reduce executive hours and save 30,000 jobs

News.com.au

time5 hours ago

  • News.com.au

Opinion: Reduce executive hours and save 30,000 jobs

ANALYSIS A recent report by Roy Morgan found that about 1.3 million Australians are currently experiencing mortgage stress. They desperately need a rate cut, but for tens of thousands, the only way to get decent mortgage relief may be to lose their jobs. One of the economic factors the RBA monitors closely when making cash rate decisions is unemployment and, ideally, it would like to see unemployment reach 4.5 per cent. Before the July decision to hold, unemployment was still at 4.1 per cent. Of course, the next set of data revealed it had jumped to 4.3 per cent, which meant there were about 30,000 more people out of work. With Australia's labour force around the 13 million mark, we'd need a similar number to lose their jobs again to get to 4.5 per cent. Are you one of the 30,000 odd Aussies who are still needed to take one for the team in order to bring about more mortgage relief? Of course, a rate cut won't do much for you if you have no income. The good news is that the 4.5 per cent figure doesn't need to be achieved immediately. RBA Governor Michele Bullock said she wants to see a gradual easing in employment. 'Having your hours cut is tough, but it's often preferable to losing a job altogether,' Ms Bullock said, while addressing a fundraising lunch last week. I agree. Perhaps we could begin by cutting Ms Bullock's hours so she works four days a week. That would take about $200,000 of potential spending out of the economy, or the equivalent of the jobs of two average wage workers. Ms Bullock would just have to tighten her belt a bit and make do with $800,000 a year. Luckily for her, she doesn't have a mortgage on her own home because she paid it off on a half price interest discount deal for RBA employees. Perhaps also Macquarie Bank CEO Shemara Wikramanayake could pro rata her $24 million earnings and get by on just $20 million a year? It will take a bit of adjustment, but if she scrimps and saves and perhaps packs her lunch a few days a week, she could save the jobs of 40 average Australians and help get relief for those with mortgages. Repeat the process for a few other of Australia's highest paid financial executives and we may actually save a few thousand average jobs. According to the ATO, there are nearly 15,000 Australians earning $1 million a year (bearing in mind, that's 'taxable' income, so likely a fair few more). If each of these went to a four-day week, it would mean 30,000 average salary employees could keep their job without any serious inflationary risk. Regular Aussies trying to pay off mortgages are always the ones who get punished in order to keep inflation under control. But doesn't it make much more sense to reduce the spending capacity of rich people who don't have mortgages?

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store