Who was Virginia Giuffre, the 'young female staff' Trump claims Jeffrey Epstein 'stole' from Mar-a-Lago?
is resorting to a new strategy to combat the Epstein files discourse. The US President recently claimed that
Jeffrey Epstein
'stole' Virginia Giuffre, along with other young spa staff, from his Mar‑a‑Lago club in Florida.
For the unversed, Virginia Louise Giuffre (formerly known as Virginia Roberts), who passed away in April this year, was a victim‑turned‑activist whose allegations exposed one of the most notorious sex‑trafficking networks in modern times.
Trump's latest claim about Giuffre prompted renewed scrutiny of Trump's past association with Epstein, whereas Giuffre herself had alleged that she was recruited at age 16 by
Ghislaine Maxwell
while working at Mar‑a‑Lago, leading to years of abuse and legal battles.
Who was Virginia Giuffre?
Virginia Louise Giuffre was born Virginia Roberts in August 1983, in Sacramento, California, and later moved to Palm Beach, Florida. Her father worked in maintenance at Trump's Mar‑a‑Lago club. In the summer of 2000, while working as a spa attendant and reading a massage‑therapy book, she was approached by Ghislaine Maxwell. Maxwell recruited the 16‑year‑old and introduced her to Jeffrey Epstein, allegedly grooming her for sex trafficking under the guise of massage training.
Giuffre later described being coerced into sexual encounters with Epstein and others, under pressure and manipulation. She escaped in 2002 and became one of the most prominent accusers in legal actions against Epstein and Maxwell, including a civil lawsuit filed in 2015 under the pseudonym 'Jane Doe 3.'
Later, Giuffre launched a nonprofit, first Victims Refuse Silence, later relaunched as Speak Out, Act, Reclaim (SOAR), to support survivors of sex trafficking and push for justice.
In 2002, she married Australian martial arts trainer Robert Giuffre and settled in Australia, raising three children together: two sons, Christian and Noah, and a daughter, Emily. Her children were described as the "light of her life."
Throughout her life, Giuffre fought to hold Epstein, Maxwell, and others accountable. Her testimony and unsealed court documents became pivotal in Ghislaine Maxwell's criminal conviction in 2021.
She also sued Prince Andrew, alleging she was trafficked to him, resulting in an out-of-court settlement in 2022.
Giuffre died by suicide in April this year, at age 41, at her home in suburban Perth, Australia. Sharing the news with the rest of the world, her family stated that the toll of the abuse became unbearable for her.
What did Trump claim
On July 29, while aboard Air Force One, President Donald Trump said he banished Epstein from Mar‑a‑Lago after learning Epstein had hired away 'young women' working at the club's spa, including, as he believed, Virginia Giuffre.
Trump recalled warning Epstein not to recruit staff and claimed he ended their friendship when the poaching continued. When reporters pressed whether Giuffre was among those employees, Trump said, as reported by PEOPLE, "He took people that worked for me. And I told him, 'Don't do it anymore.' And he did it."
When asked if Giuffre was one of these employees, the president said, "I think she worked at the spa... I think so.
I think that was one of the people. He stole her, and by the way, she had no complaints about us, as you know, none whatsoever."
Trump also claimed that Giuffre never had complaints about Mar‑a‑Lago during her employment.
Now, Trump's framing of Epstein 'stealing' Giuffre adds a new political twist to their equation and past association, which are already under scrutiny. relationship. It also seems like a viable reasoning to suggest that his falling out with Epstein around the early 2000s stemmed from workplace recruitment concerns, not misconduct, as earlier stated.
However, it may be argued that Trump's narrative is a purposeful shift to deflect scrutiny from his own past ties with Epstein, including a widely publicized 2002 remark praising him.
However, Virginia Giuffre's life and legacy transcend any claim by Trump or others. She was a survivor who brought global attention to an abusive trafficking network, fought tirelessly for justice, and became an epitome of resilience and quiet strength.
Though she tragically died in 2025, her advocacy work and public testimony steered the much-needed attention on Epstein, Maxwell, and allegations implicating powerful individuals. She inspired many survivors to come forward, and her nonprofit continues supporting others impacted by trauma.
Trump's assertion that Epstein 'stole' her from Mar‑a‑Lago might open a fresh chapter in scrutiny over his connection to Epstein. However, the real focus should remain on Giuffre's incredible strength, resilience, her influence on public understanding of trafficking, and the ongoing need for transparency and justice in the wake of her passing.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Time of India
34 minutes ago
- Time of India
Why the Ghislaine Maxwell case still matters, even if you're tired of hearing her name
When was convicted in December 2021 for facilitating 's sex trafficking ring, the moment felt like a closing chapter. Yet, more than three years later, her story refuses to fade. In fact, it's increasingly front and center, raising questions about privilege, justice, and whether the authorities can or will ever unearth the full scope of what happened. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now Accountability that must mean something Maxwell's 20‑year sentence was meant to be a decisive statement: no one, regardless of wealth or connections, is above the law. Judge Alison Nathan made that crystal clear during sentencing, saying Maxwell wasn't being punished as a stand-in for Epstein, but for her own calculated role in grooming and deceiving underage victims. Yet, her conviction has been upheld on appeal reinforcing the legitimacy of the verdict and efforts to argue that she was shielded by Epstein's 2007 plea deal have repeatedly failed. Some still say she was made a scapegoat after Epstein died, but courts haven't bought it. Ghislaine Maxwell wasn't just a side character in the Jeffrey Epstein saga, she was central to how the whole operation worked. While Epstein may have been the face of the abuse empire, Maxwell was often the one pulling the strings behind the scenes, smoothing over the ugliness with charm, British polish, and a Rolodex full of high-society connections. Born into wealth as the daughter of media mogul Robert Maxwell, Ghislaine had always been part of elite circles. After her father's mysterious death and financial scandal, she moved to New York and became a fixture in the Manhattan social scene—where she met Epstein. Their relationship started as romantic, but even after that fizzled, they remained deeply entwined both personally and professionally. Maxwell's role, according to dozens of victims and federal prosecutors, went far beyond simply being Epstein's ex. Tired of too many ads? go ad free now She was allegedly the recruiter, the groomer, and sometimes even the enforcer. Many women who came forward described her as the one who first approached them with promises of legitimate work, like massage gigs or modeling. She'd often pretend to take them under her wing, only for things to turn coercive once Epstein entered the picture. In court, she was accused of normalizing sexual abuse, manipulating girls into silence, and even participating in the acts herself. What makes it all worse is the way Maxwell used trust to gain access. She was often described as sophisticated and nurturing, someone who made victims feel safe. That false sense of security is what allowed her to facilitate a system of exploitation that allegedly spanned decades, with some victims as young as 14. In 2021, Maxwell was convicted on several charges, including sex trafficking of minors and conspiracy to commit sex trafficking. She's now serving a 20-year sentence. A modern history student, an Oxford graduate Ghislaine Maxwell's educational background is just as elite as the social circles she moved in. Born into privilege as the daughter of British media tycoon Robert Maxwell, she had access to some of the best schools money could buy, and she took full advantage of that early on. She started her education in the UK at Headington School, a prestigious all-girls private school in Oxford. It's the same school that counts Emma Watson (of Harry Potter fame) as an alum, so you get the idea, it's upscale, academic, and built for the well-connected. From there, Ghislaine went on to Balliol College at Oxford University, one of the oldest and most respected colleges in the world. She studied modern history and graduated with a degree in the early 1980s. Now, graduating from Oxford is no small feat, and it placed her firmly in Britain's intellectual and social elite. But like a lot of people in those upper-crust circles, her education was as much about networking as it was about knowledge. Oxford gave her connections some of which she likely drew on later when she entered high society in both the UK and the U.S. Interestingly, despite her academic background and degree in history, Maxwell didn't exactly pursue a career in academia or the public sector. She floated into her father's media empire for a while and later moved to the U.S., where her social life seemed to take center stage, especially once she connected with Jeffrey Epstein. Vaulted into relevance again Recently, Maxwell was transferred to a minimum-security federal prison camp in Texas a move her accusers condemned as preferential. Why does this matter? Because it signals she may still be negotiating with authorities. Reports say she's been questioned by Deputy Attorney General Todd Blanche and offered testimony in exchange for clemency. That makes her a potentially powerful witness and that prospect is stoking political and legal backlash. The secrets Epstein took to his grave One of the enduring mysteries of the Epstein scandal is who else knew what and when. Maxwell, as one of only two people convicted for the criminal enterprise, may be one of the only living witnesses with real insight. Investigators and former prosecutors believe her testimony could implicate powerful figures possibly including politicians, financiers, or royalty. If she cooperates, fresh revelations may finally crack open the shadowy world Epstein and Maxwell inhabited. Why society still needs to listen Maxwell's case isn't just about one woman's crimes, it's about how society fails victims, how power shields abusers, and how complicity often looks like silence. Maxwell leveraged charm, privilege, and elite social circles to sustain exploitation and for years, her reputation shielded her behavior from scrutiny. Her fall was dramatic, but it also forces us to confront uncomfortable truths about wealth, gender, and influence. Survivors still haven't been heard fully Even now, survivors including Virginia Giuffre (who tragically passed away in April 2025) remain at the heart of this story. Families like hers argue any leniency toward Maxwell is a betrayal not just to the survivors but to the cause of justice. Giuffre's statements before she died are still some of the most powerful testimony to Maxwell's cruelty. A political flashpoint, not a closed case Now we come to the political dimension: speculation surrounds whether Donald Trump might pardon Maxwell or leverage her testimony for political gain. His MAGA allies are fueling the idea that she could expose a broader network of shared connections. Right-wing commentators portray Maxwell both as a potential whistleblower and a victim but many observers see these efforts as cynical political tactics. Why we're still talking about it If you've tuned out, here's why this case refuses to vanish: Justice isn't complete: Epstein died in custody, but Maxwell lives and could speak. Elite networks still intact: Unanswered questions remain about who else may have enabled or protected abuse. Systemic lessons: The case highlights shortcomings in policing, prosecuting, and protecting survivors. This isn't just another celebrity scandal. It's a cultural reckoning wrapped in a legal drama that keeps revealing new stakes. Whether you're exhausted by simply watching from afar, the Maxwell saga matters—not just for the past, but for how society chooses to confront privilege, power, and justice.
India.com
44 minutes ago
- India.com
How Young Is Too Young? India Debates Legal Age For Sexual Consent
New Delhi: Senior Advocate Indira Jaising stood before the Supreme Court of India in the last week on July and made a request that reignited an old and uncomfortable question: should consensual sex between teenagers still be considered a crime? At the center of this storm is one number: 18. That is the age set by Indian law for legally consenting to sex. Jaising argued this threshold may be punishing teenagers instead of protecting them. In her written submission, she urged the court to reconsider how the law treats consensual relationships between adolescents aged 16 to 18. Such relationships, she said, do not fit the definitions of exploitation or abuse. The government disagreed. It fears that lowering the bar could leave minors, those legally not adult, below 18, vulnerable to coercion, manipulation or worse. It argued making room for exceptions could lead to loopholes that might be exploited by traffickers or abusers. But the law, especially the 2012 Protection of Children from Sexual Offences (POCSO) Act, draws no lines between love and violation when it comes to minors. It sees all sexual activity under the age of 18 as criminal, even when both parties consent. This hard line has come under scrutiny from activists, judges and rights groups who believe the law is outdated or at least too rigid. In some cases, they say, parents have used the law to intervene in relationships they disapprove of, especially when caste, religion or class are involved. Many experts say the law has become a tool of control more than protection. The Global Picture and India's Long Trail Consent laws around the world are not the same. In countries like the United Kingdom and Canada, the age is 16. In the United States, it varies state to state. But in India, it is fixed, one rule for all. Back in 1860, when India first codified its criminal laws, the age was 10. In 1940, it was raised to 16. Then came POCSO, which made 18 the new standard. That was over a decade ago. Since then, the conversation has shifted, slowly, painfully but noticeably. The Courts Speak, Then Pause In 2022, the Karnataka High Court stepped in. It suggested that the Law Commission revisit the consent age under POCSO. The court pointed to several cases where teenage couples, a girl just over 16 and a boy barely out of adolescence, had been pulled into criminal trials under the law, even when there was no allegation of force. The Law Commission reviewed the matter but did not recommend lowering the age. Instead, it proposed something else: allowing courts to use 'judicial discretion' in cases involving teenagers. This means judges could consider the nature of the relationship, the age gap and whether coercion was involved before passing judgment. Even without formal legislation, some courts across India have started doing that. They have granted bail, overturned convictions or dismissed charges in cases where evidence showed mutual consent and emotional connection between teenagers. But not every bench agrees. In April, the Madras High Court overturned an acquittal in a case where a 17-year-old girl left home to be with a 23-year-old man. Her family had arranged her marriage elsewhere. The court sentenced the man to 10 years in prison under POCSO. Process as Punishment For Advocate Jaising, this is part of the problem. She said simply giving judges the discretion is not enough. Trials can be long, traumatic and carry the weight of stigma. 'For many people, the process itself becomes the punishment,' she stated. A report from the India Child Protection Fund shows just how overloaded the system is. As of January 2023, nearly 250,000 POCSO cases were pending in special courts created to handle them. Jaising argued for consistency and for a system that does not criminalise teenagers for being teenagers. 'Leaving everything to judicial discretion can result in unequal outcomes,' she warned. A Society in Conflict With Itself This is where India finds itself today caught between the need to protect and the need to understand, the fear of abuse and the reality of young love and between a law that seeks clarity and a society that lives in shades of grey. Lawyer and child rights advocate Bhuvan Ribhu said exceptions cannot be unconditional. He worries about misuse in cases of trafficking or child marriage. He supports discretion, but also faster trials, better rehabilitation of survivors and greater awareness. Not everyone is cautious. Ananashi Ganguly, co-founder of HAQ: Centre for Child Rights, stands with Jaising. 'We cannot avoid reform only because we are afraid of misuse,' she said. According to her, society is changing. The law needs to change with it. As this debate continues, India faces another question: what does protection mean when it becomes punishment? Where does responsibility lie in a law written for children or in a society still learning to talk to them about sex, safety and consent?
Time of India
an hour ago
- Time of India
Free Palestine protest: WikiLeaks' Julian Assange joins thousands in march across Sydney Harbour Bridge - Zohran Mamdani shares video
WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange (AP) Thousands of pro-Palestinian demonstrators, including WikiLeaks founder Julian Assange, marched across the Sydney Harbour Bridge on Sunday, braving heavy rain and winds, to call for an end to the war in Gaza. Assange, who returned to Australia last year following his release from British prison, was seen surrounded by family and walking alongside former Australian foreign minister and New South Wales premier Bob Carr. Assange however, did not address the crowd or speak to the media. New York City mayoral frontrunner Zohran Mamdani took to X to share a video of the Sydney protest, stating: 'Over 300,000 people in rain marched across Sydney Harbour Bridge today in solidarity with Gaza. Israel has been exposed — and its crimes will never be forgotten.' New South Wales Police said hundreds of extra personnel had been deployed across Sydney to manage the large-scale demonstration, which drew participants chanting slogans such as 'ceasefire now' and 'free Palestine.' Australia's Labor Party MP Ed Husic also attended the rally and urged his ruling party, led by Prime Minister Anthony Albanese, to officially recognise a Palestinian state. by Taboola by Taboola Sponsored Links Sponsored Links Promoted Links Promoted Links You May Like Ngo Quyen: Unsold Furniture Liquidation 2024 (Prices May Surprise You) Unsold Furniture | Search Ads Learn More Undo While Australia has called for an end to the war in Gaza, it has yet to make a formal move towards recognising Palestine. However, in a joint statement with more than a dozen other nations on Tuesday, Australia expressed its 'willingness or positive consideration... to recognise the state of Palestine as an essential step towards the two-State solution.' International pressure has been mounting over the humanitarian crisis in Gaza. In recent weeks, countries including France, Britain, and Canada have signalled their intention to diplomatically recognise a Palestinian state.
