Facts That Should Be Common Knowledge But Aren't
Recently, Reddit user Shag_Dawg was curious about those type of facts when they asked: "What's your biggest 'how do people NOT know this?' fact?"
The thread got thousands of responses, from misconceptions because of myths to misunderstandings of common science concepts. Below are some of the the top and most often repeated comments:
"The Underground Railroad was not a literal subterranean locomotive."
—George_W_Bushdiver
"Green peppers are just immature red peppers that were harvested before they were ripe."
—FigBug
"Percentages are reversible. Like, 8% of 25 is the same as 25% of 8, and one of them is much easier to do in your head."
—MirSydney
"Copy and pasting: Ctrl+C and Ctrl+V. The number of people who go through life working in a corporate office and have no idea about this is astounding. Truly worrying."
—toby_gray
"Jalapenos and chipotles are the same peppers, chipotles are just smoked."
—UnsorryCanadian
"Butterflies have four wings, not two."
—heralies
"The Better Business Bureau is not a government agency. They don't hold any legal power."
—LizardPossum
"There are 4 quarts in a gallon because they are quarter gallons."
—Vivid_Obscurity
"All Visa credit cards start with a 4. All Mastercard credit cards start with a 5. All Amex credit cards start with a 3. And Discover starts with 6."
—No-Chapter1389
"Cows have to get pregnant to make milk — they don't just make milk."
—flavouredicecubes
"Don't center your plates or bowls in the microwave. It heats better off-center. There's like a dead spot in the middle. That's why the bowls get hot but the food stays cold."
—shroomie19
"Flammable and inflammable mean the same thing."
—white_hart_2
"Plants can emit 'screams' at certain frequencies when in danger."
—Vivid-restaurant99
"I'm sad to say that I know people who only use Excel for its razor-sharp rows and columns, with no idea that Excel can calculate the numbers that go into their razor-sharp rows and columns."
—hymie0
"That the ancestors of whales lived on land and had legs. It's shocking how many people don't know that."
—GraphicDesignMonkey
"That you can't actually see the Great Wall of China from space with the naked eye. Still blows my mind how many people believe this."
—Kaerevek
"When you're using a spray product to disinfect or clean a surface, you have to let it sit for a few minutes. It will tell you how long you have to wait for the bottle. If you just spray something and immediately wipe it up, it's not getting the job done right."
—HamHockShortDock
"Peanuts are not nuts, they are legumes. So approximately 20% of people with a peanut allergy are also allergic to lentils, etc."
—Kamic1980
"Blood is not blue in your veins. It is always red. A darker red, but still red. Your veins look blue because of the way your skin and tissue interact with light."
—The_Queen_Zsofia
"The moon is out during the day just as much as it is out at night."
—ryan1987mn
"An undercover cop doesn't have to tell you they're a cop. Cops can lie to you, but you can't lie to cops. Even if you're innocent, don't talk to the police without a lawyer present."
—sc0n3z
"Not everyone has an internal monologue. For some people, thoughts are purely conceptual. They do not have a narrative voice in their head."
—NotoriusPCP
And lastly, "The yolk is not the part of the egg that turns into a chicken."
—quartzgirl71
You can read the original thread on Reddit.
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Newsweek
5 hours ago
- Newsweek
Couple Take 'Romantic' Beach Pic—Horror As They Fear Danger in Plain Sight
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. A woman has shared a shocking story of how she believed she almost killed her husband—by asking him to pose for a romantic photo. Aslıhan, 52, who gave her first name only, is originally from Turkey but now lives in California with her family, whom she described to Newsweek as loving "snorkeling and exploring marine life." After the associated restrictions of the COVID-19 pandemic came to an end, the family decided to celebrate with an unforgettable vacation to Bora Bora, a tranquil island in French Polynesia, famous for its luxury resorts and stunning marine life. And, one day, walking on the shore, Aslıhan said she "spotted a beautiful shell," which she picked up and placed on her husband's hand for a romantic photo, before returning it to where she found it. Aslıhan didn't think much of it again—until, years later, her kids saw a video "about deadly sea creatures," and appeared to recognize the shell from their parents' photo. When she later asked ChatGPT to identify the creature in the photo, it determined it "looked like a venomous cone snail." Cone snails, within the Conidae family, are predatory gastropod mollusks. The venom from just one snail is hypothesized to have the potential to kill up to 700 humans, according to a report published in the National Library of Medicine. Tourists may inadvertently pick up the creatures, thinking it is a harmless snail or a shell souvenir, and several humans have died from envenomation from the cone snail—with injuries most often occurring on the palms and fingers. Aslıhan's husband holds the shell she picked up on the beach. Aslıhan's husband holds the shell she picked up on the beach. Reddit u/KremKaramela Aslıhan was horrified, and took to Reddit's r/Wellthatsucks via her account u/KremKaramela on August 5, where she shared the photo and wrote: "I almost killed my husband. "I found this beautiful shell in Bora Bora and put it on my husband's hand we took a 'romantic' photo only to learn years later that its venom is deadly," she wrote, adding: "It gives me chills every time I think I put my husband's life in danger." Reddit users had a big reaction, awarding the post more than 53,000 upvotes; however, many commenters rushed to assure Aslıhan that she may not, in fact, have almost killed her husband. As one commenter put it: "This is a Mitra mitra. Not a cone snail, and not deadly. However, it's still a good reminder to not pick up random sea creatures." Another agreed: "Pretty sure this is just a mitra mitra shell, very commonly sold and I can't find anything about poison." Read more Woman picks up shell—only to learn it's one of the deadliest on Earth Woman picks up shell—only to learn it's one of the deadliest on Earth "It's almost definitely mitra mitra as others have pointed out. Absolve your guilt, your husband was safe," a third posted, adding: "It is best to not touch animals in the wild, because you really never know, but also because they deserve to live their lives without being bothered or handled by humans." And, in positive news, the Marine Biological Association (MBA) confirmed to Newsweek that the creature is indeed an episcopal miter, Mitra mitra. This species of large sea snail is harmless to humans. However, the MBA recommends that, if a member of the public needs to identify a shell, they should send an image, location and habitat to the Conchological Society email, marine@ Aslıhan told Newsweek it was "definitely a relief to hear it might not have been the deadly species, but I'm still upset with myself for possibly putting us at risk." "We haven't returned to Bora Bora since, but this experience wouldn't stop us from going back," she said. "That said, I'll never again pick up or handle any unknown marine life—lesson learned!"
National Geographic
a day ago
- National Geographic
Why synthetic pot could be the future of pain relief
Photographs by Sergiy Barchuk This article is part of The New Cannabis, a National Geographic exploration into the most critical questions raised by today's stronger, stranger, ever more accessible weed. Learn more. They call it the holy grail of pain-relief research: a medicine that is comparable to the strongest opioids but lacks their potentially devastating side effects. When biophysicist and structural biologist Kaavya Krishna Kumar set out looking for a novel way to develop one, she knew she needed to start with a substance that hit the body incredibly hard. So she took to the seedier corners of the online forum Reddit, where she learned about an illicit street drug with a reputation for making people both very high and very sick. 'It's OUT OF THIS WORLD POTENT,' read one recreational user's post. 'A very, very small, almost invisible amount of powder skyrockets you into stoned euphoria.' The drug is called FUBINACA, and it's what's known as a synthetic cannabinoid, a molecule designed in a lab to target the same parts of the nervous system affected by tetrahydrocannabinol, or THC, the main psychoactive compound in cannabis. Underground chemists have been making drugs like it since the early 2000s, when recreational marijuana was still criminalized in the United States and synthetic cannabinoids began catching on as cheap, quasi-legal alternatives. From their powdered form, they're typically dissolved into solvents, which are then sprayed onto plant shreds to be sold, with a wink, as incense or potpourri. 'Not for human consumption,' the label may read—a dodge against regulation. Sold under monikers like spice or K2, these gray market synthetics have raised public health alarms for both their toxicity and their contamination risks. The exact chemicals and their concentrations can vary from product to product, with side effects ranging from mania to heart attacks. But Krishna Kumar—then at Stanford Medicine, now at Weill Cornell Medicine—saw in FUBINACA a tool for better understanding how our pain-management system works. And after some clever molecular modeling, she and a team led by researchers from Stanford and Washington University School of Medicine in St. Louis devised an innovative way of modifying it. Earlier this year, the team published a study showing a FUBINACA-derived drug providing sustained pain relief in mice, seemingly without psychoactive or tolerance-building side effects. Such side effects have stymied progress on other would-be cannabinoid pain relievers, dampening enthusiasm for what once seemed like a promising opioid alternative. Now some scientists hope the research can breathe new life into that work—and perhaps open up even wider therapeutic frontiers. Fubinaca wasn't always a street drug. It was developed by Pfizer and patented in 2009, part of an effort to create 'a superpowered aspirin with no side effects,' according to former Pfizer chemist Darin Jones. Like THC, synthetic cannabinoids activate a powerful chemical receptor known as CB1. In humans and other mammals, CB1 is found on nerve cells in the brain and, crucially, on cells elsewhere in the body. It's known to influence not only the perception of pain but also sleep, metabolism, and memory, making it a promising target for pharmaceutical research. (A second cannabinoid receptor, CB2, seems mostly to regulate the functions of immune cells.) Of course, the path to market for any new drug must take into account future profitability. And while it's unclear just what scuttled Pfizer's research, Jones theorizes it had to do with the increasing legality of medical marijuana, which was suddenly 'pennies a pound' at proliferating dispensaries. But when the company published its patent, that became a blueprint for so-called garage chemists to replicate the formula and create analogues. The U.S. Drug Enforcement Administration reports that law enforcement has encountered hundreds of different synthetic cannabinoids, most of them manufactured in Asia. Variants of Pfizer's FUBINACA, the first of which was detected in Japan in 2012, are known as some of the most toxic. In 2014 dozens of deaths in Russia were linked to an analogue called MDMB-FUBINACA. Two years later, another variant was behind a mass overdose in Brooklyn, New York, that the media characterized as a 'zombie outbreak.' But Krishna Kumar hoped to pick up where Pfizer left off, harnessing that potency. First, she examined how MDMB-FUBINACA attached to human CB1 receptors in a dish. Compared to other synthetic cannabinoids, she found, it held tighter and activated effects more powerfully. Then, using a Nobel Prize–winning technology called cryo-electron microscopy (cryo-EM), she flash froze that FUBINACA molecule while it was affixed to CB1 and scanned the conjoined pair with a beam of electrons. The result was a 3D picture, down to individual atoms, of how the drug fit so well into a pocket, or binding site, on the receptor's surface—like a key in a lock. Chronic pain affects as many as one in five people worldwide. As early as the Middle Ages, Arab physicians sought dosages of cannabis that 'killed pain but did not intoxicate,' wrote historian Martin Booth. That image provided a starting point for designing new versions of FUBINACA that might, by stimulating the receptor in new ways, keep the original's potency while limiting side effects. For that, Krishna Kumar turned to Susruta Majumdar, a Washington University chemist and pharmacologist, whose lab had previously shown that activating a particular site on an opioid receptor could inhibit chemical reactions that lead to tolerance. Might this be possible for CB1? The researchers knew that CB1, a cousin to that opioid receptor, had a potential binding site with similar qualities—but it was deep inside the receptor and, in Krishna Kumar's cryo-EM snapshot, blocked by clusters of atoms. It was also the wrong shape to fit FUBINACA. So Majumdar's team started sketching bespoke attachments for the cannabinoid, chains of atoms that might help the molecule worm its way in. Meanwhile, Stanford scientists took another approach, animating the static snapshot using computer simulations, showing how atoms in the drug and the receptor moved around each other. The simulations revealed something surprising: The atom clusters blocking that tantalizing site sporadically moved aside, opening what biochemists call a cryptic pocket, allowing researchers a glimpse in. Tweaking their designs to fit, Majumdar's team made one other crucial adjustment in the hope of nixing FUBINACA's psychoactive side effects. The newly accessible site, it turned out, could accept a compound with a positive electric charge, which hinders a molecule from crossing the membrane separating blood from the brain. By tacking a charged group of atoms onto FUBINACA, researchers confined its activity to CB1 receptors outside the brain—where it can't get anyone high or act on the brain's reward circuitry, limiting risks of misuse and abuse. New versions of FUBINACA were injected into rodents experiencing various kinds of pain. And one variant, which the researchers called VIP36, showed indicators of relieving chronic pain from three different sources—inflammation, nerve damage, and headaches—even after days of repeated injections. True, says Washington University neurobiologist Robert Gereau, all that molecular tinkering had reduced the drug's potency—and thus its pain-relieving effects. But where that might have left other cannabinoids toothless, Gereau says, VIP36 remained 'effective in a range that is useful clinically,' precisely because FUBINACA packed such a wallop to begin with. VIP36 is still in its baby steps phase. It has yet to be tested in humans, who have fewer CB1 receptors outside of their brains than rodents do. And, for now, the new compound can't be taken orally, only injected. But even if the drug never reaches your medicine cabinet, the research could still chart new pharmaceutical paths. For one, it might occasion a reassessment from those skeptical of cannabinoids' potential as medicine—a constituency that includes the world's largest pain-research organization, the International Association for the Study of Pain, whose official position is that science has so far failed to prove cannabinoids either safe or effective. 'This is the perfect paper to help re-put steam into the cannabinoid field,' says Michael Burton, a neuroscientist and cannabinoid researcher at the University of Texas at Dallas. What's more, Majumdar says, there may be other cryptic pockets in other receptors related to CB1, many of which have nothing to do with pain. Some have been linked to heart disease, for instance, or substance abuse disorders. This opens an enticing possibility: What the researchers have learned about changing a receptor's behavior could help them tinker with a whole range of drugs. Majumdar is already planning to revisit a previous study that unsuccessfully targeted a hard-to-reach opioid receptor. He imagines redesigning antidepressants, maybe cancer drugs. 'Targeting diseases beyond pain is expected in the near future,' he says. 'We are just scratching the surface.' This story appears in the September 2025 issue of National Geographic magazine. Set Design: Mat Cullen, Lalaland Artists
Newsweek
a day ago
- Newsweek
Plant Owner Accidentally Feeds It Creatine—Internet Wants Answers
Based on facts, either observed and verified firsthand by the reporter, or reported and verified from knowledgeable sources. Newsweek AI is in beta. Translations may contain inaccuracies—please refer to the original content. Creatine is a popular performance enhancer for athletes, known for helping muscles power through short bursts of activity. But what happens when you give it to a plant instead? One Reddit user who goes by Best_Sheepherder5438 shared a photo of a plant on a table. The August 6 post, titled "I accidentally put creatine in my plant," quickly gained traction, earning 1,200 upvotes and a flood of comments from amused and curious gardeners. To get to the root of the matter, Newsweek spoke with Mike Carthew, a geography specialist focusing on ecology and climate change, and owner of the gardening education site Garden Footprint. He said: "Spraying a plant with creatine is a creative experiment, but it probably won't smash out a personal best on the bench press. Creatine enhances the fueling of muscle cells, but plants run on an entirely different energy system—they make their own energy from sunlight, CO₂, and water via photosynthesis." He added: "They have no pathways to use creatine directly, so the most that might happen is soil microbes metabolizing it into nitrogen compounds. In short: you won't have done any harm, but stick to liquid seaweed fertilizer in future and keep the creatine for yourself." Reddit Reacts Many users leaned into the humor of the situation. "You are going to walk in one day and hear a deep voice say, 'Bro, can you spot me?' In all seriousness, flush the soil out and hope for the best," one commenter wrote. "Ok here's a more important question. Did you drink miracle grow? Is it working better then creatine? Let me know!" asked another. A third commenter shared a story: "My nan had an orchid on her window, and honestly I'd never seen one as plentiful or luscious as it. It easily had 40 flowers on its stems. I asked what she did that kept it so amazing. 'When I finish my redbull I rinse the can with water and water the plant.' Never had the guts to try it myself." "My husband's grandma has the same luscious orchids and she told me her secret was to give them black coffee once in a while. Just a drip of black coffee mixed with water," another user revealed. Coffee Grounds and Plant Growth A stock image of a man watering his indoor plants. A stock image of a man watering his indoor plants. Ольга Симонова/iStock / Getty Images Plus Coffee in the garden isn't just an old wives' tale. In fact, science suggests it can have real benefits. Overusing chemical fertilizers can harm soil, making it harder for plants to grow naturally. The coffee industry, however, produces a significant amount of waste—particularly used coffee grounds—that could help fix this problem. These grounds are rich in natural compounds that improve soil structure, boost nutrients, and support plant growth, while also reducing food waste and environmental pollution. In a 2024 study, researchers tested how different treatments—chemical fertilizer, worm compost (vermicompost), and used coffee grounds—impacted the growth of red radishes and soil quality. They experimented with coffee grounds mixed into fertilizer at various levels (5 percent, 10 percent, 25 percent, and 50 percent) and as a top dressing in doses of 0.5 g, 1 g, and 2.5 g. The findings were striking: the 0.5 g coffee ground top layer produced the tallest plants (average 18.47 cm) and heaviest weights (average 27.54 g), while the 50 percent vermicompost treatment yielded the largest leaves (average 58.32 cm²). The researchers concluded that used coffee grounds could be an eco-friendly alternative to chemical fertilizers, boosting both plant growth and soil health while promoting sustainable agriculture and recycling.
