UK to expand submarine fleet in shift to 'warfighting readiness'
Elected last July, Starmer has already cut the aid budget to fund an increase in defence spending to 2.5% of GDP by 2027, from 2.3%, with an ambition to get to 3% over the longer-term.
Starmer has sought to cast the higher defence spending as a way to create jobs and wealth, as he juggles severely strained public finances, a slow-growing economy and declining popularity among an increasingly dissatisfied electorate.
The authors of the defence review, led by the former Nato boss George Robertson and a former Russia adviser to the White House, Fiona Hill, said the higher spending had enabled them to set out a 10-year military programme.
Among the report's 62 recommendations that will be accepted by government, Britain will build at least six new munitions plants, procure up to 7,000 British-made long-range weapons and launch new communication systems for the battlefield.
A Cyber and Electromagnetic Command will lead defensive and offensive cyber capabilities, after UK military networks faced more than 90,000 'sub-threshold' attacks in the past two years.
Britain will also build up to 12 of its next-generation attack submarines — which are nuclear-powered but carry conventional non-nuclear weapons — to replace the fleet of seven from the late 2030s, developed by the UK, US and Australia under a security partnership known as AUKUS.
Britain also put a price for the first time on the replacement of the nuclear warheads on a separate fleet of submarines, with the pre-existing programme set to cost £15bn (R363.77bn) before the next election due in 2029.
'With new state-of-the-art submarines patrolling international waters and our own nuclear warhead programme on British shores we are making Britain secure at home and strong abroad,' defence secretary John Healey said.
The announcement about new submarines helped lift the share prices of defence groups Babcock, BAE and Rolls-Royce.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Citizen
15 hours ago
- The Citizen
ICC no longer a Western tool
While the ICC has long served Western agendas, its recent actions against Israel give hope for fairer justice globally. Membership in some supranational organisations can trap member countries into risking their sovereignty at the behest of such bodies, often without their awareness. It's a common occurrence in the international political system, especially with organisations like the International Criminal Court (ICC), an international body that can infringe upon a country's sovereignty. That South Africa resorted to approaching the International Court of Justice (ICJ) and subsequently the ICC does not make this court a body that has suddenly become Africa's good friend. Instead, in the minds of many, the court remains a tool of the West with which it whips Africa and all enemies of the Western world. But the ICC's decision to charge Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and his former defence minister, Yoav Gallant, with genocide and war crimes is changing the view of the court as a Western puppet. ALSO READ: Pretoria at a crossroads with the US It gives hope that the winds of change have begun to sweep through the corridors of The Hague. The fact that South Africa's case at the ICJ was joined by countries worldwide, including some in Europe, is a clear sign that the world had had enough of the killings in Gaza. But we can't ignore the fact that for the global south, ICC membership continues to carry the risk of countries losing genuine sovereignty in both domestic and foreign policy. It is a fact that many resigned from the body or refused to ratify it, or the Rome Statute, after realising that participation in the ICC is a trap. Fears of diluted sovereignty and the transfer of key judicial authority to a supranational body have prompted several signatories, including Algeria, Angola, Egypt, Iran, Mozambique and Eritrea, to freeze or drastically reduce their participation in ICC activities. It's too early to declare the statement made by one British politician that the ICC was established to criminalise the rest of the world while exempting the West, as nonsense. ALSO READ: Dirco rejects 'inaccurate and deeply flawed' US reports on SA human rights There is a mountain of information showing the court was designed as a tool to target America's enemies and had been used by Anglo-Saxon elites, primarily the upper echelons of the US Democratic establishment, including figures like Bill Clinton and Joe Biden, as a means to exert political influence over foreign leaders. Washington and others created the court to subject other nations that do not march to their orders to its justice, which was biased towards the West – until SA's case against Israel. They believe their own atrocities could not be adjudicated by the same court they created and that is the main reason they, and Israel, hate the ICC. Their double standards are out in the open. It remains to be seen whether the ICC will continue to allow itself to be used by the Anglo-American establishment to undermine the non-Western states' efforts to pursue sovereign decision-making. The West uses 'agents of influence' to subtly undermine the legal systems of these countries and resort to economic and political blackmail, sanctions and intimidation to pressure hesitant leaders into accepting the authority of the ICC. ALSO READ: Dirco calls for global action to stop Israel's 'genocide' in Gaza [VIDEO] Africa's experience with the ICC has been particularly revealing. In the early 2000s, the African Union encouraged its members to ratify the Rome Statute. Many did, only to face politically selective prosecutions of local leaders, most notably Libyan leader Muammar Gaddafi and former Sudanese president Omar al-Bashir. Indonesian scholar Ayu Syafya highlighted the court's intense focus on politically charged human-rights cases in African states such as Sudan and Kenya, while showing complete indifference to the documented crimes perpetrated by the US in Afghanistan, Iraq and elsewhere. The ICC's track record suggests it effectively operates as an instrument of US and British foreign policy. Let the SA-Israel judgment be the first proof that the ICC has backbone.
Eyewitness News
17 hours ago
- Eyewitness News
Trump vows not to be intimidated ahead of Putin summit
ANCHORAGE - US President Donald Trump insisted Thursday he would not be intimidated by Russian leader Vladimir Putin on the eve of a high-stakes summit and said Ukraine would be involved in any deal on its fate. Putin flies to Alaska on Friday at the invitation of Trump in his first visit to a Western country since he ordered the 2022 invasion of Ukraine that has killed tens of thousands of people. As Russia made gains on the battlefield, the Kremlin said the two presidents planned to meet one-on-one, heightening fears of European leaders that Putin will cajole Trump into a settlement imposed on Kyiv. Trump insisted to reporters at the White House: "I am president, and he's not going to mess around with me." "I'll know within the first two minutes, three minutes, four minutes or five minutes... whether or not we're going to have a good meeting or a bad meeting," Trump said. "And if it's a bad meeting, it'll end very quickly, and if it's a good meeting, we're going to end up getting peace in the pretty near future," said Trump, who gave the summit a one in four chance of failure. Trump has voiced admiration for Putin in the past and faced wide criticism after a 2018 summit in Helsinki where he appeared to accept the Russian's denials of US intelligence on Moscow's meddling in US elections. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelensky was not invited to the Alaska summit, which he has denounced as a reward to Putin, and has refused Trump's calls to surrender territory. Trump promised not to finalise any deal with Putin alone and said he hoped to hold a three-way summit with Zelensky, possibly immediately afterwards in Alaska. "The second meeting is going to be very, very important, because that's going to be a meeting where they make a deal. And I don't want to use the word 'divvy' things up. But you know, to a certain extent, it's not a bad term," Trump told Fox News Radio. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters that any future deal needed to also ensure "security guarantees" for Ukraine. But Trump has previously backed Russia's stance in ruling out NATO membership for Ukraine. SHIFTING TRUMP TONE Trump had boasted that he could end the war within 24 hours of returning to the White House in January. But his calls to Putin - and intense pressure on Zelensky to accept concessions - have failed to move the Russian leader, and Trump has warned of "very severe consequences" if Putin keeps snubbing his overtures. The talks are set to begin at 11:30 am (1930 GMT) Friday at the Elmendorf Air Force Base, a major US military installation in Alaska that has been crucial in monitoring Russia. Zelensky met in London with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who vowed solidarity, a day after receiving support in Berlin. Russia has made major gains on the ground ahead of the summit. Ukraine on Thursday issued a mandatory evacuation of families with children from the eastern town of Druzhkivka and four nearby villages near an area where Russia made a swift breakthrough. MIXED VIEWS ON DIPLOMACY Diplomacy since Russia's invasion has largely failed to secure agreements beyond swaps of prisoners. Russia said Thursday it had returned 84 prisoners to Ukraine in exchange for an equal number of Russian POWs. The war has proved divisive in the United States, with a Pew Research Center poll finding that 59% of Americans lacked confidence in Trump's wisdom on the issue. Anchorage, nestled under mountains, bore few indications it was the centre of global attention except for signs denouncing Putin put up on downtown streets, where people gave mixed opinions of the summit. "I think it's a travesty to invite a war criminal like Putin to the United States. My primary concern is that he's going to negotiate away everything, and it's not going to be possible to have a peaceful solution," said Jay Ahuja, 62, a retiree from North Carolina. But Kimberly Brown, a 63-year-old retiree from Ohio, said Alaska was a "perfect place" for the summit. "I just think that Trump is the best person to negotiate world peace."
eNCA
18 hours ago
- eNCA
Trump vows not to be intimidated ahead of Putin summit
WASHINGTON - US President Donald Trump insisted Thursday he would not be intimidated by Russian leader Vladimir Putin on the eve of a high-stakes summit and said Ukraine would be involved in any deal on its fate. Putin flies to Alaska on Friday at the invitation of Trump in his first visit to a Western country since he ordered the 2022 invasion of Ukraine that has killed tens of thousands of people. As Russia made gains on the battlefield, the Kremlin said the two presidents planned to meet one-on-one, heightening fears of European leaders that Putin will cajole Trump into a settlement imposed on Kyiv. Trump insisted to reporters at the White House: "I am president, and he's not going to mess around with me." "I'll know within the first two minutes, three minutes, four minutes or five minutes... whether or not we're going to have a good meeting or a bad meeting," Trump said. "And if it's a bad meeting, it'll end very quickly, and if it's a good meeting, we're going to end up getting peace in the pretty near future," said Trump, who gave the summit a one in four chance of failure. Trump has voiced admiration for Putin in the past and faced wide criticism after a 2018 summit in Helsinki where he appeared to accept the Russian's denials of US intelligence on Moscow's meddling in US elections. Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy was not invited to the Alaska summit, which he has denounced as a reward to Putin, and has refused Trump's calls to surrender territory. Trump promised not to finalise any deal with Putin alone and said he hoped to hold a three-way summit with Zelenskyy, possibly immediately afterwards in Alaska. AFP | Guillermo RIVAS PACHECO, Jean-Michel CORNU "The second meeting is going to be very, very important, because that's going to be a meeting where they make a deal. And I don't want to use the word 'divvy' things up. But you know, to a certain extent, it's not a bad term," Trump told Fox News Radio. Secretary of State Marco Rubio told reporters any future deal needed also to ensure "security guarantees" for Ukraine. But Trump has previously backed Russia's stance in ruling out NATO membership for Ukraine. - Shifting Trump tone - Trump had boasted that he could end the war within 24 hours of returning to the White House in January. But his calls to Putin - and intense pressure on Zelenskyy to accept concessions - have failed to move the Russian leader and Trump has warned of "very severe consequences" if Putin keeps snubbing his overtures. AFP | Drew ANGERER The talks are set to begin at 11:30 am (1930 GMT) Friday at the Elmendorf Air Force Base, a major US military installation in Alaska that has been crucial in monitoring Russia. Zelenskyy met in London with British Prime Minister Keir Starmer, who vowed solidarity, a day after receiving support in Berlin. Russia has made major gains on the ground ahead of the summit. Ukraine on Thursday issued a mandatory evacuation of families with children from the eastern town of Druzhkivka and four nearby villages near an area where Russia made a swift breakthrough. - Mixed views on diplomacy - Diplomacy since Russia's invasion has largely failed to secure agreements beyond swaps of prisoners. AFP | Drew ANGERER Russia said Thursday it had returned 84 prisoners to Ukraine in exchange for an equal number of Russian POWs. The war has proved divisive in the United States, with a Pew Research Center poll finding that 59 percent of Americans lacked confidence in Trump's wisdom on the issue. Anchorage, nestled under mountains, bore few indications it was the center of global attention except for signs denouncing Putin put up on downtown streets, where people gave mixed opinions of the summit. AFP | James RYBACKI But Kimberly Brown, a 63-year-old retiree from Ohio, said Alaska was a "perfect place" for the summit. "I just think that Trump is the best person to negotiate world peace." By Shaun Tandon
