logo
Rare earth magnet ban lifted: What it means for India's EV and auto sector

Rare earth magnet ban lifted: What it means for India's EV and auto sector

Hindustan Times13 hours ago
After months of shadowboxing over trade and supply chains, Beijing has finally eased its grip, lifting the export ban on rare earth magnets to India. For the auto industry, the move comes not a moment too soon. This ends a standoff for the Indian auto industry that could have disrupted production lines and hampered the country's EV ambitions.
Back in April, Beijing tightened the screws on exports of seven key rare earth elements and magnets, citing end-use checks and stricter licensing rules. For India, which depends on China for over 80 per cent of its magnet imports, the curbs landed like a punch to the gut.
The decision follows a round of high-level diplomacy between External Affairs Minister S. Jaishankar and his Chinese counterpart Wang Yi, signalling a fragile but meaningful easing in bilateral trade friction.
Also Read : India's Bajaj Auto flags lower-than-planned EV output on rare earth magnet crunch
The ban that stalled the wheels
Back in April, Beijing tightened the screws on exports of seven key rare earth elements and magnets, citing end-use checks and stricter licensing rules. For India, which depends on China for over 80 per cent of its magnet imports, the curbs landed like a punch to the gut.
Factories began to stutter. Maruti's much-hyped e Vitara EV lost two-thirds of its near-term output forecast, dropping to just 8,200 units between April and September, down from 26,500. Bajaj Auto, too, warned of a possible 'zero month" for electric scooter and three-wheeler output in August due to shortages. Crisil flagged how a 30 day delay in magnet supply, even though these parts account for less than 5 per cent of vehicle cost, could derail production of EVs and internal-combustion vehicles alike.
Also Read : India's Bajaj Auto flags lower-than-planned EV output on rare earth magnet crunch
A vulnerability exposed
The Indian auto industry felt like a sprinter tangled in the blink of a false start. The EV race isn't just about sleek designs, it's about reliable supply chains. With India importing over 80 per cent of its 540 tonnes of rare earth magnets from China, that choke point exposed a vulnerability in the entire value chain.
Delegations in the industry were forced to push for emergency meetings with Chinese officials. Visas were approved for many executives, yet licenses to import were slow in coming. The vacuum forced the Indian government into fast-tracking discussions on subsidies to scale up domestic magnet manufacturing.
What the ban's removal unlocks
Now, with China easing export flows, the clock resets, and India's auto industry can restart its engines. EV production lines can roar back to life. Maruti Suzuki, for one, can push up e Vitara volumes in the second half of fiscal 2025–'26 and still meet its yearly goal of 67,000 EVs. Bajaj would have a fighting chance to salvage August production.
Also Read : Maruti Suzuki e-Vitara's production to start on 26 August
More than just immediate reprieve, this development becomes a bridge to a more resilient future. It gives breathing space to ongoing efforts, like IREL's pursuits with Japan and Korea to kickstart domestic rare earth magnet production, and India's national push to build processing infrastructure.
The road ahead
The Indian auto industry has learned its lesson hard. Gone are the days when a strategic choke point could bring production to a standstill. While the lifting of the ban is satisfying, it is not enough. Building internal capacity, diversifying supply chains, and strengthening domestic manufacturing now seem inevitable in the EV era.
For India's automobile sector, the lifting of the ban is both a relief and a reminder. Relief, because supply lines can start moving again. Reminder, because overdependence on a single source is a strategic vulnerability no industry can afford. In that sense, the rare earth episode may just have handed India's EV transition its most important lesson yet: resilience matters as much as scale.
Get insights into Upcoming Cars In India, Electric Vehicles, Upcoming Bikes in India and cutting-edge technology transforming the automotive landscape.
First Published Date:
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

"Untenable": Centre As Nepal Objects To India-China Trade Through Lipulekh
"Untenable": Centre As Nepal Objects To India-China Trade Through Lipulekh

NDTV

time11 minutes ago

  • NDTV

"Untenable": Centre As Nepal Objects To India-China Trade Through Lipulekh

New Delhi: India on Wednesday rejected Nepal's opposition to the resumption of border trade with China through the Lipulekh Pass, calling Kathmandu's territorial claims "unjustified, untenable, and not supported by historical facts." The statement came after Nepal's Ministry of Foreign Affairs objected to the reopening of India-China trade through the Himalayan pass, a route that cuts through the Kalapani-Lipulekh-Limpiyadhura region. Kathmandu maintains the territory lies within Nepal, citing its map and historical treaties. Ministry of External Affairs spokesperson Randhir Jaiswal said India's position was "consistent and clear." "We have noted the comments of Ministry of Foreign Affairs of Nepal related to resumption of border trade between India and China through the Lipulekh Pass. Our position in this regard has been consistent and clear. Border trade between India and China through Lipulekh pass had commenced in 1954 and has been going on for decades. This trade had been disrupted in recent years due to Covid and other developments, and both sides have now agreed to resume it," he said in a statement. Mr Jaiswal called it a "unilateral act" and termed as "untenable" the "artificial enlargement" of the territorial claims by Nepal. India maintains Lipulekh, Kalapani and Limpiyadhura belongs to it. Addressing Nepal's objections, Mr Jaiswal said, "As regards territorial claims, our position remains that such claims are neither justified nor based on historical facts and evidence. Any unilateral artificial enlargement of territorial claims is untenable. India remains open to constructive interaction with Nepal on resolving agreed outstanding boundary issues through dialogue and diplomacy." Nepal shares a border of over 1,850 km with five Indian states - Sikkim, West Bengal, Bihar, Uttar Pradesh and Uttarakhand. On Wednesday Nepal said that the territory is its inseparable part and also incorporated in its official map. "The Nepal government is clear that Limpiyadhura, Lipulekh and Kalapani, situated East of Mahakali river, are inseparable parts of Nepal. These are also officially incorporated in the Nepalese map, included in the Constitution as well," the Nepal foreign ministry said. A joint document released on Tuesday after wide-ranging talks in New Delhi between Chinese Foreign Minister Wang Yi with External Affairs Minister S Jaishankar, National Security Advisor Ajit Doval and Prime Minister Narendra Modi, said both sides agreed to re-open border trade through the three designated trading points, namely Lipulekh Pass, Shipki La Pass and Nathu La Pass. The Nepal foreign ministry statement comes in response to questions raised by Nepalese media regarding the announcement by India and China to resume border trade through Lipulekh. "It is a well-known fact that the Nepal government has been requesting the government of India not to construct or expand roads and indulge in any kind of activity such as border trade in the territory," read the statement issued by spokesperson of the foreign ministry, Lok Bahadur Chhetri. "It is also well known that the Nepal government has already informed the government of China that the area lies in Nepalese territory," it added. "The Nepal government is committed to resolving the border issue between the two countries through diplomatic channels on the basis of historical treaty - agreement, facts, map and other evidence complying with the spirit of cordial and friendly relations existing between Nepal and India," read the statement. On June 18, 2020, Nepal completed the process to update the country's political map by incorporating three strategically important areas Lipulekh, Kalapani and Limpiyadhura areas by amending its Constitution.

Letters to The Editor — August 21, 2025
Letters to The Editor — August 21, 2025

The Hindu

time11 minutes ago

  • The Hindu

Letters to The Editor — August 21, 2025

Vice-President, the contest The Vice-President is expected to embody neutrality, remain above partisan politics, and uphold an unbiased stance that is free from any rigid political ideology. Traditionally, these posts have been held by eminent individuals whose contributions to society and the nation have been exemplary. By these standards, Justice B. Sudershan Reddy is a good choice. His is a distinguished judicial career. In contrast, C.P. Radhakrishnan, the NDA's nominee, is a seasoned political figure with a long record in public office, and, therefore, may not be perceived as a non-partisan choice for this esteemed role. One hopes that Members of Parliament exercise a 'conscience vote'. May wisdom guide this decision. Varghese George, Secunderabad While the Vice-President of India is also the Chairman of the Rajya Sabha and, therefore, has the duty to conduct proceedings in the House of Elders impartially, it was expected that a scholar with sound knowledge in the tenets of the Constitution would be elected as the next Vice-President in consultation with all the stakeholders, particularly the Opposition. Alas, it is not to be. With the ruling BJP dispensation announcing the candidature of C.P. Radhakrishnan, a hard-core member of the RSS and the BJP, and bypassed going in for a consensus candidate, we now have a situation of a contest. It is unfortunate that some in the BJP in Tamil Nadu have invoked the son of the soil line. The people of Tamil Nadu are well aware that the Union government has always been acting against their interests. One can expect Mr. Radhakrishnan to be another spokesperson of the saffron party. Tharcius S. Fernando, Chennai India-China de-escalation We do need de-escalation at the Line of Actual Control. We also need the display of strong political will at the Centre and robust diplomacy to negotiate peace with China. We must not lose sight of the economic front. We need to settle a trade deal, bypassing American sanctions and also Chinese moves. Manas Agarwal, Shahjahanpur, Uttar Pradesh Urban parks Rapid urbanisation in India has only highlighted a key issue — an insufficient number of public parks. Parks serve an important purpose of bringing people from all walks of life together and creating harmony ('Open Page, 'For urban lung space', August 17). Parks improve the aesthetic value of the area and are a major source of green cover in the urban pockets, keeping the temperature under control. According to a study conducted by Pennsylvania State University, the amount of time spent in parks and green common spaces has a direct correlation with the well-being of an individual. R. Sivakumar, Chennai

India and China are developing a special mechanism to tackle...,Trump should be worried because...
India and China are developing a special mechanism to tackle...,Trump should be worried because...

India.com

time11 minutes ago

  • India.com

India and China are developing a special mechanism to tackle...,Trump should be worried because...

India china relations India-China relations: In a significant development between India and China, the two neigbours have agreed that like the Western Sector, a General Level Mechanism will also be set up in the Eastern and Central Sectors to address boundary issues. As a part of the mechanism, a meeting under will also be held soon in the Western Sector to discuss the border dispute. The update is seen as a step meant to strengthen dialogue between the two armies along the Line of Actual Control (LAC). What have India and China agreed for? In a news update that US's Donald Trump should see as a bad news, India and China have agreed for the set up of the General Level Mechanism which refers to Corps Commander level talks between the Indian and Chinese armies. How did India-China relations worsen? Notably, this format began after April 2020, when tensions escalated in Eastern Ladakh. Since the region comes under the 14th Corps of the Indian Army, its Commander represents India in these talks. What China said on boundary dispute with India? 'Regarding the boundary question, the two sides reached new consensus on conducting regular management and control, maintaining peace and tranquility in border areas, appropriately handling sensitive points, and initiating boundary negotiations in areas where conditions are met, Wang said on the boundary dispute with India. Story highlights: India and China have agreed for General Level Mechanism in the Eastern and Central Sectors. The two countries are planning to solve their border disputes. India-China tensions escalated in Eastern Ladakh in 2020. Recently, Chinese Foreign minister visited India. What PM Modi said on India-China relations? 'Glad to meet Foreign Minister Wang Yi. Since my meeting with President Xi in Kazan last year, India-China relations have made steady progress guided by respect for each other's interests and sensitivities. I look forward to our next meeting in Tianjin on the sidelines of the SCO Summit. Stable, predictable, constructive ties between India and China will contribute significantly to regional as well as global peace and prosperity,' PM Modi stated in a post on X.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store