logo
Kashmir: India bans books by prominent writers over alleged 'secessionist' content

Kashmir: India bans books by prominent writers over alleged 'secessionist' content

Middle East Eye07-08-2025
Indian authorities banned 25 books in Kashmir on Wednesday, including several written by prominent authors, alleging they promote "false narratives" about the contested territory and "incite secessionism".
The New Delhi-run Home Department issued a notification which accused the books and authors of playing "a critical role in misguiding the youth, glorifying terrorism and inciting violence" against the Indian state.
The ban listed 25 books it said had "been identified that propagate false narrative and secessionism", including Booker Prize winner Arundhati Roy's Azadi: Freedom, Fascism, Fiction; The Kashmir Dispute 1947–2012 by A G Noorani and US-based academic Hafsa Kanjwal's Colonizing Kashmir: State-building Under Indian Occupation.
The government alleged that the content of the books "would deeply impact the psyche of youth by promoting a culture of grievance, victimhood and terrorist heroism".
Kanjwal, an associate professor of South Asian History at Lafayette College, told Middle East Eye that the government's ban "reveals the deep insecurity at the heart of its settler colonial project in Kashmir".
New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch
Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters
"On one hand, it hosts events like the Chinar Book Festival, urging Kashmiri youth to read and celebrate literature. On the other, it aggressively censors the kinds of stories and histories Kashmiris are allowed to access," the award-winning academic said.
"This contradiction is central to how settler colonialism operates: through erasure and replacement. Erasure of memory, history, and identity combined with a long-standing effort by the Indian state to overwrite Kashmir's past and replace it with a narrative that legitimises its control. The book ban must be seen in this broader context," she added.
Attacks on human rights and freedom of expression have escalated since 2019, when Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi's government unilaterally stripped Kashmir of its decades-long autonomy and statehood.
Book seizures in Indian-controlled Kashmir spark fears of religious censorship Read More »
Earlier this year, Indian authorities seized more than 600 books by or about Syed Abul A'la Maududi, a noted twentieth-century Islamic scholar and founder of Jamaat-e-Islami, one of the largest religious organisations in the Indian subcontinent.
"Banning books is a defining feature of fascist regimes that fear truth and people's capacities to question state-imposed histories," Mona Bhan, a professor of anthropology at Syracuse University told MEE.
"The recent move to ban books marks yet another assault on Kashmiri identity and history, reflecting the broader impunity with which India has exercised control over Kashmir since 1947," she said.
"These bans are intended to suppress critical thinking and credible scholarship on Kashmir, making way for state-sanctioned narratives to dominate the Indian public," she added.
Kashmir has remained at the heart of a decades-long dispute between nuclear-armed neighbours India and Pakistan, both of which claim the territory in full but control separate parts.
Since 1989, the Indian-controlled portion of Kashmir has been in a state of insurgency, with tens of thousands of people arrested, brutalised or killed. Kashmiris widely view the armed revolt as a legitimate freedom struggle.
The United Nations views the territory as disputed between India and Pakistan, with several resolutions maintaining the Kashmiri people's right to self-determination and calling for a resolution to the dispute through a UN-monitored plebiscite.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

'They need a Nakba': Former Israeli intelligence chief calls Gaza death toll 'necessary'
'They need a Nakba': Former Israeli intelligence chief calls Gaza death toll 'necessary'

Middle East Eye

time3 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

'They need a Nakba': Former Israeli intelligence chief calls Gaza death toll 'necessary'

The former head of Israel's military intelligence, who resigned last year for failing to prevent the 7 October attacks, has said Palestinians need to face a Nakba "every now and then" and that the spiralling death toll in Gaza is "necessary" and will serve as "a message for future generations." According to audio recordings broadcast on Ulpan Shishi, a TV programme which airs on Israel's Channel 12 on Friday, Retired General Aharon Haliva said that "50 Palestinians should die" for every victim of the 7 October attack on southern Israel. "There's no choice, they need a Nakba every now and then to feel the consequences," Haliva said, referring to the ethnic cleansing of Palestine by Zionist militias to make way for the creation of Israel in 1948. "I'm not saying this out of revenge, but as a message for future generations," he added. It's unclear how many Israelis were killed by Hamas-led fighter on 7 October but according to the Israeli military at least 1,195 people died on that day. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters According to Haaretz, Israel's newspaper of record, the Israeli military widely employed the Hannibal directive on 7 October which mandates that Israeli forces use any means necessary to prevent the capture of Israeli soldiers, even if it involves killing them. In the wide-raging recording, Haliva also said that Israel was intent on creating a politically hostile environment in the occupied West Bank so that groups like Hamas could assume power and the international community would refuse to engage with them, thereby killing off the idea of a two-state solution. Haliva said that a plan was devised after the 2014 Gaza war to dismantle Hamas, but Israeli officials had no intention of "implementing it." "Listen, you don't understand that there are much deeper things here. The Israeli-Palestinian conflict is at the heart of the matter, because Hamas is good for Israel - that's [Finance Minster Bezalel] Smotrich's argument," Haliva said, saying that the minister wants to dismantle the Palestinian Authority and let Hamas take control in the West Bank, as it did in Gaza. "Why? Because if the entire Palestinian arena is destabilised and crazy, it is impossible to negotiate with," he said. "Then there will be no agreement [on a Palestinian state]." "Who made the decision to differentiate between Gaza and the West Bank? The prime minister!" Haliva said, placing blame on the rise of Hamas in Gaza on Netanyahu. "Why does he want Hamas, a terrorist organisation, to take over from the PA?" Haliva asked. "He wants Hamas, which is much worse than the PA. Why does he want Hamas? Because the PA has international status." "Hamas is an organisation that you can fight freely, it has no international justification, it has no legitimacy, you can fight it with a sword," he said. Hamas and Israel reached a brief three-stage ceasefire in January, but the deal collapsed in March after Israel took back several of its captives and resumed bombing Gaza, walking away from the deal before talks with Hamas on a permanent end to the war could start. Since then, the Trump administration has given Israel full backing to wage war on the enclave. Israel has relentlessly bombed the besieged Gaza Strip since the 7 October 2023 attacks on southern Israel, displacing the entire 2.3 million population multiple times, and has killed more than 60,000 Palestinians, mostly women and children.

Libyans turn out for elections as officials condemn 'unacceptable' obstructions
Libyans turn out for elections as officials condemn 'unacceptable' obstructions

Middle East Eye

time6 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Libyans turn out for elections as officials condemn 'unacceptable' obstructions

Hundreds of thousands of Libyans went to the polls on Saturday as officials condemned "unacceptable" obstructions that prevented voting in some areas. Fifty cities across the fractured country, including the capital Tripoli, took part in the elections. Polling stations opened as early as 9am [7am GMT] for the 380,000 registered voters, with security provided in the west by the interior ministry of the Tripoli-based Government of National Unity (GNU). The High National Election Commission (HNEC) said voting had been postponed in several polling stations after incidents and irregularities were reported. Libya remains divided between two authorities. Prime Minister Abdul Hamid Dbeibah, based in Tripoli, leads the internationally recognised GNU, while the east is controlled by Khalifa Haftar, head of the Libyan Arab Armed Forces. After a first phase in November across 58 cities, voting was scheduled to take place in 63 municipalities - 41 in the west, 13 in the east and 9 in the south. But the HNEC was forced to suspend the election at the end of July in 11 cities after reports of "irregularities". New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters In a statement on Saturday, Dbeibah praised those who came out to vote and criticised the reported disruption. 'There is no doubt that obstructing the electoral process, preventing it in a number of municipalities within this phase, and blocking citizens from reaching the ballot boxes to choose those who will manage their local affairs is an unacceptable act. It puts those responsible to the test regarding future entitlements, including parliamentary and presidential elections," he said. 'Direct elections remain our firm vision and the only option we seek to realise across the entire country. They are the path to overcoming political division and ending the long and burdensome transitional stages that have weighed heavily on our nation and our people.' On Saturday, HNEC said voting had been postponed in seven municipalities until 23 August after arson attacks destroyed election materials in Zawiya and Sahel al-Gharbi. The commission also reported an 'armed attack' on its offices in Zliten, 150km from Tripoli, on Tuesday. Dbeibah was appointed in 2021 as a consensus prime minister with a mandate to lead Libya into elections that never took place. Since then, there have been regular protests against his rule. Libya has been divided since the Nato-led removal of long-time ruler Muammar Gaddafi in 2011. The civil war became a proxy conflict with Russia, the UAE, Egypt and France backing Haftar and Turkey supporting the government in Tripoli.

Human Rights Watch condemns Qatar over jailing of Bahai leader
Human Rights Watch condemns Qatar over jailing of Bahai leader

Middle East Eye

time11 hours ago

  • Middle East Eye

Human Rights Watch condemns Qatar over jailing of Bahai leader

Human Rights Watch (HRW) has criticised Qatar for handing a five-year jail sentence to the leader of the country's Bahai community, denouncing it as an attack on his religious freedom. Remy Rowhani, 71, president of the National Spiritual Assembly of the Bahais in Qatar, was sentenced Wednesday to five years in prison by a Doha court for violating public order and religious and social values. HRW said Rowhani was being targeted "solely for exercising his rights to freedom of expression and religion". According to the group, Rowhani's sentence came as a result of his promoting the Bahai faith on social media. The Bahai community, which says it has more than 7 million followers worldwide, follows the teachings of Bahaullah, born in Iran in 1817, whom it regards as a prophet. New MEE newsletter: Jerusalem Dispatch Sign up to get the latest insights and analysis on Israel-Palestine, alongside Turkey Unpacked and other MEE newsletters "Locking up Remy Rowhani for five years on a series of charges... based solely on his religious identity and activities within the Baha'i community in Qatar constitutes a serious violation... of human rights," said Michael Page, HRW's deputy Middle East and North Africa director. "The Qatari authorities should respect fundamental freedoms and immediately release Rowhani." Citing court documents, the group said Rowhani was convicted, among other things, of "promoting ideas that question the foundations and teachings of Islam". Qatar's constitution officially prohibits any "discrimination based on sex, origin, language, or religion" and emphasises "freedom of worship". However, between 2003 and 2025, Qatari authorities "expelled up to 14 members of the community for no apparent reason other than their membership in the Baha'i faith," according to HRW. Remy Rowhani was arrested last April under Qatar's cybercrime law for posts made on an anonymous account, only months after being released from prison following a one-month sentence.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store