logo
A revived Democratic Leadership Council cannot save the Democratic Party

A revived Democratic Leadership Council cannot save the Democratic Party

The Hill13-02-2025
What has been clear to some of us for years is finally common knowledge: the Democratic Party is lost in the wilderness.
It is the most unpopular it has been since Quinnipiac began asking the question in 2008. The election saw it lose support among every voter group except White college-educated voters. Far from learning its lesson, the recent DNC meeting was a parade of progressive cliches, from land acknowledgements to handwringing over pronouns. Party leaders doubled down on the very priorities voters had just rejected.
Now, self-proclaimed Democratic centrists claim to have the solution: Simply revive the Democratic Leadership Council, the moderate movement that elevated Bill Clinton and rescued Democrats from obscurity in the 1990s.
Both of us worked at the DLC for more than a decade at founder Al From's side, and take it from us: Reviving the DLC today is a pipe dream.
For one, this is not the 1990s. When the DLC was formed, the far left was fringe. It had to be contended with, sure, but nobody thought Jesse Jackson controlled the ideology of the party.
Not so today. In the last decade, radical progressives took the party citadel while the very Democratic elites now calling for change welcomed them in, bargaining that they would bring power, popularity and money. For a while, it seemed to work. Only now do these establishment players want a do-over.
Their counter-coup against the progressives is destined to fail before it begins. Two major takeaways from the DLC reveal why.
One, the DLC emerged from outside the establishment, from those with the courage to take significant risks and the credibility to speak truth to power. No one in the Democratic establishment has that courage or credibility today. If they did, they would have stood up to the progressives back when they had power.
An ideal moment would have been the debate over 'Build Back Better' in 2021. These same supposedly centrist Democratic groups attacked members of their own party who questioned the far-left agenda around it, like Sens. Joe Manchin (D-W.Va.) and Kyrsten Sinema (D-Ariz.) and the group of nine House members led by Rep. Josh Gottheimer (D-N.J.). Those brave leaders built the Bipartisan Infrastructure Bill without any support from their party, and eventually it became clear that their solution was the only way forward. Now the Democratic establishment takes credit for their work.
Second, the DLC succeeded because it innovated to create a new politics. It didn't twist itself in knots trying to win over a progressive base. It built a new movement outside of the party to appeal to the common-sense majority, regardless of party affiliation.
Today, as then, that common-sense majority is not the property of the left or right. The new politics will emerge by combining together Republicans, Democrats and Independents who still care about sensible governance and problem solving.
This contrasts with the Democrats calling for a new DLC, who are solely concerned with repairing their own party. Theirs is a cynical effort. Real courage is to say 'Forget the party, let's build a new movement.' Remember: the DLC held its own convention, separate from the DNC. Democrats only claimed it and owned it when it was clear that it was winning.
Our organization, No Labels, is built around this very goal of innovating to create a new politics. We support the leaders in both parties who are bucking leadership to work together in the middle. Our focus is not to build a third party but rather a third force. We are also marshaling the citizen support for such a politics, which is the enduring success of our unity ticket effort — an effort attacked by the Democratic establishment even though the election proved our thesis true.
An old saying comes to mind: 'Do not seek to follow in the footsteps of the wise. Seek what they sought.'
The DLC was built four decades ago. It was of and for a different era. There is no repeating it now, no going back, especially not under the leadership of the very elites who let the cancer of progressivism consume their party.
Our experience at the DLC tells us that the way forward is to create an entirely new politics that is representative of the times — one that unites common-sense Democrats, Republicans, and Independents into a new movement for America.
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Ex-CBS reporter rips network's ‘bias' after Shari Redstone expressed concerns over Biden interview
Ex-CBS reporter rips network's ‘bias' after Shari Redstone expressed concerns over Biden interview

New York Post

time5 minutes ago

  • New York Post

Ex-CBS reporter rips network's ‘bias' after Shari Redstone expressed concerns over Biden interview

Former CBS News investigative reporter Catherine Herridge called out the network after a report revealed that Shari Redstone expressed concerns that '60 Minutes' may have downplayed President Biden's mental decline during a sitdown in 2023. Herridge — who was fired last year as part of a wider cost-cutting purge by parent company Paramount ahead of its $8 billion merger with Skydance — slammed CBS News for its lack of 'media transparency' after Redstone said the Biden interview played a part in her decision to settle with President Trump. The daughter of the late media mogul Sumner Redstone drew wide-spread criticism for agreeing to pay Trump $16 million over his allegations that '60 Minutes' deceptively edited an interview with Democratic presidential candidate Kamala Harris to make her sound better shortly before November's election. 4 Redstone, who sold Paramount to Skydance earlier this month, said she felt CBS needed more balance to its reporting on issues like Israel's war against Hamas. FilmMagic Redstone, however, feared that going to trial could expose the network to a claim that '60 Minutes' concealed the aging Biden's condition, she told the New York Times on Tuesday. Herridge has demanded that CBS release the raw video and transcripts of the interview by '60 Minutes' correspondent Scott Pelley. 'Last year, I called for more transparency. @60Minutes about its October 2023 interview with President Biden. Now we learn via @nytimes even the owner Shari Redstone had concerns,' the award-winning journalist wrote on X late Tuesday. 4 Herridge slammed her former employer for a lack of transparency after Shari Redstone told The Times she was concerned over '60 Minutes'' edit of its Biden sitdown. Getty Images 'Releasing the raw video and transcripts from the Biden interview would address the larger question of whether there is a pattern and practice @CBSNews of heavy-handed editing to make some politicians look better and other politicians look worse. In this case, did editing conceal President Biden's cognitive decline?' When contacted by The Post, Herridge added that '60 Minutes' should make the material public in order to garner the public's trust in the storied outlet. 'If there's no problem, making the material public would reinforce '60 Minutes' position that their editing meets the highest standards,' she said, adding that if the program refuses it says a lot. 'My training is that with major newsmakers, the full transcript should always be released.' Herridge had previously told The Post that CBS CEO George Cheeks gave her the green light to prioritize balanced coverage of the Hunter Biden laptop story at the behest of Redstone, but faced roadblocks from her immediate bosses. She reiterated that claim in her post on Tuesday. 'I was stunned by the obstruction and bias of some senior CBS News executives who resisted the balanced coverage Redstone had called for,' she wrote on Tuesday. Cheeks has been retained by the newly-formed Paramount Skydance Corp. as chief of its media and TV division. Redstone walked away with around $2 billion after selling her controlling stake in Paramount to Skydance. She told the Times that part of the reason she wanted to settle Trump's $20 billion lawsuit was because it could help address the network's anti-Israel bias. 4 Redstone told The Times that a CBS staffer who saw the Biden interview said he appeared 'drowsy' and that there were fears that the network cleaned up the edit to cover up his cognitive decline. AP Redstone also was worried that Trump's lawyers could 'cherry-pick raw footage and internal communications' which could do major 'damage to CBS News's reputation,' according to the Times. Those fears were also related to the Biden interview, which one CBS staffer told Redstone reportedly appeared to conceal his decline. The person told Redstone that Biden 'seemed drowsy and had to be prodded to answer' Pelley's questions, the Times reported. 'This case was never as black-and-white as people assumed,' Redstone told the outlet. Other CBS staffers who witnessed the interview and saw the raw footage told the Times that Redstone's concerns were 'overblown.' A rep for CBS News declined to comment.

Newsom, Booker rally support for California redistricting on DNC call
Newsom, Booker rally support for California redistricting on DNC call

The Hill

time5 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Newsom, Booker rally support for California redistricting on DNC call

California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) appeared alongside Sen. Cory Booker (D-N.J.), Democratic National Committee Chair Ken Martin and Texas state Rep. Nicole Collier (D) as they rallied their party behind California's redistricting measure. 'Yes, we'll fight fire with fire. Yes, we will push back. It's not about whether we play hardball anymore. It's about how we play hardball,' Newsom said on the call. Newsom and California Democrats released a new set of congressional lines last week that look to offset expected gains Texas Republicans will likely make with their new House map once passed. Democrats are seeking to put their House map on the ballot before voters this November, pressing voters to allow lawmakers to redraw the map in the middle of the decade and bypass the state's independent redistricting commission. Republicans have already challenging California Democrats' ability to put the measure before voters and other top GOP leaders like former Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger (R) and House Speaker Mike Johnson (R) have also signaled they're preparing to fight the map. The appearance of Booker and Newsom together is notable given both have been floated as 2028 White House hopefuls. The two painted a picture of democracy under threat and emphasized the stakes of the redistricting battle. 'The is all hands-on deck right now. People are going to ask, 'Where did you stand when Donald Trump was violating court orders?' 'Where did you stand when he was trashing the concept of due process in our country?'' Booker said. ''Where did you stand when he was sending out masked unidentified people in unmarked vehicles to sweep people off of our streets?'' 'I'll be damned if I'm going to continue to let Donald Trump, Republicans from Texas continue to disregard, demean and degrade other Americans, to deny them their rights without a fight,' he added later. During the call, state Rep. Nicole Collier (D) was asked to leave at one point while she was participating in the call from a bathroom in the Texas Capitol, saying 'They said it's a felony for me to do this. Apparently I can't be on the floor or in a bathroom.' It's unclear what wrongdoing Collier committed. The Hill has reached out to Collier's office, the Texas House Democratic Caucus and Texas House GOP caucus for comment. Democrats on the call slammed the move. 'Rep. Collier in the bathroom has more dignity than Donald Trump in the Oval Office,' Booker said. 'That is outrageous. What they're trying to do right there, is silence an American leader, silence a Black woman and that is outrageous,' he added.

Trump purchased $100M+ in bonds since January, filings show
Trump purchased $100M+ in bonds since January, filings show

The Hill

time5 minutes ago

  • The Hill

Trump purchased $100M+ in bonds since January, filings show

President Trump purchased over $100 million worth of bonds since he took office for his second term in January, according to Office of Government Ethics filings. The filings, released on Tuesday night, showed that the president began purchasing on Jan. 21, the day after the inauguration, and purchased over 30 more corporate and municipal bonds in that month. Through Aug. 1, he made nearly 700 bond purchases. The filing is a periodic report released after the Office of Government Ethics reviewed the transactions and certified them as in compliance, including getting Trump's signature, according to a senior White House official. The official said that the president has no role in managing his investments, and they are managed by a third-party financial institution. The official added that neither Trump nor any member of family had direct input into the investments and all decisions are made by independent management. The bonds Trump purchased, according to the filings, was sold by entities like Triborough Bridge and Tunnel Authority, a health facility in Alachua County, Fla., a Michigan public power agency and a Johnson County, Kan., park and recreation office. Bonds were also purchased from some major companies, including Home Depot, T-Mobile USA, UnitedHealth Group, Wells Fargo, Morgan Stanley and Qualcomm. The filing does not give a specific amount of each purchase, but the lowest range from $50,001 to $100,000 and the largest range from $500,001 to $1 million. Trump has been criticized for mingling politics with his business interests throughout his second term, with ethics watchdogs and Democrats accusing him of profiting off of the presidency through ventures like the launch of a cryptocurrency, Trump-branded sneakers and Bibles and a line of fragrances.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store