
The JSE 100 000 points milestone that broke our market table
Remember Y2K? The Business Maverick team certainly does now. As eagle-eyed readers might have noticed, there was something wonky (sorry, it was just wrong) with the market report in our newsletter this morning.
The FTSE/JSE All Share Index (ALSI) was showing as a rather pedestrian 179.80 points instead of its actual, history-making 100,179.80 points.
The Yahoo Finance API that feeds our market data threw a digital tantrum when the JSE ALSI crossed the 100,000-point threshold for the first time in its 65-year history on Wednesday, 23 July 2025. Like those infamous millennium computers that couldn't cope with the year 2000, our system essentially 'reset' when faced with numbers it had never seen before.
It's a fitting technological hiccup for what is genuinely a historic moment.
Against all odds
Over that journey, the ALSI has delivered annualised returns of more than 11% – not too shabby for a market that's weathered apartheid, sanctions, global financial crises and more commodity cycles than a mining engineer's nightmares.
'This milestone reflects the resilience, innovation and operational excellence of companies listed on the JSE,' Leila Fourie, group CEO of the JSE said in a statement, clearly having a better day than our data systems. And she has every right to crow. In 2025, the JSE has positioned itself among the best-performing markets globally in both dollar and rand terms.
The ALSI now represents 125 listed companies with a combined market capitalisation of R21-trillion, capturing 99% of the eligible market capitalisation on the JSE Main Board. It's a trusted benchmark that has shown robust long-term growth since 2002, when it was redefined through a partnership with the FTSE.
But before we get too carried away with the champagne and celebration, it's worth noting that this milestone comes against a backdrop of some serious structural challenges. The JSE may be hitting record highs, but it's doing so with significantly fewer players on the field. By June last year there were fewer than 300 listed companies.
The competition conundrum
Kearabilwe Nonyana, head of Scope Prime Africa for B2B, highlighted the drop in listings in an interview with Daily Maverick this week and he is quick to point out flaws in the JSE's competitive landscape.
'There's a lack of competition locally in terms of access specifically to local markets and our local exchange,' he says, referencing the execution costs that are 'quite exorbitant' for retail investors who have 'always gotten the shorter end of that stick'.
The technological lag is particularly painful. Nonyana recounts instances where South African brokerages, comfortable in their monopoly over the industry, made clients trade over an Excel spreadsheet.
The listing requirements themselves have become the ultimate barriers to entry for new businesses, often pushing companies to remain private and diverting potential listings to private equity.
In 2022, the exchange did make moves to change listing requirements in an effort to encourage more listings.
Now in 2025, the JSE is playing catch-up in innovative spaces like cryptocurrency ETFs, where Nonyana says it needs to come to the party and lead rather than follow.
'South Africa's relatively small population of 60-odd million people also creates challenges in achieving the economies of scale that larger markets enjoy.' It's hard to compete on cost when your addressable market is a fraction of what Brazil or other emerging markets can offer.
Spread the good news
Before you start planning the JSE's funeral, consider this: the exchange has some genuine competitive advantages that shouldn't be underestimated.
The resurgence in dual-listed companies is creating interesting opportunities. 'These listings allow South African institutions to access international businesses on local boards without using their foreign investment allowance, while giving global investors access to African assets,' Nonyana explains.
When the London Stock Exchange is open and the JSE is closed, trading can continue – a neat trick that extends market hours naturally.
The global reach of South African companies is often overlooked. 'JSE-listed companies have tentacles worldwide – gold miners with operations in Canada and Papua New Guinea, Naspers/Prosus with stakes in Tencent and European assets,' he says.
South African Breweries grew from a local player into a global giant before being acquired by AB InBev. These aren't provincial companies; they're global players that happen to call Johannesburg home.
Then there are the 'crown jewels' – Nonyana is referring to South Africa's natural resources. Gold, platinum (still in supply deficit) and copper (the 'AI metal' with a projected supply deficit by 2035) remain compelling draws. Add significant energy resources from natural gas and oil explorations off both coasts, and you have a resource base that most countries would kill for.
The bottom line
The JSE's journey to 100,000 points is remarkable – a thousand-fold increase over 65 years that reflects genuine economic value creation and corporate resilience. Yes, there are fewer listed companies than before, and yes, the competitive environment has challenges that need addressing urgently.
But dismissing the JSE because of the exodus misses the bigger picture. This is still the largest stock exchange in Africa, operating for 137 years and ranked among the top 20 globally by market capitalisation. The companies that remain are often global players with diversified operations and strong fundamentals.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


Daily Maverick
14 minutes ago
- Daily Maverick
The Finance Ghost: The battle for MAS is over – now begins the war?
With Hyprop terminating its bid for MAS Real Estate, Prime Kapital has won the first skirmish. But the war is in its early stages… MAS Real Estate is the company that nobody expected to become the juiciest M&A story on the JSE this year. All the ingredients are here – big hitters on either side of the table and a board in the middle that is coming under increasing pressure by the day. And depending on the outcome of the extraordinary general meeting that has been scheduled for Wednesday, 27 August, at the request of a group of South African institutional investors, we could see an equally big hitter like Des de Beer landing up on the board as well. But why all this interest and opportunistic dealmaking activity? Why are such impressive sharks circling this particular boat? Blood in the water Although MAS isn't exactly a household name, it does have a market cap of R15.6-billion. Despite this significant size, MAS has been struggling to prepare for upcoming bond maturities, flagging weak support in the bond market for companies with MAS' risk profile. This led to the suspension of the MAS dividend in 2023 and subsequent panic selling by dividend-focused investors. Then, as various other strategies to strengthen the balance sheet came to fruition, investors with more of a net asset value (NAV) or total return focus (vs purely caring about the dividend yield) bought shares, leading to a recovery in the share price to levels seen before the panic selling. But here's the really important bit: the current share price still represents a substantial discount to NAV, which means that there's money to be made by getting control of the assets and managing the balance sheet in such a way that value can be unlocked over time. A lot of money. And in reality, the progress made by MAS towards being ready for bond refinancing or redemption activity is probably the major catalyst for the recent flurry of interest, as the best time to acquire control of a business is when it is still a recovery story rather than a bright and shiny object that everyone loves (and hence wants to be paid a fortune to part with). Either way, the substantial gap between the 52-week high of R24.65 and 52-week low of R15.76 tells quite a story, with plenty of opportunities for traders along the way. But aside from the short-term gains (and losses) on offer, the real story here is the battle between Prime Kapital and Hyprop, with both parties keen to get their hands on the MAS value unlock opportunity. Disclosure, dividends and liquidity – these are the tools of war In the world of corporate finance, parties bring different negotiating tactics to the table. At Prime Kapital for example, one of their key strengths in this fight is that they hold the keys to unlocking the capital that is currently tied up in the joint venture between MAS and Prime Kapital. With so much focus on the balance sheet at MAS and a desire to get back to paying dividends, that capital is a highly valuable bargaining chip. This joint venture has been a major bone of contention for institutional investors, with allegations that the board of MAS didn't disclose important elements of the joint venture agreement to the market. Simply put, investors have been caught by surprise that Prime Kapital holds quite so much influence over the broader MAS balance sheet and cashflow profile. This has led to the demand by investors for changes to the board, which would include the removal of a couple of directors and the appointment of several new independent directors. The 'white knight' for these investors is Hyprop, a JSE-listed Reit (real estate investment trust) that is well known to the local institutional investor community. Such is the support that Hyprop enjoys that it had no difficulties in raising more than R800-million in an accelerated bookbuild process, based on little more than a vague suggestion that it would have a go at acquiring MAS if it raised the money. But of course, R800-million is nowhere near enough to acquire control in a fund with a market cap of R15.6-billion, which brings us to the next negotiating point: liquidity of the shares. For Prime Kapital to acquire control of MAS, it needs to convince shareholders to accept a part-cash, part-shares deal. Although it is currently suggesting that it would put more cash on the table than Hyprop (which is a positive), the downside to its indicative offer is that the equity portion would take the form of an inward-listed preference share that is unlikely to have much liquidity at all. The actual terms of the preference shares do have some appealing features, but they will almost certainly require investors to take a long-term view of holding them until some kind of redemption event. In contrast, Hyprop shares are liquid and investors who swap their MAS exposure for shares in Hyprop would have no trouble in reducing that stake if required. The Hyprop offer is thus perceived as having a stronger equity portion, while the Prime Kapital indicative terms are stronger on the cash side. Understanding these levers is important, as it shows how we got to a place where Hyprop put in a bid that was terminated almost as quickly as it arrived. A highly unusual offer structure Offers to shareholders are usually open for a long time, as there's a process in which the board of the target company is given a chance to hire an independent expert and give the market a proper view on the transaction. Such offers are also usually open for acceptance even once important conditions have been met, allowing shareholders to accept an offer that they know is going ahead. And in most cases, those conditions are outside of the control of the offeror, i.e. they relate to regulatory approvals. The Hyprop offer followed none of these market norms. Before Hyprop decided to terminate the bid, the structure of the offer was that it would have been open for acceptance for only a few days from when it was announced. This doesn't give the board time to properly opine on the terms, nor does it give enough time for any of the important underlying conditions to be fulfilled. In other words, investors would have to accept the offer (via an irrevocable undertaking) and then wait and see how long it would take for conditions to be met. But there's more: one of the conditions was a demand by Hyprop to be given the same access to information as Prime Kapital, which of course ties in beautifully with the institutional investors and their valid concerns around disclosure shortcomings. Now, had there been no attempt to address those shortcomings, this would be fair. But the nuance here is that the MAS board had already released a detailed legal summary of the terms, so this demand by Hyprop implied that there were still significant disclosure issues. If true, that casts the MAS board in a very poor light. And if false, then it creates inappropriate optionality in the offer that prejudices shareholders who must give an irrevocable undertaking in the hope that Hyprop eventually chooses to go ahead with closing the offer, something that could take several months. As the demand by Hyprop wasn't going to be met by Prime Kapital (as this would've required detailed disclosure of documents by a party that is in no mood to cooperate with Hyprop's bid terms), Hyprop decided to walk away from this offer. Much as it may lay the blame at the door of poor disclosure, I still can't see how they could justify such an aggressive offer structure. Why was it necessary for the acceptance period to be just one week, particularly when the price implied by the offer was at a substantial discount to the current traded price of MAS? What's next? With Hyprop terminating its bid, Prime Kapital has won the first skirmish. But the war is in its early stages, as we are still talking about a substantial property fund that is trading at a juicy discount. Will Hyprop stay in this fight? Will another party enter the fray? There's no way of knowing. All we know is that Prime Kapital certainly isn't going anywhere, as it is a significant minority shareholder in MAS and holds great influence over its economics. We also know that the institutions won't just roll over, as they are pushing for changes to the board and answers about disclosure. It feels unlikely that this will just fizzle out. All eyes will now be on the extraordinary general meeting in August, followed by the responses of the (potentially new) board to the institutional investor questions. If nothing else, perhaps the lesson to learn here is that if you are going to attempt an offer with highly unusual terms, you are setting yourself up for an unpleasant outcome. Had Hyprop simply dialled back some of the terms to more reasonable levels, it wouldn't have given Prime Kapital so much ammunition to discredit its bid. DM


eNCA
11 hours ago
- eNCA
Former EOH director fined R500k for faking PhD
PRETORIA - The Johannesburg Stock Exchange (JSE) has fined former EOH director Anushka Bogdanov R500,000 for misrepresenting her academic qualifications. Bogdanov falsely claimed to have a PhD from the London Business School. As a result, she has also been banned from serving on the boards of JSE-listed companies for the next 10 years. Dr Esewu Mathebula, from the South African Association of PhDs, says they are working to collaborate with law enforcement to root out this kind of misconduct.


The Citizen
a day ago
- The Citizen
Warning for South Africans buying cars via online auctions
'These sophisticated scammers create convincing fake accounts that use WesBank branding, purporting to be official representatives selling bank auction vehicles.' Many people in South Africa opt to buy second-hand cars for various reasons and at different places. One of the most popular ways to buy a car is at an auction, due to the reasonable prices and varied conditions of the cars. As the world advances, so have the methods to participate in an auction. Thanks to technology, one can buy a car from an auction while sitting in the comfort of their own home, office, restaurant, or even at an airport. However, WesBank has warned individuals of the risks of buying at an online auction. ALSO READ: Consumer scammed out of R6 million while 'trading' on JSE The vehicle and asset finance provider reports a surge in online auction scams, particularly on platforms like TikTok. How car scams work WesBank says fraudsters are targeting unsuspecting customers, hoping to capitalise on bargains in the automotive retail space. 'These sophisticated scammers create convincing fake accounts that use WesBank branding, purporting to be official representatives selling bank auction vehicles. They lure unsuspecting buyers with seemingly irresistible deals, pressuring them to pay over large sums of money to 'secure' what appears to be an auction-listed vehicle,' said Lebo Gaoaketse, Head of Marketing and Communication at WesBank. However, once the payment is made, the scammers quickly close their fake accounts and vanish with the customer's money, leaving their victims with no recourse. Tips when buying cars online WesBank offered essential tips people can follow when buying cars online. Registration and deposits: To participate in a legitimate auction, registration is mandatory. A refundable deposit is typically required from the bidder upon registration. It is crucial to understand that a genuine WesBank auction will never require a deposit to secure a specific car before the auction. 'If you are asked for such a deposit, it is a major red flag.' Know the terms and conditions: Always familiarise yourself with the general terms and conditions of auction sales. This includes understanding payment procedures, buyer responsibilities, and refund policies. Beware of 'too good to be true' offers: Always ensure you are dealing with a reputable auction house and an authorised representative. 'As the saying goes, if an offer seems 'too good to be true,' it probably is.' ALSO READ: Tempted by unqualified finfluencers and social media investment ads? Here's why it's a bad idea Dealing with a trusted source 'Always ensure that you are dealing with a registered auction house, and in the case of a bank auction, an official bank representative,' said Gaoaketse. 'Do not be tempted to accept unofficial offers. It is often a ploy to defraud those looking for a good deal. Trust your instincts and proceed with caution. It's better to err on the side of caution than to fall victim to a fraud scheme.' Recognising red flags Staying alert for red flags is crucial to protect yourself. Be vigilant for common warning signs such as: Sellers requesting payment outside of the official auction platform. Reluctance to provide additional information or photos of the vehicle. Vague or inconsistent product descriptions. 'We urge participants to report any suspicious activity promptly to the auction platform to prevent others from falling prey to scams and contribute to a safer online marketplace. By taking note of these guidelines and exercising caution, buyers can confidently navigate vehicle auctions, maximising their chances of securing a quality vehicle at a reasonable price,' Gaoaketse concludes. Always verify information and find reliable details about official WesBank online vehicle auctions by visiting the vehicle and asset finance provider's official page. NOW READ: How to spot the signs and avoid falling victim to online scams