Royal Mail allowed to scrap second-class post on Saturdays
However, new reforms will allow the firm to stop delivering second-class mail on Saturdays and, instead, deliver it on an alternative mid-week day.
First-class stamps will remain unaffected by this change, with letters using these still being delivered six days a week.
We're reforming the UK's postal service so it delivers what people need:
✅ First Class still next-day Mon-Sat
📆 Second Class: every other weekday
🛑 New delivery targets to cut long delays
💷 2nd class stamp price cap remains
🔗 https://t.co/QBIaH4uHzj pic.twitter.com/JO3RN45GXN
Discussing the change, Natalie Black, Ofcom's group director for networks and communications, said: "These changes are in the best interests of consumers and businesses, as urgent reform of the postal service is necessary to give it the best chance of survival."
'But changing Royal Mail's obligations alone won't guarantee a better service – the company now has to play its part and implement this effectively.
'We'll be making sure Royal Mail is clear with its customers about what's happening, and passes the benefits of these changes on to them.'
Other recent changes mean the company will have to deliver 90% of first-class mail next day, down from the current target of 93%, according to the BBC.
95% of second-class mail must be delivered within three days, a cut from the current 98.5%.
There will also be a new target of 99% of mail being delivered no more than two days late to incentivise Royal Mail to cut down on long delays.
The regulator has said that from July 28, Royal Mail will be allowed to axe the six-day-a-week delivery for second-class stamps.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Independent
an hour ago
- The Independent
Government defends Online Safety Act after X claims it threatens free speech
The Government has defended the Online Safety Act after Elon Musk's X said the legislation was threatening free speech. In a post titled What Happens When Oversight Becomes Overreach, the platform, formerly known as Twitter, outlined criticism of the act and the 'heavy-handed' UK regulators. The Government countered that it is 'demonstrably false' that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech and said it is not designed to censor political debate. Under rules that came into effect on July 25, online platforms must take steps to prevent children accessing harmful content such as pornography or material that encourages suicide. This includes a new duty for online providers to reduce the risk that users encounter illegal content as well as age verification measures in the UK to access pornographic content. 'As a result, the act's laudable intentions are at risk of being overshadowed by the breadth of its regulatory reach. Without a more balanced, collaborative approach, free speech will suffer,' X said. It accused regulators of taking a 'heavy-handed approach' and said that 'many are now concerned that a plan ostensibly intended to keep children safe is at risk of seriously infringing on the public's right to free expression'. Ofcom said this week it had launched investigations into 34 pornography sites for new age-check requirements. The company said 'a balanced approach is the only way to protect individual liberties, encourage innovation and safeguard children'. A Government spokesperson said: 'It is demonstrably false that the Online Safety Act compromises free speech. 'As well as legal duties to keep children safe, the very same law places clear and unequivocal duties on platforms to protect freedom of expression. Failure to meet either obligation can lead to severe penalties, including fines of up to 10% of global revenue or £18 million, whichever is greater. 'The Act is not designed to censor political debate and does not require platforms to age gate any content other than those which present the most serious risks to children such as pornography or suicide and self-harm content. 'Platforms have had several months to prepare for this law. It is a disservice to their users to hide behind deadlines as an excuse for failing to properly implement it.' Technology Secretary Peter Kyle became embroiled in a row with Nigel Farage earlier this week over Reform UK's pledge that it would scrap the Act if the party came into power. He said the Reform UK leader of being on the side of 'extreme pornographers'.
BBC News
10 hours ago
- BBC News
Car finance judgement 'a hard pill to swallow'
A ruling by the UK's most senior judges later has closed down an opportunity for millions of motorists to claim compensation for motor finance Supreme Court decided not to uphold an earlier ruling which found that hidden commission payments to car dealers were the ruling left open the possibility of claims for compensation for large commissions that were BBC talked to two of the people who brought the case to the Supreme Court, plus a person who is planning to make a claim. 'A really big bag of salt' Marcus Johnson from Cwmbran, Torfaen, was one of the claimants in the landmark described the the outcome as "a bitter pill to swallow", although was awarded just over £1,650 on the grounds that his relationship with the lender was said he was "pleased for myself, but not for the hundreds of others" who will now miss out."It's weird," he said. "It's a win, but it's a really big bag of salt to go with it".He was 27 when he bought a blue Suzuki Swift in 2017, and did not know that the commission had been paid, although the lender said he had signed a after passing his driving test in June of that year he walked into a car dealership, and within an hour was driving away in a car he liked, "very excited".It wasn't until threes years later, when he had paid off the finance on the car, that he realised he still had almost the cash price of the car left to was then he decided to contact the three claimants won their test cases, it could have opened up lenders to compensation claims totalling about £ it stands, that bill could shrink to between £5bn and £13bn, according to accountancy and advice firm BDO. 'There's still meat on the bone' Andrew Wrench has been described as "a postman with a penchant for fast cars".He says that description "made me chuckle". The 61-year-old is ex-forces, and also held other positions before becoming a postman, but he is proud to have been described as "the Erin Brockovich of Stoke-on-Trent".He says he is pleased that Marcus was awarded compensation, and that there will be further claims arising from that judgement."There's still meat on the bone," he says, adding that he is glad he helped throw light on the subject, even though his own case was not successful."I just want people to be accountable, and I don't want them getting away with being deceitful and dishonest," he adds. "It all comes down to: honesty is the best policy."Andrew's lawyer, Kavon Hussain of Consumer Rights Solicitors, says that the judgement was "a mixed bag", but showed that the Supreme Court expected car dealers to "always be acting in their own interests" and people should not expect a good deal. 'I'm going to chase my claim' Although it has been a mixed result for the claimants in the case, some people are determined to pursue dealers were paid a bigger commission if they sold a higher interest rate on the were known as discretionary commission arrangements (DCAs) and were banned by regulators in Caffrey, from Blackburn, bought a car in 2009 after maternity leave. Her son was born with certain medical needs, and she wanted a car to get to work and multiple doctor appointments."I'm going to pursue my claim, but I do feel for the people it's put a stop to," she says. "They won't be compensated and I find that quite sad."Jemma feels she was "taken advantage of as a vulnerable new mum". She trusted the car dealership to give her the best deal it could, and paid a high interest rate for her blue Corsa, which she named "Colin". It was not until years later, having read about car finance in the local press, that she went to a law firm to bring a now intends to pursue it.
The Independent
19 hours ago
- The Independent
Rules for UK waste tyres tightened after millions sent to furnaces in India
The environment watchdog said it will tighten rules around exporting waste tyres from the UK after millions were found to be going to makeshift furnaces in India that omit toxic fumes. Under UK waste regulations, used tyres can be shipped to overseas for recycling, with official figures suggesting around 25 million tyres (about 350,000 tonnes) are sent to India every year. But the Environment Agency launched an internal review earlier this year after a BBC investigation heard that millions were actually going to unregulated dumps or illegal industrial plants where they would undergo a heating process that releases carcinogenic gasses and heavy metals. The broadcaster found the plants have been causing serious health problems among workers and nearby communities as well as environmental damage. The Environment Agency published its review online on Friday, which said the regulator had failed to ensure it was fulfilling its legal obligations for overseeing the export of UK waste tyres to India. The report found it 'highly likely' that a proportion of these tyres are being diverted to illegal furnaces on arrival in the country. It also said the watchdog 'cannot assume' based on the incomplete information it held that tyres are being properly recovered or treated in an environmentally sound manner, as required under UK waste shipment rules. The Environment Agency said it 'should take further steps' to ensure it is meeting its legal obligations and pledged to implement 'enhanced verification' checks on all shipments of waste tyres to India from October 1. This means firms that arrange shipments to India will need to demonstrate that the waste tyres will be recovered in an environmentally sound way. The agency will also use its legal powers to prevent individual shipments if it is not satisfied by the provided evidence. Pressure group Fighting Dirty, which campaigns against environmental dumping abroad, welcomed the move after it had threatened legal action over the issue of tyre exports. Georgia Elliott-Smith, founding director of Fighting Dirty, said: 'This is a landmark moment in our fight to hold the UK to account for the toxic trail it leaves in other countries. 'The Government has finally admitted what we've known all along, that our waste tyres are being illegally burned in India, poisoning communities and destroying the environment. 'It should never have taken the threat of legal action to force this level of honesty.' But Ms Elliott-Smith also warned that the group will be watching closely to ensure the new measures are fully implemented and enforced. Law firm Leigh Day, which represented the campaign group, said in a statement: 'This report vindicates our client's concerns and confirms that the UK Government has not been doing enough to fulfil its legal duty to ensure waste tyres exported to India are processed safely and legally. 'The Environment Agency's commitment to strengthen its regulatory approach is a direct result of the legal action we pursued on behalf of Fighting Dirty, together with investigations by the (Office for Environmental Protection) and BBC. 'We are considering the review in detail and will continue to monitor the implementation of these changes closely.' An Environment Agency spokesperson said: 'Following concerns raised around waste exports, the Environment Agency has completed a review into its approach for regulating the export of waste tyres. 'We are taking direct action based on the review's findings and will launch enhanced verification checks for all waste tyres exported to India to ensure they are handled in an environmentally sound manner. 'We have shared the review with ministers and will continue to work with the UK Government on their long-term plans to improve the way waste shipments are controlled.'
