Media Matters sues FTC to block probe
The group received a request from the FTC last month for documents and communications related to several advertising and watchdog groups, as well as its legal battle with Elon Musk's X.
'Media Matters faces an ongoing campaign of retribution for exercising its First Amendment rights,' the lawsuit reads. 'For the third time, Media Matters must ask this Court to halt this 'government campaign of retaliation.''
X sued the watchdog group in 2023 over a report that outlined how the social media site had placed ads for mainstream brands next to hateful content. The report, combined with controversial comments from Musk at the time, prompted advertisers to halt their spending on the platform.
Texas and Missouri followed suit, opening investigations into Media Matters and requesting documents from the group that were later blocked in court.
'Now the Federal Trade Commission seeks to punish Media Matters for its journalism and speech in exposing matters of substantial public concern,' the group wrote in its complaint, adding, 'The campaign of retribution against Media Matters must stop.'
Media Matters argues the FTC's request is 'overbroad and designed to be maximally burdensome' and 'constitutes a fishing expedition into the most sensitive areas' of its work, seeking information about the group's finances, editorial process and newsgathering activities.
The FTC did not immediately respond to The Hill's request for comment.
Notably, the agency no longer has any Democratic commissioners, after President Trump fired commissioners Rebecca Kelly Slaughter and Alvaro Bedoya in March. The pair, who argue their firings are illegal, have sued the president.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Verge
22 minutes ago
- The Verge
Grok will no longer call itself Hitler or base its opinions on Elon Musk's, promises xAI
xAI has offered a couple more fixes for 'issues' with its Grok AI chatbot, promising it will no longer name itself 'Hitler' or base its responses on searches for what xAI head Elon Musk has said. According to an X post earlier today, the chatbot's latest update sets new instructions that its responses 'must stem from your independent analysis, not from any stated beliefs of past Grok, Elon Musk, or xAI. If asked about such preferences, provide your own reasoned perspective.' The changes follow more than a week of controversy for Grok. In recent days, multiple reports showed that when asked its opinion about hot-button topics like Israel and Palestine, immigration, and abortion, the chatbot first searched for Musk's opinion on the matter before responding. In its Tuesday post, xAI said that the reason for this was that when asked about its views, 'the model reasons that as an AI it doesn't have an opinion but knowing it was Grok 4 by xAI searches to see what xAI or Elon Musk might have said on a topic to align itself with the company.' The company also addressed another controversy from over the weekend, in which Grok 4 Heavy, the chatbot's $300 per month subscription product, responded that its surname was 'Hitler.' In the company's statement, xAI said that it was due to media headlines responding to yet an earlier incident: Grok going off the rails in a multi-day series of tirades where it denigrated Jews and praised Hitler. (It also posted graphic sexual threats against a user.) Since Grok doesn't have a surname, said xAI, it 'searches the internet leading to undesirable results, such as when its searches picked up a viral meme where it called itself 'MechaHitler.'' The new instructions should prevent this, according to the company. Grok's antisemitism isn't limited to the recent past — in May, the chatbot went viral for casting doubt on Holocaust death tolls. But its responses escalated dramatically this month after a set of changes to its system prompts, including that it should 'assume subjective viewpoints sourced from the media are biased' and that its response 'should not shy away from making claims which are politically incorrect, as long as they are well substantiated.' The 'politically incorrect' instruction was briefly removed before being re-added in recent days. During the livestream release event for Grok 4 last week, Musk said he's been 'at times kind of worried' about AI's intelligence far surpassing that of humans, and whether it will be 'bad or good for humanity.' 'I think it'll be good, most likely it'll be good,' Musk said. 'But I've somewhat reconciled myself to the fact that even if it wasn't going to be good, I'd at least like to be alive to see it happen.' Now, xAI says that after rolling out these latest updates, the company is 'actively monitoring and will implement further adjustments as needed.'
Yahoo
24 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Pentagon taps four commercial tech firms to expand military use of AI
The Pentagon announced Monday it has chosen Google, xAI, Anthropic and OpenAI to help the U.S. military expand its use of advanced artificial intelligence capabilities. Each company received a contract worth up to $200 million, according to a notice from the Chief Digital and AI Office. The firms will help the Defense Department develop agentic AI workflows for key national security missions. 'Leveraging commercially available solutions into an integrated capabilities approach will accelerate the use of advanced AI as part of our Joint mission essential tasks in our warfighting domain as well as intelligence, business, and enterprise information systems,' Chief Digital and AI Officer Doug Matty said in a statement. The military services have adopted generative AI tools to varying degrees and for a range of tasks — from tech support to finding files. Agentic AI uses more advanced reasoning to address and act on more complex challenges. The Pentagon didn't specify what missions the program would support, but the department has said it wants to use AI in areas like intelligence analysis, campaigning, logistics and data collection. Following the announcement, Elon Musk-owned xAI — whose conversational AI chatbot goes by the name Grok — unveiled a U.S. government-specific production line called Grok for Government. Grok has come under scrutiny after an update generated a slew of racists and antisemitic comments. In one instance, the chatbot referred to itself as 'MechaHitler.' The award follows Musk's months-long push from within the White House to slash federal spending. Amid a public falling out earlier this summer, President Donald Trump has threatened to cancel government contracts awarded to Musk's companies. Under this new deal, however, the billionaire's federal work would expand.
Yahoo
38 minutes ago
- Yahoo
1 Thing That Matters Most for Tesla Stock Investors
Tesla shares have boosted investors' portfolios in the past decade, as they seem to always trade at a steep valuation. The current P/E ratio implies monster success down the road with full self-driving technology and a robotaxi service. In recent years, Tesla has been a struggling car maker, which shows glimpses of the company's true nature. These 10 stocks could mint the next wave of millionaires › While it has taken investors on a bumpy drive, no one can deny that Tesla (NASDAQ: TSLA) has worked out to be a wildly successful stock. In the past 10 years, shares have rocketed 1,700% higher (as of July 10). The company's revenue growth has slowed, to be sure, but Tesla is now consistently profitable, which is a positive development. Even though the business might not be firing on all cylinders right now, the market continues to give Tesla the benefit of the doubt. Shares trade 35% off their peak from December last year, but they're very expensive, at a price-to-earnings (P/E) ratio of 170.4. It seems that Tesla is always at a nosebleed valuation regardless of what's going on with the underlying fundamentals. Existing shareholders, as well as those investors looking to buy the electric vehicle (EV) stock, need to understand what's going on. Here's what matters most as we look at Tesla's future. Anytime there's a valuation as high as Tesla's, it's a clear indication that the market believes the future will be incredibly bright. And that's exactly what founder and CEO Elon Musk has gotten shareholders to believe. In this case, the main thing to focus on is its full self-driving (FSD) technology, which is what Tesla's ultimate success and current valuation depend on. After many delays, Tesla finally introduced a robotaxi service in Austin, Texas in June. It was a very limited and controlled launch to a select number of people in a small area. The cars, which had supervisors in them, did make driving errors. However, the company deserves credit for getting to this point, even though it's significantly behind Alphabet's Waymo in the FSD and robotaxi race. The financial reward of one day bringing a robotaxi service to cities across the world is massive. So, it makes sense why Musk and Tesla are so focused on this top objective. According to Cathie Wood and Ark Invest, this is a multitrillion-dollar opportunity. To make Tesla's strategy a success, it involves not only selling more of its EVs but having these people offer up their cars to the robotaxi service. In this way, Tesla would be able to rapidly scale up its fleet, earning what could be very high-margin revenue if it can chip away at the leading market positions of Uber and Lyft, at least in the U.S. And if FSD can bring down the cost of travel, then perhaps demand would grow meaningfully, providing upside to the equation. Investors need to realize that it's far from a certainty that Tesla achieves broad robotaxi adoption. Up until this point, Musk has overpromised and underdelivered. There are obviously major regulatory hurdles to overcome, with safety being the leading concern. And riders must get comfortable sitting in a car that has no one behind the wheel (or no wheel at all). These are big question marks that no one has answers for at this point. Time will tell how things play out. This means that investors who are comfortable buying the stock today are implying that Tesla will find monster success with its FSD capabilities, enough so that the company's earnings power will be substantially higher five or 10 years from now. That's a bet I'll gladly skip out on. There remains a good possibility that Tesla's business model doesn't change. And in the future, this company could still be selling EVs. In that scenario, something the Tesla bulls would not be pleased with, Tesla would be deserving of a much lower P/E multiple. Ever feel like you missed the boat in buying the most successful stocks? Then you'll want to hear this. On rare occasions, our expert team of analysts issues a 'Double Down' stock recommendation for companies that they think are about to pop. If you're worried you've already missed your chance to invest, now is the best time to buy before it's too late. And the numbers speak for themselves: Nvidia: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2009, you'd have $427,709!* Apple: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2008, you'd have $40,087!* Netflix: if you invested $1,000 when we doubled down in 2004, you'd have $671,477!* Right now, we're issuing 'Double Down' alerts for three incredible companies, available when you join , and there may not be another chance like this anytime soon.*Stock Advisor returns as of July 14, 2025 Suzanne Frey, an executive at Alphabet, is a member of The Motley Fool's board of directors. Neil Patel has no position in any of the stocks mentioned. The Motley Fool has positions in and recommends Alphabet, Tesla, and Uber Technologies. The Motley Fool recommends Lyft. The Motley Fool has a disclosure policy. 1 Thing That Matters Most for Tesla Stock Investors was originally published by The Motley Fool Sign in to access your portfolio
