logo
Eco Age relaunches "as agency for future fashion"

Eco Age relaunches "as agency for future fashion"

Fashion Network08-06-2025
Sustainability consultancy Eco Age is relaunching this month as 'the voice of future fashion'. The 16-year-old agency behind the Green Carpet Fashion Awards and included former clients such as Gucci, Stella McCartney, Chopard and Diesel, has now undergone an extensive rebrand, 'creating an elevated identity that merges conscious fashion with nature-inspired aesthetics'.
Having closed last year following 'a financial attack' on the business, it has reopened under the ownership of former journalists John and Clodagh Higginson, who also own communications agency Higginson Strategy.
Marwa Zamaray, who has two decades of experience in the fashion industry, has also joined as partner and executive director.
Its new tagline 'Fashion. For A Future', emphasises the agency's commitment to working with the fashion industry as it targets 'a positive, innovative and far more sustainable future'.
Claiming more than 220,000 followers across live social media channels, including Instagram, LinkedIn, TikTok and Facebook, it is 'reigniting its base of followers'.
Its presence on the platforms has been boosted by partnerships with influencers, including sustainability campaigner and model Dr Brett Staniland.
Meanwhile, the agency has hired an advisory board that includes Africa Fashion Guide founder Jacqueline Shaw, climate activist Tori Tsui, Circuthon founder Paul Foulkes-Arellano, fashion journalist turned activist Bel Jacobs, and By Rotation founder Eshita Kabra-Davies.
Clients include colour platform technology company Sparxell and Textile Genesis, 'a traceability platform custom-built for the fashion and textile ecosystem'.
The agency also plans to reinstate the Green Carpet Fashion Awards next year.
John Higginson, CEO, said: 'Every day we get the opportunity to make the world better simply by what we choose to wear. When we buy less, better quality and make it last, we send a powerful message to the world without even opening our mouths. When we buy fast fashion, which is cheap because the planet and workers have been ripped off and abused, we feel cheap and nasty.
'The number of people accepting this reality is growing by the day. Eco Age is a home for these people. We are supplying them with the information they need to make better choices and working with the brands and fashion companies providing the solutions.'
Zamaray added: 'Eco Age changed the way the world talks about fashion, bringing sustainability into the spotlight and making ethical fashion a priority from boardrooms to consumers. It built a legacy of influence, trust, and action across the industry.
'Today, with rising pressure from regulations, investors, and conscious consumers, Eco Age is more vital than ever, a lighthouse guiding fashion through transformation. I'm proud to carry the torch forward, with a clear focus on driving lasting impact for both people and planet.'
Orange background

Try Our AI Features

Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:

Comments

No comments yet...

Related Articles

Personalized AI chatbots go off the rails on Instagram and Messenger
Personalized AI chatbots go off the rails on Instagram and Messenger

LeMonde

time21 hours ago

  • LeMonde

Personalized AI chatbots go off the rails on Instagram and Messenger

Meta is usually known for making big announcements. This time, however, Mark Zuckerberg's company was surprisingly subdued when it rolled out AI Studio in France: Since the end of July, French Instagram and Messenger app users have been able to create personalized chatbots or chat with ones made by other users. Users can now talk to an artificial intelligence (AI) version of a psychologist, a cooking expert, a version of Batgirl, a parody of Vladimir Putin or even a "virtual girlfriend." All of these bots are created by the platforms' users, based on Llama, Meta's large language model. It only takes a few seconds to set up a chatbot by describing its purpose and personality, with the option to add further instructions if needed. The user can then decide whether to make their chatbot publicly accessible or restrict it to their friends only. However, Meta has warned that "we review AIs you create" before they are published, to ensure they do not violate the platform's rules. Yet the review process is rather superficial. Naruto, Harry Potter, the French YouTuber Squeezie, God, Marilyn Monroe, Breaking Bad 's Walter White and even France's prime minister, François Bayrou: Le Monde quickly found many chatbots that impersonate real people, fictional characters covered by copyright protections, and religious figures – including several Jesus Christ bots – all of which are forbidden by Meta. While some of these bots appeared not to have interacted with any users, others have already exchanged millions of messages. Furthermore, despite rules prohibiting the chatbots from posing as financial advisers, dozens of AI bots dedicated to cryptocurrency, personal finance or investment could be found easily. The few profiles tested by Le Monde only repeated general statements. However, in just a few moments, we were able to create a bot specialized in financial advice that encouraged beginners to invest online via the fraudulent trading website RiveGarde, which a previous Le Monde investigation found was connected to an organized crime network. It was then possible to share the chatbot with friends after it went through Meta's automatic verification process, which took less than a minute.

Vogue US faces backlash over Guess ad featuring AI-generated model
Vogue US faces backlash over Guess ad featuring AI-generated model

Fashion Network

time2 days ago

  • Fashion Network

Vogue US faces backlash over Guess ad featuring AI-generated model

Vogue US sparked major debate when it ran a Guess ad featuring artificial intelligence–generated visuals in its August 2025 issue. The campaign stirred widespread backlash from readers, image professionals, and content creators, who see it as a warning sign for creative industries. The double-page spread showed a blonde model with light eyes and full lips wearing a sky-blue top and a black-and-white patterned dress. Vogue included a footnote confirming the images came from AI, but readers flooded the magazine's social platforms with criticism. Social media users and TikTok creators expressed frustration with the decision, citing Vogue's legacy of groundbreaking photographers like Irving Penn, Lee Miller, and Erwin Blumenfeld. Critics argued that AI contradicted the magazine's artistic foundation. Although Vogue stated that the ad came from its advertising department, not its editorial team, many readers still saw it as a symbolic turning point. The placement raised bigger questions about the industry's reliance on human creativity. Seraphinne Vallora created the AI visuals Marketing agency Seraphinne Vallora designed the campaign. The company has promoted its synthetic models across Elle, Grazia, Harper's Bazaar, the Financial Times, and the Wall Street Journal. On Instagram, the agency showcases its AI-generated visuals and promotes its ability to replicate real-life models through digital scans. Brands like H&M have already used these AI body doubles, allowing real models to fulfill contracts without attending photo shoots. These avatars save time and reduce production costs. U.S. laws such as the 'right of publicity' protect personal features like a model's face or voice. Companies must obtain consent before using AI likenesses. But disputes still occur. Scarlett Johansson, for instance, accused OpenAI of using her voice without permission—sparking another legal controversy. Although the U.S., the UK, and the EU enforce laws to regulate AI-driven use of personal identity, industry professionals continue to raise concerns about the impact on makeup artists, stylists, photographers, and production crews. Creative professionals push back Many journalists and artists now use AI to streamline repetitive tasks, but this Guess campaign reignited fears that companies will use AI to replace—not support—creative professionals. On Newstalk Tech's TikTok account, correspondent Jess Kelly said, 'This puts people out of work. And creatively, a photoshoot isn't just about the model—it involves photographers, lighting crews, and an entire team working behind the scenes.' Governments and unions act on copyright To protect human-created work, unions and lawmakers are stepping in. The European Union adopted the AI Act in April 2024 to regulate synthetic media. This legislation, rolling out through 2027, requires companies to disclose AI-generated content, publish training datasets, and respect intellectual property—even when using open-source tools. In journalism, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) published formal recommendations in January 2025. 'AI cannot replace human journalists,' the report stated, 'and its production should not be considered journalism unless it undergoes proper human oversight.' INA, the French audiovisual institute, published a report outlining AI's risks and benefits in the newsroom. It praised AI for boosting speed, format diversity, and translation—but warned that it also encourages content standardization, audience detachment, and unchecked data mining. The authors argued that publishers risk prioritizing cost over quality. AI won't affect every media role equally​ Despite industry anxiety, some roles may adapt instead of disappearing. A 2025 report by consulting firm BearingPoint examined how generative AI could impact broadcast journalism jobs. The study flagged roles like documentalists, subtitlers, motion designers, editors, and translators as highly automatable. But BearingPoint identified other roles—such as reporters, web editors, data journalists, and community managers—that could shift toward supervising AI output, managing quality control, or using AI as a creative partner. In short, the firm believes that many image and information professionals can evolve with the technology rather than get replaced by it. Still, the reaction to Vogue's Guess ad shows that industry players view AI as a serious threat to creative labor. As Condé Nast navigates this backlash, it faces a critical choice: either establish clear rules for advertisers—or risk weakening the very ecosystem that defines its brand legacy.

Vogue US faces backlash over Guess ad featuring AI-generated model
Vogue US faces backlash over Guess ad featuring AI-generated model

Fashion Network

time2 days ago

  • Fashion Network

Vogue US faces backlash over Guess ad featuring AI-generated model

Vogue US sparked major debate when it ran a Guess ad featuring artificial intelligence–generated visuals in its August 2025 issue. The campaign stirred widespread backlash from readers, image professionals, and content creators, who see it as a warning sign for creative industries. The double-page spread showed a blonde model with light eyes and full lips wearing a sky-blue top and a black-and-white patterned dress. Vogue included a footnote confirming the images came from AI, but readers flooded the magazine's social platforms with criticism. Social media users and TikTok creators expressed frustration with the decision, citing Vogue's legacy of groundbreaking photographers like Irving Penn, Lee Miller, and Erwin Blumenfeld. Critics argued that AI contradicted the magazine's artistic foundation. Although Vogue stated that the ad came from its advertising department, not its editorial team, many readers still saw it as a symbolic turning point. The placement raised bigger questions about the industry's reliance on human creativity. Seraphinne Vallora created the AI visuals Marketing agency Seraphinne Vallora designed the campaign. The company has promoted its synthetic models across Elle, Grazia, Harper's Bazaar, the Financial Times, and the Wall Street Journal. On Instagram, the agency showcases its AI-generated visuals and promotes its ability to replicate real-life models through digital scans. Brands like H&M have already used these AI body doubles, allowing real models to fulfill contracts without attending photo shoots. These avatars save time and reduce production costs. U.S. laws such as the 'right of publicity' protect personal features like a model's face or voice. Companies must obtain consent before using AI likenesses. But disputes still occur. Scarlett Johansson, for instance, accused OpenAI of using her voice without permission—sparking another legal controversy. Although the U.S., the UK, and the EU enforce laws to regulate AI-driven use of personal identity, industry professionals continue to raise concerns about the impact on makeup artists, stylists, photographers, and production crews. Many journalists and artists now use AI to streamline repetitive tasks, but this Guess campaign reignited fears that companies will use AI to replace—not support—creative professionals. On Newstalk Tech's TikTok account, correspondent Jess Kelly said, 'This puts people out of work. And creatively, a photoshoot isn't just about the model—it involves photographers, lighting crews, and an entire team working behind the scenes.' Governments and unions act on copyright To protect human-created work, unions and lawmakers are stepping in. The European Union adopted the AI Act in April 2024 to regulate synthetic media. This legislation, rolling out through 2027, requires companies to disclose AI-generated content, publish training datasets, and respect intellectual property—even when using open-source tools. In journalism, the International Federation of Journalists (IFJ) published formal recommendations in January 2025. 'AI cannot replace human journalists,' the report stated, 'and its production should not be considered journalism unless it undergoes proper human oversight.' INA, the French audiovisual institute, published a report outlining AI's risks and benefits in the newsroom. It praised AI for boosting speed, format diversity, and translation—but warned that it also encourages content standardization, audience detachment, and unchecked data mining. The authors argued that publishers risk prioritizing cost over quality. AI won't affect every media role equally​ Despite industry anxiety, some roles may adapt instead of disappearing. A 2025 report by consulting firm BearingPoint examined how generative AI could impact broadcast journalism jobs. The study flagged roles like documentalists, subtitlers, motion designers, editors, and translators as highly automatable. But BearingPoint identified other roles—such as reporters, web editors, data journalists, and community managers—that could shift toward supervising AI output, managing quality control, or using AI as a creative partner. In short, the firm believes that many image and information professionals can evolve with the technology rather than get replaced by it. Still, the reaction to Vogue's Guess ad shows that industry players view AI as a serious threat to creative labor. As Condé Nast navigates this backlash, it faces a critical choice: either establish clear rules for advertisers—or risk weakening the very ecosystem that defines its brand legacy.

DOWNLOAD THE APP

Get Started Now: Download the App

Ready to dive into a world of global content with local flavor? Download Daily8 app today from your preferred app store and start exploring.
app-storeplay-store