Dublin city councillors set to increase property tax for first time
The change, for 2026, comes at the same time that the government is also applying increases to property tax to reflect the significant rise in house prices,
although tax bands have been tweaked to moderate the impact.
It's understood councillors' decision will cost less than €65 per year for homeowners whose houses are worth up to €525,000, with exact costs on a sliding scale based on the value of the property.
For a €450,000 house, for example, the annual charge will be €428 in total.
For the owners of the capital's most expensive houses, councillors' decision will cost more, with homes worth between €1m and €2m likely to pay €150-460 more than they would have with the discount. A house worth €1.2m must pay €1,094 in property tax in total each year from 2026 onwards.
Property tax was
introduced in 2013
at the
behest of the Troika
, with a view to broadening the tax base and funding local authorities without taxing employment.
Dublin City Council management has long argued that the vast majority of Dublin homeowners would not be hit with substantial additional charges if councillors agreed to reduce the discount applied, while the city would benefit.
The council's ruling group, comprising Fine Gael, Fianna Fáil, Labour and the Green Party,
agreed after last year's local elections to apply the baseline rate with no discount
this year for the first time.
The decision, which will be taken at a meeting on 18 July, is expected to bring in more than €15m in extra funding for the city. It's understood councillors are considering targeting the additional revenue at improving the council's housing stock, as well as improvements to footpaths, although no final decisions have been taken yet.
Advertisement
Labour and the Green Party, which pushed for the discount to be scrapped, argue that property tax is progressive and will provide crucial funding for improving the city.
Councillors Feljin Jose of the Green Party and Darragh Moriarty of Labour characterised property tax as the closest thing Ireland has to a wealth tax, given most of the country's wealth is held in property.
'A lot of our [council] housing stock is very bad, and we need to maintain and repair and urgently increase the energy efficiency of those buildings,' said Jose of the Green Party.
Darragh Moriarty of Labour said: 'In the vast majority of instances, these are very modest property taxes, by European comparisons. The 15% will be modest as well.'
He noted that the decision would mean an extra €60m could be invested in improving the city over the lifetime of the council.
Councillor Deirdre Heney of Fianna Fáil said she hoped additional funding would be allocated to footpath repairs and tree maintenance, issues that are raised with her frequently by residents, as well as to building more playgrounds.
Property tax for 2026 is owed on 1 November. The
government changed property tax bands
earlier this year to moderate the increase in the amount of tax payable as a result of increasing house prices.
A possible left-leaning ruling coalition on Dublin City council last year including Sinn Féin
fell apart over the question of property tax
. Sinn Féin wanted to continue to apply the 15% property tax discount.
Separately, the government said last week that this year it will allow Dublin city, which takes in by far the most property tax of any council, to keep an additional €19m of the revenue it raises this year. The government wants this extra funding spent on implementing the recommendations of its
Dublin city taskforce.
Each year, a proportion of council tax from larger local authorities is redistributed to those with a lower property tax base.
Readers like you are keeping these stories free for everyone...
A mix of advertising and supporting contributions helps keep paywalls away from valuable information like this article.
Over 5,000 readers like you have already stepped up and support us with a monthly payment or a once-off donation.
Learn More
Support The Journal
Hashtags
Try Our AI Features
Explore what Daily8 AI can do for you:
Comments
No comments yet...
Related Articles
Irish Independent
21 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Shane Ross: Surprise Labour move could end Micheál Martin's dilemma over running a Fianna Fáil candidate for presidency
The bodies of wannabe presidents are already strewn all over the battlefield. Fine Gael's Seán Kelly and Frances Fitzgerald tested the water and withdrew; Independent senator Frances Black's ambitions are stillborn, despite her great work on the Occupied Territories Bill; Fianna Fáil's Barry Andrews was one of those who hadn't given it any thought but rapidly rebuffed overtures; other credible candidates, including former SDLP leader Colum Eastwood, are finding it hard to break out of the starting blocks.
Irish Independent
32 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Fine Gael members object to Mairead McGuinness's ‘coronation' while Micheál Martin is urged to enter Áras race for Fianna Fáil
Backbenchers are unhappy that former European Commissioner is set to get the party nod uncontested Today at 00:30 Fine Gael members are fuming over the lack of a contest to pick their presidential candidate as former EU commissioner Mairead McGuinness is to get the party nod uncontested. It comes as Taoiseach Micheál Martin has now been urged by a former Fianna Fáil TD to run for the Áras and hand over the party leadership to somebody else.
Irish Independent
35 minutes ago
- Irish Independent
Looming pay transparency risks stoking tension and resentment
Up until now, this issue has been unlikely to arise, but this is about to change. On foot of a European directive, pay transparency must become law in Ireland by the middle of 2026 at the latest and when this happens employers will lose the significant information advantage they currently have over employees and job applicants. The key measures of the EU Pay Transparency Directive are: Job ads will have to include a salary level or a salary range – information that will be as much of interest to existing employees as it will be to job applicants. Employees will have the right to proactively request information on pay levels for their positions and to see the effect of career progression on pay. Gender pay gap reporting will continue for employers with a certain number of employees, but this reporting requirement will be extended to include the valuation of benefits. Where pay gaps above 5pc exist for any level in an organisation that cannot be justified using objective gender-neutral criteria, employers will be obliged to explain them. They may need to consult with workers' representatives and even potentially undergo joint pay assessments. Where pay gaps between men and women doing work of equal value exist, employers will need to address them. Given the level of change involved, these measures are going to have a major impact and create issues for employers that will be complex to manage. Mercer's global survey on Pay Transparency shows that organisations have an awareness of the expectations when it comes to pay transparency but are not yet prepared to navigate the path ahead. As it stands, for example, employers regularly assert that the existence of a gender pay gap does not mean that they are engaging in unfair pay practices. This is usually a fair assertion as the level of correlation between gender pay gaps and pay equity is little to none, but employers have rarely been required to prove that their pay practices are fair. Under the Pay Transparency Directive, the burden of proof on pay equity moves pretty decisively to the employer in the event of claims of unfair practice. Once the directive takes effect in Ireland, employees will be able to see how their pay compares with that of new hires and peers doing the same work or work of equal value. They will be free to form their own judgments on whether they are being paid fairly or not. Managerial discretion in setting pay can lead to perceptions of unfairness, especially when employees can compare their salaries with new hires. The common practice, where job markets are hot, of offering new hires premium salaries may produce a hostile reaction from existing employees when greater visibility over pay norms exist. At a minimum, employers will need to be able to justify such distinctions by reference to legitimate factors such as experience or qualifications. Given the potential for upheaval, it's likely that neither employers nor their people will want new anomalies to come to light every time a job and the accompanying pay range is advertised. To avoid this happening, employers will need to prepare, and they should start to do so by conducting a comprehensive pay-equity analysis. Under this process, an employer should assess current pay structures, identify any discrepancies, and evaluate the justification for these differences. By understanding the existing pay landscape, they can make informed decisions about necessary adjustments. Employers should also establish clear pay ranges for all roles within their organisation. This transparency will not only help in aligning salaries with market standards but also provide a framework for future hiring and promotions. Where pay ranges already exist, it should be checked that they reflect the organisational reality. If not, this situation should be addressed. Clear guidelines on how pay is determined – based on allowable factors such as relevant experience, performance and qualifications – should be communicated to all employees to foster trust and understanding. Training for hiring managers and HR personnel is crucial. They must be equipped to handle inquiries about pay and understand the implications of the new directive. Engaging with employees through surveys or focus groups can also provide valuable insights into their perceptions of pay equity and transparency. Objectively, a world in which pay is transparent may be a better one for both employers and employees. Arguments over fairness of pay can become toxic in a non-transparent world, with misinformation sometimes playing a very destructive role. This is far less likely to be a factor where pay is transparent, where ranges are visible and where the factors affecting pay have been clearly articulated. Danny Mansergh is the leader of the Career Practice at Mercer Ireland
