US, Indo-Pacific partners agree to strengthen maritime, critical minerals cooperation
The foreign ministers of the four countries, known as the 'Quad,' met in Washington on Tuesday as the Trump administration seeks to expand U.S. influence in the Indo-Pacific to compete with a rising China amid tensions with partners over trade and defense issues.
In a joint meeting with his three colleagues, Secretary of State Marco Rubio said the Quad must be a 'vehicle for action' that goes beyond statements of intent and stressed that commerce and trade will be critical to ensuring the group's relevance in the future.
To that end, the four announced in a statement the creation of a 'Quad Critical Minerals Initiative' that aims 'to strengthen economic security and collective resilience by collaborating on securing and diversifying critical mineral supply chains.' The statement did not provide details of the initiative.
'We are deeply concerned about the abrupt constriction and future reliability of key supply chains, specifically for critical minerals,' they said. 'This includes the use of non-market policies and practices for critical minerals, certain derivative products, and mineral processing technology.'
The statement did not mention China by name, but Chinese domination of the critical minerals supply chain has long been a concern of the U.S. and others. The ministers expressed specific concern about rising tensions in the East and South China Seas, where Beijing has become increasingly assertive of maritime and territorial claims that are rejected by its smaller neighbors.
'We reiterate our strong opposition to any unilateral actions that seek to change the status quo by force or coercion,' they said. 'We express our serious concerns regarding dangerous and provocative actions, including interference with offshore resource development, the repeated obstruction of the freedoms of navigation and overflight, and the dangerous maneuvers by military aircraft and coast guard and maritime militia vessels, especially the unsafe use of water cannons and ramming or blocking actions in the South China Sea.'
The ministers also condemned North Korea for continuing to launch ballistic missiles, expand its nuclear weapons program and engage in malicious cyberactivity. In a veiled reference to North Korean support for Russia in its war against Ukraine, they expressed 'deep concern about countries that are deepening military cooperation with North Korea, which directly undermines the global nonproliferation regime.'
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
19 minutes ago
- Yahoo
You Can't Look Away From Lisa Murkowski's 'Creepy' Death Stare At NBC Reporter
If looks could kill, NBC News' Ryan Nobles wouldn't be standing right now. (Watch the video below.) The network's chief Capitol Hill correspondent was on the receiving end of what's been described as a prolonged death stare from Sen. Lisa Murkowski (R-Alaska). He recounted the confrontation in a viral X post with the video. 'Sen. Lisa Murkowski stares me down for more than 10 secs after I ask her to respond to Sen. Rand Paul's critique of the deal she struck to get her to a YES and pass the OBBB,' Nobles wrote. Murkowski voted Tuesday to approve the so-called 'big beautiful bill,' paving the way for Vice President JD Vance to cast the tiebreaking tally for its passage. The senator received concessions to make the bill's cuts to Medicaid and SNAP less severe in her state, prompting Sen. Rand Paul (R-Ky.) to call out his colleagues for choosing 'to add more pork and subsidies for Alaska to secure [the vote].' Nobles caught up with Murkowski and told her: 'Sen. Paul said that your vote was a bailout for Alaska at the expense of the rest of the country.' Murkowski locked into his eyes like a prize fighter at a weigh-in. 'I'm just asking for your response,' Nobles said. 'My response is I have an obligation to the people in the state of Alaska. And I live up to that every single day,' she said. 'Do I like this bill? No. But I tried to take care of Alaska's interest,' she added. NEW: Sen. Lisa Murkowski stares me down for more than 10 secs after I ask her to respond to Sen. Rand Paul's critique of the deal she struck to get her to a YES and pass the OBBB.'Do I like this bill? No. But I tried to take care of Alaska's interests.'w/ @ — Ryan Nobles (@ryanobles) July 1, 2025 Some observers on X were not impressed.'Does she think that stare down makes her look tough?' one observer wrote . Another called it 'creepy' while a critic mused, 'That stare is all this muppet is capable of.' Whatever it was, it was no match for this guy. How Republicans Got Lisa Murkowski To Vote For The Tax Cut Bill GOP Senator Says 'We Are All Afraid' Of Retaliation By Donald Trump Lisa Murkowski Rips GOP For Being 'Afraid' Of Criticizing Trump, Elon Musk

Associated Press
20 minutes ago
- Associated Press
Analysis shows Trump's tariffs would cost US employers $82.3 billion
WASHINGTON (AP) — An analysis finds that a critical group of U.S. employers would face a direct cost of $82.3 billion from President Donald Trump's current tariff plans, a sum that could be potentially managed through price hikes, layoffs, hiring freezes or lower profit margins. The analysis by the JPMorganChase Institute is among the first to measure the direct costs created by the import taxes on businesses with $10 million to $1 billion in revenue, a category that includes roughly a third of private-sector U.S. workers. These companies are more dependent than other businesses on imports from China, India and Thailand — and the retail and wholesale sectors would be especially vulnerable to the import taxes being levied by the Republican president. The findings show clear trade-offs from Trump's import taxes, contradicting his claims that foreign manufacturers would absorb the costs of the tariffs instead of U.S. companies that rely on imports. While the tariffs launched under Trump have yet to boost overall inflation, large companies such as Amazon, Costco, Walmart and Williams-Sonoma delayed the potential reckoning by building up their inventories before the taxes could be imposed. The analysis comes just ahead of the July 9 deadline by Trump to formally set the tariff rates on goods from dozens of countries. Trump imposed that deadline after the financial markets panicked in response to his April tariff announcements, prompting him to instead schedule a 90-day negotiating period when most imports faced a 10% baseline tariff. China, Mexico and Canada face higher rates, and there are separate 50% tariffs on steel and aluminum. Had the initial April 2 tariffs stayed in place, the companies in the JPMorganChase Institute analysis would have faced additional direct costs of $187.6 billion. Under the current rates, the $82.3 billion would be equivalent on average to $2,080 per employee, or 3.1% of the average annual payroll. Those averages include firms that don't import goods and those that do. Asked Tuesday how trade talks are faring, Trump said simply: 'Everything's going well.' The president has indicated that he will set tariff rates given the logistical challenge of negotiating with so many nations. As the 90-day period comes to a close, only the United Kingdom has signed a trade framework with the Trump administration. India and Vietnam have signaled that they're close to a trade framework. There is a growing body of evidence suggesting that more inflation could surface. The investment bank Goldman Sachs said in a report that it expects companies to pass along 60% of their tariff costs onto consumers. The Atlanta Federal Reserve has used its survey of businesses' inflation expectations to say that companies could on average pass along roughly half their costs from a 10% tariff or a 25% tariff without reducing consumer demand. The JPMorganChase Institute findings suggest that the tariffs could cause some domestic manufacturers to strengthen their roles as suppliers of goods. But it noted that companies need to plan for a range of possible outcomes and that wholesalers and retailers already operate on such low profit margins that they might need to spread the tariffs costs to their customers. The outlook for tariffs remains highly uncertain. Trump had stopped negotiations with Canada, only to restart them after the country dropped its plan to tax digital services. He similarly on Monday threatened more tariffs on Japan unless it buys more rice from the U.S. Treasury Secretary Scott Bessent said in a Tuesday interview that the concessions from the trade talks have impressed career officials at the Office of the U.S. Trade Representative and other agencies. 'People who have been at Treasury, at Commerce, at USTR for 20 years are saying that these are deals like they've never seen before,' Bessent said on Fox News Channel's 'Fox & Friends.' The treasury secretary said the Trump administration plans to discuss the contours of trade deals next week, prioritizing the tax cuts package passed on Tuesday by the Republican majority in the Senate. Trump has set a Friday deadline for passage of the multitrillion-dollar package, the costs of which the president hopes to offset with tariff revenues. ___ Follow the AP's coverage of President Donald Trump at
Yahoo
21 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Should You Buy Brookfield Asset Management While It's Below $60?
Brookfield raises funds and invests on behalf of clients in alternative assets. The company's fee-based business model is highly profitable. A strong growth outlook supports the stock's premium valuation. 10 stocks we like better than Brookfield Asset Management › Brookfield Asset Management (NYSE: BAM) has been on a bit of a tear, surging over 40% in the past year. The company, part of several subsidiaries of the sprawling Brookfield ecosystem, deals in managing investments in alternative assets. It's a relatively new stock, created by a spinoff a few years back. Investors may not yet fully appreciate the company's lucrative business model or the growth opportunities ahead. Here is what Brookfield offers, and why it's a fantastic buy at under $60 right now. Brookfield is one of the world's largest alternative investment companies, with over $1 trillion in assets under management (AUM). Brookfield Corporation is the parent company and owns stakes in numerous private and publicly traded subsidiaries. The Brookfield Asset Management subsidiary plays a key role in this broader ecosystem. It creates private investment funds and other financial products and services that it sells to clients to raise capital. Then, the company invests that money on its clients' behalf into Brookfield (and elsewhere) assets, such as real estate, energy, infrastructure, private equity, and credit. The best aspect of Brookfield Asset Management is that it doesn't directly operate the assets it invests in; it only manages the equity. For example, if the company buys a power plant, it's not responsible for its day-to-day operations or the expenses associated with that. However, it could sell the plant for a profit if its value increases. Therefore, Brookfield Asset Management is a very asset-light and lucrative business. The fee revenue it generates is almost entirely profit. You could think of Brookfield Asset Management as a hedge fund that invests money in these alternative assets, rather than stocks. Growing, dividend-paying stocks can be lucrative investments when you buy and hold them for many years. Brookfield Asset Management hasn't been around long enough to have established a reputation, but the stock looks like a dividend monster in the making. It currently yields nearly 3.2% at its current share price. Because it has virtually zero physical assets, the company pays out almost all the fee-based revenue it generates as dividends. Brookfield Asset Management primarily grows by expanding its AUM, thereby increasing fee-based revenue. It does that by attracting new clients and capital. Management believes that the global asset opportunity for alternative investments will increase from $25 trillion today to over $60 trillion by 2032. Brookfield, with $1 trillion under management, is a prominent player, so this is a fragmented industry. The company can grow by capturing market share, while the size of the pie expands simultaneously. Currently, Brookfield Asset Management projects that it will increase its fee-based revenue sufficiently to raise the dividend at a 15% annualized rate through 2029. That's impressive for a stock with a starting yield of 3.2%. At first glance, Brookfield Asset Management looks pretty expensive at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 40. But consider the following. The company anticipates growing its profits at a mid-teens growth rate over the next four to five years. That's not a bad P/E for such high growth. Additionally, Brookfield Asset Management is a highly profitable, asset-light business, which also often supports a higher valuation. All said, Brookfield Asset Management isn't dirt cheap by any means, but it's still a fair valuation for such an excellent company and emerging dividend growth star. Investors, especially those looking to hold the stock for the long term, can confidently buy the stock under $60 and feel good about what they're getting. Before you buy stock in Brookfield Asset Management, consider this: The Motley Fool Stock Advisor analyst team just identified what they believe are the for investors to buy now… and Brookfield Asset Management wasn't one of them. The 10 stocks that made the cut could produce monster returns in the coming years. Consider when Netflix made this list on December 17, 2004... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $722,181!* Or when Nvidia made this list on April 15, 2005... if you invested $1,000 at the time of our recommendation, you'd have $968,402!* Now, it's worth noting Stock Advisor's total average return is 1,069% — a market-crushing outperformance compared to 177% for the S&P 500. Don't miss out on the latest top 10 list, available when you join . See the 10 stocks » *Stock Advisor returns as of June 30, 2025 Justin Pope has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Brookfield and Brookfield Corporation. The Motley Fool recommends Brookfield Asset Management. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. Should You Buy Brookfield Asset Management While It's Below $60? was originally published by The Motley Fool Error in retrieving data Sign in to access your portfolio Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data Error in retrieving data