Equities surged in May while the Rand stabilised
The JSE had a bumper month and year-to-date
Image: Supplied
The JSE had a bumper month and year-to-date. Given all the growing uncertainties on the global and domestic geo-political front, investors and the public expected the worst for the share and foreign exchange markets during the month of May.
Given the Trump administration's chop-and-change announcements in the trade war between the US and other countries, like China, Canada, and European countries, as well as the jittery South Africa/US relations, it was expected by many members of the public that the economy and financial markets would go from better to worse.
Table 1: Various share indices performances since the beginning of 2015
Index 1 month 3 months Year-to-date JSE ALSI 3.4% 10.2% 12.1% JSE Top40 3.4% 10.8% 14.4% JSE Financial15 4.3% 8.7% 16.0% JSE Industrial 25 4.2% 8.7% 16.0% JSE Res 10 3.1% 21.1% 31.3% Dow S&P500 5.5% -0.13% -0.14% UK FTSE 3.3% -0.04% 7.3% MSCI Europe 3.8% 7.0% 18.3% Hang Seng 5.3% 1.7% 16.10%
In contrast, share prices on the JSE reached record high levels and their best annual five months since the 2020 Covid-Virus equity downward streak, and all the main indices recorded growth of above 10% since the beginning of the year.
Prospects for share and capital markets
Despite the national budget woes, US trade tariff threats, the lack of domestic service delivery, and a deterioration of transport infrastructure and export facilities, signs of an economic recovery in South Africa boost capital and equity markets.
The cut in the repo rate by the Monetary Policy Committee, nine consecutive months where the inflation rate remained less than the Reserve Bank's midpoint target of 4.5%, and expectations of an inflation rate remaining around the 3.0% proposed new target range, boosted domestic and global investment confidence.
The expected further cut in fuel prices in June, despite the hike in the fuel levy by the Treasury, the possible extension of the Agoa agreement, and lower proposed US tariffs against South Africa, increase domestic and foreign investment appetite on the South African share and capital markets. The rand against the dollar stabilises and gives reason for a rate cut.
On the foreign exchange market, the rand improved in May to its strongest level against the major currencies for 2025. Against the dollar, the rand improved over the month of May by 3.1% or 50 cents from R18.59 to R17.99 on Friday. Against pound sterling, the currency appreciated by 2.5% or 57cents to R24.21/£ and against the Euro, stronger by 3.0% or 64c to R20.24/€. The stronger rand also contributes to a surge in financial, retail, and property shares on the JSE with the capital market returns also higher.
The Trump administration's latest tariff surge threatens.
US President Trump doubled tariffs on steel imports on Friday from 25% to 50% and announced: 'Nobody is going to get around that,' as he also introduced 50% tariffs on imported aluminum. This 'new' tariffs surge will be introduced on June 4. This latest tariff craze put global equity markets and currencies under pressure.
The Euro Stoxx 50 index lost 1.07% last week, and the Hang Seng index in Hong Kong traded 1.2% lower on Friday and tumbled by 1.4% over the week.
Prospects for this coming week
This coming week, domestic and foreign investors await the release of US non-farm payrolls for May 2025, which will be released on Friday. The market expects 140 000 new jobs, and the unemployment rate to remain at 4.2%. These two indicators will give an indication of prospects for a bank rate cut by the Federal Reserve at their next interest rate meeting later this month. Domestically, the new vehicle sales for May will be released today. Elsewhere, the ECB will make its interest rate decision on Thursday.
Chris Harmse is the consulting economist of Sequoia Capital Management and a senior lecturer at Stadio Higher Education.
Image: Supplied
Chris Harmse is the consulting economist of Sequoia Capital Management and a senior lecturer at Stadio Higher Education.
BUSINESS REPORT
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
IOL News
2 hours ago
- IOL News
Forget about persecution, greener pastures could have led some Afrikaners to move to US
White South Africans arrived in Washington last month as "refugees". They are simply opportunists grabbing an opportunity provided by Trump to migrate to the US. Many South Africans, in particular Afrikaners, have been moving to the United States under President Donald Trump's 'South African refugee program' in what he says is meant to protect the persecuted white minorities. However, new revelations suggest that some migrants may have exploited U.S. immigration policies, not out of genuine risk, but in pursuit of improved economic opportunities. One such case is that of Lucinda Trigard, a former IT support consultant from Centurion, South Africa. Trigard recently put her house up for sale after struggling to find a management job in the U.S. However, in her original refugee application under the Trump-era Executive Order 14204, she claimed she feared for her life due to 'farm killings' and so-called 'white genocide' in South Africa. This executive order allows South Africans to apply for refugee status under three conditions: being of South African nationality, being of Afrikaner ethnicity or another minority group, and having suffered or fearing future persecution. While Trigard met the first two requirements, her claim of persecution is now being questioned. She has no history of farming — one of the key reasons often cited in these claims — and experts argue there is no evidence of a 'white genocide' in South Africa. Some Afrikaners have used the refugee route to fast-track immigration to the US. This has led to criticism from South African farmers and researchers who argue that many of these applicants are not actually victims. Nick Serfontein, a well-known white commercial farmer, criticised the trend, saying: 'They are opportunists.'
TimesLIVE
4 hours ago
- TimesLIVE
Many SA households don't have enough food to eat — study
Over 23% of SA households experienced inadequate or severely inadequate access to food, a recently released report on food security has revealed. The report, Food for Thought: Reflections on Food Insecurity, — which was launched by the Socio-Economic Rights Institute (Seri) on Tuesday, — aims to better understand how vulnerable communities in the country experience hunger and food insecurity, particularly in the wake of the Covid-19 pandemic. The results of the report comes from interviews Seri conducted with partner organisations representing informal workers, recyclers, domestic workers, and residents in informal settlements. The report also exposes the harsh realities of food poverty in both rural and urban settings. While SA produces enough food to feed its population, the report highlighted that economic access, not food availability, is the biggest barrier. 'Many households may 'move in and out of hunger' during the course of the month as they have to make decisions about food based on their income. In addition to economic or direct access, another way in which households or individuals are able to access food in dire economic circumstances, is through food aid,' read the report. Low wages, rising food prices, and structural inequalities leave many unable to afford nutritious meals. This not only affecting the unemployed but also working-class families earning minimum wage, the report added.
eNCA
4 hours ago
- eNCA
EU antiques import clampdown could gut trade, warn dealers
New European rules designed to crack down on the trafficking of stolen antiques and art are causing alarm among gallery owners, with some dealers warning of suffocating red tape that will affect trade. The sector is bracing for the implementation of Regulation 2019/880 on June 28 which will introduce strict new requirements for imports into the European Union from non-EU countries. Dealers wishing to import goods such as archaeological treasures will have to provide documentation and proof that they have been exported from their country of origin legally. Other items including artworks, coins or books that are worth more than 18,000 euros ($20,500) and are more than 200 years old will also be subject to the restrictions. "We'll end up buying nothing outside the European Union," warned Antonia Eberwein, vice-president of the National Union of Antiques Dealers (SNA) in France. She warned that the markets for archaeological items, as well as pre-Columbian, Chinese or Indian art "risk being depleted, without putting an end to illicit trafficking, which by nature is invisible and undeclared". Pierre Valentin, an art and heritage specialist at London-based law firm Fieldfisher, believes the aim of the regulation is "laudable" but that implementing it could lead to an "evidential nightmare for collectors". In some cases, goods will have left their country of origin centuries ago before changing hands several times among collectors, with today's owners left needing to prove their property was exported legally. "We're being asked to provide things that don't exist," said Eberwein, calling the regulation "absurd" and the evidence requirement "a total lack of understanding of the realities" of the market. - Terror financing - The regulation is a European response to developments spanning terrorism in the Middle East to changing attitudes to cultural appropriation. The links between organised crime, terror groups and trafficking in cultural goods have been repeatedly raised by international police group Interpol and the United Nations. Al-Qaeda and the Islamic State (IS) group were both found to have looted archaeological sites under their control in Iraq and Syria to help fund their activities. The EU regulation, which was first proposed in 2017 following years of IS attacks in Europe, refers to the pillaging of archaeological sites reaching "an industrial scale". The European Commission estimated in 2017 that the illicit trade in cultural goods could be worth up to 6.0 billion euros a year, putting it on a par with drugs, arms or counterfeit goods trafficking. "Money is the life blood of war for the terrorists who attack our continent or who fight in Iraq and Syria," then EU economic affairs commissioner Pierre Moscovici said at the time. There is also growing sensitivity in Europe about the continent's colonial history and its role in looting artistic and cultural property. Many major European institutions from the British Museum to the Louvre in Paris are analysing their collections and, in a small number of cases, returning items to their countries of origin. - 'Losses' - Edouard de Lamaze, president of France's Council of Auction Houses, which regulates auction houses, said the changes would have some positive effects and "will enhance transparency for buyers and collectors, and strengthen the role of auctioneers". AFP | Hugo MATHY But it also risks bringing "a heavy administrative burden and a slowdown in activity". Auctioneers "will now have to systematically rely on experts to trace the history of artworks -- a task that is difficult, if not impossible", especially in the case of inherited items with no documentation, he added. Some countries, such as Mexico, "ban all exports and claim their entire archaeological heritage", noted Alexandre Giquello, head of France's Drouot auction group. He views the regulation "very unfavourably" and warned of "significant economic losses". "While the aim is commendable, it could penalise a large part of the market by introducing a very convoluted process that is slow to implement and will drastically increase delays," he said. Paris-based gallery owner David Ghezelbash, who specialises in archaeological items from Greece, Egypt and Italy, said he was "not concerned", however. He operates outside the EU, including with American museums, and he already regularly commissions independent experts "to trace the history of each work, as far as possible". He acknowledged that "a grey area" would be formed for objects without documented provenance, however, especially inherited pieces which risk being discredited. By Sandra Biffot-lacut And Adam Plowright
