‘Every day, we think about how to upgrade': China's factories see rise in robot adoption
Robotic arms lift freshly pressed plastic parts out of hot metal moulds and onto a conveyor belt at Midea's air-conditioner factory in Guangzhou.
– When Mr Sun Huihai first began working at a factory in the southern manufacturing belt of Guangdong some 13 years ago, his colleagues were all humans.
Now, they are joined by more than 200 robots that can work around the clock, seven days a week, to help produce air-conditioners for home appliances giant Midea.
Rows of bright orange robot arms whir at all hours of the day, fishing freshly pressed plastic parts out of hot metal moulds and onto a long conveyor belt.
Driverless robots with blinking lights store these parts in a multi-storey warehouse, and later take them to be assembled into units that are sold in China and around the world.
The number of robots put to work on the factory floor increases every year, said Mr Sun, 37, who heads the plant's engineering department.
'Every day, we think about how to upgrade and make manufacturing here more intelligent,' he told The Straits Times.
Scenes like this have become more common across China, as the 'factory of the world' turns to robotics to sustain and turbocharge its manufacturing juggernaut.
Top stories
Swipe. Select. Stay informed.
Singapore Over 118,000 speeding violations in first half of 2025; situation shows no signs of improvement: TP
Singapore Israel's plan to step up Gaza offensive dangerous and unacceptable: MFA
Singapore Four men arrested in Bukit Timah believed to be linked to housebreaking syndicates
Singapore Criminal trial of Hyflux founder Olivia Lum and five others starts Aug 11
Singapore Why some teens cook despite Singapore's da bao culture
Singapore Man arrested over hacking attempt on RedeemSG portal
Singapore 'We could feel the heat from our house': Car catches fire in Bidadari area
Asia 'Pain in the neck': Cable theft on the track derails train speed and schedules in Malaysia
Over the past decade, the
number of industrial robots on China's factory floors has increased more than six times to over 1.7 million, as companies grappled with rising wages and a shortage of workers willing to staff production lines.
China now has the world's third-highest density of robots in its manufacturing industry, trailing South Korea and Singapore in first and second place respectively, according to the International Federation of Robotics' figures for 2023, the latest available.
Their deployment is poised to increase further as China continues its transition from low-value, labour-intensive production to advanced manufacturing – a national priority.
'At any given time, China cannot do without the manufacturing industry,' said Chinese President Xi Jinping in 2023. 'The state will strongly support the development of high-end manufacturing.'
Policymakers in China, wary of the hollowing out of industries which can occur when countries get richer, have long pushed for greater automation to keep factories competitive.
A decade ago, the government rolled out 'Made in China 2025', a plan to upgrade manufacturing and become a production hub for high-tech sectors such as robots.
Rebates, subsidies and other incentives have been offered to encourage factories to automate.
A rise in domestic production of industrial robots has also reduced prices, making the machines more affordable.
Factories in China pumped out nearly 370,000 of such robots in the first half of 2025, up 35.6 per cent from the previous year, according to figures from the National Bureau of Statistics.
At the Midea factory in Nansha, Guangzhou, where Mr Sun works, there are 204 robotic arms and 82 automated guided vehicles. They are supplied by Kuka, a German industrial robot giant which the Chinese company bought over.
One section of the plant, where plastic parts for the air-conditioner are moulded and retrieved, is dubbed a 'dark (heideng)' area. It is so named because of the high degree of automation: In theory, it can run without humans or any lights on, but in practice, it is brightly lit here at the plant.
Not every part of the factory is as automated, a costly endeavour. Humans are needed to staff assembly lines, maintain the machines, and check the quality of manufactured parts. The facility employs some 4,000 workers during peak season, Mr Sun said.
Mr Sun Huihai, 37, has worked for 13 years at Midea's air-conditioner factory in Guangzhou.
ST PHOTO: JOYCE ZK LIM
Elsewhere, other manufacturers of electrical items, electronics and cars – the main users of industrial robots in China – have also ramped up the use of technology on their factory floors.
'Dark factories' have become a buzzword to describe the most advanced of China's production facilities. Such operations have reportedly been adopted by companies ranging from home appliance giants Xiaomi and Gree to automakers Changan and Zeekr.
As robot adoption picks up pace, one question that arises is: What will happen to the more than 100 million workers whom China's manufacturing sector employs?
The automation drive has at times been dubbed 'replace humans with robots (jiqi huanren)'. In 2021, Gree's chairman said that the company's 'dark factory' had slashed the need for workers at the plant from 10,000 to 1,000.
In Mr Sun's telling, employment at Midea's air-conditioner factory has remained roughly unchanged from a decade ago. What has changed, he said, is productivity. The number of air-conditioners the factory produces has more than tripled from 2015, company figures show.
Academics Nicole Wu and Sun Zhongwei, who interviewed and surveyed factory workers in southern China just prior to the Covid-19 pandemic, found that these individuals were not too concerned about robots just yet.
'Contrary to the more pessimistic assessments of automation, most manufacturing workers in Guangdong – who are buffered by steady increases in demand and a chronic labour shortage – appear to be unfazed by technological change at present,' they wrote in a paper published in 2025.
China now has the world's third-highest density of robots in its manufacturing industry.
ST PHOTO: JOYCE ZK LIM
As
China's birth rate falls and the population grows more educated, it has become more difficult for factory bosses to fill jobs, said Professor Sun Zhongwei, who studies industrial relations and social security at the South China Normal University.
He is not worried that the automation drive will go so far as to undermine the manufacturing jobs often seen as a means of stabilising employment, because market forces are at play.
Automation is a rational process, and industrial robots are a sizeable investment, Prof Sun said. 'Companies will need to calculate whether the cost of the machinery justifies the wages saved.'
Still, he added, the biggest losers as manufacturing goes high-tech are lower-educated, older migrant workers who lack the skills to remain relevant. Many will have to return to their rural homes to do odd jobs, while others might find employment as service staff.
Back at the Midea factory, Mr Wang Liangcai, 26, an engineer, believes that his job is safe from automation for now.
'Equipment still needs to be maintained, it can't do so itself,' he said. 'But if you think about the long run... we also don't know how things will be.'

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

Straits Times
25 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Explainer-Can Trump take control of Washington to fight the city's crime?
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Protesters hold a banner near the White House, as U.S. President Donald Trump announced he is placing the D.C. Metropolitan Police Department under direct federal control and deploying National Guard troops to Washington, D.C, in Washington D.C., U.S., August 11, 2025. REUTERS/Ken Cedeno U.S. President Donald Trump has repeatedly threatened to put Washington, D.C., under full federal control to reduce crime, even as city officials stressed crime is already falling. While Trump does have some authority over the capital city's police force and National Guard soldiers, a full federal takeover would likely be blocked in court. Here is why. WHAT DOES THE CONSTITUTION SAY ABOUT CONTROL OF DC? The U.S. Constitution, ratified in 1787, provided for the creation of a federal capital district to serve as the permanent seat of the government. The Constitution made clear that Congress has complete legislative authority over the district. But Congress has historically delegated at least some of the day-to-day work of municipal government to other entities. HOW IS DC GOVERNED? A federal law passed by Congress in 1973, known as the Home Rule Act, allowed city residents to elect a mayor and council, who have some autonomy to pass their own laws. Congress still has budgetary oversight over D.C., however, and can overturn local legislation. Congress did that most recently in 2023, voting to overturn changes to Washington's laws that lowered penalties for some crimes. WHO CONTROLS DC LAW ENFORCEMENT? The Democratic mayor of Washington, Muriel Bowser, has authority over the city's Metropolitan Police Department. But the Home Rule Act allows the president to take control of the MPD for federal purposes during emergencies if 'special conditions of an emergency nature exist.' A presidential takeover is limited to 30 days, unless Congress votes to extend it through a joint resolution. Trump invoked this part of the Home Rule Act on Monday, saying in an executive order that there is a "crime emergency" in the city that necessitates federal management of the police department. Bowser has pushed back on Trump's claims of unchecked violence, saying the city is "not experiencing a crime spike" and highlighting that violent crime hit its lowest level in more than three decades last year. Violent crime, including murders, spiked in 2023, turning Washington into one of the nation's deadliest cities, according to city police data. However, violent crime dropped 35% in 2024, according to federal data, and it has fallen an additional 26% in the first seven months of 2025. Trump also has broad control over the D.C. National Guard's 2,700 soldiers and airmen. They report directly to the president, unlike counterparts in other states and territories. Trump said on Monday he was deploying 800 National Guard troops to Washington. SO CAN TRUMP 'FEDERALIZE' DC? It is highly unlikely. To exert full federal control of D.C., Trump would need Congress to repeal the Home Rule Act. Such a repeal would require 60 votes in the U.S. Senate, where Trump's Republican Party has a 53-47 advantage. Democrats have been supportive of home rule for DC and are not expected to cross party lines to endorse Trump's vision. But there are ways Trump can exert more influence over the district without fully taking it over. Trump in recent months has directed federal law enforcement agencies such as the FBI to increase the police presence in Washington. Trump has broad authority to reallocate FBI personnel, and in recent months, FBI agents around the country have been given temporary assignments to help with immigration enforcement. Trump also signed an executive order in March to make D.C. "safe and beautiful," establishing a task force to increase police presence in public areas, maximize immigration enforcement, and expedite concealed carry licenses. CAN TRUMP EVICT DC'S HOMELESS POPULATION? Trump has said homeless people must move out of Washington, without offering specifics of a plan to accomplish this. "I'm going to make our Capital safer and more beautiful than it ever was before," Trump said on Truth Social. "The Homeless have to move out, IMMEDIATELY. We will give you places to stay, but FAR from the Capital." The federal government owns much of Washington's parkland, so the Trump administration has legal authority to clear homeless encampments in those areas, like President Joe Biden did while in office. But the federal government cannot force people to move out of the city because they lack shelter, legal experts said. REUTERS

Straits Times
25 minutes ago
- Straits Times
Man on trial for stalking woman blasted by judge for asking scandalous questions in court
Sign up now: Get ST's newsletters delivered to your inbox Lucas Seng Yong Yi, 39, had also posed scandalous and irrelevant questions at length to the prosecution's witnesses. SINGAPORE - A man who stalked a former co-worker for five years continued harassing her even during his trial, where he represented himself and asked her irrelevant questions over seven days of cross-examination. Lucas Seng Yong Yi, 39, also subjected other prosecution witnesses to similar antics by asking them scandalous questions during the trial, which spanned over 70 days from April 2021 to September 2024. Seng was sentenced to 18 months' jail by a district judge in late 2024 after he was convicted of three charges of stalking under the Protection from Harassment Act. Justice Vincent Hoong blasted Seng's behaviour in court in a written decision on Aug 8 after dismissing the offender's appeal against conviction and sentence on July 30. The High Court judge said Seng's conduct at the trial was 'outrageous'. Justice Hoong agreed with the lower court that Seng's deplorable conduct during the trial was an aggravating factor in the sentencing. He said Seng had engaged in victim-blaming, such as contending that the victim had brought some of the acts of harassment on herself because she uploaded her resume onto LinkedIn. Top stories Swipe. Select. Stay informed. Singapore Luxury items seized in $3b money laundering case handed over to Deloitte for liquidation Singapore NEL resumes service after hours-long power fault; single-track service on Sengkang-Punggol LRT Singapore Plan to base Singapore's F-15 fighter jets in Guam cancelled Singapore Hyflux investigator 'took advantage' of Olivia Lum's inability to recall events: Davinder Singh Singapore Man who stabbed son-in-law to death at Boon Tat Street in 2017 dies, aged 80 Singapore Scoot to launch flights to Chiang Rai, Okinawa, Tokyo-Haneda, boost frequency to other places Singapore Off-duty SCDF officer dies after accident in Punggol; 15-year-old pillion rider taken to hospital Singapore Jail for woman who forged medical documents in bid to quickly withdraw her CPF funds Seng also posed scandalous and irrelevant questions at length to the prosecution's witnesses. For instance, he alleged that a male witness was homosexual and was lying in court about being the woman's boyfriend. Seng asked the man if he knew the victim's 'cup size' and if he liked 'sexy men'. He also asked the victim's cousin whether he could kiss her. Seng also made baseless allegations that the prosecution, the police, and various witnesses were fabricating evidence and conspiring against him. 'His conduct at the trial wasted judicial time and resources, caused annoyance to witnesses (including the victim), and undermined the sanctity of the proceedings. It also evidenced a clear lack of remorse,' said Justice Hoong. While self-represented individuals are given some latitude in presenting their cases, that did not give Seng the right to harass the witnesses with repetitive or irrelevant questions, he said. The judge noted that Seng was told repeatedly by the trial judge that certain lines of questioning were irrelevant to the issues to be determined. Justice Hoong added: 'By frequently raising scandalous allegations without any reasonable grounds, the appellant only harmed his own case by demonstrating that he did not have a cogent defence that cast doubt on the prosecution's evidence and had to resort to accusing the prosecution's witnesses of unfounded conspiracies against him.' He noted that trial judges should not intervene excessively in the questioning of witnesses to avoid giving the impression that they are predisposed towards a particular outcome. However, if the court steps in when the questions are not relevant, intended to insult or annoy, or needlessly repetitive, this would not amount to improper judicial interference or 'descending into the arena', he said. Between 2015 and 2020, Seng repeatedly sent the woman text messages, ordered sample products to be delivered to her home, and mailed her his court papers to pressure her into dropping criminal charges against him. In his defence, Seng argued that he believed he was the woman's boyfriend. He said he formed this impression because of certain text messages she had sent him. Justice Hoong said Seng could not have reasonably believed that he was in a romantic relationship with the victim, as the woman had sent him multiple text messages in which she clearly stated that she was not romantically interested in him. Even if Seng thought that he was the victim's boyfriend, his text messages to her would not be reasonable, given her unequivocal demands for him to stop messaging her, said the judge. Seng also claimed that the woman had set a trap to frame him on in April 2017, by stalking him at his void deck, and that the police reports she filed against him were a 'test of love'. The victim said she saw him on the bus and decided to confront him. Her boyfriend, who later joined them at the void deck, corroborated this. But Seng claimed that the man was not a credible witness because if he was attracted to men, he could not have been the victim's boyfriend, and therefore must have been instigated by the woman to lie in court.
Business Times
25 minutes ago
- Business Times
China factories cut shifts and workers' pay as US tariffs bite
[GUANGZHOU] Mike Chai aims to cut wage costs at his kitchen cabinet factory by about 30 per cent to remain competitive against other Chinese firms, which have stopped selling to the US due to steep tariffs and are now coming after his long-time customers in Australia. Chai had already halved his workforce to 100 people since the pandemic and says he has no more room to trim. Instead, he is shortening shifts and asking workers to take unpaid leave – an increasingly common practice that has become a hidden deflationary force in the world's second-largest economy. 'We're in survival mode,' said the 53-year-old, adding that his company, Cartia Global Manufacturing, in the southern city of Foshan, 'barely breaks even.' 'I told them, you don't want our factory to go broke. You've worked here for 10-15 years, let's do it together.' China's headline unemployment rate has held around 5 per cent as US President Donald Trump raised tariffs on imports from China by 30 percentage points this year. Washington and Beijing extended on Monday a tariff truce for another 90 days, during which tariffs will not return to April's triple-digit levels. But economists say underemployment – which, in common with other economies, is not tracked in data – is worsening due to higher levies and industrial overcapacity, squeezing workers' income, undermining their confidence about the future and prompting them to spend less. BT in your inbox Start and end each day with the latest news stories and analyses delivered straight to your inbox. Sign Up Sign Up Consumer confidence lingers near record lows, retail sales have weakened, and inflation in July was zero. Alicia Garcia-Herrero, chief Asia-Pacific economist at Natixis, says it is China's manufacturing workers who suffer while exports – and the economy – keep growing despite the US tariffs. 'It's the people who are hammered by this model of huge competition, lower prices, thus you need to lower costs, thus you need to lower wages. It's a spiral,' she said. 'The model is crazy. I'm sorry, but if you need to export at a loss, do not export.' Statistics will not reveal Chinese workers as 'the main losers' in the trade war because 'they will not become unemployed, but they will get unpaid leave of absence or work fewer hours,' she added. Chai has already lost two key customers in his main market of Australia after other Chinese firms cut their prices and his factory is operating at half-capacity. 'All those who have (left) America have come to Australia,' he said. 'A lot of new supply is knocking on my customers' doors.' While Chinese exports to the US dropped 21.7 per cent year-on-year in July, they rose by 9.2 per cent to the European Union, 16.6 per cent to the Association of South-east Asian Nations and 14.8 per cent to Australia. Chai plans to cut prices by about 10 per cent. To afford that, he is also cutting overtime – which previously made up more than a third of workers' income – from 28 days per month in total to about 10. On average, his workers earn 5,000 yuan (S$894) a month before overtime. Factory bosses are also turning to temporary workers, hiring them for new orders and dismissing them when demand dries up. Dave Fong, who co-owns three factories in southern China making everything from school bags to climbing gear and industrial machinery, says he laid off 30 full-time workers at one of the plants, then rehired some of them on a temporary basis to fulfil unexpected orders. 'We prefer temporary contracts so we don't need to pay pension or insurance,' said Fong. 'It's by day or by hour.' 'If we don't do that, the company hits a dead end. The market is weak because consumption power has decreased. Another factor is trade, especially with the US.' Temporary work is common in China, especially among its nearly 300 million rural migrants. Chen Chuyan, a recruiting agent in the central city of Wuhan, says the going rate has dropped to 14 yuan per hour from 16 yuan last year. 'There's a long line of people waiting for job interviews every day, but the factories don't have that much demand,' Chen said. Alan Zhang has taken such jobs in Datang village, a cluster of small garment factories in the southern city of Guangzhou, since 2021. Back then, he earned 400 yuan a day, but now he struggles to find work paying even half that amount. 'If it's just a couple hundred yuan, I won't take it,' said the 30-year-old, after scanning handwritten ads for temporary work held by recruiters lounging on scooters. 'I don't know what happened. Suddenly it got really hard to find anything. Prices dropped fast,' said Zhang, who pays 700 yuan per month to rent a studio flat in Datang with his wife, who also works in clothing factories. He worked just 14 days in July, which worries him because he must raise 10,000 yuan every year for his son's kindergarten fees. The boy lives with grandparents in Zhang's hometown in neighbouring Fujian province. 'If manufacturing wages are being squeezed, then the wider economy would feel deflationary pressure,' said Richard Yarrow, a fellow at Harvard Kennedy School's Mossavar-Rahmani Center for Business and Government. 'This is definitely a growing issue for some of the lower-skill types of manufacturing in China, such as textiles, furniture, and simple electronics.' At the Longhua employment market in the tech hub of Shenzhen, dozens of people browsed bulletin boards for electronics factory jobs paying 17-28 yuan per hour. Mo, 26, who has a degree in digital marketing but could not find a job in the field, had already had two interviews by early afternoon. He declined the offers because the terms were not as advertised. 'They'll say 23 yuan, but actually give you 20,' said Mo, only giving his surname for privacy reasons. 'Then they'll take management fees, housing, cleaning, and whatever else they can deduct.' Huang, 46, was checking the market for a fifth straight day, having arrived by bus from the southwestern province of Yunnan. He managed real estate projects before the property market crash. Now he is divorced and lives on 10 yuan meals, paying 25 yuan per night for a bed in a dormitory. He cannot afford anything else until he finds work. 'I had one interview this morning but they asked for an upfront placement fee of 80 yuan,' said Huang, dragging a small suitcase. 'So I didn't go. I bought some food instead.' REUTERS