logo
Jewel Thief – The Heist Begins: How many times will Saif Ali Khan facilitate the destruction of Bollywood (after restoring it)?

Jewel Thief – The Heist Begins: How many times will Saif Ali Khan facilitate the destruction of Bollywood (after restoring it)?

Indian Express01-05-2025

Many years ago, Netflix announced a grand prequel series to SS Rajamouli 's landmark Baahubali films. A cast was assembled and paraded before the press in Singapore; the series was even given a title: Baahubali: Before the Beginning. It was filmed at Ramoji; people were taken on tours of the set. But the final show was deemed unworthy of Netflix's server space, and, in an admirable display of creative integrity, it was decided that the project be revamped before being shown to the world. A new creative team was brought on board, and the entire thing was redone with a different cast. Remarkably, even the 2.0 version failed to meet Netflix's high standards — we are, after all, talking about the same streamer that nodded in approval when presented with Jewel Thief: The Heist Begins — and the mega-budget project, on which hundreds of crores had already been spent, put out of its misery.
Imagine how bad the Baahubali show must've been to be buried by a platform that thought stuff like Mrs Serial Killer, Maharaj and Nadaaniyan was fit for consumption. It isn't the only thing that Netflix has pulled the plug on, by the way. One of contemporary Bollywood's biggest unsolved mysteries — other than Amitabh Bachchan 's decision to distance himself from Brahmastra — revolves around the (completed) Abbas-Mustan project Penthouse. Nobody, not even cast member Cyrus Broacha, knows what happened to it. They even released promotional stills. The nation wants to know. The nation probably also wants to know why they couldn't just cancel Jewel Thief as well. The movie marks a full-circle moment for the Hindi film industry; one of those 'water finds its level' situations. And Saif Ali Khan would know exactly what's happening; he's been here before.
Saif Ali Khan and Jaideep Ahlawat star in Netflix's Jewel Thief.
He was, of course, the star of Netflix's first original streaming series out of India, Sacred Games. Those were the days. How full of hope we were. How excited Anurag Kashyap was. But then, only two years later, our favourite Nawab headlined the Prime Video show Tandav, which changed everything. While the show could've cratered the Andheri-Goregaon area through sheer terribleness alone, Tandav destroyed the streaming industry for entirely different reasons. What was once seen as a haven for ambitious storytellers, a place where everybody could get paid a fair wage for pushing creativity in the right direction, turned into a hopeless hellhole where ideas go to die. Which brings us to Jewel Thief, a movie that truly embodies the current state of the Hindi film industry.
Not only does it take Jaideep Ahlawat — the single biggest star that Indian streaming has produced — and reduce him to a dancing meme, the movie seems to cater to the exact opposite crowd that Netflix was supposed to have cultivated. Jewel Thief isn't merely a reflection of the state that Bollywood finds itself in, it's a reflection of what Bollywood thinks of you, the viewer. You aren't capable of appreciating films like Masaan and The Disciple, it seems to be saying; heck, you aren't even capable of appreciating Gangs of Wasseypur or The Lunchbox any more. This what you deserve. It's like Kunal Kapoor's cop character in Jewel Thief. In a regular movie, he'd have been a laughing stock for his ineptitude. But because Jewel Thief surrounds him with a couple of actual morons, he seems smarter by comparison.
That's how Bollywood works. That's how movies like Stree 2 and Chhaava get a pass. We've been so conditioned to accept absolute garbage, the minute we see something that displays the bare minimum of competence, we make it a mega-hit. Before joining hands with his son to destroy every last morsel of originality that this town had remaining, Saif went through a similar cycle in the theatrical space, not once but twice. He was, after all, a crucial part of generation-defining films such as Dil Chahta Hai and Omkara — these movies genuinely altered the course of the industry. But then, he also headlined Tigmanshu Dhulia's Bullett Raja and Sajid Khan's Humshakals. In Jewel Thief, he plays Rehan, a suave man who has been disowned by his dad for his career choices. You can't really blame uncle; no self-respecting middle-class Indian father would approve of their first-born becoming a 'chor'.
Rehan is hired by Ahlawat's character to steal a priceless ruby, while Kapoor's scowling cop and his two cronies chase him across the globe. Gentleman thieves have a rich legacy in cinema; in recent years, the archetype was resurrected by the Netflix show Lupin, which itself was based on the character Arsène Lupin. Created as France's answer to Sherlock Holmes, Lupin also inspired a series of Japanese anime shows and films, which, interestingly enough, have counted Hayao Miyazaki and Takashi Yamazaki as directors over the years. All of this is to say that Bollywood's penchant for originality remains intact. Not to validate calls for a more 'rooted' Hindi cinema — 'rooted' is just code for 'misogynist' — but Jewel Thief is particularly unhinged, even by Bollywood's already unreal standards. Even though the movie is supposedly set in real locations, it looks like a fever dream (derogatory). Why, for instance, do directors Kookie Gulati and Robbie Grewal — wonder who was fired first — insist that the very recognisable Griffith Observatory in Los Angeles is in Turkey or something?
Jaideep Ahlawat plays the antagonist in Netflix's Jewel Thief.
Here's a movie that introduces its 'villain' with a scene in which he murders a dog. It's designed as an intimidation tactic, an arm-twisting manoeuvre to get Rehan to do his bidding. There's an unwritten rule in cinema that says 'don't kill dogs and children on screen'. Some lines simply cannot be crossed. Not a single audience member, regardless of their socio-economic background, would forgive an act this vile. To be clear, it's not that Hindi filmmakers have a disregard for rules. The bigger issue is their skewed idea of morality. They're convinced that murdering babies and innocent animals wouldn't bother us, because it doesn't bother them. This is why, in the last six months alone, we've seen infants being graphically killed in movies such as Marco and Emergency. To make matters worse, after killing his dog, the villain is promoted to a parallel lead for the next hour or so. Weirder still, he's a part of the dance number that plays over the end credits.
Bollywood has been in trouble before, but it hasn't been in trouble this deep in about 25 years. They say that writers are underpaid, and yet they keep turning to the same six people for scripts. After being handed trash in return, they decide to go ahead and produce it. And when the trash project predictably implodes mid-production, they carry on. Serious introspection is necessary, you'd agree, when an industry that won't think twice before greenlighting movies like this keeps Neeraj Ghaywan in the lurch for a decade; that doesn't allow masterpieces by Dibakar Banerjee and Aamir Bashir to even see the light of day. Netflix actually abandoned the Banerjee project, but for it to produce a movie like Jewel Thief with our subscription money isn't all that different from taxpayer funds being used to erect public Wi-Fi towers that'll never work. Who are we kidding, thought; perhaps it's for the best that we don't get free Wi-Fi. All we'd do with it is watch Jewel Thief.

Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

AA22A6: Deepika Padukone as The Witcher? AI image resurfaces after casting in Atlee-Allu Arjun film
AA22A6: Deepika Padukone as The Witcher? AI image resurfaces after casting in Atlee-Allu Arjun film

Time of India

time18 minutes ago

  • Time of India

AA22A6: Deepika Padukone as The Witcher? AI image resurfaces after casting in Atlee-Allu Arjun film

As Deepika Padukone picks up her sword and gets ready to play the role of a warrior queen, an AI-generated image of the beauty has resurfaced on social media. The picture, shared by a fan handle back in 2024, reimagined her as a fierce female Witcher. The picture was posted online with the caption, "You asked for it! Deepika is a Witcher!" This comes just hours after the official announcement of her casting as the female lead in Atlee's next big project with Allu Arjun was announced on Saturday. The viral image depicts Deepika in a leather and iron clad outfit with a breastplate, giving her the perfect warrior look. With piercing eyes she wears her hair down in loose waves, much like Henry Cavill 's character of Geralt of Rivia. While not officially linked to the film, the timing of the AI artwork and the project's epic scale teased in the announcement clip, has sparked speculation about Deepika's role in the high-octane sci-fi film tentatively titled Project AA22 x A6. On Saturday, the makers dropped an announcement video, showcasing director Atlee and Deepika in discussion. The video later shows the actress getting into prep mode as she picks up a sword and swings an axe while prepping for her action-packed role. When not in her armour, DP was seen in a motion-capture suit, riding a mechanical horse, suggesting epic battle scenes set to unfold in this new film. Director Atlee, in a press note, praised the actress, saying, 'Collaborating with Deepika Padukone ma'am on Jawan was incredible—her range, power, and grace shine in every frame. She drives the story. Now, with her and Allu Arjun sir together, we're creating something truly unforgettable—real filmmaker's dream synergy.' Backing the grand vision, Sun Pictures added, 'Having Deepika Padukone on board elevates this project to a whole new level. She brings gravitas, star power, and an unmatched presence that will leave a lasting impact. With Atlee's vision, Allu Arjun's magnetic energy, and Deepika's commanding brilliance, we're creating something iconic for audiences across the globe.' While plot details remain under wraps, Deepika's pairing with Allu Arjun has generated major buzz, both in Bollywood and pan-India cinema circles. Check out our list of the latest Hindi , English , Tamil , Telugu , Malayalam , and Kannada movies . Don't miss our picks for the best Hindi movies , best Tamil movies, and best Telugu films .

Shocking! Anurag Kashyap blasts Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos for this reason, says 'Always knew tech guys are dumb but...'
Shocking! Anurag Kashyap blasts Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos for this reason, says 'Always knew tech guys are dumb but...'

First Post

time39 minutes ago

  • First Post

Shocking! Anurag Kashyap blasts Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos for this reason, says 'Always knew tech guys are dumb but...'

Sarandos touched upon the timing of the show's launch: 'If I did it all over again, would I have done Sacred Games a couple of years later, maybe.' read more Anurag Kashyap revolutionized the OTT space with the iconic Sacred Games back in 2018 also directed by Vikramaditya Motwane. The series starred Saif Ali Khan and Nawazuddin Siddiqui, along with Radhika Apte and Kubbra Sait. However, Netflix CEO Ted Sarandos said in an interview he is unsure if starting the programming of the streaming giant with this show was the right idea. Kashyap isn't pleased. In fact, he has severely criticized his comments in his statement that reads- 'He should have started with Saas Bahu .. he would have done well. Which he is doing now Z I always knew the tech guys are dumb when it comes to story telling but tedsarandos is the definition of dumb is what I didn't know . Good to discover that. This explains everything now.' STORY CONTINUES BELOW THIS AD What Ted said Our very first Indian original show was Sacred Games. And I thought, 'This is going to be great. People in India love movies. This is a TV show that feels as big as a movie, it has movie stars.' What's interesting about it is that it was very, very novel, but what I didn't understand that we were introducing a brand new kind of entertainment in a country the size of India. At the time, India's television landscape was largely defined by sports, talk shows, and family dramas - very different from the cinematic format Netflix was offering. 'There was nothing else like it,' he reflected, highlighting the difference between existing formats and the kind of 'cinema-infused television' Netflix was producing globally. Sarandos also touched upon the timing of the show's launch: 'If I did it all over again, would I have done Sacred Games a couple of years later, maybe.'

After Anurag Kashyap, Vikramaditya Motwane, Kiran Rao speak out on tech control and OTT release norms: ‘Now it's statistics and algorithm'
After Anurag Kashyap, Vikramaditya Motwane, Kiran Rao speak out on tech control and OTT release norms: ‘Now it's statistics and algorithm'

Indian Express

time43 minutes ago

  • Indian Express

After Anurag Kashyap, Vikramaditya Motwane, Kiran Rao speak out on tech control and OTT release norms: ‘Now it's statistics and algorithm'

Ace filmmakers like Anurag Kashyap, Vikramaditya Motwane, and Kiran Rao have zeroed in on what's wrong with the Hindi film industry today. Kashyap, who recently called out Netlfix CEO and has admitted that he's relocated to the South to work there, also reiterated the issues he's been voicing for months now. On lack of good producers 'I don't think there's a lack of stories, storytellers, filmmakers or courage. What's really lacking is a good producer and producers' love for films. There was a time when producers were proud of films, now it's statistics and algorithm. The moment studios and film companies have started going to the stock market, it's gone down,' said Kashyap. In the interview with The Quint, Anurag Kashyap quoted the example of producers like Rakesh Roshan who used to mortgage their homes to fund their films. He recalled an instance in 1987 when Rakesh and his entire family were nervously sitting inside a car during the premiere of his action drama Khudgarz, fearing that if the film doesn't work, they'd lose their home. 'Whenever people have liked my film, there was a good producer empowering me. And whenever my film didn't work, the same producer was pulling the strings because the money comes from somewhere else. That's suffocating. If the producer is ready to fight, then we can go to court, like we did with Udta Punjab,' added Kashyap. After Pahlaj Nihalani-led Central Board of Film Certification halted the release of Abhishek Chaubey's Udta Punjab in 2016 because of its depiction of the drug menace in Punjab, the producers — Anurag Kashyap and Vikramaditya Motwane-led Phantom Films and Ekta Kapoor's Balaji Motion Pictures — moved Bombay High Court to ensure a smooth release of the film in theatres. 'We need producers who are invested in the story and vision of the film. This is part of the changing landscape. The fact is that most of our entertainment is owned by tech companies, and not run by old-fashioned producers. There's a slight broadening of the gap between creative people and people who have the money,' said Motwane, pointing to tech giants like Netflix, Amazon, and Jio which own streaming services including Amazon Prime Video and Hotstar. 'In the right way, it should be: we know how to make the movies, you know how to run a corporation, we'll always make it work. Sometimes, there's a tendency of coldness in this approach. But in an industry like this, you need warmth, collective energy, and passion,' added Motwane. He lauded Dinesh Vijan of Maddock Films for putting his heart and soul into producing all his movies, but maintained 'not every producer or studio is like that.' On escalating marketing costs Kiran Rao pointed out that the entertainment market is so saturated now that it's extremely challenging to reach the audience organically. 'There's so much noise now that the cost of marketing, to getting to your audience, is so high that only big films can afford. Small films, that are great, can just not afford that,' said Rao. That's exactly why her, Vikramaditya Motwane, Anurag Kashyap, and Nikkhil Advani have come on board as executive producers of Karan Tejpal's crime thriller Stolen, starring Abhishek Bannerjee, which is now streaming on Amazon Prime Video. On the theatrical experience 'It takes a lot for someone to find the right show, the right timing, the ticket prices are sometimes prohibitive, and it's not convenient. Films are never playing long enough. By the time you've heard of it, the film's already gone or moved to another neighbourhood,' said Kiran Rao, adding, 'There has been a dearth of great cinema. It's sometimes because of this conundrum that the best films don't get there, the big films do.' Anurag Kashyap insisted the Hindi film industry should learn from its southern counterparts on how to cap ticket prices. But Rao pointed out the unique issue in Bollywood. 'Each of these films from the southern states have an institutional or government support. There are fewer producers who have an understanding. The Hindi film industry is quite gargantuan. We have no state technically because every other film has their own state language. We are na ghar ka na ghat ka (neither here nor there),' argued Rao. Vikramaditya Motwane criticized the moviegoing experience of today. 'I go to theatres because I love the movies, but I hate the movie-watching experience. You're walking into a theatre that's sterile, there's no character. There are 30 minutes of advertising, smoking disclaimers, and then there are 15 minutes of advertisements during the interval, with someone asking you to advertise more. I get so angry when I see that! Then you exit through the bum of the place. It's only the love for the movies which is pushing me to go to a theatre,' confessed the filmmaker. On streaming vs theatres 'We've become used to watching films at home, especially after this eight-week thing has become a standard, which I don't think it should,' said Motwane, referring to the minimum eight-week gap between theatrical release and streaming premiere. He lauded Aamir Khan for trying to stretch that gap further by announcing that his next film, RS Prasanna's coming-of-age movie Sitaare Zameen Par, will only release in cinemas on June 20. Motwane also pointed out that historically, Hollywood filmmaker Christopher Nolan has also benefitted from the same strategy. But both him and Rao claimed that if the trailer is exciting enough, the audience would choose theatres over streaming. 'I've always felt streaming and theatres are absolutely not mutually exclusive. You should be able to release a film in the cinemas and on streaming on the same date,' said Rao. Also Read — Stolen: The rare Hindi movie that isn't afraid to insult its own audience, and you know what, we deserve it 'It's so complex. There are so many moving parts in a film. It's easy to put the blame on only exhibition and distribution. But honestly, we're part of an art form that also needs to be a business. And that's a tricky space to create within. You also need an ecosystem around you where your films can fly,' she added.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into the world of global news and events? Download our app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store