Tensions soar in Serbia as angry protesters clash with police, set fire to party offices
Wearing scarves over their faces and chanting slogans against President Aleksandar Vucic, a group of young men threw flares at his Serbian Progressive Party offices in Valjevo, some 100 kilometers (60 miles) from the capital Belgrade. They set fire to the party's offices before clashing with riot police in a downtown area.
Police threw multiple rounds of tear gas and charged at the demonstrators who hurled bottles, rocks and flares at them.
Similar clashes also erupted on Saturday evening in Belgrade, with police directing tear gas at protesters while battling the protesters who set garbage containers on fire.
The protesters in Valjevo turned out to the streets to protest what they allege is police brutality.
There were no immediate reports on the numbers of injured people in either Valjevo or Belgrade.
Serbia has been gripped by protests since November, when a train station canopy collapse killed 16 people. Many blamed the tragedy on poor renovation work resulting from widespread corruption in infrastructure projects.
The student-led protests had been largely peaceful for months but turned violent this week. The situation has put pressure on Serbia's increasingly autocratic president Vucic, who has refused the protesters' demand to call an early parliamentary election.
Vucic has accused the protesters of following orders from abroad to 'destroy Serbia,' and promised a crackdown on the nationwide movement led by university students.
The protest in Valjevo drew several thousand people after a video on social media showed a young man from the town being severely beaten by police who kicked him and bashed him with batons during a protest earlier this week.
The gathering was peaceful until groups of protesters threw flares at the SNS offices which sparked the fire inside.
The incident marks the second such attack on the SNS party offices this week after protesters demolished the party headquarters in the northern city of Novi Sad on Wednesday.
Clashes between the SNS party loyalists and police on one side and anti-government protesters on the other side have erupted every evening since then. Dozens of people have been injured and scores have been detained.
Secretary General of the Council of Europe, Alain Berset, has called for 'calm and respect of the right to peaceful assembly'
'Serbian authorities must uphold Council of Europe standards,' he said on X this week.
Serbian police have denied reports of brutality, saying they have been attacked and that dozens of officers have been injured in the rioting.
Serbia is formally seeking EU membership, but Vucic has maintained strong ties with Russia and China. The Serbian president has faced accusations of stifling democratic freedoms while allowing organized crime and corruption to flourish. He has denied this.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
42 minutes ago
- Yahoo
I visited Birmingham's Soho Road to hear the real story beyond the drugs, drunks and sex work
Three men slump in a bus shelter, rambling and swigging from beer cans. Across the street, a stumbling group shout in disagreement, drinks in one hand, cigarettes in another. It's a sight more fitting of a Saturday night on Broad Street. Sadly, this is the reality at 9am on a Tuesday morning in one of Birmingham's busiest high streets. Here on Soho Road, Handsworth, the spiralling problem of alcohol and drug abuse is only getting worse. In a concerning video, up to six people were seen passed out in the street amid a 'bad batch of black mamba'. Read more: Police warning over specific family car targeted by criminals as 'flavour of the month' Though an arterial route through the city, it's one that's now synonymous with prostitution, anti-social behaviour and lately, the "huge boom" of exempt housing. Locals have become scared to shop there, and some now even want to move from the area they've called home for decades. But behind the scenes are those who are here to stay, a community that's fighting to survive in an increasingly challenging climate. We took a walk along the busy mile-long strip with resident and community activist, Shuranjeet Singh, to hear the real story of Soho Road as locals battle for a brighter future. With every new betting shop, or new exempt housing that's approved for the area, there's another that was rejected thanks to those residents who fought back, he points out. READ MORE: In pictures: The real story of Soho Road as community fight to survive amid challenges As we walk along, the main issue of drink and drugs is impossible to miss. Most bus shelters we pass are occupied with intoxicated men huddled under cover. Those awake enough to move make their presence known by shouting aggressively at one another. "This is the kind of mild peril we're seeing intensify," Mr Singh explains as we begin the walking tour. "Bus stops that should be shelters are now used by people who are incredibly intoxicated. "That in itself, particularly for elderly women, is enough to not feel as safe stood in close proximity. "I speak to people who want to come spend time on their high street, but don't feel safe making their way here or while they're there. But so many communities are still fighting which gives me a lot of hope and energy. So much work goes on behind the scenes to improve the area, he says, but unfortunately a recent project adding artwork to each bus shelters has only helped to hide the anti-social behaviour going on inside them. "I helped out and designed all of them, then you find out what it means in reality, police then can't see what's going on behind them," he says. An area steeped in history, Handsworth is full of beautiful, five or six bed Victorian homes. However, as more residents move out, more of these are fast becoming HMOs and exempt accommodations. "With a dwindling perception of the area, people want to move out but don't want to sell their properties, and families don't want to move in, so it's a bit of a spiral," he adds. Despite the problems, Mr Singh stresses that new businesses are choosing to open up here in an area boasting one of the city's most diverse food scenes. Via Delhi, Bocadias and Arya are just a handful of the new places to pop up in the street. In any other area, he argues empty shops would stay derelict, bringing down the appearance. Here however, each time a shop closes up to 20 enquiries will flood in to occupy the space. Shops that have been open since the late 70s are still going too. As we talk about up and coming businesses, a man with a beer can behind us shouts in the street about prison fights - such is the bizzare complexity of Soho Road. "When people talk about opening up opportunities, this has been that space for the last 70 years and it still is. People are so innovative, industrious," he continues. "The fascinating paradox of Soho Road is that there are challenges, but it's still seen as a place of opportunity. "Handsworth is just a historically very unique place, it's somewhere many have come to make their home when they've just moved to the country - with that came a lot of community work and organising. "In the 70s it wasn't a particularly transient place, that's changed a lot in 15 years. It was somewhere people saw their future, but sadly now I don't think a lot see their future here." Mr Singh, born and bred in Handsworth, chose to return to the area after University while his friends moved out to work in London. "I wanted to build where my roots are. My family are all within a ten minute walk of this point," he explains. "It's one of the most thriving places in the city, you only have to look down and see. We have eight places of worship, but then there's also six or seven bookies and that doesn't look towards an optimistic future, that doesn't make us feel excited, it's a bit of a negative stamp on the local map. "You have people who really like their area, but they're almost going through boxing rounds, one they've just been battered, another they've won." The building housing Monga's, a bridal shop, was due to become yet another betting shop. But thanks to the community, it was rejected and it instead now houses the bespoke store. "It's a really good example of what could have been vs. what is," he comments. Residents are also fighting to reclaim the derelict Bill House as new social housing for the elderly and families. However, the large building, which marks the "gateway to Soho Road", was purchased by an American company who are claimed to be "land-banking" and said to want £3.5million for it. "No developer wants to take it on because they know they won't get the money back," he says as we walk by. "That's been ongoing for two years. We're still pushing for something to happen with the building." Locals, alongside police, are also battling another application for an aparthotel near to primary schools and a nursery. There are already problems with drunks being abusive towards parents picking up their kids, he says. "There are businesses and community organisations offering opportunities, but then in the middle of that, we have issues with waste, housing related issues, and crime and anti-social behaviour," he added. "Everywhere has their challenges, but there are so many amazing things that are being done. There's this sense of warmth here. "There are things that happen behind the scenes, but really communities are doing so much to bring the place up. There's so much civic pride here, but there's a limit, and I worry we'll reach that. To rebuild civic pride is very difficult."
Yahoo
an hour ago
- Yahoo
Palestine Action's violent criminality is not lawful protest
Faced with the intolerable scenes of suffering and devastation in Gaza, people across the country are feeling desperate and angry about what is happening and many have joined protests on the street. Each month, the police work with organisers to facilitate safe, lawful protests, and will continue to do so. Over the last 18 months, hundreds of thousands of people have joined pro-Palestinian protests, while only a tiny minority have been arrested for breaking the law. Protest and free speech are an important part of our democracy and those freedoms will always be protected. So anyone who wants to protest against the catastrophic humanitarian situation and crimes against humanity in Gaza, to oppose Israel's military offensive, or to criticise the actions of any and every government, including our own, has the freedom to do so. The recent proscription of the group Palestine Action does not prevent those protests, and to claim otherwise is nonsense. That proscription concerns one specific organisation alone – a group that has conducted an escalating campaign involving not just sustained criminal damage, including to Britain's national security infrastructure, but also intimidation, violence, weapons, and serious injuries to individuals. The clear advice and intelligence given to me earlier this year from the UK's world-leading counter-terrorism system, based on a robust assessment process, was that Palestine Action satisfies the relevant tests in the Terrorism Act 2000 and should be proscribed. Some may think it is just a regular protest group known for occasional stunts. But that is not the extent of its past activities. Nor does it reflect disturbing information given to me that covered ideas and planning for future attacks. Many of those important details cannot yet be publicly reported because of criminal proceedings. But if stunts were the only concern, its proscription would never have been considered in the first place, and it certainly wouldn't have become the unanimous recommendation to ministers from the cross-government security expert review group. Palestine Action has claimed responsibility for – and promoted on its website – attacks that have seen those allegedly involved subsequently charged with violent disorder, grievous bodily harm with intent, actual bodily harm, criminal damage and aggravated burglary. Charges that include, in the assessment of the independent Crown Prosecution Service, a terrorism connection. Many people will also know about the attack on RAF planes at Brize Norton, but fewer will have read about the Jewish-owned business in north London badly vandalised in the dead of night by masked men just three weeks before. Or the attack on a Glasgow factory that caused the sentencing sheriff to say: 'Throwing pyrotechnics into areas where people are being evacuated could hardly be described as non-violent.' 'For a home secretary to ignore all the security assessments, advice and recommendations on Palestine Action would be irresponsible' Or the 'underground manual' that encourages the creation of cells, provides practical guidance on how to identify targets to attack and how to evade law enforcement. These are not the actions of a legitimate protest group. For a home secretary to ignore all those security assessments, advice and recommendations would be irresponsible. Protecting public safety and national security are at the very heart of the job I do. Were there to be further serious attacks or injuries, the government would rightly be condemned for not acting sooner to keep people safe. Public protests on the Gaza crisis will continue through the summer, and the overwhelming majority of those involved do not and will not endorse violent and criminal tactics. That is why the proscription of this group is not about protest or the Palestinian cause. In a democracy, lawful protest is a fundamental right but violent criminality is not. Some of those holding placards in direct support of Palestine Action may not know the kind of organisation they have been promoting: its violence, intimidation, or future plans and aspirations. But that is all the more reason why no one should allow desperate calls for peace in the Middle East to be derailed into a campaign to support one narrow group involved in violence here in the UK. Because it is those calls for peace that should be the most urgent focus now. Each day the humanitarian crisis in Gaza worsens, the conditions for hostages deteriorate, the prospects for peace are diminished, and the scenes of children being shot and starved get ever more horrific. An immediate ceasefire, release of the hostages and urgent humanitarian aid are vital. So too is the pathway the prime minister has set out to the recognition of a Palestinian state, now supported by Australia and Canada as well as France. Yvette Cooper is home secretary. Photograph by @FLO360aero
Yahoo
2 hours ago
- Yahoo
Proscription was disproportionate – and has had a chilling effect
Last month I was granted permission by the high court to legally challenge the proscription of Palestine Action. The judge said the ban was arguably unlawful on the grounds that it was disproportionate with rights to free speech and protest, and that the home secretary failed to consult Palestine Action or any human rights organisations. As my barristers argued, the proscription has had a chilling effect on thousands of people across the country. Examples include a former headmaster arrested for displaying a Private Eye cartoon, and protester Laura Murton being accused by police of potentially committing a terror offence by displaying a Palestine flag and a placard that said 'Free Gaza'. Even the UN human rights commissioner, Volker Türk, agrees the proscription is 'disproportionate and unnecessary'. The impact on free speech is evident even as I write this piece. I'm given less latitude to counter the home secretary's claims than she is afforded to advance them. Her decision to proscribe gives her a higher degree of control of the narrative, as many papers will be reluctant, for legal reasons, to publish a piece that may make the readers sympathetic to Palestine Action's aims. So all I am allowed to say on that is contained within my first witness statement. But I must do at least this. It is important that readers understand our case. As I explained to the court, Palestine Action 'take direct action against Israel's arms trade in Britain'. We 'put our bodies in the way of a military machine perpetrating genocide'. In my view the campaign has been effective, so I believe weapons firms and the Israeli embassy lobbied hard for ministers and police to crack down on Palestine Action. However, proscribing a domestic direct action group has sparked outrage. So far, more than 700 people have been arrested under the Terrorism Act for holding signs, while opposition to the ban is growing across the political spectrum. To save face, it seems to me the government has resorted to a smear campaign. Rather than solely litigating the case in the courts, they're also trying to litigate it in the media, where hard facts are swapped for soundbites. Their newest claim refers to supposed evidence of 'disturbing' plans and ideas. Yvette Cooper failed to reference any such evidence in court ahead of the 'permission hearing' to challenge the ban, instead launching the claims on TV. These allegations are not supported by the security assessments disclosed by her own department, and don't match the facts. The assessment to proscribe Palestine Action was made in March 2025, but it seems Cooper delayed proscription until the most politically convenient moment. If there were 'disturbing plans' and serious concerns of national security, why wait four months? Even Keir Starmer weighed in, making reference to 'Jewish-owned' businesses. The intention seemed to be to imply that Palestine Action was antisemitic. In reality, it targeted dozens of companies associated with Israel's biggest weapons producer, regardless of the identities of the owners. This fact is known by the government, yet they continue to weaponise antisemitism. I believe the idea behind the government's statements is to deliberately mislead the public and parliament. The group was banned due to 'serious property damage for a political cause', not because of racism or alleged violence against people. It is false to claim the organisation had violent intent against people. The home secretary's own security assessments say the direct action group didn't advocate violence or pose a threat to life. Cooper's attempt to justify her decision by misleading the public shows only what a huge political misstep she has made. Her political career will be marked by the most draconian attack on our civil liberties in a generation. Huda Ammori was co-founder of Palestine Action and is challenging its proscription in court Photograph by Antonio Olmos
