What India can learn from Israel about atmanirbharta in defence
Yet, despite these restrictions and existential threats, Israel rapidly transformed itself into a defence innovation powerhouse, exporting nearly $15 billion in advanced weaponry in 2024, while India continues to rely heavily on arms imports to meet its needs. Understanding this divergence reveals key lessons on strategy, institutional design, and national resolve, which India must learn to become a global powerhouse.
India and Israel became independent countries less than a year apart — in August 1947 and May 1948, respectively. Almost immediately, both countries had to wage a war to safeguard their sovereignty and territorial integrity due to their inimical neighbours. As independent states, both countries inherited nascent economies, fragile infrastructure, limited heavy industries, and immediate security threats. In fact, Israel was probably in a more critical situation as it faced a UN arms embargo on all parties involved in the 1948 Arab-Israeli war, which limited its access to military equipment.
This was particularly so during the Nehruvian years, when the Armed Forces were seen as a necessary evil and priority was given to the development of the civilian industrial sector at the cost of a firm military foundation. Israel, on the other hand, saw military capability as essential to survival. Every war from 1948 through 1967, 1973, and right up to the ongoing conflict in Gaza, has been a catalyst for innovation, with battlefield necessity spurring not only rapid development of weapons systems, but also new tactics, techniques, and procedures.
The urgency to upgrade our defence preparedness has returned to the fore, more so after Operation Sindoor. Limited foreign imports are being considered to plug critical gaps, including the possibility of inducting a foreign-made fifth-generation fighter aircraft. Inaugurating a workshop and exhibition held at the Manekshaw Centre in Delhi on 16 July, Chief of Defence Staff General Anil Chauhan said, 'In today's warfare, you can't win with yesterday's weapon system.' It is logical then that tomorrow's wars cannot be fought with weapon systems based on today's technology. We need a transformative change in our systems.
Two contrasting defence sectors
Israel carried out institutional integration of its military, academic, and private industrial capabilities, resulting in a tightly coordinated ecosystem. The Israel Defense Forces (IDF) worked in close tandem with universities, startups, and defence firms such as Elbit Systems, Rafael, and Israel Aerospace Industries (IAI).
This tri-sector collaboration allowed rapid prototyping, battlefield testing, and iterative refinement. Mandatory conscription ensured military-civilian integration while early support from the Jewish diaspora in terms of funds and know-how also helped. This aspect of a strong civil-military-industry interface has been repeatedly stressed upon by Edward N Luttwak and Eitan Shamir in their book The Art of Military Innovation. The result was world-class systems such as the Iron Dome, Trophy active protection system, unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs), and satellite systems.
By contrast, India's defence sector remained largely insulated. Dominated by public-sector entities like DRDO, HAL, and OFB, it followed bureaucratic, slow-moving processes with limited commercial incentives or accountability. Weak feedback loops between users (the military) and designers (DRDO), along with little to no synergy between academia, industry, and the military, further hindered progress. Most importantly, procurement must transition from least-cost (L1) models to highest-performance (T1) evaluations. Emphasising metrics such as lifecycle cost, operational performance, and indigenisation will incentivise innovation and discourage a process-over-product mindset. The L1 system has been the bane of our procurement, encouraging companies to give the bare minimum to win contracts. Except for the Armed Forces, no stakeholder truly has skin in the game.
Israel's export success in defence is also a reflection of its strategic necessity. With a small domestic market incapable of sustaining mature industries, Israel pursued exports aggressively. In 2024, Israeli defence exports hit a record $14.8 billion, with 48 per cent comprising rockets, missiles, and air defence systems. These sales — to Europe and other friendly countries — not only validated Israeli technology but also funded future R&D. India, despite its large Armed Forces, has lacked a similar export essentiality, and its fledgling defence industry has struggled to translate capacity into mass production or compete globally, resulting in continued reliance on imports.
Also read: A letter to Defence Minister, with lessons from American fighter pilot John Boyd: Jaithirth Rao
The real challenge
India has initiated policy reforms aimed at shifting this paradigm. Programmes like Make in India, the Defence Acquisition Procedure 2020, and the Strategic Partnership Model have opened doors for private sector participation in defence, raised FDI limits, and corporatised legacy PSUs. Notably, Reliance Defence's recent partnerships with Germany's Rheinmetall and Diehl Defense to produce advanced ammunition and guided shells domestically mark significant milestones. Similarly, the indigenous helicopter gunship and sniper rifle developments reflect gradual progress. India's defence exports, estimated at Rs 21,083 crore in FY 2023-24, to over 100 countries, underscore a nascent export orientation, though much of it remains aspirational.
Israel's success is an off-shoot of existential necessity, an integrated ecosystem, a culture of innovation, and export-driven development. India must build upon the momentum by deepening private sector involvement, institutional reform, procurement refocus, and nurturing human capital, to genuinely realise Atmanirbharta in defence. This requires bold structural transformation, sustained political support, and clear strategic direction, with an emphasis on defence preparedness. In this context, it would be worthwhile to recollect what French President Emmanuel Macron said in his speech on the eve of Bastille Day 2025: 'To be free in this world, you must be feared. To be feared, you must be powerful.'
India's challenge is not of capability, but of unity and resolve. A focused, innovation-driven, user-integrated defence ecosystem is achievable if the government empowers rather than restrains; the military leads rather than watches; and the industry builds rather than waits to be spoon-fed. India has the necessary talent, demand, and environment to build one of the world's best indigenous defence ecosystems. We just have to put it all together.
General Manoj Mukund Naravane PVSM AVSM SM VSM is a retired Indian Army General who served as the 28th Chief of the Army Staff. Views are personal.
(Edited by Aamaan Alam Khan)
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
&w=3840&q=100)
First Post
7 minutes ago
- First Post
From code to combat: AI-driven drones rewrite battle rules from Op Spider Web to Operation Sindoor
In an insightful conversation with Firstpost, Sai Pattabiram, Founder and CEO of an Indian drone manufacturer company, Zuppa, explained the significance of drones in modern warfare and the challenges that come with it. read more In the span of just a few months, the world witnessed three innovative military operations that changed the dynamics of modern warfare. These missions were: Operation Spider Web, Operation Rising Lion and Operation Sindoor. All these military operations had one thing in common: the use of autonomous drones where AI plays a key role in their trajectories and the actual work of the drones. While the technology has made the war games a level playing field, it has also raised numerous security concerns. In an insightful conversation with Firstpost, Sai Pattabiram, founder and CEO of an Indian drone manufacturer company, Zuppa, explained the significance of drones in modern warfare and the challenges that come with it. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Zuppa is a Chennai-based drone manufacturer and seller to the Indian army. Its drones took part in Operation Sindoor India, launched to target nine terror camps in Pakistan and Pakistan-occupied Kashmir (PoK) following the Pahalgam terror attack. Pattabiram explained the tech that makes these drones so vital for various services. 'One needs to understand that a drone is unmanned because an embedded electronic motherboard known as the autopilot has replaced the Human pilot,' he said. 'This autopilot consists of both hardware and software layers that enable a user to use it much like a mobile phone or a laptop. This is called the Cyber Physical Stack of the drone, as shown below: Pattabiram mentioned that it is the electronic layer where the automation and AI drone technology are usually built. 'The evolution of drone tech in terms of deployment that has been witnessed across conflicts globally, from Operation Sindoor to Operation Spider Web and everything in between, has been in these layers,' Pattabiram told Firstpost. 'The technology life cycle of innovation happening in this layer has dropped significantly to 8 – 10 weeks. Thus, indicating an innovation in drone use happening every 2-3 months. Much of this evolution that has been witnessed today has been in these layers,' he said. Pattabiram emphasised that the future of drone technology will be its ability to adapt quickly. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD From delivering groceries to delivering bombs In the span of just a few years, there has been an evolution in how drones are being used. From delivering items one purchased online to dropping bombs and turning into suicide bombers. While speaking on the evolution of the use of drones, Pattabiram emphasised that the dual-use technology can deliver anything, be it food or bombs. 'Initially, drones' dual-use technology was not given enough care across the world, not only in India. Nobody looked at it as a dual-use technology. They all looked at it as separate military applications and separate civilian applications,' he told Firstpost. However, Pattabiram also pointed out how these drones can be used by terrorists, raising a security concern. 'Civilians, military and terrorists can use the same thing for three very different purposes. Like a farmer can use a drone for spraying pesticides or nutrients. The military could use it to use a drone to ship material from point A to point B, and the terrorists could use it as a kamikaze mode or even as a bomb dropping,' he said. 'So this dual-use nature of drones is what is now turning out to be a kind of revolution for most of the people in the security apparatus or the security organisations. And this all started primarily with Ukraine using FPV drones.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Zuppa's Kamikaze Micro Drone Ajeet Mini. Image Source: Zuppa 'Now, FPV drones today are known as kamikaze drones. Today we know it as drones which can damage lethally, which can deliver lethal blows, like Operation Spider that happened recently. But FPV drones were never intended to be this,' he explained. 'FPV drones were racing drones. There is an FPV racing league and Ukraine and Russia, both countries, that practically use FPV, flyers, people who do drone racing to fly these drones into war. Drones as Dual-use technology weren't expected and weren't something people thought of,' he added. Ukraine Operation Spider Web: The concerns & opportunities On June 1, 2025, Russia was rocked by a drone attack on its key military infrastructure. Ukraine eventually announced that after over one and a half years of planning, they had conducted what they called 'Operation Spider Web'. In the mission, Ukraine used a whopping 117 drones to strike the Russian airfield. What was shocking was the fact that the strikes were conducted 600 kilometres away from the battleline and 1,000 kilometres away from the Ukrainian border. While speaking to Firstpost, Pattabiram noted that this was the 'first time we saw the use of the remote operational capabilities of the drone.' He also mentioned how Elon Musk's Starlink played a crucial role in the operation. 'While Kamikaze drones themselves haven't changed much since their first use in the Ukraine-Russia war, it's their evolution in terms of deployment that has been changing modern warfare. Like Operation Spider Web was a very innovative use of Kamikaze drones way inside enemy lines,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Ukraine's Security Chief Briefs President Zelenskyy on Operation Spider's Web. Image: X/@ZelenskyyUa However, he also stated that the 'true impact of Operation Spider Web is not only on Russia, but it is on the entire global security ecosystem, given the scale and asymmetry of damage it has inflicted in terms of cost and operational preparedness'. 'This operation has galvanised the former Indian Army Chief to state that the Entire Country is now a battlefield thanks to the scale of this operation,' he said. Not something new Another point on which Pattabiram emphasised was the fact that 'such a kind of operation has not happened in India. 'In India, if you see, we have had the Jammu air base attack in 2021. Which again was possibly by a locally operated drone. Possibly even locally assembled using locally available material. Means material within India,' he said. 'So the Operation Spider Web has woken up the security apparatus across the world. This Operation is going to change the way people look at drones. The way people operate drones in war as well,' he said. Open source code and the risks of hijacks One of the key aspects of the Operation Spider Web is the fact that Ukraine used open-source codes to develop the drones that ultimately struck the Russian airfield. However, if the easily available codes fall into the wrong hands, the impact would be detrimental. While raising concerns over the matter, Pattabiram recalled the hijacking of an Indian drone back in August 2024. 'The drone was taken over on the 23rd of August 2024 by Pakistan, and it's not like that was the first time it's happened, it's happened before as well. A lot of this can be directly attributed to the use of open source code,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD SBU chief Lt. Gen. Vasyl Maliuk is standing beside a schematic map of the operation. @SBUkr 'The code layer of a drone is where the vulnerability of hacking or the vulnerability of misuse lies. The code can be downloaded from GitHub, and it can be used, and the commands can be directly given to the drone to hack. So, considering this open-source code is a major risk from a security perspective,' he explained. The need for a regulatory framework When asked how the risk can be tackled, Pattabiram suggested innovative ideas. 'The key is that there is a lot of learning that is possible from the telecom sector. Chinese phones that were sold here without IMEI numbers. Which meant there was no traceability of the phone. So they could be misused for various things, and nobody knows where it is. Now, today the drone is in the same status. Despite the civilian drone regulation having been in place since 1921. For the last 4 years, nobody knows where a drone is operating or who is operating,' he averred. 'So, considering this, DGCA has a digital sky on which you can register a drone. But there is something beyond the online portal on which you register, and you get one thing called a UIN number. So the regulatory framework has a very simple thing to be done, i.e. using the telecom as a learning point.' 'So all they need to do is completely stop the import of autopilots and then introduce SIM cards into every autopilot in India. So that every SIM card has an IMEI number. And it has an IMEI number, which is your subscriber number. This way, you can trace the drone from the telecom network to where it is. Who is operating it, and the moment you have got the IMEI number, and you have done a KYC for it, you know who owns the drone,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD When it comes to imported autopilots, Pattabiram said that those drones need to be controlled. 'It should not be an open item. A drone autopilot cannot be imported under OGL or a general licence. There should be specific people who are allowed and authorised to import it based on licensing. And the second is that all autopilots need to have a SIM card on them. If this is done, then I think one can get rid of a lot of problems. The first drone war in South Asia: India-Pak conflict While the Indian and Pakistani military clashed with each other on numerous occasions, the conflict that erupted following the devastating Pahalgam attack saw drones taking the centre stage. 'Operation Sindoor was the first time a totally non-contact remote war played out in the subcontinent, with neither side crossing either the IB or the LOC. This was possible primarily on account of the deployment of remote technologies like drones and missiles,' Pattabiram said. 'Having said that, it is important to note the fact that the small drone war has been happening even before Operation Sindoor, with Pakistan violating lower-level Indian airspace over the past couple of years, every day by sending hundreds of drones to deliver drugs, small arms, explosives, etc. This war is interestingly continuing even after May 10th 2025.' A debate will take place in the Upper House of Parliament over India's Operation Sindoor. Representational Image 'The importance of addressing and building capabilities for this particular type of low intensity, dispersed, highly asymmetric war is one of the biggest learning's from Operation Sindoor. This is exactly the kind of warfare that is stretching out the Ukraine-Russia war for over three years now. The Israel-Iran war and the Israel-Houthi wars are other such conflicts that are stretching out. The result of such stretched-out, open-ended conflicts can be both costly and debilitating to the economies of the countries involved,' he said. STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD Pattabiram emphasised that India needs to build capabilities and abilities to block enemy drones from coming to India. Mentioning how Pakistan often uses drones to send drugs within the Indian borders, he called for finding ways to neutralise these threats. A general view of a damaged portion of a building, after it was hit by an Indian strike, in Muridke near Lahore, Pakistan, May 7. Jain played a big part in Operation Sindoor. Reuters AI & Drones During the conversation with Firstpost, Pattabiram noted that AI automation is going to be the future of drones. 'The question of trying to operate them manually is not going to be feasible. The skill level required to fly this kind of FPV drone takes years for somebody to build into that kind of capability. Due to this, it is not scalable as well,' he said. 'It needs to be AI-based. It needs to have self-autonomous capabilities, which do not exist. But looks like many of the countries and many of the companies, including us, are also working along those lines in terms of autonomous AI and Machine learning is being infused into drones,' he asserted, emphasising that the integration of AI and drones is an 'unavoidable future'. So, the swarm drone concept is another concept that is going to be very, very strong going forward. The only thing that you will see grow going forward is the technology content, and the way the technology is used is going to start scaling very well,' he said. Operation Rising Lion: Are drone bases new sleeper cells? After Israel conducted Operation Rising Lion against Iran's nuclear facilities, it was revealed that Mossad had drone bases within Iranian territory. It was from these bases that they activated the drones and conducted the strikes on military and nuclear facilities in Iran. While talking about the operation, Pattabiram compared setting up drone bases within enemy territory to setting up sleeper cells or deploying terrorists on foreign land. 'It is more on the lines of a terrorist operation. So it is like you are having terrorists within the country, within the enemy country, and you are operating those sleeper cells,' he said. 'In some ways, it is very similar to a sleeper cell concept. And that is exactly what Ukraine and Israel, or Mossad, did. They have activated certain existing assets in terms of people within the other country. This is very, very similar to what has been happening in India. In terms of Pahalgam, or in terms of Patankot or in terms of Bombay, 26-11. Now, in the terrorist case it is human, in this case it is a drone. But the basic concept is the same,' he said. Pattabiram emphasised that the only way to counter these attacks would be the same way one works on counter terrorism measures. 'So it is a counter terrorism and counterinsurgency kind of scenario that has to be used for something like this. Now, one of the ways of figuring it out is controlling the availability of material to be able to activate these things. And the second is legitimacy in terms of seeing who is using this material, who is buying this material,' he explained. Are drones replacing battle tanks? Over the decades, the rules of warfare have evolved significantly. From the use of horses to battle tanks. Then missiles came into play, making countries target each other irrespective of the distance. However, the three operations that rocked the world in the span of a few weeks beg one question: Are drones replacing battle tanks? When Firstpost asked this question, Pattabiram said drones are being used for the first time as a 'de-escalatory asymmetric'. 'When a war moved from a horse to a tank, the tank was far more expensive than a horse. But still, people took it because it offered certain strong advantages over a horse. When it moved from propeller planes to jet planes, jet planes were far ahead of propeller planes in terms of capabilities. So even though it was higher in terms of cost, people adopted it because it delivered asymmetric impact to the forces,' he explained. When bombs evolved into missiles, a similar kind of asymmetry happened where the cost escalated, but the impact also escalated. But drones are the first time in the history of warfare where it has gone the other way around. Where the cost has reduced, but the impact has increased.' 'So, thereby enabling larger deployment of drones, covering larger areas and being cost-effective, they are a de-escalative asymmetry which delivers a higher impact,' he added. To support his assertion, Pattabiram gave an example of how to take down a tank with millions of dollars of Russian bombers, Ukraine just used $2,000 drones. 'So, where this also plays is now if somebody were to use missiles to stop drones, then you are stopping a $2000 drone with a $2 million missile. When it comes to that kind of equation, it can bleed a country,' he said. Can drones be a deterrent in war as nuclear weapons have been? When asked if drones can be given the same stature as nuclear weapons for deterrence in war, Pattabiram emphasised that while drones can be solid levellers, they are not deterrents and the impact is not as significant as a nuclear weapon. 'The drones are turning out to be more of irritants and more of psychological players, rather than being something like an impact player, like nuclear weapons,' Pattabiram said. 'Nuclear weapons have more of an impact as a deterrent. Whereas drones are turning out to be more than something, they start affecting people psychologically as well as people, keep irritating and chipping away.' 'So nuclear is something like, one hard bang. This is something that gives a thousand cuts. So, drones and nuclear weapons can't be compared to that extent; one is kind of destructive in one shot. So there is a difference between the two,' he concluded. While drones might not be as lethal as nuclear weapons, one thing remains clear: they will be at the centre stage of modern warfare.
NDTV
23 minutes ago
- NDTV
Pahalgam Attack Victim's Father Writes To PM Modi, Demands Compensation, Martyr Status
Kanpur (Uttar Pradesh): Sanjay Dwivedi, father of Pahalgam terror attack victim Shubham Dwivedi, has written two letters to Prime Minister Narendra Modi and demanded compensation for the families of the April 22 deadly attack victims and a grant of "martyr status". He also described AAP MP Sanjay Singh as "one of the few leaders who stand with truth", and highlighted the issues of the families of the Pahalgam terror victims in Parliament. Mr Dwivedi, while speaking to the ANI, said, "He is one of the few leaders who stands with the truth. He presented our issues in the Parliament with all his might... I hope he will stand by our demands in the future too... I have written two letters to the Prime Minister (demanding compensation for the families of the victims and for the victims to be given the 'martyr' status). This is not a matter of party politics. This is a national issue." Sanjay Singh on Sunday met the family of the Pahalgam terror attack victim Shubham Dwivedi during his visit to Kanpur. After the meeting, he spoke to reporters and called on the Union government to grant martyr status to victims. The AAP Rajya Sabha MP stated that he had also raised the demand during the ongoing Monsoon session of Parliament. Mr Singh said, "I had raised this point in the Parliament that the victims' families demand that all those who died in Pahalgam should be given the status of martyrs. Shubham's father also demands that the tragic incident that happened cannot be compensated in a lifetime, but the Prime Minister (Narendra Modi) and the government should definitely take the steps they can. This will also be a message against terrorism." The AAP leader also criticised the government over what he termed a "delay" in providing compensation for the families of the victims."The government must provide compensation and jobs to the families of the Pahalgam terror attack victims. There has been a lot of delay in that," Singh said. Shubham Dwivedi was among the 26 people killed when terrorists opened fire on a group of tourists and locals in Baisaran Valley near Pahalgam. Indian armed forces carried out Operation Sindoor on May 7 to avenge the terror attack in Jammu and Kashmir's Pahalgam on April 22, which killed 26 people.
The Hindu
37 minutes ago
- The Hindu
Parliament Monsoon session Day 11 LIVE: Lok Sabha to take up National Sports Governance Bill, 2025
The government is likely to push on Monday (August 4, 2025) the passage of a key sports bill in the Lok Sabha, amid a continuing deadlock in Parliament as the opposition's united demand for a discussion on SIR failed to draw a positive response from the ruling alliance. Editorial | House of wars: On Parliament, Operation Sindoor discussion Prime Minister Narendra Modi and Union Home Minister Amit Shah on Sunday (August 3, 2025) separately called on President Droupadi Murmu at the Rashtrapati Bhavan. While the details of the meeting were not immediately available, the development comes in amid Bihar SIR stir in Parliament. The Opposition INDIA bloc leaders on Friday (August 1, 2025) had submitted a joint letter, asking for a discussion on SIR in Bihar, to Lok Sabha Speaker Om Birla. Except for a two-day discussion on the Pahalgam terror attack and Operation Sindoor in both the Houses, parliamentary proceedings have been all but a washout since the Monsoon session began on July 21 as the Special Intensive Revision (SIR) of electoral rolls in Bihar has ignited vociferous protests from opposition parties.
