
From Korea to Iran: A history of US conflicts — overt and covert — since World War II
The Second World War ended in 1945 after the United States dropped two atomic bombs on Hiroshima and Nagasaki, killing an estimated 2,00,000 people. The bombings led to Japan's unconditional surrender on August 14, marking the end of World War II. US soldiers finally returned home to cheers, parades, and promises of peace. Yet in the 80 years since, the United States has seldom been without a military footprint on foreign soil. While the US Congress has declared war only 11 times, American forces have continuously been engaged in conflicts around the globe.
After World War II, the United States set itself as a bulwark against the spread of communism and entered several conflicts to contain Soviet and Chinese influence.
By mid-1945, the Korean Peninsula had become a Cold War flashpoint. The Soviet Union supported the northern half, and the United States backed the southern half. On June 25, 1950, North Korean People's Army troops crossed the 38th parallel southward, intent on unifying the peninsula under communist rule. President Harry S Truman, wary of Soviet expansionism, invoked a United Nations Security Council mandate for what he termed a 'police action.' Over 15 nations joined the United States under the United Nations banner, leading to a three-year conflict known as the Korean War. By the time the fighting ceased with an armistice in July 1953, nearly 5 million people were killed, as per the American Legion, a US veterans organisation. 'More than half of the casualties were civilians, about 10 per cent of the population. This rate of casualties was higher than World War II and the Vietnam War.'
In 1951, Iran's democratically elected Prime Minister, Mohammad Mossadegh, nationalised the British-controlled Anglo-Iranian Oil Company. The UK vehemently objected, and the US feared Soviet influence might fill the vacuum in Iran's oil-rich landscape. Under the presidency of Dwight D Eisenhower, the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), in collaboration with the United Kingdom's Secret Intelligence Service (commonly known as MI6), launched Operation Ajax, a covert operation aimed at deposing Prime Minister Mossadegh, installing a compliant monarch, and securing Western access to Iranian oil.
On August 19, 1953, after weeks of orchestrated propaganda, demonstrations, and clandestine bribery of clerics and officials, Prime Minister Mossadegh was forced from power and arrested. A declassified internal memo from the CIA stated: 'The military coup that overthrew Mosaddeq and his National Front cabinet was carried out under CIA direction as an act of US foreign policy, conceived and approved at the highest levels of government.' The Shah, Mohammad Reza Pahlavi, was reinstated, but the long-term costs proved high. The operation planted deep seeds of anti-Americanism, which ultimately found crescendo in the Islamic Revolution of 1979.
Vietnam, emerging from French colonial rule, became a Cold War epicentre. In 1954, the Geneva Conference resulted in dividing Vietnam at the 17th parallel: Ho Chi Minh's Democratic Republic of Vietnam in the north, and the Republic of Vietnam in the south, backed by Western nations. To contain communism, the United States began sending military advisers in the mid-1950s. However, following the Gulf of Tonkin naval incident in August 1964, when the destroyer USS Maddox reported being attacked by North Vietnamese boats, the United States Congress passed the Gulf of Tonkin Resolution. This allowed for full-scale military escalation under President Lyndon B Johnson.
By 1969, half a million American servicemen and women were deployed (Scorched Atmospheres: The Violent Geographies of the Vietnam War and the Rise of Drone Warfare, Ian G R Shaw, 2016) amid intense jungle warfare, strategic bombing campaigns, and the deployment of chemical defoliants such as Agent Orange. The war began to unravel on the home front, as public protests surged and American casualties escalated. President Richard Milhous Nixon initiated 'Vietnamisation,' withdrawing combat troops while increasing support for South Vietnamese forces. Ultimately, Saigon fell to communist forces in April 1975. The war ended with reunification under the Socialist Republic of Vietnam and cast long shadows over US foreign policy and public trust.
After it intervened in Iran, the US continued to use intelligence agencies to reshape governments in Chile, Laos, Cambodia, and Africa.
Between 1964 and 1973, American B-52 bombers dropped over two million tonnes of ordnance on the Kingdom of Laos, making it 'per person, the most heavily bombed country in history.' (Remarks of President Obama to the People of Laos, 2016). The bombing campaign was conducted under the codename Operation Barrel Roll (later supplemented by Operation Steel Tiger).
In the Kingdom of Cambodia, Operation Menu involved covert airstrikes aimed at destabilising communist supply routes in violation of Cambodian neutrality. The chaos these bombings engendered helped pave the way for the rise of the Khmer Rouge regime, which directly led to the Cambodian Genocide that claimed the lives of around 1.5-3 million people over four years, as per the University of Minnesota, Holocaust and Genocide Studies records.
In South America, the Cold War paranoia extended to elected socialist democracies. Chile's democratically elected President, Salvador Allende, who took office in November 1970, alarmed United States officials. Henry Alfred Kissinger, then National Security Advisor, regarded Allende as a threat, and President Richard Nixon feared a repeat of Cuba. Declassified CIA documents revealed secret funding of opposition media, support for labour strikes, and covert efforts to destabilise the Allende government. On September 11, 1973, General Augusto José Ramón Pinochet's military junta bombed La Moneda Palace, resulting in President Allende's death. A brutal dictatorship ensued, with thousands tortured and disappeared over the next 17 years.
In Central America, after the Sandinista National Liberation Front successfully overthrew the Somoza (a political family that ruled Nicaragua for 43 years) dictatorship in 1979, the United States responded by backing the Contrarrevolucionarios, commonly known as the Contras. President Ronald Wilson Reagan's administration directed covert assistance to the Contras, despite the passage of the Boland Amendment by the United States Congress, which banned such funding. When the operation was exposed in November 1986, it became known as the Iran–Contra scandal, which involved American covert dealings involving the sale of weapons to Iran, in exchange for funds funneled to the Contras.
In Southern Africa, Angola descended into civil war upon Portuguese decolonisation in 1975. Competing factions — the Soviet- and Cuban-backed Popular Movement for the Liberation of Angola, and the American- and South African–supported National Union for the Total Independence of Angola (UNITA) and the National Liberation Front of Angola (FNLA) — clashed in a conflict lasting until 2002. While the United States did not deploy combat forces, the CIA provided millions of dollars worth of arms and logistical support, as per a 1975 New York Times report. Jonas Savimbi's UNITA became the primary beneficiary of US covert involvement. The war resulted in hundreds of thousands of deaths, widespread displacement, and disruption of regional stability.
The United States maintained an official stance of neutrality during the Iran-Iraq War but in practice pursued a contradictory policy pursuant of its strategic interests in the Middle East. Initially, US policymakers saw Iraq, under Saddam Hussein, as a potential counterbalance to revolutionary Iran, especially after the 1979 US Embassy hostage crisis and the fall of the pro-American Shah.
While the US did not directly initiate the war, reports and declassified records suggest it tacitly approved Iraq's invasion of Iran, believing it might weaken Iran's Islamic regime. Throughout the war, the US provided intelligence, satellite imagery, and material support to Iraq. At the same time, the US covertly sold arms to Iran in what became known as the Iran-Contra Affair. This dual-track 'tilt' policy aimed to prevent either side from winning, thereby preserving regional balance and securing American strategic interests, particularly oil access and Israel's security. Ultimately, US involvement prolonged the conflict and intensified regional instability.
With the Cold War over, the United States turned to precision warfare to assert its global dominance.
In August 1990, Iraqi President Saddam Hussein, reeling from the financial wreckage of the Iran-Iraq War and $37 billion in Gulf debts, ordered an invasion of Kuwait. Initially, sanctions were imposed after an international backlash. Under the leadership of President George HW Bush, the United States assembled a coalition of 34 nations under the United Nations Security Council resolutions to liberate Kuwait.
Operation Desert Shield transitioned to Operation Desert Storm on January 17, 1991. A six-week air campaign devastated Iraqi military infrastructure, followed by a 100-hour ground offensive in February 1991 that liberated Kuwait. However, Saddam remained in power, internal rebellions were suppressed, and economic sanctions remained in place.
After September 11, 2001, the US launched an open-ended war on terror, stretching from Afghanistan and Iraq to Yemen and Somalia. In a strong statement after the attack, President George W Bush said, 'We're going to meet and deliberate and discuss – but there's no question about it, this act will not stand; we will find those who did it; we will smoke them out of their holes; we will get them running and we'll bring them to justice. We will not only deal with those who dare attack America, we will deal with those who harbor them and feed them and house them.'
The September 11, 2001 terrorist attacks by al-Qaeda triggered an immediate American response. President Bush authorised Operation Enduring Freedom in October, targeting al-Qaeda training camps and Taliban regime infrastructure in Afghanistan. With rapid initial success, the Taliban were deposed. Over time, however, the mission shifted toward counterinsurgency, governance challenges, and infrastructure development, as directed by NATO and United States Central Command. After nearly two decades and a cost of close to two trillion dollars, the United States formally withdrew military forces in August 2021, marking the return of the Taliban.
In March 2003, the United States, under President George W Bush, launched Operation Iraqi Freedom, asserting that Iraqi President Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction and harboured ties to terrorist networks. Baghdad fell swiftly, but the resulting power vacuum spawned an extended insurgency. Sectarian violence escalated, large-scale reconstruction efforts faltered, and humanitarian crises mounted amid allegations of torture and human rights abuses. No weapons of mass destruction were ever recovered, prompting global scrutiny and American skepticism. The Chilcot Report confirmed that the UK went to war in Iraq based on flawed intelligence that claimed Saddam Hussein possessed weapons of mass destruction (WMDs). In response, former Prime Minister Tony Blair offered a limited apology but defended the decision to remove Saddam Hussein. In a 2015 CNN interview ahead of the report's release, Blair admitted: 'I apologise for the fact that the intelligence we received was wrong. I also apologise for some of the mistakes in planning and, certainly, our mistake in our understanding of what would happen once you removed the regime.' The United States completed its military withdrawal in December 2011, but instability persisted. Despite its support for the withdrawal from Iraq, the Obama administration in 2014 returned American military forces to Iraq to wage war on ISIS and then extended the war into Syria.
In February 2011, the State of Libya saw widespread unrest as part of the Arab Spring, a series of pro-democracy protests, uprisings, and armed rebellions. Libyan leader Muammar Muhammad Abu Minyar al-Gaddafi responded with brutal force, prompting the United Nations Security Council to pass Resolution 1973, authorising 'all necessary measures' to protect civilians. The North Atlantic Treaty Organization (NATO), with limited direct American involvement, enforced a no-fly zone and launched air strikes. Gaddafi was killed in October, but the leadership vacuum spawned competing militias and rival governments.
The Syrian Arab Republic descended into civil war in March 2011, when the Bashar Hafez al-Assad regime violently suppressed civilian protests. Over time, multiple groups entered the conflict, including the Islamic State of Iraq and Syria (ISIS), Kurdish-led Kurdish forces, the Syrian Arab Army, and intervening foreign powers, including Russia, Iran, and the United States. American involvement remained deliberately limited: both covert and overt support for moderate rebel groups, NATO-led airstrikes targeting ISIS, and paramilitary assistance to Kurdish allies via the United States Special Operations Command. As of 2025, Ahmed al-Sharaa, who led a campaign that toppled Bashar al-Assad, is President.
In the aftermath of the September 11 attacks, the United States started using unmanned aerial vehicles (drones) to neutralise threats. President Bush authorised covert strikes against terrorist leaders in 'ungoverned spaces.' Under President Barack Obama, drone use intensified, both for 'targeted strikes,' aimed at identified terrorist members, and more controversial 'signature strikes,' which were finally based on behavioral patterns rather than confirmed identity. Operating largely out of air bases in Pakistan and Yemen, and coordinated via the United States Africa Command in East Africa, these drone programmes allegedly killed hundreds of al-Qaeda, Taliban, and Islamic State fighters. Osama bin Laden was killed during a US military raid in Abbottabad, Pakistan, on May 2, 2011.
During the 2010s, the United States pivoted to Africa's Sahel region, deploying 1,100 troops to the Republic of Niger (The Guardian, March 2024), equipping and training local militaries, operating drone surveillance and strike platforms from a newly constructed airfield near Agadez, and supporting both anti-terror operations and humanitarian missions. In July 2023, a military coup ousted democratically elected President Mohamed Bazoum and suspended existing security agreements with the United States. However, the relations between Niger and the US deteriorated after the military junta claimed power in July 2023, in what the US called a coup (CNN, March 16, 2024). Since then, the US has withdrawn many of its 1,100 troops who were stationed in Niger.
Since the Iran-Iraq war, US presidents have avoided hitting Iran directly. The risks of regional war, soaring oil prices, and global instability were too high. It changed this year in June after President Donald Trump ordered direct military strikes on Iran's nuclear facilities.
Trump called the strikes 'a spectacular military success.' In a televised adress he said Iran's key nuclear enrichment facilities had been 'completely and totally obliterated.'
'If peace does not come quickly, we will go after those other targets with precision, speed and skill,' he said.
Aishwarya Khosla is a journalist currently serving as Deputy Copy Editor at The Indian Express. Her writings examine the interplay of culture, identity, and politics.
She began her career at the Hindustan Times, where she covered books, theatre, culture, and the Punjabi diaspora. Her editorial expertise spans the Jammu and Kashmir, Himachal Pradesh, Chandigarh, Punjab and Online desks.
She was the recipient of the The Nehru Fellowship in Politics and Elections, where she studied political campaigns, policy research, political strategy and communications for a year.
She pens The Indian Express newsletter, Meanwhile, Back Home.
Write to her at aishwaryakhosla.ak@gmail.com or aishwarya.khosla@indianexpress.com. You can follow her on Instagram: @ink_and_ideology, and X: @KhoslaAishwarya. ... Read More
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles


NDTV
an hour ago
- NDTV
After Missiles, The Anxieties Taking Hold Of Iran Now
Earlier this week, as US President Donald Trump expressed his outright anger towards Israel - perhaps for the first time in such an explicit and public manner - Iran announced its subscription to a ceasefire agreement. Amidst the whole saga, while Trump expected to add another ceasefire to his kitty and Israel sought final blows against the Iranian military, Tehran preserved its theological and political systems that have governed the state since the 1979 Islamic Revolution. The current hold of the ceasefire is fragile. From an Israeli point of view, dragging the US into combat against Iran's nuclear programme was a significant victory. However, Trump also wanted to draw red lines and not expand the American role beyond the strikes, something he has propagated over the past many years to make sure Iran does not go nuclear. Shaken Up Contrarily, for Iran, the events of the past few months and Israel's application of outright military dominance over its skies may shake up and reshape the way in which the state's polity has functioned over the past 46 years. Even though Iranian retaliation, despite its meek nature, was able to dent Israel's perceived indestructible air defence shield, the long-term state of its power and deterrence, along with its military competence, stands exposed. More than Israel's impunity in the air, installing an unchallenged air power supremacy - one that may be utilised at will, considering Iran's depleted air defence - it is the penetration on the ground by their intelligence that would raise urgent alarms within the system. For long, Israel has managed to build capacities within Iran's polity and military, mobilised during war to take out the crème of the powerful Islamic Revolutionary Guard Corps (IRGC), intelligence, and defence leadership. As a response, Iran has reportedly arrested more than 700 people already, accusing them of colluding with the enemy. Three of them have already been executed. How Power Is Maintained The war was also marketed as a direct challenge to the Islamic Revolution's veracity and longevity. The seat of power for Shia Islam has had its share of internal crises and inflexion points over the years, ranging from protests led by women to consistent dissent by a largely young population. However, the regime has maintained its position of power utilising its own support base - not meagre in numbers - and suppressive tactics. The power centres have, on occasion, also allowed the easing of their own diktats to manage these pressures. Scholar Vali Nasr notes how hijab patrols by the state's moral police, known as the Gasht-e-Ershad (Guidance Patrol), have loosened their enforcement of mandatory hijab for women. Often, they have allowed the police to look the other way if they encounter such a situation in some parts, such as northern Tehran, a young, affluent area of the capital. On a more political and military front, it is almost certain that the framework of the Ayatollah, the IRGC, and the elected representation of the government, currently under the moderate leadership of President Masoud Pezeshkian, may change for good. The Supreme Leader is already in his late 80s, and it is expected that succession plans for his replacement are in place. There was heavy debate a few years ago over his son Mojtaba Khamenei's eligibility as the next Supreme Leader; concerned voices back then had expressed unease over the idea of a nepotistic transfer of power rather than one underpinned by theology and consensus between the clerical leadership. Choosing The Next Supreme Leader Iran's Assembly of Experts, led by Mohavedi Kermani, who was also the Supreme Leader in the IRGC between 1992 and 2006, is tasked with leading the process of choosing a successor. The selection of Kermani, himself older than Khamenei at 93, arguably highlights that the oldest representative of the Revolution's ideology remains the most trustworthy entity for deciding any future course. Notably, the other name that had featured along with Mojtaba was that of Ebrahim Raisi, Iran's former conservative president who died in a helicopter crash in May 2024. Other viewpoints abound, too. One such is the increased power of the IRGC with regard to that of the Ayatollah. Iran has had a long-running 'reformists vs. conservatives' discourse. It is also one of the few states in the Middle East that has some kind of democratic process and elections (albeit orchestrated under the auspices of the Supreme Leader) - ironically, along with Israel. An outcome of this juxtaposition was the nuclear negotiations with the P5+1 nations beginning in 2006, culminating into the Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA) signed in 2015. Its demise in 2018, when the US under Trump unilaterally exited the deal, emboldened the anti-negotiations ecosystem, the outcome of which was reflected in Raisi's election as president in 2021. Whatever the speculations, the natural next step for Iranian power centres would now likely be to hunker down, re-strategise and rebuild conventional power, cleanse their compromised internal security dynamics, and rally public opinion around the fervour of nationalism. The unanswered question is, given what the regime has suffered over the last few weeks, will the intrinsic circles of power in Iran hand the next phase of the country's history to the same players, or will they demand a fresh take on power, politics and people? (Kabir Taneja is Deputy Director and Fellow, Strategic Studies Programme, Observer Research Foundation)


Hindustan Times
2 hours ago
- Hindustan Times
Uproar Over Leaked Intelligence Underlines Murky View of Iran Strikes
WASHINGTON—President Trump on Wednesday doubled down on his claims that U.S. military strikes against Iranian nuclear sites crippled Tehran's ability to pursue a nuclear bomb, rejecting a leaked preliminary intelligence report that assessed the American strike had merely delayed Iran's efforts for a few months. The dispute points to a larger problem that is likely to bedevil U.S. intelligence analysis and experts for many months, as they attempt to determine the full extent of damage to the nuclear facilities that were struck. While there are ample indications that the Iranian program suffered major damage from the B-2 bomber and cruise-missile strikes the U.S. carried out last weekend, the status of Iran's program might not be fully known unless inspectors are allowed to visit the sites that were attacked and the suspected locations where enriched uranium and nuclear-related equipment might be hidden. Iran maintains that its program is for peaceful purposes. 'Remote battle-damage assessment is always difficult,' said Charles Duelfer, who oversaw United Nations weapons inspections in Iraq and later directed a Central Intelligence Agency assessment after the 2003 U.S. invasion on what happened to Saddam Hussein's weapons of mass destruction programs. 'That's why people like inspectors on the ground.' Speaking at a North Atlantic Treaty Organization summit at The Hague, Trump stood by his initial claims that the Iran program had been 'totally obliterated' and called the early findings in a leaked Defense Intelligence Agency report 'inconclusive.' The issue is likely to be addressed Thursday morning at a rare Pentagon news conference, which Trump announced in a social-media post. 'We destroyed the nuclear,' Trump said. A satellite image shows airstrike craters covered with dirt at the Natanz nuclear site in Iran. CIA Director John Ratcliffe issued a statement that lent support to Trump's broad claims without offering details. 'CIA can confirm that a body of credible intelligence indicates that Iran's Nuclear Program has been severely damaged by the recent, targeted strikes,' Ratcliffe said. 'This includes new intelligence from an historically reliable and accurate source/method that several key Iranian nuclear facilities were destroyed and would have to be rebuilt over the course of years.' Neither the White House nor the CIA addressed the status of stocks of highly enriched uranium that Iran was known to possess and whether they might have been moved before the U.S. attack. On Sunday, Vice President JD Vance suggested to a television interviewer that Iran still had caches of enriched uranium. 'We are going to work in the coming weeks to ensure that we do something with that fuel and that is one of the things that we're going to have conversations with the Iranians about,' Vance told ABC News. Before Israel and the U.S. attacked, Iran was thought to have enough near-weapons-grade material for about 10 nuclear weapons. But Vance also argued that the uranium wouldn't be useful to Iran because its main known enrichment facilities had been destroyed. A person familiar with the DIA intelligence report leaked this week said the document itself states in its first paragraph that it is a preliminary assessment based on reporting available just 24 hours after the strike, and that it wasn't coordinated with other agencies within the intelligence community. It also states that a full damage assessment would require days to weeks to collect the necessary data to make a proper judgment. A senior DIA official described the report, which was written about 24 hours after the U.S. strikes and based on an early battle-damage assessment of the sites, as 'a preliminary, low-confidence assessment—not a final conclusion.' Former U.S. officials and experts said there were multiple challenges in determining whether any residual Iranian nuclear capabilities remain to pursue the development of nuclear weapons. One question is the amount of destruction to the Iranian enrichment facilities that were targeted, including the heavily fortified Fordow site that is built inside a mountain. Another crucial question is whether Iran's stocks of enriched uranium might have been moved before the U.S. strike or recovered afterward. Still another uncertainty is whether Iran might have a clandestine inventory of centrifuges or nuclear-related equipment at locations that weren't targeted. If some of Iran's program survived, Tehran might be more determined than ever to try to produce a nuclear weapon, former officials said. 'The devastating impact of Israeli and U.S. military attacks has most likely heightened Iranian interest in acquiring nuclear weapons and increased the influence of Iranian hard-liners favoring nuclear weaponization,' said Robert Einhorn, a former senior State Department official who worked on weapons-proliferation issues during the Obama administration. Among the unanswered questions, Einhorn said, is whether the U.S. and the International Atomic Energy Agency are confident that none of the enriched uranium Iran produced has been moved to secret locations. The preliminary classified DIA report found that the U.S. military's strikes only set back Tehran's nuclear ambitions by a few months, according to people familiar with the matter. Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth said Wednesday that the Federal Bureau of Investigation was probing the leak of the document to the media. The disagreement is just the latest to position Trump against the views of some of his own intelligence agencies. In the past, Trump has dismissed consensus determinations from the intelligence community, such as its conclusions that Russia interfered in the 2016 election in a bid to help his campaign. This time, however, Trump's dispute is with the low-confidence findings of a spy agency's initial assessment of a situation that some U.S. officials and independent nuclear-security experts say is difficult to make clear judgments about without more information. Spy agencies frequently produce raw, low-confidence assessments that are then disseminated across the intelligence community, where other analysts look to corroborate or challenge the findings. For example, the National Security Agency works to intercept the private communications of foreign targets. To bolster or rebut DIA's findings, analysts there could be sifting through its surveillance databases to discover whether Iranian officials were discussing the extent of the damage at the nuclear facilities. But gathering a clearer picture of the extent of the damage to the sites could ultimately prove to be a slow and difficult process. U.S. lawmakers have been seeking intelligence briefings on the outcome of the U.S. and Israeli strikes, but a White House official said the administration is planning to limit how it shares classified intelligence products with Congress in response to the DIA report leak. Write to Michael R. Gordon at Dustin Volz at and Lara Seligman at


India Today
2 hours ago
- India Today
More Pakistani than Indian: Kangana Ranaut's jab at Zohran Mamdani
BJP MP Kangana Ranaut on Wednesday launched a sharp personal attack on Indian-American lawmaker Zohran Mamdani, who recently won the Democratic primary for New York City mayor, defeating former Governor Andrew a post on X, Ranaut questioned Mamdani's cultural and religious identity and alleged that he appears more Pakistani that Indian despite her being a Padmashri."His mother is Mira Nair, one of our best filmmakers, Padmashri, a beloved and celebrated daughter born and raised in great Bharat based in New York. She married Mehmood Mamdani (Gujarati origin), a celebrated author, and obviously son is named Zohran, he sounds more Pakistani than Indian whatever happened to his Hindu identity or bloodline and now he is ready to wipe out Hinduism, wow!! It's the same story everywhere," the firebrand BJP MP wrote in a post on X. advertisement She ended the post by congratulating Nair and her husband, noting she had met the filmmaker on a few son of award-winning director Mira Nair and Ugandan academic Mahmood Mamdani, was declared the winner of the Democratic mayoral primary on Tuesday night. He is currently a New York State Assemblyman from Queens and is known for his affiliation with the Democratic Socialists of to his win, Mamdani wrote on X: "In the words of Nelson Mandela: it always seems impossible until it's done. My friends, it is done. And you are the ones who did it. I am honoured to be your Democratic nominee for the Mayor of New York City".Born in Kampala, Uganda, on October 18, 1991, Mamdani moved to New York with his parents at the age of seven. He is married to Brooklyn-based Syrian-born artist Rama Mamdani has pledged sweeping reforms if elected New York City Mayor, vowing to freeze rents for all stabilised tenants and aggressively push for affordable housing construction to tackle the city's deepening campaign also promised a public transit overhaul. Mamdani said he will make all city buses permanently fare-free, while accelerating the rollout of priority lanes, bus queue jump signals, and dedicated loading zones to unclog routes and cut delays.- EndsTrending Reel