
NZ Budget 2025: Economic Forecasting Is Notoriously Difficult, But Global Uncertainty Is Making It Harder
Theres no crystal ball when it comes to the future of New Zealands economy. But to understand the upcoming budget, people need to understand why forecasting is so hard.
This year's budget will be one of the tightest in a decade, with the New Zealand government halving its operating allowance – the new money it has available to spend – from NZ$2.4 billion to $1.3 billion.
The cut reflects weaker than expected growth owing to global economic turmoil. It also highlights just how difficult it is to predict what is going to happen when it comes to the economy.
Economies are dynamic systems where relationships between variables shift. Even the current state of the economy is uncertain due to data revisions and lags in reporting.
Despite this uncertainty, governments have to assume paths for revenue and expenditure to make meaningful plans.
Based on the Pre-election Economic and Fiscal Update (PREFU 2023), the National Party announced plans to achieve an operating surplus in the year ending June 2027 during the 2023 election campaign.
As forecasts changed, so did those plans. By the Half-Year Economic and Fiscal Update (HYEFU 2024), released in December 2024, the goal of an operating surplus had been pushed back to 2029.
The table below shows the change in the 2027 forecasts for key economic indicators between the two fiscal updates.
Nominal gross domestic product (GDP) measures the value of goods and services produced within a country during a specific period. It is a key determinant of tax revenue. Real GDP measures the volume of output of the New Zealand economy.
Ultimately, the 2027 nominal GDP forecast at the half-year update was weaker than expected. This weakness was driven by lower than expected output, not by changes in prices.
The 2027 forecast tax revenue fell even more sharply than the nominal GDP forecast. This was in part due to the government's personal income tax cuts which have been costed at $3.7 billion a year.
More changes afoot
We're likely to see further downward revisions in economic growth. The Treasury has already lowered its economic growth forecasts for 2025 and 2026, in part due to the expected impact of global tariffs.
While the direct effects of the tariffs on New Zealand may be limited, the indirect effects – particularly through increased global economic uncertainty – are likely to be substantial.
Research has shown that United States-based uncertainty spills over into the New Zealand economy by making firms more pessimistic about the future. This pessimism leads to firms delaying investment, ultimately reducing potential output in the future.
Potential output is important as it represents the economy's capacity to grow without generating inflation. Potential GDP is affected by productivity, which has also been weaker than expected and one of the reasons Treasury lowered its forecasts after the pre-election fiscal update.
The lesson from all of this
New Zealand is running a structural budget deficit. That means the government is spending more than it earns, even accounting for the fact that governments automatically spend more and tax less in economic downturns.
These deficits add to government debt, which can limit future spending and taxation choices. High debt can also hamper the government's ability to assist in counteracting the next downturn if the Reserve Bank's official cash rate is already near zero.
It can also limit the ability of the government to respond to external shocks such as disasters or extreme weather events. These concerns are possibly behind the government's goal of returning to surplus by 2029.
But there are counter-arguments. With pressing needs in many areas, some argue the government should be spending more now to boost productivity and growth. These contrasting views reflect a legitimate debate about values and priorities.
Still, one point is clear: weaker than expected economic growth since the pre-election update has made the trade-offs between present and future fiscal choices more acute.
The takeaway is that economic growth is essential for expanding the resources available to both households and governments. This is so they can spend money on things they deem important both now and in the future.
A growing economy is not just about producing more for prestige – it's about creating the economic and fiscal resources to improve lives both now and in the future.
Hashtags

Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles

RNZ News
5 hours ago
- RNZ News
US to screen for ‘anti-Americanism' in immigration applications
By Jessie Yeung, CNN People wave US flags to celebrate becoming US citizens after taking the oath of allegiance during a naturalization ceremony . Photo: AFP / Joseph Prezioso People applying to live or work in the United States will now be screened for "anti-Americanism," including having their social media checked, authorities announced on Tuesday, in a tightening of restrictions that has alarmed immigration advocates and lawyers. Immigration officers will be able to look at whether applicants have had "any involvement in anti-American or terrorist organizations," or whether there is any "evidence of antisemitic activity," said the policy update by US Citizenship & Immigration Services (USCIS). Social media vetting, already introduced into immigration screening in June by the Trump administration, will be expanded to include searches for any "anti-American activity," it said. It's the latest step in the administration's crackdown on immigration regulations, with many new actions likely to deter immigrants and international students from coming to the US. The State Department has revoked more than 6000 student visas this year, an official said on Monday. And in June, the State Department said embassies and consulates must vet student visa applicants for "hostile attitudes towards our citizens, culture, government, institutions, or founding principles". "America's benefits should not be given to those who despise the country and promote anti-American ideologies," said USCIS spokesperson Matthew Tragesser in a news release on Tuesday. He added that the immigration agency was "committed to implementing policies and procedures that root out anti-Americanism and supporting the enforcement of rigorous screening and vetting measures to the fullest extent possible." The policy update did not give a specific definition for "anti-Americanism," only saying this included those who supported "antisemitic terrorism, antisemitic terrorist organizations, and antisemitic ideologies". But it pointed to a section of the 1952 Immigration and Nationality Act (INA) for examples of "anti-American" ideologies. The section in the Act, the US' overarching legal framework for immigration, bans certain people from becoming naturalized citizens - including members of various Communist parties, those who advocate for "world communism," those who write or distribute materials opposing "all organized government," or those who wish to overthrow the US government by force or violence. The announcement immediately stoked confusion and alarm, with online forums debating what counted as "anti-American." Many worried that the vague wording and lack of clear definition would give immigration officers the power to crack down further on immigration, regardless of a genuine threat. "Is being against the recent strike in Iran or being in favor of a cease fire in Gaza anti-American or antisemitic?" read one Reddit post in an immigration discussion. "What if you personally don't like Trump as a President or you shared a post on the recent South Park episodes making fun of him (and Homeland Security Secretary Kristi) Noem?" "The term (anti-Americanism) has no prior precedent in immigration law and its definition is entirely up to the Trump (administration)," said Aaron Reichlin-Melnick, a senior fellow at the American Immigration Council, in a post on X. He added that the move was reminiscent of McCarthyism - the period of the 1950s also known as the Red Scare, when authorities prosecuted left-wing individuals amid a widespread public panic over communism and its influence on American institutions. Steven Brown, an immigration attorney based in Houston, also posted on X that so-called American values were "a subjective standard not found in the INA." "For me, the really big story is they are opening the door for stereotypes and prejudice and implicit bias to take the wheel in these decisions. That's really worrisome," said Jane Lilly Lopez, associate professor of sociology at Brigham Young University, according to the Associated Press. "It means you are going to just do a whole lot more work to provide evidence that you meet our standards," Lopez said. - CNN

RNZ News
6 hours ago
- RNZ News
Sarah Shaw describes traumatic ordeal in US detention
refugees and migrants world 32 minutes ago New Zealand mother Sarah Shaw has described her traumatic ordeal in United States immigration detention, where she and her son were held for three weeks after a visa mix up at the US-Canada border. She's finally made it back to her home state of Washington, but is required to wear an ankle monitor and still faces further court appearances. She said she's full of gratitude to the friend who relentlessly publicised her case and pressured US authorities. Kate Green reports.


Techday NZ
10 hours ago
- Techday NZ
WatchGuard names top ANZ partners for 2024 awards recognition
WatchGuard Technologies has named the recipients of its 2024 ANZ Partner Awards, acknowledging partners across Australia and New Zealand for their achievements in customer service, business growth, and platform adoption. Annual awards The awards, in their 11th year, aim to recognise the strength of WatchGuard's partner ecosystem in the SMB, mid-market, and Pacific Island sectors. Over 150 certified partners were considered before four winners were selected by WatchGuard's Asia Pacific and Japan leadership, based on criteria such as revenue contribution, technical proficiency, marketing involvement, and competitive success. The Partner of the Year award was granted to Sydney-based Systemnet. Systemnet achieved the distinction after delivering nearly 50% of its annual revenue during the second half of the year, reflecting increased adoption of WatchGuard's full security stack and broad integration across its cyber portfolio. Other award recipients include Manux Solutions, which received the Next Level Excellence Award for its early implementation of both managed detection and response (MDR) and network detection and response (NDR) and alignment with WatchGuard's technology roadmap. Clearly IT was recognised with the Competitive Win of the Year award for deploying a comprehensive WatchGuard solution for a major client, replacing older security systems. VITG received the Marketing Program of the Year award for a successful campaign centred on the AISA Cyber Security Conference, which resulted in lead generation and year-on-year growth. Channel-focused approach WatchGuard operates a 100% channel-driven model throughout Australia, New Zealand and the Pacific Islands. This approach is supported by local enablement programmes such as roadshows and bootcamps, the roll-out of new security offerings like ThreatSync, MDR and NDR, and flexible licensing provided through the FlexPay scheme, all delivered via the WatchGuardONE programme. This programme aligns with established frameworks, including the Essential Eight, and over the last 12 months has contributed to a 20% increase in partner certifications and engagement in the ANZ region. WatchGuard's channel partner model has also contributed to its third consecutive year as a Champion in the Canalys Cybersecurity Leadership Matrix for 2025, based on partner evaluations of the company's ease of business, profitability and support. Industry feedback "Our partners are central to how we deliver security outcomes across Australia and New Zealand. These awards recognise the commitment, capability and impact our top performers delivered - from competitive wins to marketing execution. We're proud to support such a strong ecosystem, and we'll keep backing our partners with the tools, insights and flexibility they need to grow." Systemnet's Operations Manager, Bruno Ianni, provided insight into the company's approach, saying: "Being named ANZ Partner of the Year by WatchGuard is a real nod to the way we do things - long-term thinking, deep technical knowledge, and a no-nonsense focus on what works for our clients. The flexibility of the platform lets us deliver full-stack solutions without the usual complexity, and the strength of that approach really showed in the second half of last year, where we saw nearly half of our annual growth. We're excited to keep building on this momentum." Darren Grant, Director, Clearly IT, reflected on his company's recognition: "This was about backing our instincts and delivering the right solution from the outset. We saw a clear opportunity to replace complexity with something smarter and more unified - and it resonated. We're proud to be recognised for our first major deployment with WatchGuard, and the partnership helped us deliver a rollout that hit every requirement without unnecessary overhead."