AI and cloud growth demands smarter security for SMBs
The power of AI is undisputable, from automation to sharper customer insights, AI has become foundational to business strategy. According to Forrester's report 'The Future of Operations', commissioned by Crayon in early 2025, 61% of APAC SMBs plan to implement or expand AI within the next two years. Those already investing are seeing results: they're 20% more likely to report revenue growth of 15% or more.
But with this opportunity comes pressure. The same technologies enabling growth are also exposing critical infrastructure, data, and processes to risk. Security and privacy are now the top IT priority for 76% of SMBs, and 74% cite compliance as a key driver of AI investment.
While AI is undoubtably fueling innovation and market expansion, the flip side is a sharp increase in cybersecurity challenges that businesses can't afford to ignore.
A gap between strategy and security
AI has also become a key force in enhancing cybersecurity measures across APAC, particularly in areas like threat detection and response. But while benefits are clear, many businesses, especially SMBs, are struggling to put the right guardrails in place.
The challenge is clear: many SMBs are ambitious, but not always equipped. Nearly half face difficulties preparing data for AI workloads, and over 40% report persistent performance issues - including managing computing, storage, and networking infrastructure. The result? Slower progress, rising costs, and widening exposure.
These aren't just technical gaps. They reflect a strategic misalignment between innovation and readiness. And too often, organisations are still relying on outdated systems and fragmented security frameworks while adopting cutting-edge technologies.
As AI becomes embedded into every layer of business, cyber risks become systemic. Alert fatigue, false positives, and blind trust in black-box AI systems all chip away at resilience. And when systems fail, the cost isn't just financial, it's reputational, operational, and regulatory.
Securing smart growth
The truth is too many businesses are still navigating these changes without the clarity or confidence they need. Security can't be an afterthought. It must be lifecycle-led, integrated into every stage of cloud and AI adoption, with an honest conversation at the start.
What are the vulnerabilities across your data, identities, applications and devices? Where do you need visibility? What does risk actually look like for your business model?
Then comes a risk-informed plan that aligns with local regulations, embeds trust in every decision, and adapts as threats evolve.
Workforces are hybrid, infrastructures are distributed, and data lives everywhere. That's why today's security models need to take on a 'Zero Trust' approach assuming nothing and verifying everything.
APAC, where stakes are high
In a region like the Asia Pacific, where cybersecurity regulations are tightening fast – such as the upcoming Cyber Security Act and Malaysia and progressive legislature in Singapore - aligning AI adoption with national standards is essential. Businesses that build security into their AI roadmap from the start are the ones best positioned to scale safely and competitively.
The promise of AI and cloud growth is immense, but so are the stakes. For SMBs, success means walking the line between innovation and risk with a clear strategy and the right partners. With the right mindset, models, and partner support, businesses can harness the power of AI - securely, sustainably, and competitively.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsroom
3 hours ago
- Newsroom
NZ's AI strategy: ‘light touch' regulation and business opportunities
The Government's AI strategy confirms the country is taking a light-touch approach to AI regulation. This will provide reassurance to businesses looking to embrace the benefits of AI, while also reminding businesses of their governance responsibilities and the need to ensure compliance with existing legal frameworks. The AI strategy follows recent guidance for the public sector, discussed in our previous article. Alongside the AI strategy, the Government has also issued a note entitled 'Responsible AI Guidance for Businesses'. In this article, we explore the key takeaways for New Zealand businesses and next steps. Key takeaways The AI strategy has been developed following a Cabinet decision in July 2024 committing to a strategic approach. The paper recognised a clear strategic direction would 'clear the path for AI to deliver better outcomes for people in New Zealand'. The new strategy seeks to achieve this in various ways: Regulatory clarity and light touch legislation The strategy notes uncertainty about how existing laws apply to AI may result in 'a cautious approach to AI implementation until regulatory clarity improves'. As a result, it confirms New Zealand is taking a light touch and 'principles-based' approach to AI policy. It helpfully identifies New Zealand has existing regulatory frameworks (e.g., privacy, consumer protection, human rights) which are largely principles-based and technology-neutral, and which can be updated if needed to enable AI innovation. This is a pragmatic and positive approach we expect will provide reassurance to businesses exploring the adoption of AI, and will avoid some of the challenges created by detailed standalone legislation such as the EU's AI Act (as discussed in our prior commentary here). Adoption focus The strategy outlines New Zealand's deliberate focus on AI adoption rather than development. That recognises the economic challenge and significant investment required for creating foundational AI. This approach is intended to 'more rapidly realise productivity benefits across the economy without waiting for local AI development to mature'. Upskilling the workforce It identifies that New Zealand faces a shortage of AI expertise across several sectors. The paper notes New Zealand universities are helping to bridge the gap by building a 'future-ready' workforce through specialised programmes, and notes the Government's investment in tuition, STEM, and youth support to boost enrolment and career pathways. In addition, the new 'Responsible AI Guidance' offers a valuable framework to help businesses adopt AI responsibly and effectively. The guidance encourages organisations to clearly define their purpose for using AI, prepare thorough stakeholder engagement and safe testing, and align AI objectives with internal policies. It also recommends building strong governance structures and ensuring compliance with existing regulations. The guidance emphasises the importance of high-quality, unbiased data and cautions against using AI in areas where human judgment is essential. What does this mean for your business? The strategy will provide reassurance to businesses seeking to adopt AI systems, and the Responsible AI Guidance offers a helpful consolidated roadmap. In practice, however, the application of the recommendations can be complex and businesses should start thinking early about the implications of the Government's announcement and how they can respond to the new guidance. We summarise below what we see as the key takeaways and next steps: Clarify your AI purpose: Define what you want AI to achieve in your organisation and ensure the intended use is lawful and aligned with your business goals. Prepare for adoption: This should include identifying current processes that are inefficient and could benefit from AI, engaging with stakeholders for input, and testing solutions in controlled environments like AI sandboxes. Build internal capability: Set up dedicated teams to identify the business's AI objectives and values, develop internal principles to guide the responsible and ethical use of AI, and develop consistent principles and terminology across the business. Establish governance frameworks: Form a governance team to oversee risk, compliance, and regulatory alignment, and maintain transparent communication with stakeholders to build trust. Ensure data quality and ethical use: Use clean, unbiased data to train AI systems, and avoid deploying AI in areas where human judgment is critical to protect individuals' rights and wellbeing. In addition, given the Government's light-touch regulatory approach and preference for relying on existing legal frameworks, it will be critical for businesses to ensure they are familiar with how current laws will apply to the new technology. That should include in particular ensuring that:
NZ Herald
4 hours ago
- NZ Herald
AI's increasing lies may reflect it is learning to become more human
It's anticipated that OpenAI's web browser will include ChatGPT features built in, among other attributes. A Kiwi, Ben Goodger, is also reportedly heavily involved in its plans. But as we dive headfirst into this new AI-fuelled future, we should demand that this new technology gets the basics right first. Over the past 30 years the internet has opened up our world. We can connect with people and enjoy endless volumes of information with the click of a button. It's a scene out of the Jetsons, minus the flying cars – for now. Traditionally, most internet searches have given the user an exhaustively long list of links to websites with varying degrees of relevant information. The user can then sort through what they find and determine what is most helpful, discarding the rest. However, with AI (artificial intelligence) tools acting as an aggregator, scraping the depths of the internet for whatever information it can find, we must ask: how reliable are its replies to our questions? Well, the growing evidence suggests the reliability is not good. When researching for a story, Google's AI Overview, which provides a summary in response to a user's search prompt, confidently asserted to the Herald that Jim Bolger was a Labour Prime Minister. Even more concerning, however, was that its answer cited official New Zealand Government websites as the source for this information. Bolger spent his entire political career in Parliament with the National Party, so predictably these 'sources' contained no information to support the falsehood. This is an example of what is now commonly referred to as an AI hallucination. It is when the system's algorithm generates information that seems plausible but is totally fabricated. Some of these hallucinations could be relatively minor, but others could be gross misrepresentations of the world we live in and our history. In a New York Times article, published by the Herald on Sunday earlier this year, researchers found the hallucination rate appeared to be increasing. The newest and most powerful systems – called reasoning systems – from companies including OpenAI and Google were generating more errors, not fewer. On one test, the hallucination rates of newer AI systems were as high as 79%. This hardly seems like a piece of technology we can or should be relying on to make sense of our world or teach others about it. We should use AI to help us where it can and there are already basic functions where it performs well, but we need to be wary of the evangelists who preach it as the answer to all our productivity and economic woes. The matter of why AI is having more Jim Morrison-like hallucinations has confused both the technology's creators and sceptical researchers. Perhaps it wants to please us? Perhaps it wants to give us the answers we want to hear – confirming the bias in our questions. Perhaps it is learning to act more human? Sign up to the Daily H, a free newsletter curated by our editors and delivered straight to your inbox every weekday.
The Spinoff
12 hours ago
- The Spinoff
Why The Spinoff is explaining the news on TikTok, explained
This week we launch Now You Know, a video series explaining issues that matter to young people. Head of audience Anna Rawhiti-Connell explains why. Last week, I was brainstorming something and threw a few stats on social media use and attention into Gemini. The AI yelled its summary back at me with this headline: 'THE ATTENTION APOCALYPSE'. We all know generative AI has bias, and that includes one towards bad news. It's hard to avoid headlines full of worry and fear about everything these days, and that applies to ones about social media, media and journalism. 'News avoidance' and 'declining trust in media' have become phrases that roll quickly and easily off the tongues of those of us in biz, keeping many of us awake at night and in constant conversation about what it means and why. The Reuters Institute Digital News report – compulsory reading for many in our industry, alongside the NZ On Air Where Are the Audiences survey – is rich with insight, and this year's report presented a tipping point for news consumption behaviour among under-35s in the United States. Over half (54% of 18–24s and 50% of 25–34s) now identify social media and video networks as their main source of news. Globally, across all 48 markets surveyed, 44% of 18–24-year-olds and 38% of 25–34-year-olds cite social media and video networks as their primary news source. New Zealand is not one of the markets surveyed, and we have our unique news landscape, but it's safe to assume these trends are being replicated here. The 2024 Where Are the Audiences survey showed global video sharing platforms (YouTube, Facebook, Instagram, TikTok) reach 90% of 15-24-year-olds. These findings are often presented in concerning tones, for many good reasons. Sometimes they're framed as a lack of engagement with news as we've known it among younger people, or patronisingly, as indifference. If you've spent any time on #nzpol TikTok or watching YouTube essays, you know that isn't true. There are always reasons to worry about where people get their information and the dominance of global tech companies. Sources have split into thousands of tributaries, people are more polarised, and the phrase 'post-truth' has been in widespread circulation for nearly a decade. There are also opportunities to change and meet people where they are. Describing the battle for control of your screen between Netflix and YouTube, and referencing the old go-to for the entertainment industry, 'content is king,' a talent executive for William Morris recently said, these days 'audience is king'. There isn't a silver bullet for addressing many of the challenges the industry faces and the problems a highly fragmented information environment creates. Fuelling our appetite for innovating, coming down from the mountain and meeting people where they are are just some of the things we can do. Now You Know, the new video explainer series we're launching today, is about meeting people where they are. Aimed at young people between the ages of 18-24, its goal is to create reliable, regular and relevant news explainers about issues that matter to young people. Another vital component part is a reliable and regular face at the helm each week. That's where Robbie Nicol comes in. Well known to audiences as the creator of the award-winning political commentary web series White Man Behind A Desk and writer and host of RNZ's The Citizen's Handbook, he'll be writing and fronting a lot of the videos, with appearances from the wider team at The Spinoff. If video isn't your thing, you'll find nothing much about The Spinoff changes. If it is, people of all ages are welcome to watch. With the boring bit over, I'll leave it to a superior explainer, Robbie, to tell you what Now You Know is and where you can watch it.
