Hiker found dead after bear attack in Japan forest
The hiker in his twenties tried to fight off the large animal but was pulled into the nearby woods with his legs bleeding profusely, local media outlets including the Yomiuri Shimbun newspaper said.
The man was attacked while walking a trail on Mount Rausu on the northern island of Hokkaido on Thursday morning, a local police spokesman told AFP.
On Friday afternoon, he was found and taken to a hospital where he was officially pronounced dead, according to a Hokkaido government official.
Hunters also caught and killed a bear near the trail, an official working for Shari town - where the mountain is - told AFP.
DNA analysis will be conducted to determine whether the bear was responsible for the victim's death.
A wallet containing a card that bore the man's name was found near the scene of the encounter in the northeastern part of Hokkaido, according to media.
A torn, bloodied shirt believed to be his was also found Friday, with nearby trees and soil dotted with traces of blood, Kyodo news agency said, quoting police.
Among other discovered items were a watch, a hat and what appeared to be tear gas, Kyodo said.
The number of brown bears in Hokkaido fell year-on-year in 2023 for the first time since 1991, according to estimates released this month.
There were about 11,600 at the end of 2023, down 500 from a year earlier.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
CNA
2 minutes ago
- CNA
Thailand's Shinawatra dynasty faces triple court test that could upend politics
BANGKOK: Thailand's billionaire Shinawatra family is bracing for a series of high-stakes court decisions starting Friday (Aug 22) that could test its political resilience, with the prospect of an early election and prolonged trouble for the country's stuttering economy. Thailand's Shinawatra political dynasty has been at the heart of two decades of intermittent turmoil, and its latest battles will culminate in rulings that could unseat Prime Minister Paetongtarn Shinawatra for an alleged ethics violation and put her influential but polarising father Thaksin Shinawatra back in prison. A court will on Friday rule if Thaksin during a 2015 media interview insulted the powerful monarchy, a serious crime in Thailand which carries lengthy jail terms of up to 15 years. Another court will decide 18 days later if the tycoon's 2023 detention in a VIP hospital wing, instead of jail, means his prison sentence for abuse of power and conflicts of interest was not fully served. Both Shinawatras have denied any wrongdoing. Unfavourable verdicts for Paetongtarn, 39, and Thaksin, 76, a divisive backroom operator and driving force behind the government, could reduce the family's bargaining power and lead to an earlier-than-scheduled election, which their once formidable Pheu Thai party is not in the best shape to contest. "A new election will definitely take place by mid-2026 or maybe sooner," said Thammasat University law professor Prinya Thaewanarumitkul. "The chances of Pheu Thai regaining the popular vote in the next election are very unlikely." A spokesperson for the Pheu Thai-led government declined to comment on the upcoming court rulings. UNCERTAINTY LOOMS The Shinawatra family are undoubtedly survivors, having prevailed through two military coups and three court rulings that collectively toppled three of their governments and five prime ministers. It is unclear how the courts will rule, with numerous permutations for what comes next in Thai politics. The coalition government of Paetongtarn, who is suspended pending the Constitutional Court's Aug 29 ruling, is sinking in opinion polls, under intense public pressure and hanging onto power by a thread. The verdicts come at a critical moment for Southeast Asia's second-largest economy, which is struggling with weak growth, high household debt, slowing tourism and investor concern over policy continuity. Paetongtarn is accused of violating ethics in a June telephone conversation with former Cambodian leader Hun Sen that was leaked as both countries were on the brink of an armed border conflict, which erupted a month later. A ceasefire is now in place. Paetongtarn's predecessor Srettha Thavisin, was dismissed by the same court a year ago, and if she suffers the same fate or resigns, parliament must choose a new premier from a shrinking list of candidates submitted before the 2023 election. Her Pheu Thai party has only one candidate left, the low-profile former justice minister Chaikasem Nitisiri. But the 76-year-old would need help from Thaksin or Pheu Thai to rally support from a shaky coalition that holds a razor-thin majority. Other candidates include former interior minister Anutin Charnvirakul, whose party exited the governing coalition in June, and former premier and coup leader Prayuth Chan-o-cha, who quit politics and is now a royal adviser. The anti-establishment opposition People's Party, the largest in parliament, has signalled it may back Anutin if he agrees to dissolve parliament this year and seek constitutional reform. Unfavourable court verdicts would make it harder for seasoned dealmaker Thaksin to keep Pheu Thai in government, but some analysts say he still has backing from a powerful conservative establishment that wants to keep the progressive opposition at bay. "The conservative camp has chosen Thaksin," said Olarn Thinbangtieo, a political science lecturer at Burapha University.
CNA
32 minutes ago
- CNA
Sengkang Green Primary bullying case: MOE details timeline of events
Scroll up for the next video X Sengkang Green Primary bullying case: MOE details timeline of events
CNA
2 hours ago
- CNA
Ex-director of healthcare firm fined for approving inflated claims, but cleared of bribing AON Singapore CEO
SINGAPORE: A former director linked to the Fullerton Healthcare brand was fined S$160,000 (US$124,000) on Thursday (Aug 21) for approving inflated entertainment expense claims. But David Sin, 46, was cleared of bribery in an alleged corruption case implicating his colleagues and the then-CEO of Aon Singapore, a health insurance broker. A judge granted the prosecution's application to give Sin a discharge amounting to an acquittal for five corruption charges and two charges of falsifying accounts. This means those charges are withdrawn and cannot be brought against him again. Sin pleaded guilty to six other charges of falsifying accounts in 2019. His offences involve more than S$213,000 of falsified sums. Sin is the first of four men in the case to be dealt with by the courts. He has been declared a bankrupt and was allowed to pay his fine in instalments. Aon Singapore's former CEO Collin Chiew, 57, remains accused of taking bribes and money laundering. Fullerton Healthcare Corporation group CEO Michael Tan, 51, and deputy group CEO Daniel Chan, 51, also face related corruption charges. Chan allegedly used the money from falsified expense claims approved by Sin to pay bribes to Chiew, with Tan accused of conspiring in these offences. Chiew, Tan and Chan's cases are still before the courts, with trial dates set from September. Sin is willing to serve as a prosecution witness at trial, according to his defence lawyers, Ms Melanie Ho, Mr Tang Shangwei and Ms Neo Yi Ling of WongPartnership. DEALINGS BETWEEN AON AND FULLERTON HEALTHCARE Tan and Chan, both doctors, founded Fullerton Healthcare Group in 2010. It provided corporate healthcare solutions through a network of doctors and clinics, and helped clients process insurance claims. Sin became an investor in the company in 2013. He and other investors incorporated Fullerton Healthcare Corporation as a holding company to buy over Fullerton Healthcare Group and its subsidiaries. Sin served on Fullerton Healthcare Corporation's board of directors from 2013 to 2018, after which he was appointed the company's president. In 2014, the company won a contract to run the Aon Care healthcare plan created by Aon Singapore. Under this employee healthcare plan, six insurance companies agreed to use Fullerton Healthcare as their healthcare service provider. These insurance companies were Great Eastern, AIA, Tokio Marine, AVIVA, AXA and NTUC Income. Clients could switch their insurers on a yearly basis because the third-party administrator, Fullerton Healthcare, remained constant. FALSIFIED CLAIMS In 2018, Chan asked Mr Tei Chu Pink, the China-based country managing director of Fullerton Health China, to claim certain business expenses from Fullerton Health Corporation. Chan told Mr Tei that the business expenses would be paid from Fullerton Health China's accounts using inflated entertainment invoices, and that Tan had consented to the arrangement. Chan said that the payments were for "consultancy services" Chiew had provided to the company, according to prosecutors. Mr Tei relayed this information to Sin, who agreed to the arrangement. Chan went on to submit multiple entertainment expense claims for approval in 2019, and Sin approved them despite knowing they were inflated. The claims were denominated in renminbi and involved false KTV receipts. They claimed over S$334,000 in purported expenses, when in reality only about S$120,000 was spent. Sin therefore abetted in a conspiracy with Chan to defraud Fullerton Healthcare Corporation, according to prosecutors. POOR CORPORATE GOVERNANCE Deputy Public Prosecutors David Menon, Jonathan Tan and Ashley Chin urged the court for a total fine of S$150,000 to S$180,000. This was based on a fine of between S$25,000 and S$30,000 per charge. The maximum fine the State Courts can impose for an offence is S$30,000. While Sin knew the expenses were inflated and was complicit, he was not the mastermind of the offences and did not derive personal benefit from them, said the prosecutors. Sin's defence team called for a total fine of S$120,000, or S$20,000 per charge. They argued that Chan and Tan "misled and deceived" Sin about the true extent and purpose of the inflated expenses. As an investor, Sin left it to them to run the company's daily operations and trusted they had "good reasons" to pay Chiew in such a manner, argued the lawyers. They acknowledged that this was poor corporate governance on Sin's part. "Should he have checked? Should he have done more? Yes," Ms Ho told District Judge Paul Quan. WENT AFTER FLAGGED CLAIMS LIKE 'A DOG WITH A BONE' Sin's role in calling for investigations into the falsified expense claims, which ended up implicating himself, was also a point of contention. During arguments, Judge Quan noted that when Fullerton Healthcare Corporation's auditors flagged irregular claims, Sin "went at it like a dog with a bone and refused to let up". According to the defence, Sin arranged, pushed for and cooperated with independent investigations to find out the extent of the irregularities. One such investigation around August 2021 was the "springboard" to a complaint being filed with the Corrupt Practices Investigation Bureau, the defence argued. Ms Ho said that Sin wanted a "clean bill of health" for the company so that nothing would scuttle its attempts at a listing or sale. The judge agreed with the prosecution that these actions were different from voluntary surrender, but they served as evidence of Sin's remorse and contrition. Taken together with Sin's cooperation with the authorities and guilty plea, this was enough for a slight reduction of his fine, said the judge. Judge Quan added that it was not for Sin to argue that it was not his responsibility to "micromanage" Chan and Tan's actions. This was because the trio had the power to approve each other's claims without having to go through the company's finance teams.
