CM praises UAE scientific progress
The chief minister and former PM Nawaz Sharif conveyed best wishes and goodwill of the people of Punjab to the leadership and people of UAE.
They agreed to take cooperation between Pakistan and UAE to new heights, and paid tribute to the leadership of President Sheikh Mohammed bin Zayed Al Nahyan. The leaders appreciated the scientific progress, environment friendliness, and modern vision of the UAE leadership.
The PML-N leader said on the occasion, "Relationship between Pakistan and UAE is not just diplomatic but a bond of hearts. Bilateral relations between Pakistan and UAE have always stood the test of time and circumstances."
Chief Minister Maryam Nawaz said,"We are keen to further expand cooperation with UAE in fields of education, research and environment."
She added,"Visa-free entry for official and diplomatic passport holders between Pakistan and UAE is commendable."
She highlighted, "Increase in Pak-UAE bilateral trade volume is a source of joy. Education, health, infrastructure and renewable energy sectors in Punjab have been put on the path of innovation." She invited UAE investors, institutions and business community to invest in Punjab.
Meanwhile, congratulating the Chinese government, people and armed forces on the 98th founding anniversary of People's Liberation Army (PLA), the chief minister said, "Role of Chinese armed forces for national and global peace is commendable. We salute our 'iron brother'."
She added,"Pak-China relations are not limited to state or defence interests, but are also ties of hearts."
She highlighted,"Pak-China defence cooperation is a bright symbol of everlasting friendship."
The chief minister said, "Professionalism, modern military strategy and spirit of national service of People's Liberation Army are exemplary." She added,"Mutual trust, joint training and defence cooperation between Pakistani and Chinese armed forces have become stronger over time."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Agriculture and inequity
Listen to article Despite being the backbone of Pakistan's economy, agriculture continues to suffer from structural inequalities that reflect not just economic disparity, but a deep-rooted feudal capture that remains largely unchallenged. The latest agriculture and livestock census — the first in 15 years — shows that 97% of Pakistani farmers own less than 12.5 acres of land, with an overwhelming 61% holding less than 2.5 acres. In contrast, a mere 16,958 landlords control over 6.2% of all farmland, averaging 215 acres each. Unequal land fragmentation continues to erode the viability of small farms and such patterns have locked millions of rural households into poverty, with most living crop to crop, vulnerable to market shocks and climate change. While the growing precarity of smallholders is a cause for concern, the enduring concentration of land in a small, powerful class should be recognised as a structural barrier to reform. For decades, Pakistan's political economy has remained tethered to the interests of large landowners, many of whom continue to wield outsized influence in policymaking circles. This has hindered any meaningful progress on long-overdue land reforms and discouraged the development of efficient land markets, thus preventing a more equitable distribution of agricultural resources. There is an urgent need to reorient agriculture policy away from patronage and towards productivity and inclusion. Expanding access to land through tenancy regularisation, land ceilings and inheritance reform must be placed back on the national agenda. At the same time, investment in cooperative farming models along with climate-resilient techniques and access to markets can help smallholders increase their yields and incomes. Women — who constitute a significant share of the rural workforce — must also be given legal rights to land ownership and decision-making roles. The future of farming cannot be left to the dictates of inherited privilege.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
India in wrong boat — again
Listen to article In 1991, Prime Minister Narasimha Rao, initiating economic liberalisation in India, geared the country away from decades-long socialist ideals to the capitalist embrace. Interestingly, this was exactly the time when the USSR had been disintegrated in the wake of its failed war in Afghanistan. Now, around 35 years later, India stands on another verge — will it keep snuggled in the US/capitalist embrace or is it time for another goodbye? When in the socialist camp, India made good benefit of the Soviet-Afghan war. It got a presence in Afghanistan under the Soviet umbrella, wherefrom it provided training, funding and in-out passage to Baloch separatist groups, with the aim of destabilising Pakistan and weakening its position in the region. The second time, when the US invaded Afghanistan, India was there again, with dozens of consulates at the Pak-Afghan border regions, again backing terror outfits that kept wreaking havoc in the country for over a decade. In both cases, India thought it was on the winning side, but twice it was proven wrong. The constant guerilla warfare of the ragtag mujahideen and Pakistan's support for them forced the global powers to shamefully retreat, and every time India, losing the plot, had to flee too. India wished to partake in the spoils of war, entrench itself in the Afghan future, get an inroad to Central Asia, and via this long cut, get a shortcut to regional hegemony. But unfortunately for India, it was in the wrong boat, each time. Both times it should have learnt the lesson that sheer hegemony and imperial lust cannot secure one a victory over a human population, but it did not. Anyways, even after India left the socialist camp, Russia always wanted to woo it back into its sphere. In the late 1990s, Russian Prime Minister Yevgeny Primakov presented a doctrine referred to as the Russia-India-China (RIC) doctrine, advocating closer cooperation between the three countries to foster a multipolar world order. But India was too haute to lend an ear to such regional integration. What India had in mind was not integration but to become the next China, the next regional power, getting ahead of all other regional entities. So, India went on closer to the US, signing strategic pacts for bases-sharing, communication and info sharing, weapons deals and more. India even joined QUAD in 2007 — a partnership specifically made to counter China. In all this wooing with the US, India got more of a narrative, and less of anything substantial. The US did not shift its industries from China to India; reportedly, manufactured goods currently account for a mere 2% of India's exports. Regarding its defence architecture, reputed Indian analyst Pravin Sawhney has stated in recent days that India has focused on building it army for conventional war, which may not occur in future conflict scenarios. On the other hand, India lacks true innovation and R&D and has no real cyber or space preparedness. The Indian side lacks 'jointness' and 'interoperability', he says. And this jointness and interoperability is something that involves network centricity, information superiority and an integrated command system, in a Sixth Generation Warfare environment. Future 6G wars will have contactless battles, aiming to destroy enemy forces on the enemy territory with precision and firepower. China, due to its R&D, has such superiorities; and Pakistan has it because of its strategic alliance with China, the right boat! In the May 2025 Indo-Pak war, Pakistan had the edge because it was using Chinese origin fighter jets and missiles, integrated with the Chinese XS-3 tactical, high-speed broadband data link, for real-time navigation and precision targeting. Deniability was also practiced by the Pakistani side by jamming India's electromagnetic environment. Pakistan had ensured jointness and interoperability, by conducting the Shaheen series of joint air exercises with the Chinese Air Force in Xinjiang and Gansu. Such effort between India and its defence partners US and Israel seem to be absent. Failure of Operation Sindoor was not only India losing a battle with Pakistan, a battle it initiated itself; rather it proved to be a double jeopardy, as it severely damaged Indo-US relations. The Indo-US partnership that had been the cornerstone of India's foreign policy got a firm blow at the hands of an additive battle, between two haute egos, Trump's and Modi's. Trump repeatedly claimed mediating the Indo-Pak ceasefire, and Modi was too proud to lose his political narrative of having the upper hand. In the frustration, Trump first slammed 25% tariff on India, and more penalties for buying Russian oil, and now he has threatened a gigantic 50% tariffs — a level where business will be impossible at all. Trump now thinks that India is enabling Russia to fight in Ukraine because it buys its oil; he thinks India's BRICS membership is anti-US; he feels India is backing off from promises to purchase billion dollars worth of weapons, including F-35s; he feels like India is not on the path to keeping its promise to increase bilateral trade from $200 billion to $500 billion by 2030. Truth is that India has been the biggest beneficiary of the Ukraine war, getting 3.4 million barrels a day of cheap Russian oil. Previously this requirement of the world's most populous country was fulfilled from Iran — another partner India pushed away to please the US. Saying no to Russia means finding another seller with such a huge capacity — one that would be hard to find at once! It seems like India has utterly failed in its core foreign policy pillar of strong US-India strategic ties. India's heartburn with China and Pakistan has also kept it alienated in the region and in the Global South. India could have been a bridge between the Global North and South, but it seems like the bridge is broke and taken down India with it. And now after Trump's threats, India is again trying to make a balancing act between the North and the South — but this time both poles want India to make one clear choice. Perhaps it was possible to be in one wrong boat at a time, but trying to keep one foot each in both two boats for a giant elephant like India may prove to be a smashing nosedive.
Express Tribune
2 hours ago
- Express Tribune
Off to Portugal!
Listen to article Portugal is the new green pasture for all those who want to abandon Pakistan, but at the altar of its national exchequer. The revelation from a cabinet minister that hordes of bureaucrats and who's who are acquiring citizenship of the southern European country on the Iberian Peninsula is not shocking. Pakistan is infected with brain drain, and all those who feel that they are lacking in social mobility despite possessing the necessary talent and education are on their way out. The point, nonetheless, here under debate is that how come the civil servants within their ''lawful'' income, hardly enough to make ends meet, afford the luxury of investing overseas in real estate, and bid adieu to their homeland without any retribution. That is tantamount to assured corruption and failure of the system to check the black sheep for their misdeeds. Defence Minister Khawaja Asif's spilling the beans should be read in conjunction with the Panama and Dubai Leaks, wherein several of his own party stalwarts and those of the PPP were named for possessing offshore properties. So is the case with hundreds of former military officers, bankers, politicians and, of course, judicial officers. It is a documented fact in the annals of parliament that, at least, 22,000 bureaucrats hold dual nationality in contravention of the law of the land. An investigative OCCRP report claimed that more than 17,000 Pakistani nationals owned some 23,000 residential properties in Dubai. This messy state of affairs is a blot on governance and testifies that robbing the exchequer is a new-normal, otherwise it is next to impossible to stash money in foreign accounts with impunity. Laws and legislations are merely for window-dressing, and there is no prosecution, per se. This is a crime against a nation which is reeling under abject poverty and whose 55 per cent populace is devoid of basic civic amenities such as health and education. One hopes this disclosure from the pinnacle in power will lead to some stringent action, and a genuine phase of accountability will see the light of the day.
