UK's sewage-clogged water sector set for total overhaul after landmark report
The Independent Water Commission, pulled together by ex-banker Sir Jon Cunliffe, will set out recommendations to get the industry back on its feet after years of controversy over bills and sewage.
But campaigners including one-time Undertones frontman Feargal Sharkey have said they are sceptical of whether the report can make a difference.
Environment Secretary Steve Reed promised yesterday to halve the sewage pollution in British rivers, lakes and seas by the end of this decade, and make them the cleanest since records began.
In an appearance on Laura Kuenssberg's BBC show, he said he would step down from his role if he failed to achieve this target.
Reed said: 'Politicians come and say we're going to do things. Of course our job should be on the line if we don't.'
He is set to describe the water industry as 'broken' and welcome the recommendations of the report when they drop later today.
It is expected that the abolition of floundering regulator Ofwat will be among those recommendations.
The body has failed to stop record amounts of sewage being pumped into English and Welsh waterways, as executives' pay and dividends soar at the private water companies.
On Sunday, Reed said Ofwat was 'clearly failing' though he would not confirm it was destined for the scrap heap.
Scotland and Northern Ireland both have nationalised water systems.
Sir Jon said: 'In this report, I have considered what is best for the long-term future of water. More Trending
'This is a complex sector with a highly integrated system, responsible for the second-largest infrastructure programme in the UK.'
However, water campaigner Feargal Sharkey has voiced doubt over whether the Commission will change the dire situation, saying he fears it will prove to be a 'flat pancake'.
He argued: 'Sir Jon's job is to make the current system better, but so many things have not been considered in his review, such as the ownership of the water companies.
'I also don't think you can talk about abolishing Ofwat without considering the future of the Environment Agency – and taking a long, hard look at the Environment Department (Defra), as well as the lack of action from government ministers for many years. They are just as culpable.'
Get in touch with our news team by emailing us at webnews@metro.co.uk.
For more stories like this, check our news page.
MORE: Afghan veteran warns data breach poses shadow threat 'for years to come'
MORE: Plane crashes at Olympic National Park killing one and injuring two
MORE: One leaked government email could put my family in grave danger
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Spectator
3 minutes ago
- Spectator
How Britain ended up in the Afghan asylum mess
The Afghan data leak has generated a mass of lurid headlines and, no doubt, there is still much analysis, pointing of fingers and assigning of blame to come. But how did it happen that the UK ended up with such an obligation to so many thousands of Afghans and their families? I support the evacuation, but clarity of ends does not necessarily justify the means. My assessment is that between 2014 and 2021 – when we, along with other Isaf nations, had moved from a combat to a support and capacity-building role – we took our eye off the ball. We accumulated liabilities but had no real mechanism to understand or control them. In this we were hampered by the particular feature of the UK's capacity-building: our focus was not on the main bulk of the Afghan security forces but on specialist units such as counter-narcotic forces, police commandos and intelligence units. (They were often known by their 'task force' designation, TF 444, TF 222, etc, hence the common nickname 'triples'.) The specialist units attracted the expertise and engagement of our special forces and intelligence agencies. They were highly successful, noted for their competence and effectiveness, and unlike the locally 'employed' civilians, of whom the interpreters are the best-known examples, the triples were employed by their Afghan ministries, not the British Armed Forces. The reality, however, was somewhat different. They were trained, mentored, supported, and in many cases, paid directly by us: their independence from us, in short, was nominal and hence they can reasonably be regarded as our local auxiliary forces and our responsibility. All might have been well had not the fundamental premise upon which we were operating in that era, the continuing existence of a more or less competent Afghan government, began to unravel at the back end of Trump's first presidency. This raised, as the army call it, a 'question four'. We had to ask ourselves: has the situation changed and, if so, do we change the plan or even the whole mission? We answered poorly. Faced with deterioration of the Afghan government, we did not examine hard enough, nor think through quickly enough, the potential consequences. President Trump's dislike of 'forever wars' is visceral and real, and his advisors reckoned, not without reason, that peace would only come to Afghanistan if some sort of deal was done with the Taliban. No-one in 2020 envisaged an Afghan governmental collapse but it was quite clear by Aug 2020 that a peace-deal era Afghanistan would be unfriendly towards those with a strong link to the Allies. That, along with the strong moral case, drove a change of heart in the then defence secretary Ben Wallace and home secretary Priti Patel in how they would look after our interpreters. The presumption at the heart of the 2014 Intimidation Scheme was that our former interpreters would be resettled in Afghanistan; this was scrapped and henceforward they were all to be offered sanctuary in the UK. This new scheme, Arap, was to formally come into effect in April 2021. What does not appear to have happened in the interim period from August 2020 to April 2021 was a 'reading across' of the logic that had driven the change in the interpreters' scheme: if it was unsafe for interpreters, then wouldn't those who had worked in our very active and very effective Afghan specialist units, trained and mentored by Britain, also be at risk? When this was raised with officials, they fell back either onto lawyerly arguments ('they're not employed by us') or Panglossian 'finger-crossing'. Somehow, they hoped, everything would turn out fine. It did not help that much of the mentoring had been conducted by 'secret squirrel' organisations. Information was held in silos, so the scale of our engagement, and thus knowledge of the extent of our liability, was partial at best. When President Biden directed, in April 2021, that US forces would only now fire in self-defence and would leave Afghanistan by the summer, what previously might have been regarded as a risk, now became a certainty. As Afghan units were progressively overrun, widespread massacres and brutality took place. This was particularly so with Afghan specialist units, whom both the Taliban and their Pakistani ISI directors were keen to eliminate. It is that which drove the desperation of the scenes at Kabul airport. The 2,000 to 3,000 we expected to evacuate through Operation Pitting turned into 15,000, as desperate Afghan commando units fought their way to the airport. That still left many thousands more, in hiding and in fear, hoping that their previous supporters and paymasters would not forget them. It is this mess that the hapless Marine had to sort-out. In desperation, he made a mistake but given the complexity he was trying to resolve, across so many disparate agencies, one questions the decision to have, in effect, a single, potential, point of failure. Earlier, during the interim period, and even after the Biden betrayal, the scale of our liability could have been recognised, plans developed, and parliament briefed. None of that happened. This all, of course, coincided with the Covid crisis and in UK, the aftermath of Brexit; even in the Behemoth that is Whitehall, we should acknowledge there is a 'bandwidth' problem. But who actually 'owned' Afghanistan in Whitehall? Who might have foreseen this problem? Who might have fixed it? I struggle.
Metro
3 minutes ago
- Metro
Premier League club tipped to land treble after deals in summer transfer window
Only two English clubs have been able to land a treble to date (Picture: Getty) Jason McAteer has tipped one of the Premier League biggest clubs to land a treble in 2025-26 after their impressive summer transfer window. Manchester United and Manchester City are the only English clubs to achieve the historic feat to date – clinched in 1999 and 2023 respectively. The treble is secured by winning the Premier League, FA Cup and Champions League in the same season and is incredibly hard to do. The likes of Liverpool, Arsenal and Chelsea have never won trebles – but McAteer feels Arne Slot's side are genuinely capable of doing it this term. The Reds, who landed last season's Premier League title in Slot's debut campaign as head coach, have already made a number of high-profile signings including Florian Wirtz, Milos Kerkez and Jeremie Frimpong. Get personalised updates on Liverpool every day Wake up to find news on your club in your inbox every morning with Metro's Football Newsletter. Sign up to our newsletter and then select your team in the link we'll send you so we can get football news tailored to you. Liverpool have also reached a full agreement with Eintracht Frankfurt to sign Hugo Ekitike in a deal worth £79m. Jason McAteer backs Liverpool for 2026 treble Liverpool won the Premier League title last term under Arne Slot (Picture: Reuters) Former Liverpool defender McAteer told William Hill Vegas: 'If Liverpool were to win back-to-back Premier League titles, it would be phenomenal. 'They don't need to win the Champions League to call it a great season, but to be a truly legendary team, you must win both competitions or even complete the treble, like Manchester United in 1998-99. 'Liverpool have been in contention in recent years, going deep in four competitions. 'The signings that Liverpool have made this summer mean they now have a squad capable of going all the way. Florian Wirtz joined from Bayer Leverkusen for a club record £116m (Picture: Getty) 'The likes of Florian Wirtz and Hugo Ekitike mean they have a team and a squad set up not just to compete, but to win the Champions League and the Premier League. 'The quality is undoubtedly there, and so is the experience. 'When you have players like Mohamed Salah still delivering 30 plus goals a season, a world-class centre-half like Virgil van Dijk, and Alisson in goal, who keeps clean sheets for fun, there is absolutely no reason why Liverpool cannot be genuine treble contenders. Mohamed Salah was the Premier League Player of the Season last term (Picture: Getty) 'There is a reason why trebles are not won often – Manchester City did it recently, but we all know pressure builds and fatigue, injuries, and the mental toll all mount up. 'But they are prepared for that – Arne Slot's squad has the ingredients to do something legendary.' More Trending McAteer has also suggested that the new Champions League format – only introduced last season – hurt Liverpool as they crashed out to eventual winners Paris Saint-Germain in the last 16. 'Despite being knocked out by Paris Saint-Germain, you have to say that Liverpool had a phenomenal Champions League campaign last season,' he added. 'They came up against PSG at exactly the wrong time. Remember, they won in Paris in the first leg and were only defeated at Anfield on penalties. 'It was more of a disappointment because Liverpool finished top of the league phase. In a different format, maybe a fairer one, Liverpool would have gone all the way.' Arrow MORE: Arsenal vs AC Milan LIVE: Pre-season friendly latest score and goal updates Arrow MORE: Martin Zubimendi reflects on Liverpool snub and decision to join Arsenal
Scotsman
3 minutes ago
- Scotsman
New whisky bottling venture close to home of golf has ‘boutique' distillery in sights
'As an independent bottler, the company is uniquely positioned to blend, finish and release special expressions from a variety of sources.' Sign up to our Scotsman Money newsletter, covering all you need to know to help manage your money. Sign up Thank you for signing up! Did you know with a Digital Subscription to The Scotsman, you can get unlimited access to the website including our premium content, as well as benefiting from fewer ads, loyalty rewards and much more. Learn More Sorry, there seem to be some issues. Please try again later. Submitting... A new whisky bottling venture has outlined bold plans for expansion including a 'boutique distillery' close to the home of golf after scoring a major win with its first collaboration. Patron Saint, which has been set up near St Andrews in Fife, is promising to offer 'something truly different' in the world of Scotch whisky and premium spirits in general. Despite a challenging global backdrop for the drinks sector, its founders believe there is 'plenty of opportunity' as consumers move to drinking 'less but better'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad The fledgling venture's first collaboration has been as the official supplier for the British and Irish Lions tour to Australia this year. David Hamilton, Campbell Archibald and Aidan Muir of Patron Saint. Patron Saint is led by David Hamilton, a serial entrepreneur and philanthropist across a range of local enterprises; Campbell Archibald, founder of Angus Alchemy; Michael Johnston, developer and owner of Avalon Business Park; and Aidan Muir, described as a 'passionate whisky industry professional'. As the business grows, the founders plan to expand their team, with the aim of creating ten full-time equivalent jobs by 2027. There is also the potential for a small boutique distillery, which would involve a multi-million-pound investment. The firm pointed to an increasing number of 'exciting innovative new distilleries' and increases in whisky production levels over the past few years, noting that it was well placed to take advantage of this 'high end growth opportunity'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad It said: 'While Fife and Tayside are already home to several outstanding new distilleries, Patron Saint sets itself apart as primarily a curator and developer of exceptional whisky originally initiated by others. As an independent bottler, the company is uniquely positioned to blend, finish and release special expressions from a variety of sources. 'The current collaboration whisky with the British and Irish Lions and Fife in Independent Bottlers is a great example of collaboration across six distilleries and producers.' The plans envisage a small-scale distillery onsite within the next two years, producing around five casks per week. Patron Saint said those micro-batches would reflect the 'same care, quality and originality that defines the brand'. Advertisement Hide Ad Advertisement Hide Ad An initial investment will be in the region of £3 million for a mixture of 'state of the art' cask management systems, whisky stock, bottling and technical equipment. Future distillery investment is likely to be of a similar level. The company's founders noted: 'A whisky experience unlike any other is what Patron Saint aims to offer visitors. Something personal and immersive and far beyond the standard tour. With exclusive access, guided tastings and a behind the scenes look at the craft, the experience will be tailored for the curious, the connoisseur, and those looking for something truly special. 'We hope to take the whisky visitor experience to a new level for whisky lovers. We prefer to think of it as a bespoke, memorable journey for the discerning and adventurous.
