GOP Sen. Murkowski cast crucial vote for Trump's megabill after getting key carveout
But not before she secured a key carveout for her constituents from one of the bill's strictest new provisions.
"Do I like this bill? No. But I tried to take care of Alaska's interests," she told NBC News' Ryan Nobles Tuesday.
"I advocated for my state's interests, I will continue to do that and I will make no excuses for doing that," Murkowski said after she cast the final 'yea' that Republicans needed to reach 50 votes and trigger a tie-breaking vote from Vice President JD Vance.
"I know that in many parts of the country, there are Americans that are not going to be advantaged by this bill," she told Nobles. "I don't like that."
But she voted for it anyway, she said, because her state would benefit overall.
Murkowski, a moderate Republican who has criticized Trump, has raised concerns about the bill's provisions making cuts to SNAP, the Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program — also known as food stamps.
One-tenth of Alaskans received help from SNAP in 2024, according to data from the Center on Budget and Policy Priorities. Alaska also has by far the nation's highest SNAP payment error rate, according to the U.S. Department of Agriculture.
But she ultimately backed the bill after securing last-minute benefits, including a boost in funding for rural hospitals and a carveout on SNAP cuts for her state.
The final Senate bill exempts states with the highest SNAP error rates from the cuts for two years.
In a lengthy statement later Tuesday, Murkowski touted her efforts to improve the bill for her state.
"My goal throughout the reconciliation process has been to make a bad bill better for Alaska, and in many ways, we have done that," Murkowski wrote on social media.
"While we have worked to improve the present bill for Alaska, it is not good enough for the rest of our nation—and we all know it," she wrote.
The bill passed the Senate 51-50 after Vice President JD Vance cast the tiebreaker vote. Three Republicans — Susan Collins of Maine, Thom Tillis of North Carolina and Kentucky's Rand Paul — sided with all of the chamber's Democrats.
The legislation now returns to the House for a final vote. If it passes, it will head to Trump's desk to be signed into law.
Paul had characterized the GOP leadership's final deliberations over the bill as a choice between "dealing with me and reducing the debt ceiling or giving pork and subsidies to Alaska."
"They chose to add more pork and subsidies for Alaska to secure that," Paul said, Nobles reported.
Murkowski took offense at Paul's critique, which was summarized to her as him calling her vote "a bailout for Alaska at the expense of the rest of the country."
"Oh my," Murkowski said. She then stared at Nobles for about 15 seconds without speaking.
"My response is, I have an obligation to the people of the state of Alaska, and I live up to that every single day. I fight for my state's interests, and I make sure that Alaskans are understood. I work hard to take care of a state that has more unique situations, more unique people, and it's just different," she said.
"And so when, when people suggest that federal dollars go to one of our 50 states in a quote, bailout, I find that offensive," she said.
Murkowski told reporters after the vote that her decision was "agonizing."
She also said she hopes that the House will continue to make changes to the bill, rather than try to ram it through in order to send it to Trump by his aspirational deadline of Friday, which is Independence Day.
"We do not have a perfect bill by any stretch of the imagination. My hope is that the House is going to look at this and recognize that we're not there yet," she said.
Rep. Jim McGovern, D-Mass., the ranking member of the House Rules Committee, tore into Murkowski over that remark later Tuesday.
"My question to her is, If you really believe that, why the hell did you vote for this bill?" McGovern said.
Rep. Daniel Goldman, D-N.Y., wrote on X, "Murkowski votes yes and hopes it doesn't pass ... It's pretty simple: words don't matter. Votes do."
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
As Texas and California ramp up their redistricting fight, a new study finds gerrymandering erodes confidence in democracy
Researchers identified a connection between highly partisan congressional maps and lower confidence in the integrity of elections. The ongoing partisan battle over gerrymandering could further undermine the confidence of Americans in their democracy, the results of a new study suggest. 'We know that confidence in U.S. elections being conducted fairly has been dwindling — gerrymandering just adds gas to that fire,' Shaun Bowler, a professor of political science at the University of California, Riverside, who coauthored the study, told Yahoo. Right now, Texas Republicans are trying to redraw their state's congressional district map to make it more favorable to their party, potentially securing up to five additional seats for the GOP in the House of Representatives in next year's midterms. That effort is currently on hold, though, because Democratic state lawmakers have fled Texas in order to block the legislature from having enough members present to formally meet. California Gov. Gavin Newsom announced Thursday that he is moving forward with a plan to counter Texas's redistricting effort by asking voters to approve a measure that would allow Democrats to redraw the state's maps. Democrats in New York and Illinois have said they may follow California's lead. Meanwhile, the GOP has been looking at putting more favorable maps in place in other red states like Ohio and Missouri. While we can't know how the redistricting tit-for-tat will ultimately shake out, there is reason to believe that this high-profile fight over congressional maps could weaken voters' already-weakening faith in the U.S. political system, Bowler said. 'A lot of the time gerrymandering really doesn't make the news ... which means a lot of the time it's not very visible to voters,' he said via email. 'But this time ... the news is going national. Even international. So a lot more voters will hear about it. And a lot don't like it.' Americans as a whole have less confidence in the integrity of U.S. elections than they did two decades ago. The biggest cause of that decline is a sharp drop among Republicans tied to President Trump's false claims that the 2020 election was stolen. But polls show that faith in democracy was dipping well before Trump became the GOP's standard-bearer, indicating that other factors are playing a role as well. Bowler and his coauthor, Todd Donovan of Western Washington University, analyzed surveys from more than 30,000 voters to understand how gerrymandering impacts views about the integrity of our elections. They found that, while belief in Trump's claims about the election was the most important driver of low trust in democracy, gerrymandering does appear to have a noticeable effect on whether voters think the elections in their states are fair. Unsurprisingly, the biggest drop in confidence was among voters who were on the wrong side of partisan gerrymanders. Democrats in states with strong pro-Republican gerrymanders like Wisconsin and Ohio were more skeptical of the integrity of the elections in their states than Democrats in other states. The same was true for Republicans living in states with gerrymanders designed to benefit Democrats, like Illinois. But Bowler emphasized that this isn't purely about sour grapes. Voters who belong to the party that benefits from a gerrymander can also be affected by the perception that the electoral victories they had hoped for were earned illegitimately, he argued. 'To some extent it doesn't matter if it is 'your' side doing it or not,' he said. 'It's not really fair play.' Bowler expanded on that point in a press release about the study. 'If they didn't win fair and square, why should I believe what they say?' he said. 'Why should I pay my taxes? You get an erosion of civic behavior.' A separate poll released on Thursday added more evidence to support Bowler's argument. It found that Californians oppose Gov. Gavin Newsom's proposal to redistrict their state in response to Texas's potential gerrymander by a two-to-one margin. Other national polls have found that few Americans support the Texas GOP's redistricting plan. They have also found that strong majorities believe partisan gerrymandering is a major problem and that the practice should be illegal. Bowler told Yahoo that even lawmakers who might be indifferent to changes in voters' faith in democracy should be wary of going too far out of their own self-interest. 'Let's say you are a Republican voter in Texas and have voted GOP for years … because of gerrymandering, there is maybe less incentive to turn out and vote,' he said. The belief that results are all but decided well before Election Day could also undermine a party's fundraising, which could make a difference in races where the outcome is more in question, he added. In their study, Bowler and Donovan also looked at how corruption — or even perceptions of corruption — among a state's elected officials affected voters' faith in democracy. They found a similar decline in trust among respondents in states where lawmakers had been convicted of crimes like bribery and campaign finance violations or had faced highly publicized accusations of corruption.
Yahoo
16 minutes ago
- Yahoo
Youngkin praises Virginia's economy, dismissing Democrats' concerns over Medicaid and job cuts
RICHMOND, Va. (AP) — Republican Gov. Glenn Youngkin said Thursday that Virginia's economy is thriving after ending its fiscal year with high revenues, a characterization Democrats criticized as rose-colored in light of budgetary decisions in neighboring Washington, D.C. In a presentation to the state's money committees, Youngkin and Virginia's secretary of finance said revenues for the fiscal year resulted in a $572 million surplus and a $4.7 billion rainy-day fund. Economic output in the state grew by about 1 percent higher than initially forecast, officials said. 'The strength and success we see today is no accident. It is the result of very intentional decisions made by all of us — intentional decisions to lift up opportunity in the Commonwealth of Virginia,' Youngkin said in his speech to lawmakers. 'And these decisions are yielding dividends. They're enabling us to compete and to win.' Democratic lawmakers were quick to push back, particularly in light of looming Medicaid work requirements for some adults after Congress passed a reconciliation bill last month. Youngkin repeatedly said Medicaid will not be taken away from Virginians, and Secretary of Finance Stephen Cummings added that hospitals will be able to absorb any additional costs from federal cuts to Medicaid. Senate Democratic Majority Leader Scott Surovell cited an analysis from the Congressional Budget Office this year estimating that roughly 11 million Americans will lose access to Medicaid. 'The governor stood up here and said a million times, repeatedly, that nobody is coming to throw out Medicaid,' Surovell said. He added that the CBO, which 'America relies upon to tell us the answers to these things, tells us that millions of Americans are going to lose their Medicaid.' Democrats also said the governor is not fully acknowledging that the White House's reshaping of the federal workforce will continue to impact the state's economy. The job losses that factored into Youngkin's assessment did not include federal workers who took buyouts and are still receiving payments until later this year, Cummings said. But Republican House Minority Leader Terry Kilgore praised Youngkin's presentation, calling it 'the kind of news every Virginian should cheer.' 'It happened because Republicans have kept a steady hand on the wheel,' Kilgore said. ___ Olivia Diaz is a corps member for The Associated Press/Report for America Statehouse News Initiative. Report for America is a nonprofit national service program that places journalists in local newsrooms to report on undercovered issues. Olivia Diaz, The Associated Press
CBS News
16 minutes ago
- CBS News
DFL state Sen. Tou Xiong arrested on suspicion of drunken driving for second time
A Minnesota state senator says police arrested him early Thursday morning on suspicion of driving while intoxicated. Sen. Tou Xiong, DFL - Maplewood, said in a statement he had been driving home after attending a family gathering when he was pulled over near his residence. "I take full responsibility for my actions, and sincerely apologize to my constituents and the people I've let down," Xiong said. "I want to thank law enforcement for doing their job to keep the roads safe. Today, I have begun the work of talking to my family and to my Senate colleagues about the situation." Ramsey County Jail records show Xiong, 35, was booked shortly before 4 a.m. and released nearly three hours later. Xiong has yet to be formally charged with any crime. This is Xiong's second DWI arrest. In 2022, he pleaded guilty to driving under the influence. Court documents say he had a blood alcohol content of .11 when he was pulled over in Blaine while returning from a community gathering. He was sentenced to one year of probation. Xiong was elected to the Minnesota Senate in 2023. Previously, he was a state representative from 2019 to 2022 for District 53A. He is part of the Minnesota Housing Finance Agency and Minnesota Council on Asian Pacific Minnesotans.
