Democratic Rep.: To Safeguard America's Future, We Need To Safeguard Taiwan's
Taiwan may not be top of mind for most Americans, but it should be—because the future of our prosperity, our security, and our democratic values is deeply tied to the future of Taiwan.
The contrast between both sides of the Taiwan Strait, between Taiwan and the People's Republic of China (PRC), is a stark one. Taiwan is a vibrant and free democracy. On the other side of the Taiwan Strait, in contrast, Xi Jinping wields supreme power over all matters of state. Taiwan is governed by the will of the people; the PRC is governed by the will of one man.
A Taiwan flag is seen at a harbor in Keelung on April 1, 2025.
A Taiwan flag is seen at a harbor in Keelung on April 1, 2025.
I-HWA CHENG/AFP via Getty Images
But Taiwan is more than just a beacon of freedom—it's one of America's most important economic partners. In fact, it's our seventh-largest trading partner and a critical customer for American farmers. Taiwan is the No. 2 importer of Illinois corn and No. 3 importer of Illinois soybeans. On a per capita basis, Taiwan buys 47 times more wheat than China. And Taiwanese companies like TSMC are investing billions to build advanced semiconductor fabs right here in the U.S.—securing our tech future and creating American jobs.
This is not charity. It's strategic partnership. Taiwan supports American jobs. Taiwanese investment strengthens our supply chains. And Taiwan's democracy serves as a counterweight to the rising authoritarianism of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
But that partnership is under threat. Xi has ordered the People's Liberation Army (PLA) to be ready to invade Taiwan by 2027. PLA warplanes violated Taiwan's airspace more than 3,000 times last year. In response to Taiwan's elections, the PLA staged military drills simulating a blockade and missile strikes. Any conflict over Taiwan is incredibly dangerous. A war over Taiwan could wipe $10 trillion off global GDP and plunge the U.S. into a deep depression.
So what do we do? We must stand with Taiwan. Not to provoke conflict, but to deter it. Peace across the Taiwan Strait is not just a regional concern; it's an American interest.
The Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the U.S. and the CCP recently held a hearing titled "Deterrence Amid Rising Tensions: Preventing CCP Aggression on Taiwan." We heard from former Deputy Secretary of State Kurt Campbell, who reminded us that Taiwan is not just important—it's indispensable. Taiwan produces more than 90 percent of the world's most advanced semiconductors, supports American farmers, and acts as an international example of freedom and democracy.
Campbell also emphasized that Taiwan's fate is being closely watched by our allies—from Japan and South Korea to our NATO allies. If authoritarianism triumphs in Taiwan, it could embolden aggression elsewhere. We see this clearly with China's enabling and support of Russia in its deadly war in Ukraine. Supporting Taiwan, Campbell argued, is not just good policy—it's a global credibility test for the United States.
The military balance in the Taiwan Strait has shifted. The PLA now fields a force that vastly outnumbers Taiwan's—and it continues to rehearse amphibious invasions, missile strikes, and blockades. But Taiwan still holds advantages: geography, a strong civil society, and—most importantly—deepening ties with the United States and our allies.
That's why we need to act now. The U.S. should expedite arms deliveries to Taiwan, especially asymmetric defenses like sea mines, anti-ship missiles, and drones. We should strengthen Taiwan's food and energy reserves, boost military and disaster relief training programs, and deepen economic ties—especially in agriculture, energy, and tech.
The Taiwan Relations Act, passed in 1979, declared that peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait are in America's interest—and that any attempt to determine Taiwan's future by force is "of grave concern" to the United States. That bipartisan law still guides us today and inspires new legislation like the Six Assurances to Taiwan Act and Taiwan Allies Fund Act, which I'm proud to lead in Congress.
We are in a decisive moment. The Select Committee's hearing made clear that deterrence is only credible if it's bipartisan, sustained, and backed by real investment. That's why I'm working with colleagues on both sides of the aisle to ensure the U.S. is prepared—not for a war, but to prevent one.
In a world growing more dangerous by the day, Taiwan remains one of our best friends. It's time we treated it that way.
Representative Raja Krishnamoorthi serves as ranking member of the House Select Committee on the Strategic Competition Between the U.S. and the Chinese Communist Party and represents Illinois' 8th Congressional District.
The views expressed in this article are the writer's own.
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
The Hill
25 minutes ago
- The Hill
DOJ examining state laws' impact on economy
The Department of Justice (DOJ) is looking at state laws with 'out-of-state economic impacts' that could hinder the national economy and interstate commerce. 'Today, the Justice Department and the National Economic Council announce an effort to identify State laws that significantly and adversely affect the national economy or interstate economic activity and to solicit solutions to address such effects,' reads the press release. The DOJ explained that President Trump has made a series of demands since his first day in office to deregulate American industry. For example, in the executive order ' Unleashing Prosperity Through Deregulation,' Trump asked to 'alleviate unnecessary regulatory burdens placed on the American people.' In another EO, ' Zero-Based Regulatory Budgeting To Unleash American Energy,' Trump asked agencies such as the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA), the Department of Energy, the Federal Energy Regulatory Commission, and others to cease some regulations concerning energy development. The DOJ, on July 9, for example, sued California Gov. Gavin Newsom (D) and Attorney General Rob Bonta for 'prohibiting farmers across the country from using commonly accepted agricultural methods that helped keep eggs affordable.' In one example of Trump's deregulation goals, the Department of Labor is seeking to remove 60 'obsolete' workplace regulations, such as the minimum wage. Furthermore, the administration has removed many regulations imposed during the Biden era on environmental laws and climate change. 'We are driving a dagger straight into the heart of the climate change religion to drive down cost of living for American families, unleash American energy, bring auto jobs back to the U.S. and more,' said EPA Administrator Lee Zeldin. In these continued efforts, the DOJ is asking for comments from the public to help identify 'Which State laws significantly burden commerce in other States or between States, thus raising costs unnecessarily and harming markets nationwide.' And, 'Whether the State laws identified may be preempted by existing federal authority and, if so, what authority.'
USA Today
25 minutes ago
- USA Today
Firestone Walker's 8Zero5 recreates the beer ritual without the actual booze
Americans are consuming less alcohol than ever. Breweries are feeling the heat -- and looking inward for solutions. There are two easy ways to create products for the least boozy generation. THC seltzers and other products made from hemp can create pathways to new markets. But while that opens up different social experiences, it struggles to replace the feeling of cracking a cold beer on a hot day. Which brings us to the second option; non-alcoholic beer. We've seen a rising tide of new NA brews, ranging from dedicated booze-free breweries (Best Day, Athletic) to new extensions from trusted brands. Firestone Walker falls squarely in the former category. The California brewer has emerged as one of the country's most reliable engines of bold, boozy beers. Can that expertise translate to non-alcoholic brews? 8Zero5 Non-Alcoholic Blonde: B+ It pours an effervescent copper color. A white head builds to about half an inch before slowly fizzling down to a thin ring at the top. The smell is light and leans close to a hefeweizen. You get a little wheat, some clove and minor fruit. The taste is similarly airy, with modest sweetness and a soft, not quite crisp, finish. The cereal grain experience you get from typical non-alcoholic beers isn't there. Though it lacks the boozy punch of a regular beer, it still gets you 90 percent of the way to a light beer. Except you're getting more flavor here than you would with a Miller Lite or the like. It does a solid job mirroring its boozy forebearer, bringing in just a little fruit and spice working on top of a current of sweet malt. That makes it an easy sipper or crushable summer beer. It would be nice with a bit more of a bite toward the end -- a little hop crispness to wash everything away dryly. But as is, it avoids the pitfalls of typical NA brews and doesn't feel like you're drinking a bowl of Grape Nuts. If you're looking for a replacement of your regular light beer, this will provide solid flavor alongside the ritual of cracking and pounding a can. Would I drink it instead of a Hamm's? This a pass/fail mechanism where I compare whatever I'm drinking to my baseline cheap beer. That's the standby from the land of sky-blue waters, Hamm's. So the question to answer is: on a typical day, would I drink 8Zero5 non-alcoholic beer over a cold can of Hamm's? I'd cycle one in every now and again to keep my head straight, sure. This is part of FTW's Beverage of the Week series. Here, we mostly chronicle and review beers, but happily expand that scope to any beverage that pairs well with sports. Yes, even cookie dough whiskey.
San Francisco Chronicle
25 minutes ago
- San Francisco Chronicle
FACT FOCUS: No, taxpayers will not receive new stimulus checks this summer
Don't splurge just yet. Rumors spread online Friday that the U.S. government will soon be issuing stimulus checks to taxpayers in certain income brackets. But Congress has not passed legislation to authorize such payments, and, according to the IRS, no new stimulus checks will be distributed in the coming weeks. Here's a closer look at the facts. CLAIM: The Internal Revenue Service and the Treasury Department have approved $1,390 stimulus checks that will be distributed to low- and middle-income taxpayers by the end of the summer. THE FACTS: This is false. Taxpayers will not receive new stimulus checks of any amount this summer, an IRS official said. Stimulus checks, also known as economic impact payments, are authorized by Congress through legislation and distributed by the Treasury Department. Republican Sen. Josh Hawley of Missouri last month introduced a bill that would send tax rebates to qualified taxpayers using revenue from tariffs instituted by President Donald Trump. Hawley's bill has not passed the Senate or the House. The IRS announced early this year that it would distribute about $2.4 billion to taxpayers who failed to claim on their 2021 tax returns a Recovery Rebate Credit — a refundable credit for individuals who did not receive one or more COVID-19 stimulus checks. The maximum amount was $1,400 per individual. Those who hadn't already filed their 2021 tax return would have needed to file it by April 15 to claim the credit. The IRS official said there is no new credit that taxpayers can claim. Past stimulus checks have been authorized through legislation passed by Congress. For example, payments during the coronavirus pandemic were made by possible by three bills: the Coronavirus Aid, Relief and Economic Security Act; the COVID-related Tax Relief Act; and the American Rescue Plan Act. In 2008, stimulus checks were authorized in response to the Great Recession through the Economic Stimulus Act. The Treasury Department, which includes the Internal Revenue Service, distributed stimulus payments during the COVID-19 pandemic and the Great Recession. The Treasury's Bureau of the Fiscal Service, formed in 2012, played a role as well during the former crisis. Hawley in July introduced the American Worker Rebate Act, which would share tariff revenue with qualified Americans through tax rebates. The proposed rebates would amount to at minimum $600 per individual, with additional payments for qualifying children. Rebates could increase if tariff revenue is higher than expected. Taxpayers with an adjusted annual gross income above a certain amount — $75,000 for those filing individually — would receive a reduced rebate. Hawley said Americans 'deserve a tax rebate.' 'Like President Trump proposed, my legislation would allow hard-working Americans to benefit from the wealth that Trump's tariffs are returning to this country,' Hawley said in a press release. Neither the Senate nor the House had passed the American Worker Rebate Act as of Friday. It was read twice by the Senate on July 28, the day it was introduced, and referred to the Committee on Finance. ___
