logo
Study of Sabah heroine Dang Insum to launch May 21

Study of Sabah heroine Dang Insum to launch May 21

Daily Express18-05-2025
Published on: Sunday, May 18, 2025
Published on: Sun, May 18, 2025 Text Size: KOTA KINABALU: The Institute for Development Studies (Sabah), in collaboration with UMS and UiTM Perlis, will launch a historical research project titled Srikandi Dang Insum: Women's Heroism in Sabah History on May 21 at Hotel Gem, Beaufort. IDS CEO Datuk Ts. Dr. Ramzah Dambul said the study aims to formally document the legacy of Dang Insum, a local heroine who led resistance against the British North Borneo Chartered Company in the late 19th century.
Advertisement Much of Sabah's historical narratives remain oral or artistic, he noted. This initiative seeks to preserve and recognize the contributions of women in Sabah's history, especially as a reference for future generations. It also has potential to support heritage-based tourism and youth identity development. The launch will be officiated by IDS Chairperson Datuk Seri Azizah Mohd Dun and will include a visit to Dang Insum's memorial site in Padas Damit and a research briefing session. * Follow us on Instagram and join our Telegram and/or WhatsApp channel(s) for the latest news you don't want to miss. * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available.
Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Online shopping worsening plastic waste problem
Online shopping worsening plastic waste problem

Daily Express

time17 hours ago

  • Daily Express

Online shopping worsening plastic waste problem

Published on: Thursday, August 21, 2025 Published on: Thu, Aug 21, 2025 By: Abbey Junior Text Size: Tahir said plastics are the other major component of the city's waste, making up close to a third of what DBKK collects. Kota Kinabalu: Sabah's mounting waste problem will not be solved by technology and policies alone unless there is a fundamental shift in public behaviour and better coordination among all stakeholders, says Universiti Malaysia Sabah (UMS) senior lecturer Mohammad Tahir Mapa. Tahir said studies by Kota Kinabalu City Hall (DBKK), including one in 2003, found that about half of all domestic waste in the city is organic — mostly food scraps, vegetables and fish. Advertisement Without proper composting, this material breaks down and releases methane gas, nitrogen oxides and carbon dioxide, all harmful greenhouse gases. 'If we don't compost, organic waste will decompose and release gases that damage the environment. Composting is the most effective way to deal with it,' he said, noting that methane is far more potent than carbon dioxide in trapping heat. Subscribe or LOG IN to access this article. Support Independant Journalism Subscribe to Daily Express Malaysia Access to DE E-Paper Access to DE E-Paper Exclusive News Exclusive News Invites to special events Invites to special events Giveaways & Rewards 1-Year Most Popular (Income Tax Deductible) Explore Plans Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia

- It Was Just A Meme, Until It Wasn't: How Digital Bystanders Enable Harmful Beliefs
- It Was Just A Meme, Until It Wasn't: How Digital Bystanders Enable Harmful Beliefs

Barnama

time21 hours ago

  • Barnama

- It Was Just A Meme, Until It Wasn't: How Digital Bystanders Enable Harmful Beliefs

Opinions on topical issues from thought leaders, columnists and editors. Most of us know someone in a WhatsApp or Telegram group who regularly shares content that's – let's be honest – a little questionable. Maybe it's your uncle forwarding a conspiracy video, a colleague dropping a misogynistic joke, or a friend quietly scrolling through racist memes 'just for the laughs'. (Because sometimes the most dangerous thing in the feed isn't the post, it's the silence that follows.) Radicalisation doesn't always begin with manifestos. More often, it starts with memes – casual, low-stakes content that slips under the radar, spreading unchecked. It isn't just driven by loud extremists shouting into the void, but by the quiet majority who see it, share it, or scroll past it without question. But that curiosity, multiplied across thousands of users who never speak up, creates exactly the kind of silence in which harmful content thrives. Everyone assumes they're just there to observe. And so, no one challenges what's shared. No one says, 'That's not okay.' The silence grows louder, and gradually, it becomes the norm. And when you ask why they stay in those groups, the answer is almost always the same: 'Oh, I'm not like them – I'm just curious.' In my work at the intersection of content regulation and media ethics, I've come to believe that the most dangerous element in an online space is not always the person posting hateful content. It's the silence that surrounds it. That silence isn't passive – it's data. To the algorithms curating our online experiences, silence on harmful content suggests engagement or approval. No reports, no objections, no friction? It must be fine. And to people within those digital communities, silence can feel like social permission. If no one's saying anything, maybe it isn't that bad. Maybe it's even true. This is how hate gets normalised – not with a bang, but with a shrug. The phenomenon is known as the digital version of the bystander effect – where the more people witness harm, the less likely any one person is to intervene. Online, that passivity is multiplied and masked by anonymity. Research shows that in extremist chat groups, over 80% of users never post anything themselves. They don't initiate hate, but they're there – watching, clicking. sharing. And in doing so, they help keep those ecosystems alive. In Malaysia, research by SEARCCT has found that radical content spreads fastest not on public platforms, but in private or semi-private spaces – unmoderated Telegram groups, closed chat rooms, and fringe forums. These aren't necessarily echo chambers of hardened extremists. They're often filled with regular people; friends, colleagues, acquaintances who may disagree with what they see, but stay silent nonetheless. It's no surprise then that many countries have turned to deplatforming as a response. Takedowns, content moderation, algorithm tweaks – these are essential tools in any regulatory arsenal. But they're not silver bullets. In fact, without thoughtful communication, they can backfire. Remove extremist content too swiftly, and its creators are recast as martyrs. Ban a channel without explanation, and you leave behind a vacuum that quickly fills with conspiracy theories. Kick bad actors off a platform, and they don't disappear – they just migrate to more opaque, harder-to-monitor spaces. Simply removing content doesn't remove its influence. The necessity for counterspeech This is where counterspeech becomes not just useful, but necessary. Counterspeech means responding to harmful content with facts, empathy, questions, or alternative narratives. It works best when it's fast, authentic, and comes from peers, not just authorities. The idea is not to out-shout hate, but to interrupt it – early, calmly, and effectively. And there's data to back it up. In Sri Lanka, a PeaceTech Lab pilot found that engagement with hate content dropped by 46% when counterspeech was introduced early. In Germany, civic volunteers who replied to hateful YouTube comments within the first hour helped reduce hate-driven threads by 17%. These aren't massive interventions. They're small, consistent disruptions, and they matter. At the Content Forum, we're building on this idea in many of our initiatives – from our suicide content guidelines to our trainings with influencers, and in our ongoing efforts to educate children and parents about digital friction and media literacy. The goal is not just to clean up digital spaces, but to amplify ethical voices – to give more people the tools and confidence to speak up before harm escalates. Still, the question remains: why don't more people do it? In every training I run, I hear the same three reasons: 'I don't want to be attacked.' 'It's not my place.' 'It won't make a difference.' But the truth is, counterspeech doesn't require you to win the argument. You don't need to craft the perfect reply or go viral with your response. You just need to say something. Even a simple, 'Are we sure this is okay?' is enough to interrupt the flow. It breaks the momentum. It breaches the echo chamber, and often, that's all it takes. Imagine if even a fraction of the millions who scroll past problematic content every day chose to pause – to respond, to report, to redirect. What if the so-called 'silent middle' decided to stop being silent? Silence online is influence Whether we realise it or not, silence online isn't just abstinence – it's influence. It tells the algorithm: this is fine. It tells the community: no one minds. It tells the extremist: no one will stop you. But that doesn't have to be the message we keep sending. If harmful beliefs thrive in silence, then perhaps disruption begins not with noise or outrage, but with clarity, courage, and consistency. We don't need everyone to be loud, social media is loud enough as it is! We just need more people to stop being quiet. Because sometimes, the most dangerous thing in the room isn't the person shouting. It's everyone else saying nothing. -- BERNAMA Mediha Mahmood is a content policy strategist and CEO of the Content Forum, Malaysia's industry forum and self-regulatory organisation for content on electronic media. She focuses on ethical content ecosystems, online safety, and responsible content governance.

Cardboard fire at Maganting Plaza sparks safety warning to traders
Cardboard fire at Maganting Plaza sparks safety warning to traders

Daily Express

time2 days ago

  • Daily Express

Cardboard fire at Maganting Plaza sparks safety warning to traders

Published on: Wednesday, August 20, 2025 Published on: Wed, Aug 20, 2025 By: Ibrahim Tabir Text Size: The blaze is believed to have started from burning cardboard dumped under the staircase of Maganting Plaza. KUNAK: Traders and tenants of commercial buildings here have been reminded not to dump or store flammable items in hidden areas, following a fire incident at Maganting Plaza on Monday. Kunak District Council (MDKNK) Executive Officer Mohd Nazri Pintal said a pile of discarded cardboard boxes found under a staircase was believed to have sparked the fire, which damaged wiring cables and an electrical box. Advertisement Quick action by firefighters prevented the blaze from spreading to shops and offices in the building, including a grocery, clinic, café and AIM branch office. Nazri urged tenants to dispose of waste properly at central bins provided nearby, while enforcement teams will step up patrols to ensure compliance with safety by-laws. The council is also monitoring loitering children seen playing under staircases at the plaza. * Follow us on our official WhatsApp channel and Telegram for breaking news alerts and key updates! * Do you have access to the Daily Express e-paper and online exclusive news? Check out subscription plans available. Stay up-to-date by following Daily Express's Telegram channel. Daily Express Malaysia

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store