Lottery player spends $5 — and wins a huge jackpot prize in North Carolina
A lottery player spent $5 on a ticket — and won a prize worth celebrating in North Carolina.
On April 13, the player bought a Magic Winnings Vegas ticket that won the game's top prize, making it worth more than $780,000, the North Carolina Education Lottery told McClatchy News via email.
Magic Winnings Vegas is a progressive jackpot game that offers online lottery tickets starting at 50 cents. To win the top-tier 'Alakazam' jackpot prize, a player must match several digital icons, per the lottery's website.
A spokesperson previously told McClatchy News the lottery can't pinpoint where players are when they buy their tickets for digital instant games. But lottery officials know the $780,794 winner lives in Raeford, a roughly 80-mile drive southwest from Raleigh.
As of early April 14, the lucky ticket holder hadn't claimed their prize. The winner has about six months to cash in, according to game rules.
The jackpot win came during a lucky weekend in North Carolina. Another online lottery player scored $100,000, and someone else bought a ticket worth $60,414, lottery officials wrote on X, formerly known as Twitter.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Bluesky is backfiring. Mark Cuban says the ‘lack of diversity of thought' is actually pushing users back to X
Billionaire Mark Cuban, who has been an active Bluesky user and supporter for several months now, said this week he thinks the social media platform has gotten 'ruder and more hateful.' Its liberal-heavy user base makes it challenging to raise questions or have debates with other users, even if their political ideologies align, he said. After Elon Musk bought Twitter (now X) in late 2022, the vibes on the platform started changing, and many accounts that were verified lost their status. But the mass exodus from X came in late 2024 following the U.S. presidential election and Musk throwing his support—and millions—behind Donald Trump. By December 2024, the platform had lost about 2.7 million active Apple and Android users in just two months, with competitor Bluesky absorbing nearly all of those users. Colloquially, it became somewhat of a safe haven for liberal users who wanted to drown out the noise of President Trump's reelection. 'It's people wanting to just try something new. It's people finding their community here,' Bluesky CEO Jay Graber told Vox Media's Peter Kafta in a June 4 podcast. 'I think in general it's both people looking for something and people looking to get away from something.' Between November 2024 and this May, Bluesky grew from about 10 million users to 30 million, according to a Pew Research Center analysis. Many news influencers—people who regularly post about current events on the platform—lean left politically, according to the analysis. One such figure was billionaire Mark Cuban, who supported former Vice President Kamala Harris during her presidential run in 2024, although he didn't give her a penny for her campaign, he said. Cuban became a regular Bluesky user, having posted nearly 2,000 times since November 2024. When he first joined the platform, he famously posted: 'Hello Less Hateful World.' But Cuban has changed his tune. In a series of posts this week, Cuban argued Bluesky has become too much of an echo chamber, and is sending more users back to X. 'Engagement went from great convos on many topics, to agree with me or you are a nazi fascist,' Cuban wrote. 'We are forcing posts to X.' The former Shark Tank star and Dallas Mavericks owner also said he thinks Bluesky users have 'grown ruder and more hateful.' 'Even if you agree with 95% of what a person is saying on a topic, if there is one point that you might call out as being more of a grey area, they will call you a fascist etc.,' said Cuban, whose current net worth is about $8.33 billion, according to Bloomberg. Bluesky did not respond to Fortune's request for comment. Cuban also reposted a Washington Post opinion article published Sunday titled 'The Bluesky bubble hurts liberals and their causes.' Author Megan McArdle argued Bluesky's left-leaning user base segregates it into a political silo. Cuban agreed. 'The lack of diversity of thought here is really hurting usage,' Cuban wrote in a separate Bluesky update including the Washington Post article. 'The moderation and block tools on here are so advanced, if you see someone you don't want to see on here, just block them. Don't attack them.' 'There used to be great give and take discussions on politics and news. Not so much any more,' Cuban added. 'Doesn't have to be this way.' This story was originally featured on
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
China ready to drop all tariffs on African imports
China has said it is ready to drop the tariffs it charges on imports from all 53 African countries with which it has diplomatic relations. The move, announced at a China-Africa co-operation meeting, comes as the continent is facing the possibility of increased tariffs on its products entering the US. China is Africa's largest trading partner – a position it has held for the last 15 years – with Africa exporting goods to the Asian nation worth around $170bn (£125bn) in 2023. A joint ministerial statement criticised "certain countries' [efforts to] disrupt the existing international economic and trade order" through the unilateral imposition of tariffs. It then called on the US to resolve trade disputes on the basis of "equality, respect and mutual benefit". The zero-tariff move, when implemented, will be an extension of the deal made last year for China to drop tariffs on goods from 33 African nations classified as "least developed". The expanded list will include some of China's largest trading partners on the continent, including South Africa and Nigeria. China has not said when the decision will come into effect. Eswatini is the only African state excluded from the s zero-tariff announcement as it recognises Taiwan as an independent country, whereas China regards it as a breakaway province. China currently imports a lot of raw materials from Africa, notably from the Democratic Republic of Congo and Guinea. In April, President Donald Trump caused consternation among US trading partners by announcing high tariffs on its imports form many countries, including a 50% rate for Lesotho, 30% for South Africa and 14% for Nigeria. How jeans and diamonds pushed Lesotho to the top of Trump's tariffs list The implementation has been paused until next month, though the temporary halt could be extended further for countries that are negotiating "in good faith", according to US Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent. In 2024, the US imported $39.5bn-worth of goods from Africa. Some of that was brought in under the zero-tariff deal known as the Africa Growth and Opportunity Act (Agoa) which now looks under threat if the Trump administration goes ahead with the imposition of fresh charges. China's mission to win African hearts with satellite TV China's Belt and Road Initiative: Kenya and a railway to nowhere The cheap Chinese shop at the centre of Kenya row Go to for more news from the African continent. Follow us on Twitter @BBCAfrica, on Facebook at BBC Africa or on Instagram at bbcafrica Focus on Africa This Is Africa
Time Business News
2 hours ago
- Time Business News
Drive Social Media Lawsuit: Everything You Need to Know
The Drive Social Media lawsuit has become a hot topic in the digital marketing and social media management world. As social media platforms continue to dominate marketing strategies, disputes involving social media companies, agencies, and clients have increased. This article provides an in-depth look at the Drive Social Media lawsuit, its background, key allegations, legal implications, and what it means for businesses relying on social media for growth. Drive Social Media is a digital marketing agency specializing in social media management, content creation, and online brand growth strategies. The company offers services to businesses of all sizes, helping them build a strong social media presence across platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and LinkedIn. With the rising demand for social media marketing, Drive Social Media quickly gained popularity. However, recent legal issues have brought the company under scrutiny. The Drive Social Media lawsuit was initiated after allegations arose from one or more clients claiming breach of contract, misrepresentation, or failure to deliver promised services. While specifics vary by case, the core of the dispute involves accusations that Drive Social Media did not fulfill contractual obligations, leading to financial losses and reputational harm for clients. Legal challenges like this highlight the complexities in the digital marketing industry, where results can sometimes be subjective or difficult to measure. Several important allegations have surfaced in the lawsuit against Drive Social Media: Clients claim that Drive Social Media failed to deliver services as outlined in the contract. This includes missed deadlines, inadequate content creation, and insufficient engagement growth on social media platforms. Another allegation is that Drive Social Media misrepresented its capabilities, promising certain levels of growth or specific campaign results that were not achieved. Such misrepresentations can be considered deceptive marketing or false advertising. The lawsuit also highlights issues with communication, where clients felt left in the dark about campaign progress or problems. Transparency is crucial in client-agency relationships, and failure in this area can damage trust. Some clients allege overcharging or billing for services that were never provided. Financial disputes in service-based contracts can complicate legal proceedings and affect reputations. The Drive Social Media lawsuit carries important legal implications for the company and the broader digital marketing industry: Contract Enforcement: The case underscores the importance of clear, enforceable contracts outlining deliverables and expectations. The case underscores the importance of clear, enforceable contracts outlining deliverables and expectations. Accountability: Agencies must be accountable for the services they promise, maintaining honesty in marketing claims. Agencies must be accountable for the services they promise, maintaining honesty in marketing claims. Client Rights: Clients are reminded of their rights to demand transparency and quality service from digital marketing providers. Clients are reminded of their rights to demand transparency and quality service from digital marketing providers. Industry Standards: The lawsuit may encourage the establishment of stricter industry standards and best practices for digital marketing agencies. For businesses relying on social media marketing, the lawsuit serves as a cautionary tale. Here are key takeaways: Choose Agencies Carefully: Vet agencies thoroughly before hiring, checking reviews, past client results, and contract terms. Vet agencies thoroughly before hiring, checking reviews, past client results, and contract terms. Set Clear Expectations: Ensure contracts clearly define deliverables, timelines, and metrics for success. Ensure contracts clearly define deliverables, timelines, and metrics for success. Monitor Campaigns: Stay actively involved in campaign monitoring and request regular updates. Stay actively involved in campaign monitoring and request regular updates. Know Your Rights: Understand your contractual rights and options if services are not delivered as promised. The outcome of the lawsuit is still pending, but it could lead to several potential consequences for Drive Social Media: Financial Penalties: The company may be required to pay damages or settlements to affected clients. The company may be required to pay damages or settlements to affected clients. Reputation Impact: Negative publicity could affect client trust and future business opportunities. Negative publicity could affect client trust and future business opportunities. Operational Changes: Drive Social Media might revise its service agreements, improve communication protocols, and enhance service delivery standards. Answer: The lawsuit primarily stems from allegations of breach of contract, misrepresentation of services, and poor communication. Answer: If the court finds Drive Social Media liable, clients may receive financial compensation for losses incurred. Answer: By choosing reputable agencies, ensuring clear contracts, and maintaining active oversight of marketing campaigns. Answer: As of now, Drive Social Media continues its operations while the lawsuit proceeds. The Drive Social Media lawsuit shines a light on the challenges and risks within the digital marketing industry. It highlights the critical importance of transparent communication, realistic promises, and contractual clarity between agencies and clients. For businesses investing in social media marketing, this case emphasizes the need for due diligence and active management of agency relationships. Stay informed about this ongoing case and similar industry developments to protect your business interests and ensure effective marketing partnerships. TIME BUSINESS NEWS
