India Won The War, But Lost Narrative Battle To Pakistani & Western Lies
India has decisively won the latest military conflict against Pakistan. If anybody had a doubt, the Indian Air Force (IAF) presser on Sunday conclusively demonstrated it with clear images and videos of the precision strikes in Pakistan Occupied Jammu and Kashmir (PoJK) and deep inside Pakistan.
From Muridke to Bahawalpur and from Sargodha to Jacobabad, every missile strike has been captured, as if in 4K.
It is now clear that the bombing of Sargodha and a couple of other airfields could be the immediate reason for Pakistan's panicked outreach to the US, which, in turn, advised it to directly request India for a ceasefire, which Pakistan did.
Apparently, the Indian missiles landed alarmingly close to its nuclear facilities and could even have triggered radiation.
But despite this unprecedented aggressive response to a terror attack (the Pahalgam massacre, in this case), cheer was missing from the Indian side. It was as if we had lost. Pakistan, forever blissfully in denial, actually started claiming victory. The Western media obliged, with almost congratulatory pieces and shows about Pakistan snatching a ceasefire.
advetisement
There were three main narrative setbacks for India.
First, some seriously irresponsible and childish mainstream media reporting. It is fine to run psy-ops on social media and rattle the enemy. But when the mainstream media outlets mirror that misinformation, it leads to loss of credibility and opens up the nation's information environment to damaging fact-checks and mocking, even when there is enough meat in its military response.
Sensational stories like Lahore, Karachi or Islamabad falling did just that. It is a good occasion for the Indian media to introspect. At a time when plain-vanilla reporting is sensational enough, going overboard with spice is a recipe for self-goals which harms the nation's splendid military effort.
Second, the international media coverage was grossly tilted against India. The West was especially negative.
Neocon online publication The National Interest carried pieces titled 'How Chinese Missiles Routed India's Air Force Over Pakistan' and 'Why Has India's Military Performed So Poorly Against Pakistan?', both by Brandon J Weichert, a contributor to the Hong Kong-based Asia Times and author of Biohacked: China's Race To Control Life and other books.
'The Pakistanis have proven their mettle. Armed with top Chinese equipment, and with military assistance provided by the Turks, Islamabad has shown itself to be more than capable of rebuffing at least the initial wave of Indian air attacks. The Pakistanis shot down a total of five Indian Air Force (IAF) warplanes at the start of Operation Sindoor, after all," Weichert writes.
A Reuters headline screamed: 'Exclusive: Pakistan's Chinese-made jet brought down two Indian fighter aircraft, US officials say'. 'At least two Indian jets appeared to have crashed during Pakistan strikes, visuals show', read a Washington Post headline.
Interestingly, neither Pakistan nor the unnamed US officials whom the Western media quoted could produce any proof of a single Indian plane being shot down.
Al Jazeera, the undeclared mouthpiece of Islamists worldwide, went as far as to carry the laughable Pakistani canard that Indian woman pilot Shivangi Singh has been captured.
Pakistani director general of inter-Services Public Relations Ahmed Shareef Chaudhry, who is the son of UN-designated terrorist and Osama bin Laden's close aide Bashiruddin Mahmood, later denied that Pakistan has custody of any pilot and dismissed it as 'fake news from social media". It is another matter that his boss, Pakistani defence minister Khawaja Asif, told Sky News that the proof of Pakistan downing Indian planes was 'all over social media".
But why did the international media lap up Pakistan's brazen lies and contradictions? Why was the Indian side so bleakly presented?
Is it because China wielded its influence—built through years of lobbying, buying out journalists, and funding western media and academia? Or does Pakistan and its intelligence ISI do better PR in the West than India?
Or because the West and China's planes and missile defence systems were effectively busted by India's own homegrown weapons and Russian aircraft and missile interception systems like S-400, making it a terrible advertisement to potential buyers?
advetisement
We may not know the precise answers, but it is time for India to up the PR ante, spend money on building presence in international media, and counter the global negative narrative more robustly.
Third, US President Donald Trump and Vice-President JD Vance have re-hyphenated India and Pakistan. Trump infantilised India, which is the victim of Pakistan-sponsored terror, by his statement: 'Proud that the USA was able to help you arrive at this historic and heroic decision." Claiming credit, he said on Saturday that the US mediated talks after which the two neighbours 'agreed to a FULL AND IMMEDIATE CEASEFIRE".
He then added insult by bringing up Kashmir and offering to mediate, which India had politely but firmly turned down in the past. 'I am going to increase trade, substantially, with both of these great Nations. Additionally, I will work with you both to see if, after a 'thousand years," a solution can be arrived at concerning Kashmir," read his statement.
advetisement
Could it be some ulterior reason, some kind of a negotiating chip to cut India down to size before the imminent trade deal?
top videos
View All
Whatever the reason, India will need to disabuse the pathological narcissist in Trump and set the narrative right.
It was never enough to win the war on the battlefield. The greatest nations and leaders have also won the war in the mind and popular imagination. Only then does one effectively break the enemy's morale and lift it for one's own people. The ceasefire has given us that moment of introspection.
tags :
donald trump Operation Sindoor Pahalgam attack pakistan United states
Location :
New Delhi, India, India
First Published:
May 12, 2025, 08:50 IST
News opinion Opinion | India Won The War, But Lost Narrative Battle To Pakistani & Western Lies
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
NDTV
17 minutes ago
- NDTV
Trump, India, Pahalgam: When Terrorists Are Easier To Deal With Than Tariffs
Weeks after the Indian media engaged in a shrill diatribe against US President Donald Trump for claiming that he had ended the escalation between India and Pakistan in the aftermath of Operation Sindoor, the public sentiment against the US seems to be softening, thanks to US Secretary of State Marco Rubio announcing that the State Department is going to designate the Terrorist Resistance Front (TRF) as a terrorist organisation, with a specific reference to the Pahalgam attack. That's a handshake of no mean order, especially after a series of western 'analysts' had desired 'proof' of the outfit's involvement in the attack. All this, of course, occurs in parallel with Trump apparently threatening a 100% secondary tariff on anyone who trades with Russia. But hold on. That is a reference to a proposed legislation supported by both political parties, which demands that 500% tariffs be levied on states trading with Russia - India included. So, the 'tariff man' is being outpaced by his own Congress. Things are not always what they seem. TRF Gets A Handle First, the designation of the TRF as a 'Specially Designated Global Terrorist' has been welcomed by Foreign Minister Jaishankar as a "strong affirmation of Indo-US Counter terrorism cooperation", as indeed it is. Earlier, Foreign Secretary Vikram Misri had stated that India's efforts at the United Nations to get a similar listing had been blocked by Pakistan, and even a reference to it removed from a press statement by the Security Council on Pahalgam. So, the US move is not something to be set aside lightly. The TRF is an interesting entity. It announced its presence on encrypted platform Telegram after the abrogation of Article 370 and when the Lashkar-e-Taiba took a back seat due to pressure from the Financial Action Task Force (FATF). The TRF's name and imagery seems carefully chosen to avoid any "radical" religious flavour, as also to position itself as indigenous. But a series of attacks it has claimed, including against Makhan Lal Bindroo, a popular owner of a medical shop, as well as those against Sikh and Hindu schoolteachers, were clearly aimed at creating communal tensions. The outfit also threatened journalists and released 'lists' of those it was prepared to kill. Notably, the TRF was the first terrorist group to launch a twin drone attack, on the Jammu air base in 2021. In the Pahalgam incident, the group again claimed the attack on Telegram but back-tracked three days later as it became apparent that India was on the warpath and that the UN was getting ready to release a resolution. Unlike the LeT, the leadership of the TRF is diffused back in Pakistan, and their 'assets' are unknown. But their leaders in Pakistan have known and long-time Lashkar affiliations. One of them, Abu Qatal, who was shot in March this year in Jhelum, uses the same infiltration routes and is part of the United Jihad Council. So, if it walks, talks and looks like the LeT, it should be the LeT. The designation there is uncomfortable business for Rawalpindi - the now-famous 'lunch' of Field Marshal Asim Munir with Trump notwithstanding. Working Groups Are Working Hard Now consider this. Just days earlier, on July 16, the Wavelength Forum held in New Delhi brought together Quad partners to strengthen subsea cable connectivity and resilience across the Indo-Pacific region. Organised under the US State Department's 'CABLES' programme, it highlighted the critical role of subsea cables in supporting the global digital economy and the importance of using trusted vendors for construction, maintenance, and repair. That underlined India's growing importance as a digital hub accounting for some 20% of global internet traffic, and the common concerns of members. This delivered on the Quad foreign ministers' joint statement, which itself was short and crisp, unlike the usual long-winded and fuzzy documents earlier. It announced the first Quad Critical Minerals Initiative, the first Quad Indo-Pacific Logistics Network field training exercise, and a Quad Ports of the Future Partnership in the works. Separately, a read-out of the meeting between Foreign Minister Jaishankar and Defence Secretary Peter Hegseth was rich in content, noting 'dangers of aggression in the 'Asia Pacific' (a rather surprising nomenclature). Coming up is the signing of the next 10 Year Defense Framework, and progress on advanced technology policy reviews, which will take forward the landmark INDUS-X which has brought together innovators to US shores, as well as the launch of the Autonomous Systems Industry Alliance (ASIA), where our own innovators are racing ahead. Earlier, even as Operation Sindoor was unfolding, the Quad was holding a tabletop logistic exercise in Hawaii, while a joint working group on Aircraft Carrier Technology cooperation was held in May even as the operations wound down. In sum, there are more areas of cooperation that can be listed easily. And that's an ongoing process, set in place years ago, with the US administration showing every inclination to push all of this harder and faster. That Public Glitch Now consider the brouhaha on tariffs, which are announced with much fanfare even as a trade deal is being hinted at. That is not going to be easy as Trump wants access to agriculture, a sensitive area of Indian politicians and a huge voter base. True also that a bill sponsored by Senator Lindsey Graham, widely credited with urging a change of heart to Pakistan under Imran Khan, has sponsored a bill calling for the President to "increase the rate of duty on all goods and services imported into the United States from countries that knowingly engage in the exchange of Russian-origin uranium and petroleum products to at least 500% relative to the value of such goods and services; that's the Trump administration's effort to get Russia to stop a wasteful and vicious war". In Sum... Much can be said about this pointless arm-twisting of countries like India, which did not start the war and have their own populations to think of in terms of inflation from rising oil prices. But the point is, relations between countries are not one composite whole. One may differ violently with one issue even while cooperating closely on another. True, with the Trump administration, there is a deliberate public confrontation in policy, but bureaucracies work quietly behind the scenes on sorting out issues with a country that is otherwise a 'Major Defence Partner', which for the first time, is becoming a two-way street. In other words, it is profitable for US companies to work here in this and other fields. It's a slow journey, but it's got to a place where a certain velocity has been achieved. After all, this is a path undertaken since at least George W Bush's days. The dangers of Trump linking trade with almost everything else persists - like pushing Apple to set up shop elsewhere - but the core relationship is in place. That, in turn, is based on one unchanging principle of US policy; which is never to allow another country to overtake it. As China grows in absolute terms, that is one fundamental that will determine relations with India. The danger is that there are also those in Washington who see India as growing too fast for comfort. US bureaucracy would ideally like all 'partners' to just roll over and play dead. Delhi is hardly in that league, and is a hitch that needs careful manoeuvring. Think of a certain 'warming' of relations with China recently. It's a dangerous game, but it seems the present dispensation seems confident. There are squalls ahead. Meanwhile, prepare to open all sluices as the Quad summit comes up.
Hans India
17 minutes ago
- Hans India
PM Modi Offers Full Assistance Following Tragic Bangladesh Air Force Crash
Prime Minister Narendra Modi has conveyed India's complete solidarity with Bangladesh following a devastating aircraft accident in Dhaka that claimed multiple lives, with many victims being young students. The Indian leader has assured comprehensive assistance to the neighboring nation during this difficult time. Expressing profound grief over the tragedy, Modi described his shock and sadness at the significant loss of life in the aviation disaster. He particularly emphasized the heartbreaking nature of the incident, given that numerous young students were among the casualties. The Prime Minister extended heartfelt condolences to all families affected by this tragic event. In his official statement posted on social media platform X, Modi emphasized India's commitment to providing whatever support Bangladesh might require. He assured that India remains prepared to offer all forms of assistance and aid to help the nation cope with this emergency situation. The Prime Minister also conveyed prayers for the rapid recovery of those who sustained injuries in the crash, demonstrating the humanitarian concern that has characterized India's response to the crisis. The devastating incident involved a Bangladesh Air Force training aircraft that went down shortly after takeoff on Monday, July 21, 2025. The Chinese-manufactured F-7 BGI training plane crashed directly into the Milestone School and College campus located in Dhaka's Uttara neighborhood, causing widespread destruction and casualties. According to official reports and eyewitness accounts, the crash resulted in at least 19 fatalities, with the majority being children who were present at the educational facility. Additionally, dozens of individuals sustained various degrees of injuries from the impact and subsequent emergency response efforts. The timing and location of the crash made it particularly tragic, as the aircraft struck an active educational institution where students and staff were present during regular hours. Emergency responders, including firefighters and military personnel, immediately rushed to the scene to conduct rescue operations and manage the aftermath of the disaster. This incident highlights the ongoing risks associated with military training operations conducted near populated areas, particularly those housing educational institutions. The Bangladesh Air Force will likely conduct a thorough investigation to determine the exact cause of the crash and implement measures to prevent similar occurrences in the future. India's immediate offer of support reflects the strong bilateral relationship between the two South Asian neighbors and demonstrates the country's commitment to regional solidarity during times of crisis. The gesture underscores the diplomatic ties and mutual cooperation that have characterized India-Bangladesh relations in recent years.
Hans India
17 minutes ago
- Hans India
Maharashtra ATS Challenges Mumbai Train Blasts Acquittals In Top Court
The Maharashtra Anti Terrorism Squad has moved the Supreme Court to challenge a controversial Bombay High Court decision that acquitted all twelve individuals convicted in the devastating 2006 Mumbai train bombings. The apex court has scheduled the matter for hearing on July 24, marking a critical juncture in one of India's most significant terrorism cases. Chief Justice BR Gavai will lead a three-judge bench alongside Justices K Vinod Chandran and NV Anjaria to examine the appeal. The urgent listing came after Solicitor General Tushar Mehta, representing the Maharashtra ATS, emphasized the matter's gravity and requested expedited proceedings. The Bombay High Court's recent verdict completely overturned the trial court's 2009 judgment that had imposed death sentences on five accused individuals and life imprisonment on seven others. The original convictions stemmed from their alleged involvement in orchestrating and executing the coordinated bomb attacks that targeted Mumbai's Western Railway network on July 11, 2006. Justices Anil Kilor and Shyam Chandak, forming the division bench, delivered a scathing assessment of the prosecution's case, declaring that investigators had "utterly failed" to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt. The court expressed difficulty in believing that the accused had actually committed the crimes they were charged with. The High Court raised serious concerns about the investigation methods employed, specifically highlighting allegations of torture against ATS officials. The judges observed that investigators appeared to be operating under intense pressure to produce quick results following the attacks, potentially compromising the integrity of the evidence-gathering process. This judicial criticism deals a devastating blow to the Maharashtra Anti-Terrorism Squad's investigation, which had maintained strong connections between the accused and the banned Students' Islamic Movement of India. The ATS had built its case around claims that the suspects had collaborated with Pakistani operatives from Lashkar-e-Taiba to orchestrate the deadly attack. The tragic incident remains etched in Mumbai's collective memory as one of the most horrific terrorist strikes in Indian history. Within a terrifying eleven-minute span, seven explosive devices detonated across the Western Railway's suburban train network, claiming 189 innocent lives and leaving more than 800 people injured. The coordinated nature of the attacks and their impact on ordinary commuters made this one of the deadliest terror incidents the country has witnessed. The acquittal verdict has sparked significant debate about the quality of terrorism investigations and the pressure law enforcement agencies face to deliver swift justice in high-profile cases. Legal experts have noted that the High Court's observations about torture allegations and investigative shortcomings raise broader questions about procedural safeguards in terrorism prosecutions. As the Supreme Court prepares to examine this contentious appeal, the outcome will likely have far-reaching implications for how terrorism cases are investigated and prosecuted in India. The hearing represents a crucial moment for both the victims' families, who have waited nearly two decades for justice, and the legal system's credibility in handling complex terrorism cases. The case's journey through various judicial levels reflects the challenges inherent in prosecuting terrorism-related offenses while maintaining due process standards and ensuring that convictions are based on solid, untainted evidence rather than investigative pressure or public sentiment.
