logo
Fight over fish in Lesotho's Katse Dam

Fight over fish in Lesotho's Katse Dam

Eyewitness News22-04-2025

Pheello Seafo says he was beaten up by police last year because he was fishing in the Katse Dam in Lesotho's Highlands.
Seafo, a fisher from Likheleng village in the Ha Lejone area, says a vehicle from the Lesotho Highlands Development Authority (LHDA) stopped near where he was fishing with four others. Police officers came out of the car and asked the men what they were doing.
'We responded that we were fishing. They asked what we were using, and we said hooks. They told us they would torture us if they found nets with us.'
'They mistook one of the lines for a net, began beating us with sticks, and left us there,' he said.
Katse Dam was built as part of Phase One of the Lesotho Highlands Water Project, through which Lesotho exports water to South Africa, earning M3.5-billion (R3.5-billion) annually in royalties. But the local fishers, who have traditionally caught yellow fish and trout to sell to passersby, say they are battling to survive.
'Mathabo Thibeli's case is one of the few that ever came to court. A few years ago, Thibeli says, she was arrested by armed soldiers in a boat. With guns pointed at her, she was accused of stealing from the government. 'They ordered me to leave the net. The soldiers used their guns to assault me,' she said. 'The net was heavy as I had caught so much fish. They beat me with sticks and gun butts on my back while I pleaded that I was just trying to support my family.'
She and another villager were kept in a police cell for three days. 'We were charged and fined M100 each, which we paid, and we were freed.'
In other cases, fishermen say they are beaten, their fish are confiscated and then they are sent home.
RESTRICTIVE FISHING LAWS
Molise Mare, a community councillor from Likheleng village, grew up fishing in the Malibamatšo River, now submerged under Katse Dam. He remembers that at first the dam's construction improved their lives. 'With the new road infrastructure, urban buyers came for our fish. We raised prices, made profits, and people built houses,' he told GroundUp.
But the prosperity was short-lived. 'Everything changed when the LHDA imposed restrictive fishing laws,' Mare said. 'We were told we could only catch two fish a day. That was a blow for us because fishing was our livelihood.'
Refiloe Ntsohi, the LHDA Senior Officer responsible for Biodiversity, said the Lesotho Highlands Water Project (Reservoirs) Fishing Regulations govern fishing at Katse Dam. The regulations, based on national fishing laws, prohibit commercial fishing, impose daily catch limits, and regulate fishing tools. 'The regulations allow only four fish per household per day,' she said.
The daily quota was intended to ensure households had enough to feed their families, she said. But due to growing demand for fish in Lesotho, some villagers have begun selling their catch outside the dam's catchment area and some are now using fishing nets to catch large quantities of fish. 'Those with resources use nets to catch more, threatening the fish population. This also denies others who can't afford nets the opportunity for sustainable subsistence fishing,' said Ntsohi.
She said there are rumours that some Chinese buyers are supplying nets to local fishers to increase their haul. 'With unregulated net use, even the most productive fish groups are being caught. This puts the entire fish population at risk of extinction,' Ntsohi said.
LHDA Environment Manager Palesa Monongoaha denied any abuse by soldiers or police. Fish patrols were conducted by boat to identify and confiscate illegal nets, she said, accompanied by security forces, she said.
Monongoaha said women officers on patrols sometimes encountered hostility from men. Stones had been used to block the road one woman officer was using. 'Since then, we've requested backup from security forces during patrols,' she said.
'We use whichever is available at the time, either police or soldiers. But we have never received any reports of human rights violations or torture.'
She said all patrols are documented, and no reports have ever mentioned gunshots or abuse. 'Most of the time, we use boats and do not chase after people who run away. We also do not use vehicles for patrols,' she said.
'If anyone had been tortured by soldiers, it would have been reported. I say that with confidence,' Monongoaha added, suggesting that some of the complaints may come from people whose net-fishing operations have been disrupted. 'It is simply not true that they were tortured,' she insisted.
'Only two soldiers accompany patrols,' she said. 'It's not like there's a heavily armed troop. It now appears as if we have a bad relationship with the fishers, but that is not the case. We hold regular meetings and training sessions on subsistence fishing.'
Monongoaha acknowledged that there had been court cases involving illegal fishing, where fish were handed to the police as evidence. However, she said court rulings had not been effective, so the LHDA had stopped pursuing legal action.
Obtaining permits to fish is costly and difficult, the local fishers say.
Pheello Seafo of Likheleng said a return trip from Malibamatšo to Katse at the LHDA offices for a permit costs M120. He said a two-week licence is M100, while a month's licence costs M200. 'It's hard to afford these fees when we are prohibited from selling fish and have no other jobs,' Seafo said.
The harsh terms push villagers into illegal fishing, or force them to give up fishing altogether.
Thibeli had a permit, but she says she was beaten and arrested for exceeding the daily limit with a net. 'We need to sell fish to survive, and nets help us catch more,' she said.
In 2019, Tomosolo Thibeli says, he survived multiple assaults and gunfire incidents while fishing. 'One morning, when an LHDA vehicle appeared, we had to run and hide,' he told GroundUp. 'Shots were fired, but we ran for our lives.'
A few days later, Thibeli says, soldiers and police captured him and two boys from his village while they were fishing again. 'They forced us to crawl on our knees up and down the hill, beating us as we crawled over sharp stones,' he said. 'My knees have never been the same. The pain worsens in winter.'
The two others have given up fishing, but Tomosolo Thibeli refuses to do so. 'I won't leave my home or resort to stealing while my village has these resources,' he said. 'I will die fishing in this dam.'
'Matsekuoa Thibeli says she has been fishing since 2018 and could make up to M1,500 in a day. 'One time the police came. We ran away, leaving our fish by the road. They took the fish with our containers and left.'
Villagers also accuse LHDA employees and police of seizing their fish only to keep it for themselves. Confiscations reportedly spike before major weekends and holidays as the police and LHDA employees go home.
Responding to allegations that LHDA staff had confiscated fish for personal consumption last year, Ntsohi said there had been no patrols in the area last year. 'So, it can't be true if people claim this happened last year.'
SCRAMBLE FOR FISH BONES
The struggle for access to fish has driven villagers to fight over fish bones and fish heads discarded by SanLei Premium Trout, a commercial fish farming company at Katse Dam. These remnants have become a vital protein source for many.
SanLei chief executive Dewald Fourie told GroundUp that the company had provided over 880,000 'high-protein fish heads to the surrounding communities' worth M434,000 in 2024.
But the handouts from SanLei have led to violence. In 2023, a fight over fish heads turned brutal when a villager was stabbed.
'There's never enough for everyone,' said Malieketso Ramokoatsi, a village committee member. 'People grab as much as they can without considering others who are more vulnerable.'
'There was an unfortunate incident in 2023 when some villagers fought among themselves for a share of the fish heads and bones. It was so bad that one of them got his belly cut open with intestines left out,' said Ramokoatsi.
SanLei's compliance officer, Relebohile Ntoi, confirmed the violent incidents. 'One of our drivers distributing fish heads was even threatened with a gun when trying to organise orderly distribution of fish heads and bones at Khohlo-Ntšo … There were fights everyday with some having not got anything while others filled over ten buckets,' Ntoi said.
As part of their licence requirement to farm in Katse Dam, Ntoi said the LHDA required them to submit a community benefit strategy and, 'in that strategy, we included fish heads distribution'. She said instead of throwing away the fish heads, 'we decided it would be a good source of protein for the community in this catchment for people who can't afford protein'.
Initially distributed daily at the SanLei plant, the fish heads were later delivered to villages on a rotating schedule as Ntoi says the crowds of villagers who came for the fish were disrupting SanLei's operations. To avoid further fights in the villages, the fish heads are delivered to schools.
Monongoaha confirmed that the distribution of fish heads is part of SanLei's community strategy. 'Nutritionists say the fish head is the most nutritious part, so instead of throwing them away, we said they should be distributed to combat malnutrition in the catchment,' she said.
She said SanLei attaches a monetary value to the fish heads in their reports on community benefits. 'As the only company in Lesotho doing primary fish processing, they produce many fish heads—more than the market can absorb,' she said.
Asked whether LHDA was concerned that communities were not receiving whole fish, Monongoaha said, 'Let's put it this way: SanLei is a business and their sole purpose is to make profit,' she said, saying expecting SanLei to give out whole fish would be like 'asking a hotel owner to feed the community for free on certain days'.
Responding to complaints that local people can no longer fish freely as they did before the dam's construction, while foreign companies profit, Monongoaha said, 'These companies do not harvest naturally occurring fish from the dam. They import eggs, hatch them, and keep the fish in cages. If there is any restriction on traditional fishing, it is not related to the companies. In fact, the dam has created a favourable environment for fish to multiply.'
Monongoaha said the LHDA monitored the fish population in Katse and Mohale dams. 'We've been collecting data for over 14 years now. The aim is to attract investors who can partner with local communities to fish sustainably, so that the fish can be sold and benefit the local people,' she said.
But villagers like Litaba Khanare are not convinced. 'Foreign businesses benefit from our waters, while we are left with nothing,' he said. 'If our government cared, it would support community-run fish projects to benefit us directly.'

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

‘Real people drawing fraudulent salaries' — crackdown looms on public sector ghost employees
‘Real people drawing fraudulent salaries' — crackdown looms on public sector ghost employees

Daily Maverick

timea day ago

  • Daily Maverick

‘Real people drawing fraudulent salaries' — crackdown looms on public sector ghost employees

It's time to end this 'orchestrated form of systemic corruption' draining state resources, says the chairperson of Parliament's Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration. Parliament's Portfolio Committee on Public Service and Administration says public sector workers should report in person to prove they're not ghost employees. 'A data audit alone is not enough. We are calling on this process to begin with physical in-person human verification audits for all government employees underpinned by biometric identification. Every person drawing a public salary must appear in person and be verified,' said committee chairperson Jan de Villiers (Democratic Alliance) in a governance cluster press conference in Parliament on Monday. 'The public has the right to know the names on the payroll correspond to individuals who really exist and who serve the public.' Read more: Ghost employees who haunt payrolls are a major occupational fraud hazard Finance Minister Enoch Godongwana, in his Budget tabled last month, announced sweeping expenditure reviews of more than R300-billion in government spending since 2013, 'with the aim of identifying duplications, waste and inefficiencies'. Godongwana said the data-driven initiative would cross-reference administrative datasets to 'identify ghost workers and other anomalies across government departments'. De Villiers said the portfolio committee, following Godongwana's announcement in his Budget, had convened on 28 May to interrogate the 'persistent and deeply corrosive problem' of ghost workers in the public sector. He said the National Treasury could not tackle this challenge alone — it required a joint, coordinated strategy, which was now under way between the Treasury and the Department of Public Service and Administration (DPSA). 'We will reconvene with the Department of Public Service and Administration and the National Treasury in the third quarter of 2025 to receive a full progress report on the implementation of the joint ghost worker audit strategy. This should include details on the scope of these audits, preliminary findings and proposed enforcement measures,' said De Villiers. 'Orchestrated form of systemic corruption' Ghost employee fraud is among South Africa's most persistent public sector challenges. However, the total number of ghost workers — individuals who are fraudulently added to an organisation's payroll but do not actually work there — is unclear. In 2021, the government launched Project Ziveze to investigate and verify all Passenger Rail Agency of South Africa (Prasa) employees after material irregularities were uncovered within Prasa's ICT and payroll systems, indicating that there could be about 3,000 phantom workers. A preliminary report in November 2022 revealed that 1,480 employees could not be verified, while 1,000 others had resigned, Daily Maverick's Suné Payne reported. The agency is estimated to have saved about R200-million through the verification project. Last year, the Auditor-General of South Africa uncovered R6.4-million being paid to 'deceased and terminated' employees. The Public Servants Association (PSA) described this as a 'shocking misuse of public funds' and a 'gross violation of financial accountability'. And in May 2025, the Sunday Times reported that the Gauteng Department of Health had frozen the salaries of 230 employees who could not be verified. These are a handful of the reported cases of ghost employees. 'These are not invisible names on paper. Real people are drawing fraudulent salaries, and fraudulent money is being siphoned into the pockets of corrupt criminals,' said De Villiers. He said the department had disclosed that inserting a ghost employee into the payroll system 'requires collusion because at least three officials need to work together to create a ghost worker. This means that we are dealing not with random lapses in judgment, but with embedded criminal syndicates operating in our public institutions.' He added that the issue of ghost workers was 'not merely a payroll anomaly. It is a deliberate and orchestrated form of systemic corruption. It is organised crime within the state. And as a portfolio committee, tasked with oversight in the public service, the time for half-measures and talk shops is over. 'Let us be clear, the phenomenon of ghost workers is not an issue of administrative error. There are real people creating these ghost workers, reaping the benefits of siphoning taxpayer money into their coffers. 'Every ghost worker represents a post that could've been filled by a qualified graduate, a dedicated nurse, a teacher at a rural school or a social worker supporting the vulnerable. Every fraudulent salary paid is a step backwards in the fight for a professional, ethical and responsive state.' Widespread phenomenon De Villiers did not know how many ghost workers there were in the public service, but suggested, when looking at the known instances of ghost employees, 'that there are thousands'. He said the DPSA had confirmed before Parliament that ghost workers were present across all three spheres of government, including national, provincial and local governments, as well as government agencies and state-owned enterprises. 'The reality is every single department, state agency, level of government and state-owned enterprise that we have, probably has ghost workers on their payroll.' PSA spokesperson Reuben Maleka told Daily Maverick on Monday that the organisation supported a physical audit of ghost workers who 'rob' the public sector of its capacity to provide services to the public. 'The problem is widespread throughout the public sector — government departments, municipalities [and] government entities. The cleaning must happen across the sector,' said Maleka. In addition to calling for a physical audit, De Villiers said the committee would 'push for disciplinary and criminal action to follow every detection of ghost workers. 'We don't know how many ghost workers there are, we don't know who's involved, and not enough people have been arrested so far, to be quite frank. 'I am not aware, as committee chairperson, of a single person who has been arrested thus far in terms of the creation of ghost workers,' he said. De Villiers added that South Africa's ghost worker phenomenon was not only made possible by fraud, but by 'outdated and fragmented administrative processes and systems'. Daily Maverick contacted the National Treasury and the DPSA with queries. Comment will be added once received. DM

Pensioners desperate for clarity after not receiving Sassa grants in June
Pensioners desperate for clarity after not receiving Sassa grants in June

The Citizen

time4 days ago

  • The Citizen

Pensioners desperate for clarity after not receiving Sassa grants in June

Some have wondered whether they are among the 210 000 social grant recipients who have been flagged for not disclosing their income. Hordes of pensioners queued at Sassa offices in Durban on Thursday after not receiving their grant payments for June. Many said that prior to the old age grant payment on 3 June, they had not received any notification that they would not be paid. Some have wondered whether they are among the 210 000 social grant recipients who have been flagged for not disclosing their income. This comes as SASSA is clamping down on fraudulent grants. National Treasury has also told Sassa to implement stricter means testing and verification. ALSO READ: More than 200 000 will experience Sassa grant delays — here's why Recipients of the R350 SRD grant have complained for years about Sassa's faulty verification systems and restrictions, some of which have been declared unlawful by the high court. Recipients are nervous that the same challenges will now be experienced by other grant recipients. GroundUp visited Sassa offices in Central Durban and Durban South on Thursday. The offices were packed with people. At the Central Durban office, at least two-thirds of the people in line put up their hands when an official asked who was there to query their unpaid old age grants. Fatime Randeree, a 61-year-old pensioner from Overpoort, said she had been in line since 7:30am. She said the security guards kept moving her to different lines without explanation. She said they were told that Sassa staff were in a meeting all morning, which is why no one was being helped. We spoke to Randeree again later in the day. She said that when she finally got to the front of the line, she was told she cannot be helped without an affidavit confirming her husband's details. When she returned later, about half an hour before the branch closed, she was denied entry and given an appointment for Monday. Another woman in the line said that she had received her grant, but her husband had not. She had come to the Sassa office to request that someone come to her home to speak to him, because he is blind and bedridden. READ MORE: Basic Income Grant implementation postponed again She was frustrated that she had to 'leave her husband alone for hours' to query why he didn't get his grant payment. Sassa spokesperson Andile Tshona told GroundUp that the flagged beneficiaries 'were notified through SMS'. Unfortunately, some of the beneficiaries change their number and they do not come to our offices to notify us of the changes. Beneficiaries have a responsibility to inform Sassa of changes. Tshona said that when beneficiaries come forward to verify their income, their grants could be reinstated as early as next week. 'The review process outcome will determine if the beneficiary is still eligible for the grant or not.' Disability grants Disability grant recipients were also among those waiting in line. Mduduzi Nzila had come to reapply for his disability grant. It was his fourth time visiting the Sassa office since a car accident in October 2024 left him with limited mobility in both hands. His initial application had been declined, but he won an appeal. Despite this, he has still not received his grant. Nzila, who is now struggling to support his sister and four children who live with him, said he walked from his home in Morningside because he could not afford the taxi fare. In the Wentworth branch, located in Durban South, there was a long line of people to see the district surgeon for disability grant applications. Keygan Asogan told GroundUp that he had waited from 5:30am to see the district surgeon, only to be denied disability grant status. Asogan suffered a stroke in December 2021 and is no longer able to work. He first applied for an appointment with the district surgeon in April this year and spent months getting together all the proper documentation needed. READ MORE: Themba Matlou officially new Sassa's CEO: Here's what we know This included travel fees and a separate consultation with another doctor, said Asogan. The waiting period for an appointment to appeal is six months, said Asogan. 'I'm battling to pay my bills without being able to work. I can't afford to wait another six months.' Tiffany (we've withheld her surname) had come to reapply for her disability grant, something she has had to do every year, but has never faced any problems in the past. But this month she did not receive payment as Sassa now wants her to show proof of divorce from her husband. Tiffany has been separated from her husband for 16 years and does not know where he is. 'He was the one who crippled me,' said Tiffany, who walks on crutches. She has no other source of income and has had to sell some of her personal belongings to afford transport and rent. This article was republished from GroundUp under a Creative Commons license. Read the original article here.

SA's alarming child violence rates demand collaboration between government and NGOs
SA's alarming child violence rates demand collaboration between government and NGOs

Daily Maverick

time5 days ago

  • Daily Maverick

SA's alarming child violence rates demand collaboration between government and NGOs

The plan is up against dysfunction within social development departments and fraught relations with NGOs that deliver most services. About 1,100 children were murdered in South Africa in the past financial year, according to South African Police Service (SAPS) crime statistics. And estimates prepared by detective services suggest that about 1.181 children were victims of attempted murder and 6,209 were seriously assaulted in just the last three-quarters of the 2024/25 financial year. It is clear that South Africa has a serious problem of violence against children. As the country marks national Child Protection Week, those mandated to care for its children should step up. In November 2024, the first-ever Global Ministerial Conference on Ending Violence Against Children took place in Bogotá, Colombia. South Africa's Social Development Minister, Sisisi Tolashe, joined ministers from 102 other countries in pledging an ambitious plan of action to prevent and respond to violence against children. South Africa committed to several actions by 2027. One was to implement evidence-based parenting programmes in 52 districts to ensure safe home environments for children, and reduce child abuse and the use of corporal punishment by parents and caregivers. Another was to implement the 2024 Basic Education Laws Amendment Act by 2027 to improve safety in the learning environment. The law strengthens the ban on corporal punishment in schools and introduces stronger penalties for those using corporal punishment. South Africa also pledged to ensure that psychosocial services are available 24 hours a day to parents and caregivers in distress, and increase the reach of the 365 Days Child Protection Programme of Action for prevention and management of violence against children to 52 districts. It also committed to strengthening the ability of caregivers and frontline workers to reduce and prevent online violence against children. Targets Achieving these targets would help keep children safe and potentially decrease violence overall in South Africa. This is critical because violence against children carries heavy costs for individuals, families and the state. A 2015 study by Save the Children South Africa and the University of Cape Town found that violence against children cost the country R238.58-billion a year, equivalent to 6% of gross domestic product. These are the most recent figures available — and annual costs will only have increased since then. Investing in preventing and reducing violence against children is urgently needed. This would not only save costs, but help increase South Africa's school completion rate, and reduce unemployment and dependency on social grants. Making this pledge a reality is in the interests of all South Africans. It is strongly supported by the many civil society organisations the Department of Social Development would need to work with to implement the programmes the pledge outlines. And herein lies the most significant challenge. The department at a national level and in several provinces has treated non-governmental organisations (NGOs) and the people they serve with a lack of respect and compassion, placing many lives at risk. The relationship between the department and civil society is mistrusting and fraught, and must change. At the same time that Tolashe was presenting her plan in Bogotá, the Gauteng Division of the High Court made a third ruling forcing the province's Social Development Department to pay NGOs that it had contracted to provide services. By that point, these NGOs had not received payment to deliver services on behalf of the state for seven months. This is not due to a lack of finances. In the same financial year (2023/4), the Gauteng provincial department underspent its budget by half a billion rand. Essentials The KwaZulu-Natal provincial department has not yet paid its NGO service providers for work done in the first quarter of 2025, leaving organisations unable to cover staff salaries or the costs of essentials, such as food for children. While departmental social workers might help deliver services promised in the pledge, most are already responding to cases of serious child abuse and neglect, and supporting cases through the courts. Without NGOs, the government probably won't be able to deliver on its pledge to prevent and reduce violence against children. There are many positive steps the department could take, including implementing the Sector Funding Policy (SFP). This outlines why services for children are a priority, and lays the basis for multi-year funding for NGOs that provide these vital services on behalf of the state. Funding certainty would help reduce the sector's insecurity and enable relations between the department and its service providers to be repaired. However, Sector Funding Policy implementation is not included in any planning documents, and there are signs that the national department is woefully under-capacitated. One indication of this is its inability to finalise memoranda of understanding with NGOs that offer the department free technical services. Since 2020/21, the national department has not received a clean audit. These examples go beyond isolated glitches. They show recurrent mismanagement, poor planning and a lack of basic operational competence across national and provincial social development departments. The minister needs to accept that the status quo is not working. Strong, capable leadership must be provided to achieve a turnaround, not least by prioritising delivery. For the state to deliver on its bold and important pledge, the minister must focus on repairing the damage caused to the relationships between her department and NGOs. She must also be held accountable for departmental failures that are being compounded daily. The department must ensure that officials deal with families holistically. Currently, it treats each family member's problem separately instead of approaching the family as a complete system. For South Africa to develop, its children must thrive — and that requires providing families with holistic, integrated services. Civil society organisations are ready to do the work required and take hands with the department to achieve the vision of a country that is safe for children. But they can no longer stand by as services to children and families are undermined by the inefficiency and ineptitude of a department that has lost its way. DM Chandré Gould, Senior Research Fellow, Justice and Violence Prevention, Institute for Security Studies (ISS); Gugu Xaba, Executive Director, Save the Children South Africa; Suzan Eriksson, Independent Consultant, Wilmi Dippenaar, Director, South African Parenting Programme Implementers Network; Monica Woodhouse, South African National Child Rights Coalition and Give a Child a Family Africa.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store