Legal storm brews over Greater Bengaluru Act; civil society, BJP likely to move court
Bruhat Bengaluru Mahanagara Palike
(BBMP) into several smaller corporations under the new Greater Bengaluru Governance (GBG) Act, 2024, has sparked a legal and political storm, with opposition parties and
civil society
groups preparing to challenge the law in court.
The legislation, passed recently in both Houses, received governor Thaawar Chand Gehlot's assent Wednesday and was subsequently notified in the official gazette. However, the Act now faces stiff resistance from several quarters, including principal opposition
BJP
and a coalition of civil society organisations under the banner Bengaluru Town Hall.
You Can Also Check:
Bengaluru AQI
|
Weather in Bengaluru
|
Bank Holidays in Bengaluru
|
Public Holidays in Bengaluru
"We will fight legally against the GBG Act," said opposition leader R Ashoka of BJP. "The governor has done his best under the circumstances. People are bound to criticise. If he gives his assent, they say he is pro-Congress and if he returns the bill, they brand Raj Bhavan as a BJP office."
BJP had earlier petitioned the governor to withhold assent, joining civil society members who contend that the bill violates the spirit of the 74th Constitutional Amendment by undermining local self-governance. Despite the objections, the govt re-sent the bill to Raj Bhavan last week.
The governor had initially returned the bill but is understood to have given assent considering a recent Supreme Court order mandating that governors must decide on pending bills within three months.
"We clearly explained our concerns about the bill in our memorandum to the governor," said Prakash Belavadi, convener, Bengaluru Town Hall. "We told him it would be detrimental to the development of the city. Now that the governor has given assent and the legislation has been enacted, we will study circumstances leading to it. We will hold a meeting with lawyers and domain experts on May 1. Taking legal recourse is one option we are exploring."
Citizen groups such as Citizen Action Forum are also gearing up to approach the high court. Several individuals are also expected to file separate petitions challenging the Act.
Meanwhile, deputy chief minister DK Shivakumar has indicated an intent to seek political consensus. "He will soon convene an all-party meeting to avert legal battles," sources said.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Hans India
9 minutes ago
- Hans India
Delhi BJP MPs meet CM Gupta a day after attack to enquire about her health
New Delhi: Delhi Chief Minister Rekha Gupta on Thursday met all seven Bharatiya Janata Party (BJP) MPs from the national Capital at her official residence in Civil Lines, a day after she was attacked by a man during a 'Jan Sunwai' programme. On Wednesday, 41-year-old Rajesh Bhai Khimji Bhai Sakariya allegedly slapped and pulled CM Gupta's hair at her Civil Lines residence. He has since been arrested and remanded to five days of police custody. Additionally, CM Gupta has been provided Z+ security and the CRPF has been deployed outside her residence. Sharing a photograph of the meeting, BJP MP Praveen Khandelwal said, "Today, along with all my fellow MPs from Delhi, I met our Chief Minister, Rekha Gupta and enquired about her well-being. The Chief Minister is completely healthy and, as always, is actively dedicated to the service of Delhi's citizens." After meeting the Chief Minister, the MPs strongly condemned the attack. BJP MP Ramvir Singh Bidhuri told IANS, "It's important to note that this minister never worried about her own safety. She was always concerned about the people… She has done a lot for my Lok Sabha constituency also. We used to advise her to increase her security, but she said she didn't need to as she works for the people." Speaking to IANS, BJP MP Bansuri Swaraj said, "We visited Chief Minister Rekha Gupta at her residence to ask about her health. I want to assure the people of Delhi that Rekha Gupta is a very brave leader. Her morale remains completely intact. This cowardly and critical attack has not affected her work style in the slightest." BJP MP Manoj Tiwari also said that the CM's public hearings will continue as usual as she "remains committed to the public." "She will meet people in the next sitting and resume work from tomorrow. Even today, after meeting people, she has been working. We will wait for the police investigation. Apart from that, our Chief Minister is now fine. Yes, she was injured, but she is in good health," he said. Meanwhile, the Delhi Police registered a case under the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita's Section 109 (attempt to murder), Section 132 (obstructing a public servant), and Section 221 (obstructing a public servant in discharge of public functions). The police said a team from central agencies and the Special Cell is interrogating the accused to determine his motive. Investigations revealed that Rajesh travelled from Rajkot to Delhi by train on Tuesday morning and stayed at Gujarati Bhavan in Civil Lines. He later went to CM Gupta's private residence in Shalimar Bagh and mentioned this in a phone call to a friend. Rajesh also has a criminal background, with at least five cases registered against him at Bhaktinagar Police Station in Rajkot. He was acquitted in four of them, while one case is pending in court, with the next hearing due on September 9. Gujarat Police have been contacted for further details.
Indian Express
9 minutes ago
- Indian Express
Anti-defection law and Supreme Court's order for Telangana speaker: When the custodian refuses to act
Written by Shashank Maheshwari and Anmol Jain 'The evil of political defections has been a matter of national concern. If it is not combated, it is likely to undermine the very foundations of our democracy.' These words from the Statement of Objects and Reasons of the Constitution (Fifty-Second Amendment) Bill, 1985, capture the spirit of the Tenth Schedule. Yet, four decades on, the anti-defection law is being weakened and bypassed not only by defections and resignations but also by omissions by the Speakers — the constitutional authority responsible for deciding anti-defection petitions. The Supreme Court's ruling in Padi Kaushik Reddy v. State of Telangana (2025) exemplifies this challenge. The case came up after three Bharat Rashtra Samithi MLAs defected to the ruling Congress in 2024. Petitions seeking their disqualification were filed before the Speaker of the Telangana Assembly, who kept them pending, allegedly for political reasons. A single judge bench of the High Court directed the Assembly Secretary to place the petitions before the Speaker and ensure a hearing schedule. Disagreeing, the division bench quashed the order, holding — contrary to the prevailing Indian jurisprudence — that courts cannot fix timelines for the Speaker under the Tenth Schedule. By the time the matter reached the Supreme Court, significant time had passed. This very fear of delay was foreseen during the parliamentary debates of 1985. Parliament chose to vest decision-making power in the Speaker, not the Courts or the Election Commission, to ensure the swift disposal of petitions. The worry was that judicial procedures would consume time and deny rightful representation to the electorate. Yet, no statutory limits were set on the Speaker's discretion, perhaps because the law's immediate purpose — when it was introduced — was to prevent the elected members of the Congress party from defecting to the opposition, a pattern that gave a blow to Congress in several states. Even so, Congress leader Priya Ranjan Dasmunsi had cautioned: 'Now, in regard to a dispute regarding a member, the matter will be referred to the Presiding Officer, but no time limit has been fixed. I would request that in the next session, the time limit be fixed within which the Speaker has to announce his decision. If he keeps it pending for three to four months, it should not be allowed.' His words now seem to be prophetic. Across the country, Speakers have used inaction to shield defectors, hollowing out the law itself. In Padi Kaushik Reddy, the SC revisited its precedents. Referring to Kihoto Hollohan v. Zachillhu (1992), it reiterated that while the Speaker's procedural role and actions are immune from judicial review under Articles 122 and 212 of the Constitution, decisions on disqualification petitions are judicial in nature and subject to review on limited grounds such as mala fides, perversity, or jurisdictional error. Relying on Rajendra Singh Rana & Ors v. Swami Prasad Maurya & Ors (2007), the Court stressed that failure to exercise jurisdiction cannot excuse inaction. In the above-mentioned case, given excessive delay and the impending dissolution of the Assembly, the Court directly decided disqualification without remanding the matter back to the Speaker. Similarly, in Keisham Meghachandra Singh v. Speaker, Manipur Legislative Assembly (2020), the Court had imposed a four-week limit for deciding petitions, recognising that delay itself defeats the law. The Court also observed that Speakers should normally conclude matters within three months. Against this backdrop, paragraphs 93 to 95 of the Padi Kaushik judgment are telling. The Court reaffirmed that while it cannot mechanically dictate timelines, indefinite silence renders the Tenth Schedule meaningless. The Speaker is under a constitutional duty to act within a reasonable time. Where this duty is breached, judicial review may not prescribe rigid deadlines but can intervene to ensure that the law's very purpose of curbing defections is not frustrated. The judgment lays bare the core dilemma. The Tenth Schedule vests power in the Speaker on the assumption that constitutional morality will guide him. But as the 1985 debates and repeated judicial interventions reveal, this assumption has not held. The Speaker's inaction, warned against four decades ago by parliamentarians like Dasmunsi, remains the law's Achilles' heel. The Supreme Court has once again underlined the problem, while exercising restraint so as not to encroach upon the legislature's domain. Unless parliament amends the law to fix a clear timeline or shifts adjudication to an independent authority, the anti-defection regime will continue to be hollowed out by seemingly partisan Speakers. The 'evil of political defections' that the framers sought to eradicate thus survives — not because the law is absent, but because its custodian refuses to act. The writers teach law at Jindal Global Law School
Indian Express
9 minutes ago
- Indian Express
‘Always a delight to be among people in Kolkata': PM Modi's Bengal outreach before 2026 polls includes new metro lines, expressway
In a significant move aimed at bolstering infrastructure and signalling a strong developmental agenda, Prime Minister Narendra Modi is set to visit West Bengal for the third time in recent months. While the inauguration of key metro railway projects in Kolkata is a major highlight, the visit is also pegged on a massive road development initiative—the foundation stone for the 7.2 km-long, six-lane elevated Kona Expressway, a project valued at over Rs 1,200 crore. This visit, the Prime Minister's second in the last two months, comes as West Bengal gears up for the 2026 Assembly elections. The repeated focus on infrastructure projects is being seen as a strategic effort by the BJP to showcase its commitment to the state's development, to counter the ruling Trinamool Congress (TMC). 'It is always a delight to be among the people of Kolkata, a city whose development we are greatly committed to. Tomorrow's programmes in the city are mainly focussed on connectivity. The metro services, which will be flagged off, include Noapara–Jai Hind Bimanbandar, Sealdah–Esplanade and Beleghata–Hemanta Mukhopadhyay routes. Connectivity to and from the airport as well as the IT hub areas will be enhanced. I am eager to be among BJP Bengal Karyakartas at a rally in Kolkata. With each passing day, public anger against the TMC is increasing. West Bengal is eagerly looking towards the BJP with hope because of our development agenda,' PM Modi posted on X on Thursday. The centerpiece of the road development plan is the elevated Kona Expressway. This project, which will enhance connectivity between Howrah, its rural hinterland, and Kolkata, is expected to save commuters hours of travel time. It will cater to a long-standing issue of traffic congestion in the Howrah-Kolkata corridor. Beyond the road project, the Prime Minister will be inaugurating several new metro lines that are set to revolutionize urban transport in Kolkata. These include the Noapara-Jai Hind Biman Bandar metro service, which will provide crucial connectivity to the airport; the Sealdah-Esplanade metro, which will drastically cut down travel time between two of the city's busiest hubs; and the Beleghata–Hemanta Mukhopadhyay section, a vital link to the city's burgeoning IT sector. The visit comes just weeks after the Prime Minister was in Bengal on July 18 — days before the TMC's annual 'Shahid Divas' mega-rally — and it also follows an earlier address in Alipurduar on May 29. 'As the BJP looks to consolidate its position ahead of the 2026 polls, its strategy appears to be a two-pronged approach, demonstrating the Central government's investment in the state's progress while simultaneously engaging with the local populace. This developmental push is intended to present a compelling alternative to the TMC government which has, over a period of time, highlighted how the Centre has deprived Bengal by not allocating funds for several welfare schemes. Moreover, the TMC is also fighting to overcome the instances in the last few years like the RG Kar rape and murder, the SSC scam, and others,' said a political analyst on condition of anonymity.
